Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleThemed Section: Wildland Fire Science in Action–Perspectives from the U.S. Fire Science Exchange Network
Open Access

Southern Fire Exchange

Connecting Fire Science and Practice in the Southeastern United States

Raelene M. Crandall, Kevin M. Robertson, David R. Godwin, Sarah A. Cain and Christian R. Fernandez
Ecological Restoration, August 2026, 44 (3) 182-187; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.44.3.182
Raelene M. Crandall
University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, 1745 McCarty Drive, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: raecrandall{at}ufl.edu
Kevin M. Robertson
Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahas-see, FL, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David R. Godwin
University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, Gainesville, FL, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah A. Cain
Extension Forestry, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian R. Fernandez
Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The Southern Fire Exchange (SFE), one of 15 regional exchanges in the Joint Fire Science Program (U.S. Department of the Interior) Fire Science Exchange Network, translates fire science into practice across the southeastern United States, the nation’s leading region for prescribed fire use. By connecting researchers, land managers, and decision-makers, SFE addresses key ecological and social challenges related to prescribed burning, which is essential for conserving biodiversity, reducing wildfire risk, and restoring fire-dependent ecosystems. This article highlights how SFE advances natural resource management through practitioner-driven science communication programs. Operated by a small staff and guided by an advisory board, SFE offers multiple pathways for practitioner engagement, including newsletters, webinars, workshops, and advisory board. Case studies include duff management research in longleaf pine savannas, where new approaches to prescribed burning have been adopted by prescribed burners on public and private lands across the region. SFE also responds to emerging smoke management challenges by developing practical tools and addressing key barriers, increasing access to technical resources and smoke modeling training for nonprofessional communities and private landowners who manage 86% of southern forestland, improving utilization of modeling tools through simplified training, and providing information on the science of emerging hazards, such as super fog events. With over 20,000 webinar participants and 165,000 YouTube views, SFE has had a broad regional impact. As fire management becomes more complex, SFE’s role as a trusted science translator and facilitator becomes increasingly important, offering a model for sustained science-practice collaboration in natural resource management.

Keywords
  • co-production
  • fire management
  • fire practitioners
  • outreach
  • prescribed fire

Restoration Recap

  • The southeastern U.S. leads the nation in prescribed fire use across diverse fire-dependent ecosystems, yet most of its wildlands are privately owned, creating a critical need for science communication that reaches beyond agency professionals.

  • The Southern Fire Exchange (SFE) bridges this gap by translating peer-reviewed fire science into accessible tools, fact sheets, webinars, pocket guides, and field workshops tailored to practitioners with varying preferences for engagement.

  • SFE’s co-production model, in which an advisory board of managers and scientists jointly shapes programming priorities, ensures outreach remains responsive to on the-ground needs.

  • Case studies in duff management and smoke modeling demonstrate that sustained, multi-format outreach results in measurable adoption of new practices across millions of hectares of public and private land.

  • As wildland-urban interface expansion and evolving air quality regulations create new challenges for prescribed fire programs, science exchange organizations like SFE offer a replicable model for keeping practitioners informed, connected, and adaptive.


Southern Fire Exchange (SFE) is one of 15 regional exchanges within the Joint Fire Science Program’s (JFSP, U.S. Department of the Interior) Fire Science Exchange Network (FSEN), created to ensure that fire science reaches practitioners who can most effectively apply it to real-world applications (Dante-Wood and Hunter 2025). SFE serves the southeastern U.S. (South), the region with the highest prescribed fire use in the country (Melvin 2021). SFE connects researchers and managers to increase their use of fire science in natural resource management decisions and provides avenues for managers to share their information needs with the scientific community (Figure 1).

The South is unique in that most of its wildland fires are prescribed fires (Melvin 2021), underscoring the region’s need for prescribed fire-focused science (Hiers et al. 2020). Reducing the threat of wildfires (Malone et al. 2011, Addington et al. 2015, Kobziar et al. 2015, Nowell et al. 2018, Donovan et al. 2023), prescribed fire is essential for maintaining fire-dependent ecosystems and supporting the richly diverse species assemblages they harbor (Engstrom et al. 1984, Cox and Jones 2009, Dixon et al. 2022). The restoration and conservation of the region’s fire-dependent ecosystems require (1) the reintroduction of fire where excluded, (2) the ability to re-apply fire at appropriate intervals in the future, and (3) the capacity for human populations to coexist with fire in a manner that promotes human health and safety. These requirements highlight the need for cutting-edge fire science in the region and underscore the importance of SFE in delivering timely and relevant fire science to natural resource managers, wildland firefighters, policy makers, and the public. Here, we highlight examples of how SFE effectively connects regional audiences with fire science research, information, and technology.

Translating Fire Science into Ecological Restoration

Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) savannas, highly prioritized for conservation and restoration, are maintained by frequent, low-intensity surface fires (Van Lear et al. 2005, Frost 2006). Where decades of fire exclusion have degraded such communities, prescribed fire re-introduction can sometimes kill centuries-old pines targeted for conservation (Varner et al. 2007). Vexing land managers, the resulting longleaf pine mortality is often delayed and can occur well over a year following the prescribed fire. Understanding the factors that can lead to this delayed mortality and preventing its occurrence have been priorities for land managers on public and private lands across the South. Through JFSP funding, researchers and managers at the University of Florida, Eglin Air Force Base, Tall Timbers Research Station, and the USDA Forest Service collaborated to apply science to address the problem. Research found that smoldering duff at the base of trees can ignite during prescribed fires and smolder for hours or days, killing fine roots and ultimately stressing trees to the point of mortality (Varner et al. 2009). This science-manager partnership led to new management recommendations, including avoiding high-severity initial burns, testing for duff moisture, and applying a series of low-severity fires during wetter conditions to gradually reduce duff and protect mature tree fine roots (Varner et al. 2007, Kreye et al. 2016, Varner et al. 2016, Susaeta et al. 2022).

Stemming from this collaboration, SFE has organized workshops, led field tours, produced videos, and developed fact sheets training thousands of managers responsible for millions of hectares of public and private land on the techniques of prescribed fire restoration (Fill et al. 2020). Private landowners play a particularly critical role in fire restoration across the South, where an estimated 86% of forestland is privately owned (Wear and Greis 2013). Across the region, for example, practitioners report widespread adoption of the multi-step burning approach and duff moisture testing protocols recommended in SFE materials, particularly in restoration projects targeting long-unburned longleaf pine stands that cover hundreds of thousands of hectares. SFE’s latest initiative, the “Mountains to Sea Duff Workshop Series,” developed in collaboration with the Consortium of Appalachian Fire Managers and Scientists, brings duff fire science to managers from the Blue Ridge mountains to the Atlantic coast through classroom presentations and field site visits. By focusing on practical, low-cost techniques like duff moisture testing and multi-stage burns, duff management becomes accessible and actionable for a wide range of landowners and fire practitioners.

A horizontal gradient diagram showing three categories of user engagement and investment in the Southern Fire Exchange programs. The diagram uses three connected rounded rectangles in warm colors (red-orange, orange, and yellow) arranged from left to right, with a directional arrow at the bottom indicating increasing 'User Engagement & Investment' from left to right. The left section, labeled 'USER ACCESSED' in a red-orange color, features a computer monitor icon and lists four items: Fact Sheets, Newsletters, Website, and Email/Social Media. The middle section, labeled 'DIRECT DELIVERY' in an orange color, displays a hand touching a play button icon and lists five items: Webinars, Presentations, Research Database, Videos, and Podcasts. The right section, labeled 'PERSONAL INTERACTIONS (Virtual & In-Person)' in yellow, shows a network diagram icon with connected people symbols and lists three items: Workshops, Field Tours, and Classes & Trainings.A wide arrow at the bottom spans all three sections, with minus and plus symbols at the left and right ends, respectively, indicating the gradient from low to high user engagement and investment.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

SFE has four program objectives that guide the development of a range of regionally relevant pro-grams, resources, and opportunities: (1) Incorporate fire science into decision-making, (2) Unite fire science and management, (3) Increase and improve fire sci-ence access, and (4) Operate as impartial brokers of fire science information.

A horizontal stacked bar chart displaying survey results from 386 respondents, who rated the usefulness of Southern Fire Exchange activities. The chart shows eight different SFE activities listed vertically on the left, with corresponding horizontal bars divided into three segments representing 'Useful' (dark green), 'Slightly Useful' (light green), and 'Not Useful' (light gray). Percentages are displayed within each segment, From top to bottom, the activities and their ratings are: Delivering professional fire-related training/presentations: 85% Useful, 14% Slightly Useful, 1% Not Useful. Sharing with professional colleagues in fire and natural resources: 84% Useful, 15% Slightly Useful, 1% Not Useful. Delivering public outreach/extension programs: 79% Useful, 18% Slightly Useful, 3% Not Useful. Sharing with private landowners via technical assistance: 75% Useful, 23% Slightly Useful, 2% Not Useful. Planning and making smoke management decisions: 75% Useful, 24% Slightly Useful, 1% Not Useful. Making fire and fuels management decisions: 74% Useful, 22% Slightly Useful, 4% Not Useful. Connecting with scientists: 71% Useful, 25% Slightly Useful, 4% Not Useful. Planning and scheduling prescribed burns: 67% Useful, 29% Slightly Useful, 3% Not Useful. The y-axis is labeled 'SFE Activity' and the x-axis is labeled 'Rating,' with a legend at the bottom showing the three rating categories.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Results of a 2025 survey (n = 386) asking respondents to rate the usefulness of SFE’s primary topics and activities. Color gradient represents the proportion of each rated response, with higher proportions shown at the darker end of the gradient. Evaluation data indicate that SFE’s work remains valuable in prescribed fire planning, training, decision-making, and ecological management, with the majority of respondents rating the activities as useful.

The Structure and Organization of SFE

SFE operates with a small but dedicated staff who coordinate programming, develop outreach materials, and facilitate connections between researchers and practitioners. The organization is guided by an advisory board composed of fire managers, scientists, and natural resource professionals from across the South, who provide strategic direction, identify emerging needs, and ensure SFE’s programming remains responsive to regional practitioner priorities. Practitioners can engage with SFE through multiple pathways beyond attending workshops or trainings: they can subscribe to monthly e-newsletters, engage with social media posts, participate in webinars, watch archived YouTube videos, request specific resources or training topics, and serve on the advisory board. This multifaceted approach to engagement ensures that SFE functions not only as an information provider but also as a dynamic network in which practitioners actively shape the organization’s direction and outputs. This model of sustained collaboration between scientists and practitioners serves as a template for other disciplines within restoration ecology seeking to strengthen science-management connections.

The Science of Keeping Fire on the Ground in a Rapidly Changing World

Fire management in the South is increasingly complex due to rapid population growth and regulatory changes. The region has the nation’s largest and fastest-growing wildland-urban interface (WUI), with North Carolina, Texas, and Georgia leading the trend (Carlson et al. 2022, Tang et al. 2024). Recent changes in EPA air quality standards require managers to make increasingly informed decisions regarding prescribed burn timing, smoke management, and public communication (Ryan et al. 2013, Jaffe et al. 2020, Bond et al. 2024, Wagner et al. 2024).

Over the past 15 years, SFE has established itself as a trusted source of information, drawing on the latest fire science research to support practitioners across the South.

A circular puzzle diagram divided into four equal interlocking pieces around a central circular logo. The Southern Fire Exchange logo sits at the center, featuring a flame icon within concentric circles with text reading 'SOUTHERN FIRE EXCHANGE' around the perimeter. The four puzzle pieces represent the program's objectives and are colored in gradient shades: Top-left (yellow-gold): 'Incorporate fire science into decision-making' with an icon showing a computer monitor and server. Top-right (green): 'Unite fire science and management' with an icon showing three people figures representing collaboration. Bottom-right (red-orange): 'Operate as impartial brokers of fire science information' with an icon showing balanced scales representing objectivity. Bottom-left (orange): 'Increase and improve fire science access' with an icon showing an open book with radiating lines suggesting knowledge dissemination. The puzzle piece edges interlock with white borders, symbolizing how these four objectives work together as an integrated framework for the Southern Fire Exchange's mission.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

SFE develops programs and products across a gradient of end-user investment and engagement, ranging from user-accessed to personal interactions. The SFE website, southernfireexchange.org, features user-accessed materials such as fact sheets and newsletters. Additionally, SFE posts new resources and opportunities on the website, via email, and on social media. Direct delivery methods include webinars, meeting presentations, a database of regionally relevant research (hosted on Zotero), and archived videos on the YouTube channel. SFE also offers virtual in-person events, including workshops, field tours, and classes.

Evaluation data show that SFE work continues to benefit prescribed fire planning, training, decision-making, and natural resource management (Figure 2). Catering to busy professionals and a range of learning styles (Figure 3), SFE supports individual learning through current website content, webinars, social media, e-newsletters, fact sheets, podcasts, and research databases, while also connecting learners through workshops, field tours, and information booths at events (Figure 2). Since 2011, over 20,000 people from across the world have attended SFE fire science webinars. The SFE YouTube Channel has more than 1,500 subscribers, 165,000 views, and shares over 400 fire science-related videos. These trends attest to the value of the content to managers.

By combining multiple delivery pathways with products on topics like smoke management, SFE connects practitioners with the latest science and tools to support safe and effective prescribed fire management decisions. A key challenge SFE has addressed is expanding access to smoke resources for diverse audiences, particularly non-professional communities and private landowners who may lack the technical training and resources available to public agency fire managers. To mitigate this barrier, SFE has focused on making smoke modeling tools more accessible through simplified fact sheets, pocket guides designed for field use, and step-by-step training webinars to demystify these tools. For example, a webinar providing training on a new wind analysis tool developed by Tall Timbers Research Station to reduce smoke impacts on local communities was followed by a “Fireside Chat” that allowed participants to engage in further discussion with the panel of presenters. Another barrier SFE has worked to overcome is the limited availability of information on emerging smoke-related hazards such as super fog events (i.e., dense fog formed when smoke from fires combines with moisture), which pose significant risks to transportation safety (Achtemeier 2009). By compiling and disseminating guidance on this and other emerging phenomena, SFE helps practitioners anticipate and respond to novel challenges. For example, following recent hurricanes in the South, SFE rapidly synthesized scientific evidence on wildfire risk associated with hurricane debris, providing timely guidance that informed fire managers’ responses to new wildfire threats and challenges for prescribed burning (Godwin et al. 2022). Increasing the skills and knowledge of prescribed fire practitioners prepares them to be nimble in the face of disturbance events, which will likely shift prescribed fire burn windows and the conditions required to accomplish management goals (Wear and Greis 2013).

The Science of Living with Fire

SFE adapts its programming as fire management challenges change and the related science advances. In response to the proposed changes to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM2.5 (i.e., particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers or smaller in diameter), SFE shifted efforts toward developing programs and resources to train landowners and fire professionals in smoke modeling and management. Recent products highlighting this focus include those developed with partners such as the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Georgia Forestry Commission, and Tall Timbers Research Station: Be Smoke Savvy: Georgia Prescribed Fire Smoke Management Pocket Guide (Fernandez et al. 2025), SFE Smoke and Weather Resources (SFE 2025) fact sheets, and a virtual workshop on PM2.5. These resources provide practical tools and training for considering shared airsheds, planning safe burns, and applying predictive smoke models.

The Power of Connection

By serving as both a translator and a facilitator, SFE ensures that fire science is not only produced but also implemented. As a convener and listener, SFE keeps a pulse on the needs of fire managers and policymakers to help guide the future of fire science research. As population growth, expanding WUI, and changing air quality regulations shape fire management in the South, this co-production of science communication programs will provide the most practical tools and accessible information for applying safe and ecologically relevant prescribed fires (Hiers et al. 2020, Kupfer et al. 2022, Siegel et al. 2024). Duff management and smoke resources are clear examples of how connecting research with practitioners improves on-the-ground decisions and underscores the importance of sustained collaboration. Looking ahead, with support from the advisory board and continued funding from JFSP, SFE aims to address the most pressing regional fire management challenges by providing accessible fire science training, decision-support tools, and engagement opportunities. These efforts help practitioners adapt to changing conditions and apply the best-available science to their fire management decisions.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) permitting copying and distributing the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited

References

  1. ↵
    1. Achtemeier, G.L.
    2009. On the formation and persistence of super-fog in woodland smoke. Meteorological Applications 16: 215–225.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Addington, R.
    , S. Hudson, K. Hiers, M. Hurteau, T. Hutcherson, G. Matusick and J. Parker. 2015. Relationships among wild-fire, prescribed fire, and drought in a fire-prone landscape in the southeastern United States. International Journal of Wild-land Fire 24:778–783.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Bond, L.A.
    , L.K. Lundy, H.M. Miller, C.A. Crandall, J.M. Diaz and R.M. Crandall. 2024. Social media use reveals public perceptions of prescribed burning. Journal of Applied Communications 108(3).
  4. ↵
    1. Carlson, A.R.
    , D.P. Helmers, T.J. Hawbaker, M.H. Mockrin and V.C. Radeloff. 2022. The wildland–urban interface in the United States based on 125 million building locations. Ecological Applications 32(5)e2597.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Cox, J.A.
    and C.D. Jones. 2009. Influence of prescribed fire on winter abundance of Bachman’s sparrow. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121(2):359–365.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Dante-Wood, S.K
    and M. Hunter. 2025. Fueling informed wildland fire management: The role of the Joint Fire Science Program’s Fire Science Exchange Network in bridging science and management. Ecological Restoration 44(3):141–149.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Dixon, C.M.
    , K.M. Robertson, M.D. Ulyshen and B.A. Sikes. 2022. Pine savanna restoration on agricultural landscapes: The path back to native savanna ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment 818:151715.
  8. ↵
    1. Donovan, V.M.
    , R.M. Crandall, J.M. Fill and C.L. Wonkka. 2023. Increasing large wildfire in the eastern United States. Geophysical Research Letters 50(24):e2023GL107051.
  9. ↵
    1. Engstrom, R.T.
    , R.L. Crawford and W.W. Baker. 1984. Breeding bird populations in relation to changing forest structure following fire exclusion: A 15-year study. The Wilson Bulletin 96(3):437–455.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Fernandez, C.
    , S. Cammack, A. Kroeger and D. Godwin. 2025. Be Smoke Savvy: Georgia Prescribed Fire Smoke Management Pocket Guide. Southern Fire Exchange. https://southernfireexchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2025-6.pdf.
  11. ↵
    1. Fill, J.M.
    , H.M. Miller and R.M. Crandall. 2020. Saving Old Trees: How Fire Science Helped Managers Put Fire Back into the Fire Forest. Southern Fire Exchange. https://southernfireexchange.org/wpcontent/uploads/SFRC_DuffFireScienceSuccessStoryFS.pdf.
  12. ↵
    1. Frost, C.
    2006. History and future of the longleaf pine ecosystem. Pages 9–42 in S. Jose, E. Jokela and D. Miller (eds.), The Long-leaf Pine Ecosystem: Ecology, Silviculture, and Restoration. New York, NY: Springer.
  13. ↵
    1. Godwin, D.
    , B. Ward, J. Fawcett, G.C. Wood and R.M. Crandall. 2022. Hurricane and tropical storm impacts on prescribed fire and wildfire management practices: FOR381/FR452, 3/2022. EDIS, DOI: 10.32473/edis-fr452-2022.
  14. ↵
    1. Hiers, J.K.
    , J.J. O’Brien, J.M. Varner, B.W. Butler, M. Dickinson, J. Furman et al. 2020. Prescribed fire science: The case for a refined research agenda. Fire Ecology 16:1–15.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Jaffe, D.A.
    , S.M. O’Neill, N.K. Larkin, A.L. Holder, D.L. Peterson, J.E. Halofsky and A.G. Rappold. 2020. Wildfire and prescribed burn-ing impacts on air quality in the United States. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 70(6):583–615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Kobziar, L.N.
    , D. Godwin, L. Taylor and A.C. Watts. 2015. Perspectives on trends, effectiveness, and impediments to prescribed burning in the southern U.S. Forests 6(3):561–580.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Kreye, J.K.
    , J.M. Varner, C.J. Dugaw, E.A. Engber and L.N. Quinn-Davidson. 2016. Patterns of duff ignition and smoldering beneath old Pinus palustris: Influence of tree proximity, moisture content, and ignition vectors. Forest Science 63(2):165–172.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Kupfer, J.A.
    , K. Lackstrom, J.M. Grego, K. Dow, A.J. Terando and J.K. Hiers. 2022. Prescribed fire in longleaf pine ecosystems: Fire managers’ perspectives on priorities, constraints, and future prospects. Fire Ecology 18(1):27.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Malone, S.L.
    , L.N. Kobziar, C.L. Staudhammer and A. Abd-Elrahman. 2011. Modeling relationships among 217 fires using remote sensing of burn severity in southern pine forests. Remote Sensing 3(9):2005–2028.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Melvin, M.
    2021. 2021 Prescribed Fire Use Report. The National Association of State Foresters and the Coalition of Prescribed Fire Councils. https://www.stateforesters.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2021-National-Rx-Fire-Use-Report_FINAL.pdf.
  21. ↵
    1. Nowell, H.K.
    , C.D. Holmes, K.M. Robertson, C. Teske and J.K. Hiers. 2018. A new picture of fire extent, variability, and drought inter-action in prescribed fire landscapes: Insights from Florida government records. Geophysical Research Letters 45:7874–7884.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Ryan, K.C.
    , E.E. Knapp and J.M. Varner. 2013. Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: History, current practice, and challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11(s1)e15–e24.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Siegel, K.J.
    , K.C. Cavanaugh and L.E. Dee. 2024. Balancing multiple management objectives as climate change transforms ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 39(4):381–395.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Southern Fire Exchange (SFE). 2025. SFE Smoke and Weather Resources. Southern Fire Exchange. https://southernfireexchange.org/wpcontent/uploads/2025-5.pdf.
  25. ↵
    1. Susaeta, A.
    , J.M. Fill, R.M. Crandall and J.M. Varner. 2022. Hidden costs of fire exclusion in longleaf pine forests linked to duff and carbon management. Journal of Forestry 120(5):504–512.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Tang, W.
    , C. He, L. Emmons and J. Zhang. 2024. Global expansion of wildland–urban interface (WUI) and WUI fires: Insights from a multiyear worldwide unified database (WUWUI). Environmental Research Letters 19(4):044028.
  27. ↵
    1. Van Lear, D.H.
    , W.D. Carroll, P.R. Kapeluck and R. Johnson. 2005. History and restoration of the longleaf pine-grassland ecosystem: Implications for species at risk. Forest Ecology and Management 211(1–2):150–165.
  28. ↵
    1. Varner, J.M.
    , J.K. Kreye and J. O’Brien. 2016. Recent advances in understanding duff consumption and post-fire longleaf pine mortality. Pages 335–338 in C.E. Coffey (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-212. Asheville, NC: USDA Research Station.
  29. ↵
    1. Varner, J.M.
    , F.E. Putz, J.J. O’Brien, J.K. Hiers, R.J. Mitchell and D.R. Gordon. 2009. Post-fire tree stress and growth following smoldering duff fires. Forest Ecology and Management 258(11): 2467–2474.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Varner, J.M.
    , J.K. Hiers, R.D. Ottmar, D.R. Gordon, F.E. Putz and D.D. Wade. 2007. Overstory tree mortality resulting from reintroducing fire to long-unburned longleaf pine forests: The importance of duff moisture. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37(8):1349–1358.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Wagner, D.
    , D. Godwin and C. Fernandez. 2024. Basic Smoke Management Practices for Prescribed Burning. Southern Fire Exchange Factsheet 2024–2. https://southernfireexchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2024–2.pdf.
  32. ↵
    1. Wear, D.N.
    and J.G. Greis. 2013. The Southern Forest Futures Project: Technical Report. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-178. Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 44 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 44, Issue 3
1 Aug 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Southern Fire Exchange
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Southern Fire Exchange
Raelene M. Crandall, Kevin M. Robertson, David R. Godwin, Sarah A. Cain, Christian R. Fernandez
Ecological Restoration Aug 2026, 44 (3) 182-187; DOI: 10.3368/er.44.3.182

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Southern Fire Exchange
Raelene M. Crandall, Kevin M. Robertson, David R. Godwin, Sarah A. Cain, Christian R. Fernandez
Ecological Restoration Aug 2026, 44 (3) 182-187; DOI: 10.3368/er.44.3.182
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Translating Fire Science into Ecological Restoration
    • The Structure and Organization of SFE
    • The Science of Keeping Fire on the Ground in a Rapidly Changing World
    • The Science of Living with Fire
    • The Power of Connection
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Themed Section: Wildland Fire Science in Action–Perspectives from the U.S. Fire Science Exchange Network

  • Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Guiding Ecosystem Restoration in Fire-Prone Landscapes of the Western U.S.
  • Broadcast Seeding Fails to Enhance Native Plant Recovery 17 Years after a Mojave Desert Wildfire
  • Delivering Actionable Science Communication for a Dynamic Fire Landscape
Show more Themed Section: Wildland Fire Science in Action–Perspectives from the U.S. Fire Science Exchange Network

Perspective

  • A Tale of Two Networks
  • When is the Right Time for Rodents in Ecological Restoration?
Show more Perspective

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • co-production
  • fire management
  • fire practitioners
  • outreach
  • prescribed fire
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire