Direct Seeding Asclepias humistrata (Sandhill Milkweed) in Coastal Dunes

References

1. ↵
   1. Baskin C. and
   2. J.M. Baskin

   . 2014. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc.
2. ↵
   1. Bitton M.C. and
   2. P.A. Hesp

   . 2013. Vegetation dynamics on eroding to accreting beach-foredune systems, Florida panhandle. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 38(12):1472–1480.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
3. ↵
   1. Brower L.P

   . 1961. Studies on the migration of the monarch butterfly I. Breeding populations of Danaus plexippus and D. gilippus berenice in south central Florida. Ecology 42:76–83.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Brower L.P

   . 1962. Evidence for interspecific competition in natural populations of the monarch and queen butterflies, Danaus plexippus and D. gilippus berenice in south central Florida. Ecology 43:549–552.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Brower L.P.,
   2. E.H. Williams,
   3. K.S. Dunford,
   4. J.C. Dunford,
   5. A.L. Knight,
   6. J. Daniels et al

   . 2018. A long-term survey of spring monarch butterflies in north-central Florida. Journal of Natural History 52:2025–2046.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Campbell G.E

   . 2016. Dormancy and Germination Characteristics of 2 Florida Native Forbs, Asclepias humistrata and Lupinus diffusus. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
7. ↵
   1. Campbell G.E

   . 2020. Conservation, greenhouse production, and restoration outplantings of sandhill milkweed (Asclepias humistrata). PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
8. ↵
   1. Campbell-Martínez G.E.,
   2. M. Thetford,
   3. D. Miller and
   4. H. Pérez

   . 2017. Follicle maturity, seed size, temperature and photoperiod effects on seed germination of Asclepias humistrata. Seed Science and Technology 45:523–529.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Ceccon E.,
   2. E.J. González and
   3. C. Martorell

   . 2015. Is direct seeding a biologically viable strategy for restoring forest ecosystems? Evidences from a meta-analysis. Land Degradation and Development 27:511–520.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Cohen J.A. and
    2. L.P. Brower

    . 1982. Oviposition and larval success of wild monarch butterflies (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) in relation to host plant size and cardenolide concentration. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 55:343–348.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Daniels J.,
    2. C. Kimmel,
    3. S. McClung,
    4. S. Epstein,
    5. J. Bremer and
    6. K. Rossetti

    . 2018. Better understanding the potential importance of Florida roadside breeding habitat for the monarch. Insects 9:137.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. ↵
    1. Flockhart D.T.T.,
    2. J. Pichancourt,
    3. R.D. Norris and
    4. T.G. Martin

    . 2015. Unravelling the annual cycle in a migratory animal: Breedingseason habitat loss drives population declines of monarch butterflies. Journal of Animal Ecology 84:155–165.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Gao R.,
    2. R. Zhao,
    3. Z. Huang,
    4. X. Yang,
    5. X. Wei,
    6. Z. He and
    7. J.L. Walck

    . 2018. Soil temperature and moisture regulate seed dormancy cycling of a dune annual in a temperate desert. Environmental and Experimental Botany 155:688–694.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Hartzler R.G

    . 2010. Reduction in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) occurrence in Iowa cropland from 1999 to 2009. Crop Protection 29:1542–1544.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Jinks R.L.,
    2. I. Willoughby and
    3. C. Baker

    . 2006. Direct seeding of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.): The effects of sowing date, pre-emergent herbicides, cultivation, and protection on seedling emergence and survival. Forest Ecology and Management 237:373–386.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Knight A.,
    2. L.P. Brower and
    3. E.H. Williams

    . 1999. Spring remigration of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in north-central Florida: Estimating population parameters using mark-recapture. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68:531–556.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Lakshmi V.,
    2. T.J. Jackson and
    3. D. Zehrfuhs

    . 2003. Soil-moisture relationships: Results from two field experiments. Hydrological Processes 17:3041–3057.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
18. ↵
    1. Lithgow D.,
    2. M.L. Martínez and
    3. J.B. Gallego-Fernández

    . 2015. The “ReDune” index (Restoration of coastal Dunes Index) to assess the need and viability of coastal dune restoration. Ecological Indicators 49:178–187.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Luong J.C.,
    2. M.P. Nolan and
    3. L.C. Stratton

    . 2019. The importance of pilot studies and understanding microhabitat requirements when reintroducing endemic plants during coastal dune restoration. Journal of Coastal Conservation 23:553–563.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Madsen P. and
    2. M. Löf

    . 2005. Reforestation in southern Scandinavia using direct seeding of oak (Quercus robur L.). Forestry 78:55–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Malcolm S.B.,
    2. B.J. Cockrell and
    3. L.P. Brower

    . 1987. Monarch butterfly voltinism: Effects of temperature constraints at different latitudes. Oikos 49:77–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Martin R.A.,
    2. S.P. Lynch,
    3. L.P. Brower,
    4. S.B. Malcolm and
    5. T. Van Hook

    . 1992. Cardenolide content, emetic potency, and thin-layer chromatography profiles of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus, and their larval host-plant milkweed, Asclepias humistrata, in Florida. Chemoecology 3:1–13.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Martínez M.L.,
    2. P.A. Hesp and
    3. J.B. Gallego-Fernández

    . 2013. Coastal dunes: Human impact and need for restoration. Pages 1–14 in M.L. Martínez, J.B. Gallego-Fernández and P.A. Hesp (eds.), Restoration of Coastal Dunes. Germany: Springer Verlag.
24. ↵
    1. Miller D.L.,
    2. L. Yager,
    3. M. Thetford and
    4. M. Schneider

    . 2003. Potential use of Uniola paniculata rhizome fragments for dune restoration. Restoration Ecology 11:359–369.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Mondo P.,
    2. Mattson,
    3. K.D., Marshall and
    4. C.C. Bennington

    . 2010. The effect of shrubs on the establishment of an endangered perennial (Aslcepias curtissii) endemic to Florida scrub. Southeastern Naturalist 9(2):259–274.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Moore L.V. and
    2. G.G.E. Scudder

    . 1985. Selective sequestration of milkweed (Asclepias sp.) cardenolides in Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 11:667–687.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
27. ↵
    1. NOAA [National Oceanic, and Atmospheric Administration]

    . 2020. National Centers for Environmental Information Online Database. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools.
28. ↵
    1. Nordstrom K.F

    . 2008. Beach and Dune Restoration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. ↵
    1. Palma A.C. and
    2. S.G.W. Laurance

    . 2015. A review of the use of direct seeding and seedling plantings in restoration: What do we know and where should we go? Applied Vegetation Science 18:561–568.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. ↵
    1. Petru M. and
    2. E.S. Menges

    . 2004. Shifting sands in Florida scrub gaps and roadsides: Dynamic microsites for herbs. The American Midland Naturalist. 151(1):101–113.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Pleasants J.M. and
    2. K.S. Oberhauser

    . 2013. Milkweed loss in agricultural fields because of herbicide use: Effect on the monarch butterfly population. Insect Conservation and Diversity 6:135–144.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Reque J.A., and
    2. E. Martin

    . 2015. Designing acorn protection for direct seeding of Quercus species in high predation areas. Forest Systems 24:e018.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Semmens B.X.,
    2. D.J. Semmens,
    3. W.E. Thogmartin,
    4. W.E. Wiederholt,
    5. L. López-Hoffman,
    6. J.E. Diffendorfer et al

    . 2016. Quasiextinction risk and population targets for the Eastern, migratory population of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus). Scientific Reports 6:23265.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
34. ↵
    1. St-Denis A.,
    2. Messier, C. and
    3. D. Kneeshaw

    . 2013. Seed size, the only factor positively affecting direct seeding success in an abandoned field in Quebec, Canada. Forests 4:500–516.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Stephens E.L. and
    2. P.F. Quintana-Ascencio

    . 2015. Effects of habitat degradation, microsite, and seed density on the persistence of two native herbs in a subtropical shrubland. American Journal of Botany 102:1978–1995.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. ↵
    1. Thogmartin W.E.,
    2. L. López-Hoffman,
    3. J. Rohweder,
    4. J. Diffendorfer,
    5. R. Drum,
    6. D. Semmens et al

    . 2017. Restoring monarch butterfly habitat in the Midwestern US: “all hands in deck”. Environmental Research Letters 12:074005.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Willoughby I.,
    2. R.L. Jinks,
    3. G. Kerr and
    4. P.G. Gosling

    . 2004. Factors affecting the success of direct seeding for lowland afforestation in the UK. Forestry 77:467–482.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Zalucki M.P. and
    2. L.P. Brower

    . 1992. Survival of first instar larvae of Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Danainae) in relation to cardiac glycoside and latex content of Asclepias humistrata (Asclepiadaceae). Chemoecology 3:81–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Zalucki M.P.,
    2. L.P. Brower and
    3. M.A. Alonso

    . 2001. Detrimental effects of latex and cardiac glycosides on survival and growth of first-instar monarch butterfly larvae Danaus plexippus feeding on the sandhill milkweed Asclepias humistrata. Ecological Entomology 26:212–224.

    OpenUrlCrossRef