Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleCase Study

The Impact of Incorporating Reforestation into the Built Environment on Biodiversity Recovery

A Case Study from Rwanda

Yntze van der Hoek and Deogratias Tuyisingize
Ecological Restoration, March 2025, 43 (1) 52-63; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.43.1.52
Yntze van der Hoek
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Musanze, Rwanda, P.O. Box 105,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yntzevanderhoek{at}gmail.com
Deogratias Tuyisingize
Deogratias Tuyisingize, Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Musanze, Rwanda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Angel, S.,
    2. J. Parent D.L. Civco,
    3. A. Blei and
    4. D. Potere
    . 2011. The dimensions of global urban expansion: Estimates and projections for all countries, 2000–2050. Progress in Planning 75(2):53–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Baldock, K.C.R.,
    2. M.A. Goddard,
    3. D.M. Hicks,
    4. W.E. Kunin,
    5. N. Mitschunas,
    6. H. Morse
    et al. 2019. A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities. Nature Ecology and Evolution 3(3):363–373.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Darnthamromgkul, W.
    2023. Public response to the appearance of ecological urban park design: The battle between the ‘picturesque’ and the ‘messiness.’ Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure 8(3):307–324.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Delaney, K.S., S.P.D. Riley and
    2. R.N. Fisher
    . 2010. A rapid, strong, and convergent genetic response to urban habitat fragmentation in four divergent and widespread vertebrates. PLoS One 5(9):e12767.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Devoto, M.,
    2. S. Bailey,
    3. P. Craze and
    4. J. Memmott
    . 2012. Understanding and planning ecological restoration of plant–pollinator networks. Ecology Letters 15(4):319–328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Dickinson, Y.,
    2. K. Pelz,
    3. E. Giles and
    4. J. Howie
    . 2016. Have we been successful? Monitoring horizontal forest complexity for forest restoration projects. Restoration Ecology, 24(1):8–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Downton, P.,
    2. D. Jones,
    3. J. Zeunert and
    4. P. Roös
    . 2017. Biophilic design applications: Putting theory and patterns into built environment practice. DesTech Conference Proceedings, The International Conference on Design and Technology KnE Engineering 2017:59–65.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Elmqvist, T.,
    2. M. Fragkias,
    3. J. Goodness,
    4. B. Güneralp,
    5. P.J. Marcotullio,
    6. R.I. McDonald
    et al. 2013. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment. Springer Nature.
  8. ↵
    1. Elmqvist, T.,
    2. W.C. Zipperer and
    3. B. Güneralp
    . 2015. Urbanization, habitat loss and biodiversity decline: Solution pathways to break the cycle. Pages 163–175 in K. Seto, W. Solecki and C. Griffith (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Urbanization and Global Environmental Change. Routledge.
  9. ↵
    1. Fuccillo
    2. Battle, K.,
    3. C.E. De Rivera and
    4. M.B. Cruzan
    . 2021. The role of functional diversity and facilitation in small-scale pollinator habitat. Ecological Applications 31(6):e02355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gibson, R.H.,
    2. B. Knott,
    3. T. Eberlein and
    4. J. Memmott
    . 2011. Sampling method influences the structure of plant–pollinator networks. Oikos 120(6):822–831.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Goddard, M.A.,
    2. A.J. Dougill and
    3. T.G. Benton
    . 2010. Scaling up from gardens: Biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25(2)90–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Guenat, S.,
    2. A.J. Dougill and
    3. M. Dallimer
    . 2020. Social network analysis reveals a lack of support for greenspace conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 204:103928.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Guenat, S.,
    2. A.J. Dougill,
    3. W.E. Kunin and
    4. M. Dallimer
    . 2019. Untangling the motivations of different stakeholders for urban greenspace conservation in sub-Saharan Africa. Ecosystem Services 36:100904.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Guenat, S.,
    2. G.P. Lopez,
    3. D.D. Mkwambisi and
    4. M. Dallimer
    . 2021. Unpacking stakeholder perceptions of the benefits and challenges associated with urban greenspaces in sub-Saharan Africa. Frontiers in Environmental Science 9:591512.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Güneralp, B., S.Lwasa,
    2. H. Masundire,
    3. S. Parnell and
    4. K.C. Seto
    . 2017. Urbanization in Africa: Challenges and opportunities for conservation. Environmental Research Letters 13(1):015002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Hagen, D. and
    2. M. Evju
    . 2013. Using short-term monitoring data to achieve goals in a large-scale restoration. Ecology and Society 18(3):29.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Hale, R. and
    2. S.E. Swearer
    . 2017. When good animals love bad restored habitats: How maladaptive habitat selection can constrain restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 54(5):1478–1486.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Hutto, R.L.,
    2. S.M. Pletschet and
    3. P. Hendricks
    . 1986. A fixed-radius point count method for nonbreeding and breeding season use. The Auk 103(3):593–602.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Jaureguiberry, P.,
    2. N. Titeux,
    3. M. Wiemers,
    4. D.E. Bowler,
    5. L. Coscieme,
    6. A.S. Golden
    et al. 2022. The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss. Science Advances 8(45):eabm9982.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Johnson, S.D. and
    2. K.E. Steiner
    . 2000. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15(4):140–143.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Kassouri, Y.
    2021. Monitoring the spatial spillover effects of urbanization on water, built-up land and ecological footprints in subSaharan Africa. Journal of Environmental Management 300: 113690.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Kolimenakis, A.,
    2. A.D. Solomou,
    3. N. Proutsos,
    4. E.V. Avramidou,
    5. E. Korakaki,
    6. G. Karetsos
    et al. 2021. The socioeconomic welfare of urban green areas and parks; A literature review of available evidence. Sustainability 13(14):7863.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Li, G.,
    2. F. Chuanglin,
    3. Y. Li,
    4. Z. Wang,
    5. S. Sun,
    6. S. He
    et al. 2022. Global impacts of future urban expansion on terrestrial vertebrate diversity. Nature Communications 13(1):1628.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Lindenmayer, D.B.,
    2. P.W. Lane,
    3. P.S. Barton,
    4. M. Crane,
    5. K. Ikin,
    6. D. Michael and
    7. S. Okada
    . 2016. Long-term bird colonization and turnover in restored woodlands. Biodiversity and Conservation 25(8):1587–1603.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Mata, L.,
    2. A.N. Andersen,
    3. A. Morán-Ordóñez,
    4. A.K. Hahs,
    5. A. Backstrom,
    6. C.D. Ives
    et al. 2021. Indigenous plants promote insect biodiversity in urban greenspaces. Ecological Applications 31(4): e02309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Mata, L.,
    2. A.K. Hahs,
    3. E. Palma,
    4. A. Backstrom,
    5. N. Johnston,
    6. T. King
    et al. 2023. Large positive ecological changes of small urban greening actions. Ecological Solutions and Evidence 4(3):e12259.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. McDonald, R.I.,
    2. P.J. Marcotullio and
    3. B. Güneralp
    . 2013. Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services. Pages 31–52 in T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P.J. Marcotullio, R.I. McDonald et al. (eds.) Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment. Springer Open.
  27. ↵
    1. Moffatt, S. and
    2. N. Kohler
    . 2008. Conceptualizing the built environment as a social–ecological system. Building Research and Information 36(3):248–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Nassauer, J.I.
    1995. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14(2):161–170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Newbold, T.,
    2. L.N. Hudson,
    3. S.L.L. Hill,
    4. S. Contu,
    5. I. Lysenko,
    6. R.A. Senior
    et al. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520(7545):45–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Nkurikiyimana, D.,
    2. A. Manishimwe and
    3. Y. van der Hoek
    . 2023. Complexity of plant–pollinator interaction networks in East African high-elevation wetlands. African Journal of Ecology 61(3):752–758.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Oksanen, J.,
    2. F.G. Blanchet,
    3. R. Kindt,
    4. P. Legendre,
    5. P.R. Minchin,
    6. R.B. O’hara
    et al. 2013. Package ‘Vegan.’ Community Ecology Package, Version 2(9):1–295.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Perfectti, F.,
    2. J.M. Gómez and
    3. J. Bosch
    . 2009. The functional consequences of diversity in plant–pollinator interactions. Oikos 118(9):1430–1440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Piiroinen, T.,
    2. P. Nyeko and
    3. H. Roininen
    . 2015. Natural establishment of indigenous trees under planted nuclei: A study from a clear-felled pine plantation in an Afrotropical rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management 345:21–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Pitman, S.D.,
    2. C.B. Daniels and
    3. M.E. Ely
    . 2015. Green infrastructure as life support: Urban nature and climate change. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 139(1):97–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Rees, W.E.
    1999. The built environment and the ecosphere: A global perspective. Building Research and Information 27(4–5):206–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Roels, S.M.,
    2. M.B. Hannay and
    3. C.A. Lindell
    . 2019. Recovery of bird activity and species richness in an early-stage tropical forest restoration. Avian Conservation and Ecology 14(1):9.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Ruiz-Jaén, M.C. and
    2. T.M. Aide
    . 2006. An integrated approach for measuring urban forest restoration success. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4(2):55–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Seto, K.C.,
    2. B. Güneralp and
    3. R. Hutyra
    . 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(40):16083–16088.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. van
    2. Breugel, P.,
    3. R. Kindt,
    4. J.P.B. Lillesø,
    5. M. Bingham,
    6. S. Demissew,
    7. C. Dudley
    et al. 2023. Potential natural vegetation map of eastern Africa (Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia) Version 2.0. Forest and Landscape (Denmark) and World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). https://vegetationmap4africa.org
  40. ↵
    1. Van De
    2. Giesen, N.,
    3. R. Hut, and
    4. J. Selker
    . 2014. The Trans-African Hydro-Meteorological Observatory (TAHMO). WIREs Water 1(4):341–348.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Venter, O.,
    2. E.W. Sanderson,
    3. A. Magrach,
    4. J.R. Allan,
    5. J. Beher,
    6. K.R. Jones
    et al. 2016. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nature Communications 7(1):12558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Weber, A.W.
    1991. Conservation and Development on the Zaire-Nile Divide: An Analysis of Value Conflicts and Convergence in the Management of Afromontane Forests in Rwanda. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin, USA.
  43. ↵
    1. Wood, S.N.
    2017. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, Second Edition. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
    1. Wortley, L.,
    2. J. Hero and
    3. M. Howes
    . 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: A review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21(5):537–543.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. Zuniga-Palacios, J.,
    2. I. Zuria,
    3. I. Castellanos,
    4. C. Lara and
    5. G. Sanchez-Rojas
    . 2021. What do we know (and need to know) about the role of urban habitats as ecological traps? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment 780:146559.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 43 (1)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 43, Issue 1
1 Mar 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Impact of Incorporating Reforestation into the Built Environment on Biodiversity Recovery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
The Impact of Incorporating Reforestation into the Built Environment on Biodiversity Recovery
Yntze van der Hoek, Deogratias Tuyisingize
Ecological Restoration Mar 2025, 43 (1) 52-63; DOI: 10.3368/er.43.1.52

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Impact of Incorporating Reforestation into the Built Environment on Biodiversity Recovery
Yntze van der Hoek, Deogratias Tuyisingize
Ecological Restoration Mar 2025, 43 (1) 52-63; DOI: 10.3368/er.43.1.52
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Data Availability Statement
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Great Lakes Shoreline Restoration
  • Swamp Reforestation in Coastal Louisiana, USA Exposes Landscape Scale Differences in Survival and Growth Across Two Hydrologically Restored Regions
Show more Case Study

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Afromontane vegetation
  • central Africa
  • habitat restoration
  • urban landscapes
  • Volcanoes National Park
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire