Effects of Restoration on Small Headwater Stream Quality

References

1. ↵
   1. Al-Zankana, A.F.A.,
   2. T. Matheson and
   3. D.M. Harper

   . 2020. How strong is the evidence—based on macroinvertebrate community responses—that river restoration works? Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 20:196–214.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Alexander, R.B.,
   2. E.W. Boyer,
   3. R.A. Smith,
   4. G.E. Schwarz and
   5. R.B. Moore

   . 2007. The role of headwater streams in downstream water quality. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43:41–59.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bash, J.S. and
   2. C.M. Ryan

   . 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: Is anyone monitoring? Environmental Management 29:877–885.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Beck, W.H., Jr.

   1955. Suggested method for reporting biotic data. Sewage and Industrial Waste 27:1193–1197.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bernhardt, E.S.,
   2. M.A. Palmer,
   3. J.D. Allan,
   4. G. Alexander,
   5. K. Barnas,
   6. S. Brooks

   et al. 2005. Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Brooks, R.T.

   2009. Potential impacts of global climate change on the hydrology and ecology of ephemeral freshwater systems of the forests of the northeastern United States. Climatic Change 95:469–483.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Conners, M.E. and
   2. R.J. Naiman

   . 1984. Particulate allochthonous inputs: Relationships with stream size in an undisturbed watershed. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41: 1473–1484.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Cooke, S.J.,
   2. A. Frempong-Manso,
   3. M.L. Piczak,
   4. E. Karathanou,
   5. C. Clavijo,
   6. S.O. Ajagbe

   et al. 2022. A freshwater perspective on the United Nations decade for ecosystem restoration. Conservation Science and Practice 4:e12787.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Doll, B.,
   2. G. Jennings,
   3. J. Spooner,
   4. D. Penrose,
   5. J. Usset,
   6. J. Blackwell and
   7. M. Fernandez

   . 2016. Identifying watershed landscape and engineering design factors that influence the biotic condition of restored streams. Water 8(4):151.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Ernst, A.G.,
    2. D.R. Warren and
    3. B.P. Baldigo

    . 2012. Natural-channeldesign restorations that changed geomorphology have little effect on macroinvertebrate communities in headwater streams. Restoration Ecology 20:532–540.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    1. Feeley, H.B.,
    2. M. Woods,
    3. J.R. Baars and
    4. M. Kelly-Quinn

    . 2012. Refining a kick sampling strategy for the bioassessment of benthic macroinvertebrates in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 683:53–68.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Ferreira, V.,
    2. R. Albarino,
    3. A. Larranaga,
    4. C.J. LeRoy,
    5. F.O. Masese and
    6. M.S. Moretti

    . 2023. Ecosystem services provided by small streams: An overview. Hydrobiologia 850:2501–2355.
13. ↵
    1. Finn, D.S.,
    2. N. Bonada,
    3. C. Múrria and
    4. J.M. Hughes

    . 2011. Small but mighty: Headwaters are vital to stream network biodiversity at two levels of organization. Freshwater Science 30:963–980.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Guerold, F.

    2000. Influence of taxonomic determination level on several community indices. Water Research 34:487–492.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Holmes, K.L.,
    2. P.C. Goebel,
    3. L.R. Williams and
    4. M. Schecengost

    . 2011. Environmental influences on macroinvertebrate assemblages in headwater streams of northeastern Ohio. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 26:409–422.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Karr, J.R. and
    2. D.R. Dudley

    . 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Management 5:55–68.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Kondolf, G.M.

    1995. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3:133–136.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Lepori, F.,
    2. D. Palm,
    3. E. Brännäs and
    4. B. Malmqvist

    . 2005. Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecological Applications 15:2060–2071.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Louhi, P.,
    2. H. Mykrä,
    3. R. Paavola,
    4. A. Huusko,
    5. T. Vehanen,
    6. A. Mäki-Petäys and
    7. T. Muotka

    . 2011. Twenty years of stream restoration in Finland: Little response by benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Ecological Applications 21:1950–1961.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Lowrance, R.,
    2. R. Todd,
    3. J. Fail,
    4. O. Hendrickson,
    5. R. Leonard and
    6. L. Asmussen

    . 1984. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds. BioScience 34:374–377.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Meyer, J.L.,
    2. D.L. Strayer,
    3. J.B. Wallace,
    4. S.L. Eggert,
    5. G.S. Helfman and
    6. N.E. Leonard

    . 2007. The contribution of headwater streams to biodiversity in river networks. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43:86–103.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Miller, S.W.,
    2. P. Budy and
    3. J.C. Schmidt

    . 2010. Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: Applications of meta-analysis to river restoration. Restoration Ecology 18:8–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Moreno-Mateos, D.,
    2. M.E. Power,
    3. F.A. Comín and
    4. R. Yockteng

    . 2012. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biology 10:e1001247.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. ↵
    1. Muotka, T.,
    2. R. Paavola,
    3. A. Haapala,
    4. M. Novikmec and
    5. P. Laasonen

    . 2002. Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from in-stream restoration. Biological Conservation 105:243–253.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Nery De
    2. Figeuiredo, T. and
    3. D. Schmera

    . 2016. The effects of topdown and bottom-up controls on macroinvertebrate assemblages in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 763:173–181.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Ohio EPA

    . 1999. Association between nutrients, habitat and the aquatic biota in Ohio rivers and streams, January 1999. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Technical Bulletin MAS/1999-1-1.
27. ↵
    1. Ohio EPA

    . 2002. Ohio EPA primary headwater habitat initiative data compendium, September 2002. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water.
28. 1. Ohio EPA

    . 2006. Biological and water quality study of the Chagrin River and selected tributaries 2003–04, December 2006. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water.
29. ↵
    1. Ohio EPA

    . 2012. Field evaluation manual for Ohio’s primary headwater habitat streams Version 3.0, January 2012. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water.
30. ↵
    1. Ohio EPA

    . 2013. Updates to biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: Volume III. Standardized biological field sampling and laboratory methods for assessing fish and macroinvertebrate communities, February 2013. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water.
31. ↵
    1. Ohio EPA

    . 2018. Field methods for evaluating primary headwater streams in Ohio, Version 4.0, October 2018. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water.
32. ↵
    1. Palmer, M.,
    2. J.D. Allan,
    3. J. Meyer and
    4. E.S. Bernhardt

    . 2007. River restoration in the twenty-first century: Data and experiential knowledge to inform future efforts. Restoration Ecology 15:472–481.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Palmer, M.A.,
    2. K.L. Hondula and
    3. B.J. Koch

    . 2014. Ecological restoration of streams and rivers: Shifting strategies and shifting goals. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 45:247–269.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Poff, N.L.

    1997. Landscape filters and species traits: Towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:391–409.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Pond, G.J.,
    2. K.M. Fritz and
    3. B.R. Johnson

    . 2016. Macroinvertebrate and organic matter export from headwater tributaries of a Central Appalachian stream. Hydrobiologia 779:75–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Roni, P.,
    2. M. Liermann,
    3. S. Muhar and
    4. S. Schmutz

    . 2013. Monitoring and evaluation of restoration actions. Pages 254–279 in P. Roni and T. Beechie (eds.), Stream and Watershed Restoration: A Guide to Restoring Processes and Habitats. Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
37. ↵
    1. Rubin, Z.,
    2. G.M. Kondolf and
    3. B. Rios-Touma

    . 2017. Evaluating stream restoration projects: What do we learn from monitoring? Water 9:174.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Samuel, E.M.,
    2. R.M. Mitchell and
    3. D.E. Winkler

    . 2023. Perspectives on challenges and opportunities at the restoration-policy interface in the U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 31:e13823.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Shields, F.D.,
    2. R.R. Copeland,
    3. P.C. Klingeman,
    4. M.W. Doyle and
    5. A. Simon

    . 2003. Design for stream restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129:575–584.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
40. ↵
    1. Vannote, R.L.,
    2. G.W. Minshall,
    3. K.W. Cummins,
    4. J.R. Sedell and
    5. C.E. Cushing

    . 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130–137.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Vinson, M.R. and
    2. C.P. Hawkins

    . 1998. Biodiversity of stream insects: Variation at local basin and regional scales. Annual Review of Entomology 43:271–293.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Webster, J.R.,
    2. E.F. Benfield,
    3. T.P. Ehrman,
    4. M.A. Schaeffer,
    5. J.L. Tank,
    6. J.J. Hutchens and
    7. D.J. D’angelo

    . 1999. What happens to allochthonous material that falls into streams? A synthesis of new and published information from Coweeta. Freshwater Biology 41:687–705.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Wortley, L.,
    2. J.-M. Hero and
    3. M. Howes

    . 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: A review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21:537–543.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. ↵
    1. Yoder, C.O. and
    2. E.T. Rankin

    . 1995. Biological criteria program development and implementation in Ohio. Pages 109–144 in W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (eds.), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.