Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticlePerspective
Open Access

Urban Lake Shoreland Restoration

Landform, Vegetation, and Management Assessment 20 Years Later

William Bartodziej and Susan Galatowitsch
Ecological Restoration, June 2024, 42 (2) 87-99; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.42.2.87
William Bartodziej
Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District, Saint Paul, MN and Natural Shore Technologies, Maple Plain, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Galatowitsch
University of Minnesota, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, 2003 Upper Buford Circle, Saint Paul, MN 55108,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aronson, M.J. and
    2. S. Galatowitsch
    . 2008. Long-term vegetation development of restored prairie pothole wetlands. Wetlands 28:883–895.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Bartodziej, W.,
    2. S.L. Blood,
    3. P.W. Erdmann, and
    4. T.F. Shevlin
    . 2008. An evaluation of fencing to challenge emergent plant herbivory (Minnesota). Ecological Restoration 26:184–186.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bohnen, J. and
    2. S. Galatowitsch
    . 2016. Restoration evaluation project: Vegetation monitoring tool. University of Minnesota. Report to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources.
  4. ↵
    1. Cavaillé, P.,
    2. L. Ducasse,
    3. V. Breton,
    4. F. Dommanget,
    5. E. Tabacchi and
    6. A. Evette
    . 2015. Functional and taxonomic plant diversity for riverbank protection works: Bioengineering techniques close to natural banks and beyond hard engineering. Journal of Environmental Management 151:65–75.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Crowder, A.A.,
    2. J.P. Smol,
    3. R. Dalrymple,
    4. R. Gilbert,
    5. A. Mathers and
    6. J. Price
    . 1996. Rates of natural and anthropogenic change in shoreline habitats in the Kingston Basin, Lake Ontario. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55(Suppl 1):121–135.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Elvecrog, H. and
    2. W. Bartodziej
    . 2008. Lake Phalen Shoreland Restoration Walking Tour and Plant Guide. Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District.
  7. ↵
    1. Francis, T.B. and
    2. D.E. Schindler
    . 2009. Shoreline urbanization reduces terrestrial insect subsidies to fishes in North American lakes. Oikos 118:1872–1882.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Gabriel, A.O. and
    2. L.R. Bodensteiner
    . 2012. Impacts of riprap on wetland shorelines, Upper Winnebago Pool Lakes, Wisconsin. Wetlands 32:105–117.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Galatowitsch, S.M.
    2023. Organization capacity and ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 31:e13757.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Galatowitsch, S.M. and
    2. J. Bohnen
    . 2020. Predicting restoration outcomes based on organizational and ecological factors. Restoration Ecology 28:1201–1212.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Galatowitsch, S.M. and
    2. A.G. van der Valk
    . 1994. Restoring Prairie Wetlands: An Ecological Approach. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
  12. ↵
    1. Galatowitsch, S.M.,
    2. D.C. Whited,
    3. R. Lehtinen,
    4. J. Husveth and
    5. K. Schik
    . 2000. The vegetation of wet meadows in relation to their land use. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 60:121–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Gobster, P.H.,
    2. J.L. Nassauer,
    3. T.C. Daniel and
    4. G. Fry
    . 2007. The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology 22:959–972.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Haskell, D.E.,
    2. C.R. Webster,
    3. A.L. Bales,
    4. M.W. Meyer and
    5. D.J. Flaspholer
    . 2017. Assessment of wildlife habitat attributes at restoration projects on northern Wisconsin lakeshores. Northeastern Naturalist 24:391–412.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Hershey, A.,
    2. S. Beaty,
    3. K. Fortino and
    4. S. Kelly
    . 2006. Stable isotope signatures of benthic invertebrates in arctic lakes indicate limited coupling to pelagic production. Limnology and Oceanography 51:177–188.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Hess, M.C.,
    2. F. Mesléard and
    3. E. Buisson
    . 2019. Priority effects: Emerging principles for invasive plant species management. Ecological Engineering 127: 48–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Huang, C.,
    2. L. Zhu,
    3. G. Ma,
    4. G.A. Meadows and
    5. P. Xue
    . 2021. Wave climate associated with changing water level and ice cover in Lake Michigan. Frontiers in Marine Science 8:746916.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Hulme, P.E.
    2014. Bridging the knowing–doing gap: Know-who, know-what, know-why, know-how and know-when. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:1131–1136.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Kartesz, J.T.
    1994. A Synonymized Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland 2nd Ed. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
  20. ↵
    1. Liu, Z.,
    2. S. Fagherazzi,
    3. X. Ma.,
    4. C. Xie,
    5. J. Li and
    6. B. Cui
    . 2020. Consumer control and abiotic stresses constrain coastal saltmarsh restoration. Journal of Environmental Management 274:111110.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. McComas, S.
    2003. Lake and Pond Management Guidebook. CRC Press.
  22. ↵
    1. MN DNR (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
    . 2005. Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province. State of Minnesota, Saint Paul.
  23. ↵
    1. Mueller-Dombois, D. and
    2. H. Ellenberg
    . 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York: Wiley Press.
  24. ↵
    1. NRC (National Research Council)
    . 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  25. ↵
    1. NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 2022. The PLANTS Database (http://plantsusda.gov, accessed March 2022). US Department of Agriculture, National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
  26. ↵
    1. Radomski, P.
    2006. Historical changes in abundance of floating-leaf and emergent vegetation in Minnesota lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26(4):932–940.
    OpenUrl
    1. Radomski, P. and
    2. T.J. Goeman
    . 2001. Consequences of human lakeshore development on emergent and floating-leaf vegetation abundance. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21(1):46–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Tisserant, M.,
    2. B. Bourgeois,
    3. E. González,
    4. A. Evette and
    5. M. Poulin
    . 2021. Controlling erosion while fostering plant biodiversity: A comparison of riverbank stabilization techniques. Ecological Engineering 172:106387.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. USDA
    . 2023. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed September 20, 2023.
  29. ↵
    1. Weiher, E.,
    2. P. Peot and
    3. K. Voss
    . 2003. Experimental restoration of lake shoreland in western Wisconsin. Ecological Restoration 21:186–190.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Winslow, L.A.,
    2. J.S. Read,
    3. P.C. Hanson and
    4. E.H. Stanley
    . 2014. Lake shoreline in the contiguous United States: Quantity, distribution and sensitivity to observation resolution. Freshwater Biology 59:213–223.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Vanderbosch, D and
    2. S.M. Galatowitsch
    . 2010. An assessment of urban lakeshore restorations in Minnesota. Ecological Restoration 28:71–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Vanderbosch, D. and
    2. S.M. Galatowitsch
    . 2011. Factors affecting the establishment of Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani in urban lakeshore restorations. Wetlands Ecology and Management 19:35–45.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Zingraff-Hamed, A.,
    2. F.N. George,
    3. G. Lupp and
    4. S. Pauleit
    . 2022. Effects of recreational use on restored urban floodplain vegetation in urban areas. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 67:127444.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 42 (2)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 42, Issue 2
June 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Urban Lake Shoreland Restoration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Urban Lake Shoreland Restoration
William Bartodziej, Susan Galatowitsch
Ecological Restoration Jun 2024, 42 (2) 87-99; DOI: 10.3368/er.42.2.87

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Urban Lake Shoreland Restoration
William Bartodziej, Susan Galatowitsch
Ecological Restoration Jun 2024, 42 (2) 87-99; DOI: 10.3368/er.42.2.87
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Bridging Education and Restoration
  • Grassland Vegetation Response to a Decade of Ecological Restoration in an Urban Park in Central Texas
  • The Ecological Benefits of Positive Public Perception on Public Access Ecological Restorations
Show more Perspective

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cost estimation
  • invasive species management
  • soil erosion control
  • littoral wetlands
  • Minnesota
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire