Evaluating Control Options for Invasive Rubus caesius in Riparian Systems

References

1. ↵
   1. Amor, R.L.

   1974. Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) III. Response of R. procerus to mechanical removal of topgrowth and to foliage-applied herbicides. Weed Research 14:239–243.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Babut, C. and
   2. D. Manea

   . 2010. Chemical control strategies of Rubus caesius L. in grain maize. Agricultural Science 42(4):3–7.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bailey, L.H.

   1941. Species Batorum. The genus Rubus in North America (north of Mexico) I. Gentes Herbarum 5:1–64.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bashtanova, U.,
   2. K.P. Beckett and
   3. T.J. Flowers

   . 2009. Review: Physiological approaches to the improvement of chemical control of Japanese Knotweed (Fallopia japonica). Weed Science 57:584–592.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Bruno, D.,
   2. V. Zapata,
   3. S. Guarreschi,
   4. F. Picazo,
   5. E. Dettori,
   6. J.A. Carbonell et al.

   2019. Short-term responses of aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity to riparian restoration measures designed to control the invasive Arundo donax L. Water 11:1–23.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Chow, J.K.M.

   2018. The effect of mowing and hand removal on the regrowth rate of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). Master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia Institute of Technology.
7. ↵
   1. Cizkova, H.,
   2. T. Kucera,
   3. B. Poulin and
   4. J. Kvet

   . 2023. Ecological basis of ecosystem services and management of wetlands dominated by common reed (Phragmites australis): European perspective. Diversity 15:1–27.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Henderson, A.M.,
   2. J.A. Gervais,
   3. B. Luukinen,
   4. K. Buhl,
   5. D. Stone,
   6. A. Cross and
   7. J. Jenkins

   . 2010. Glyphosate General Fact Sheet. National Pesticide Information Center, Oregon State University Extension Services.
9. ↵
   1. iMapInvasives

   , 2023. iMapInvasives: NatureServe’s online data system supporting strategic invasive species management. © [2023], NatureServe. (accessed August 2, 2023) http://www.imapinvasives.org.
10. ↵
    1. Fernald, M.L. and
    2. R.C. Collins

    . 1950. Gray’s Manual of Botany: A Handbook of the Flowering Plants and Ferns of the Central and Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York: D. Van Nostrand Co.
11. ↵
    1. Foss, A.I.

    2005. Comparative ecology of the invasive Rubus phoenicolasius and the native Rubus argutus. PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland.
12. ↵
    1. Myers, J. and
    2. D. Bazely

    . 2003. Ecology and Control of Introduced Plants. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. ↵
    1. Renteria, J.L.,
    2. M.R. Gardener,
    3. F.D. Panetta and
    4. M.J. Crawley

    . 2012. Management of the invasive hill raspberry (Rubus niveus) on Santiago Island, Galapagos: Eradication or indefinite control. Invasive Plant Science and Management 5:37–46.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Reznicek, A.A.,
    2. E.G. Voss and
    3. B.S. Walters

    . 2011. Michigan Flora Online. University of Michigan. Web. (accessed October 26, 2020) http://michiganflora.net/species.aspx?id=2554.
15. ↵
    1. Richardson, D.M.,
    2. N. Allsopp,
    3. C.M. D’Antonio,
    4. S.J. Milton, and
    5. M. Rejmanek

    . 2000. Plant invasions—The role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews 75(1):65–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. ↵
    1. Strid, A.,
    2. W. Hanson,
    3. A. Cross and
    4. J. Jenkins

    . 2018. Triclopyr General Fact Sheet. National Pesticide Information Center, Oregon State University Extension Services.
17. ↵
    1. Svanberg, I. and
    2. S. Stahlberg

    . 2021. Wild European dewberry, Rubus caesius L. (fam. Rosaceae), in Sweden: From traditional regional consumption to exotic dessert at the Nobel Prize banquet. Journal of Ethnic Foods 8:37.

    OpenUrl