Visitor Use and Activities Detected Using Trail Cameras at Forest Restoration Sites

References

1. ↵
   1. Albers, J.L.,
   2. M.L. Wildhaber and
   3. N.S. Green

   . 2023. Human Use and Activities at Two Urban Riparian Forest Restoration Sites in Indiana, USA, May–Sept, 2016: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9ELD4H4.
2. ↵
   1. Allen, J.A.,
   2. B.D. Keeland,
   3. J.A. Stanturf,
   4. A.F. Clewell and
   5. H.E. Kennedy. Jr.

   2001. A Guide to Bottomland Hardwood Restoration: U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR-2000-0011, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-40, 132 p. pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/itr000011.
3. ↵
   1. Carvalho, W.D.,
   2. L.M. Rosalino,
   3. C.H. Adania and
   4. C.E.L. Esberard

   . 2016. Mammal inventories in seasonal neotropical forests: Traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies. Iheringia, Serie Zoologica 106:1–9.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. City of Bluffton

   . 2022. Bluffton Native Habitat Waterway (accessed 25 Aug 2022). blufftonindiana.net/native-habitat-waterway/.
5. ↵
   1. City of Bluffton

   . 2014. Bluffton Native Habitat Waterway Map (accessed 25 Aug 2022). blufftonindiana.net/data/uploads/2014/02/NativeHabitatMap.pdf.
6. ↵
   1. Dallimer, M.,
   2. A.G. Davies,
   3. K.N. Irvine,
   4. L. Maltby,
   5. P.H. Warren,
   6. K.J. Gaston et al.

   2014. What personal and environmental factors determine frequency of urban greenspace use? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11:7977–7992.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Department of the Interior

   (DOI, accessed 20 June 2022.). 2021. Restoration Program, Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration. www.doi.gov/restoration/about.
8. ↵
   1. Emmert, J.J.

   1999. Award-winning undergraduate paper: Income and substitution effects in the travel cost model: An application to Indiana state parks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81:1330–1337.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Fairfax, R.J.,
   2. R.M. Dowling and
   3. V.J. Neldner

   . 2014. The use of infrared sensors and digital cameras for documenting visitor use patterns: A case study from D’Aguilar National Park, southeast Queensland, Australia. Current Issues in Tourism 17:72–83.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Green, N.S.,
    2. M.L. Wildhaber,
    3. J.L. Albers,
    4. T.W. Pettit and
    5. M.J. Hooper

    . 2020. Efficient mammal biodiversity surveys for ecological restoration monitoring. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 00:1–13. DOI:10.1002/ieam.4324.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    1. Gotelli, N.J. and
    2. R.K. Colwell

    . 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4:379–391.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Hamstead, Z.A.,
    2. D. Fisher,
    3. R.T. Ilieva,
    4. S.A. Wood,
    5. T. McPhearson and
    6. P. Kremer

    . 2018. Geolocated social media as a rapid indicator of park visitation and equitable park access. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 72:38–50.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Harmsen, B.J.,
    2. R.J. Foster, and
    3. H. Quigley

    . 2020. Spatially explicit capture recapture density estimates: Robustness, accuracy and precision in a long-term study of jaguars (Panthera onca). PLoS One 15(6):1–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    1. Hegetschweiler, K.T.,
    2. F.M. Wartmann,
    3. I. Dubernet,
    4. C. Fischer and
    5. M. Hunziker

    . 2022. Urban forest usage and perception of ecosystem services—a comparison between teenagers and adults. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 74:127–624.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Hooper, M.J.,
    2. S.J. Glomb,
    3. D.D. Harper,
    4. T.B. Hoelzle,
    5. L.M. McIntosh and
    6. D.R. Mulligan

    . 2016. Integrating holistic risk and recovery monitoring into ecosystem restoration planning at contaminated sites. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 12:284–295.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Huynh, L.T.M.,
    2. A. Gasparatos,
    3. J. Su,
    4. R.D. Lam,
    5. E.I. Grant and
    6. K. Fukushi

    . 2022. Linking the nonmaterial dimensions of human-nature relations and human well-being through cultural ecosystem services. Science Advances 8:eabn8042.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)

    . 2020. Bonn Challenge: Impact and Potential of Forest Landscape Restoration. 40p. www.bonnchallenge.org/resources/bonn-challenge-2020-report.
18. ↵
    1. Kunz, B.K.,
    2. J.H. Waddle and
    3. N.S. Green

    . 2019. Amphibian monitoring in hardwood forests: Optimizing methods for contaminant-based compensatory restorations. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 00:1–15. DOI:10.1002/ieam.4202.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Leggett, C.,
    2. N. Scherer and
    3. M. Donlan

    . 2013. Assessment of Visitor Use of Restored Areas of Lincoln Park. Prepared for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration by Industrial Economics, Incorporated. July 1.
20. ↵
    1. Leggett, C.G.

    2015. Estimating Visitation in National Parks and Other Public Lands, Report prepared for the National Park Service under contract to Bioeconomics, Inc., under award number P13PD02250.
21. ↵
    1. Leggett, C.G.

    2017. Sampling strategies for on-site recreation counts. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 5:326–349.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Lindsey, G.

    1999. Use of urban greenways: Insights from Indianapolis. Landscape and Urban Planning 45:145–157.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Lindsey, G.,
    2. Y. Han,
    3. J. Wilson and
    4. J. Yang

    . 2006. Neighborhood correlates of urban trail use. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 3:S139–S157.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Lindsey, G.,
    2. J. Wilson,
    3. E. Rubchinskaya,
    4. J. Yang, and
    5. Y. Han

    . 2007. Estimating urban trail traffic: Methods for existing and proposed trails. Landscape and Urban Planning 81:299–315.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Lupp, G.,
    2. V. Kantelberg,
    3. B. Forster,
    4. C. Honert,
    5. J. Naumann,
    6. T. Markmann et al.

    2021. Visitor counting and monitoring in forests using camera traps: A case study from Bavaria (Southern Germany). Land 10:736–757.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. MacKenzie, D.I.,
    2. J.D. Nichols,
    3. J.A. Royle,
    4. K.H. Pollock,
    5. L. Bailey and
    6. J.E. Hines

    . 2017. Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence. 2nd edition. Elsevier, London.
27. ↵
    1. Mahaffey, A. and
    2. A. Evans

    . 2016. Ecological Forestry Practices for Bottomland Hardwood Forests of the Southeastern U.S. Forest Stewards Guild. 44p. foreststewardsguild.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/FSG_Bottomland_Hardwoodsweb.pdf.
28. ↵
    1. Martin, D.M. and
    2. J.E. Lyons

    . 2018. Monitoring the social benefits of ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 26:1045–1050.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. National Research Council (NRC)

    . 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/1807.
30. 1. Natural Concepts, LLP

    . 2000. Natural Resource Damage Assessment Settlement, Restoration Plan, For Wayne Reduction Site, Allen County, Indiana. Dated March 29, 2000. www.cerc.usgs.gov/orda_docs/DocHandler.ashx?task=get&ID=806.
31. ↵
    1. O’Connor, K.M.,
    2. L.R. Nathan,
    3. M.R. Liberati,
    4. M.W. Tingley,
    5. J.C. Vokoun and
    6. T.A. Rittenhouse

    . 2017. Camera trap arrays improve detection probability of wildlife: Investigating study design considerations using an empirical dataset. PLoS One 12:e0175684.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. R Development Core Team

    . 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R version 2.15.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org.
33. ↵
    1. Rice, W.L.,
    2. P. Newman,
    3. B.D. Taff,
    4. K.Y. Zipp and
    5. Z.D. Miller

    . 2020. Beyond benefits: Towards a recreational ecosystem services interpretive framework. Landscape Research 45:892–904.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Staab, J.,
    2. E. Udas,
    3. M. Mayer,
    4. H. Taubenböck and
    5. H. Job

    . 2021. Comparing established visitor monitoring approaches with triggered trail camera images and machine learning based computer vision. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 35:100–387.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. United States Census Bureau

    (accessed 22 June 2022). 2022. Quick-Facts: Population Census, July 1, 2021. www.census.gov.
36. ↵
    1. United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana

    (accessed 22 June 2022). 2000. Consent Decree, United States of America and State of Indiana, Plaintiffs, v. SC Holdings, Inc. et al. Defendants. www.cerc.usgs.gov/orda_docs/DocHandler.ashx?task=get&ID=670.
37. 1. U.S. Office of Personnel Management

    (accessed 12 July 2022). 2016. 2016 General Schedule (GS) Locality Pay Tables. www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2016/general-schedule/.
38. 1. U.S. Office of Personnel Management

    (accessed 12 July 2022). 2022. 2022 General Schedule (GS) Locality Pay Tables. Accessed 12 July 2022. www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2022/general-schedule/.
39. ↵
    1. Wheeler, B. and
    2. M. Torchiano

    . 2016. lmPerm: Permutation Tests for Linear Models. R package version 2.1.0. CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmPerm.
40. ↵
    1. Wood, S.A.,
    2. S.G. Winder,
    3. E.H. Lia,
    4. E.M. White,
    5. C.S.L. Crowley and
    6. A.A. Milnor

    . 2020. Next-generation visitation models using social media to estimate recreation on public lands. Scientific Reports 10:15419.

    OpenUrl