Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Article

We Built It; Did They Come? Pollinator Diversity and Community Structure in a Post-Mining Prairie Restoration Project

Zachary J. Beneduci, Drew A. Scott, Shana M. Byrd and Rebecca M. Swab
Ecological Restoration, December 2023, 41 (4) 180-188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.41.4.180
Zachary J. Beneduci
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Drew A. Scott
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Mandan, ND
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shana M. Byrd
Director of Scienc and Conservation. The Dawes Arboretum, Newark, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca M. Swab
Director of Conservation and Community Forestry, The Holden Arboretum, 9550 Sperry Road, Kirkland, OH 44094,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rswab{at}holdenfg.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ashworth, L.,
    2. R. Aguilar,
    3. L. Galetto and
    4. M.A. Aizen
    . 2004. Why do pollination generalist and specialist plant species show similar reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation? Journal of Ecology 92:717–719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Barton, K.
    2019. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.43.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.
  3. ↵
    1. Bates, D.,
    2. M. Maechler,
    3. B. Bolker and
    4. S. Walker
    . 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Burger, J.A.
    2011. Sustainable mined land reclamation in the eastern U.S. coalfields: A case for an ecosystem reclamation approach. Pp. 113–141 in Proceedings of the National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation, Bismarck, ND.
  5. ↵
    1. Cameron, S.A.,
    2. J.D. Lozier,
    3. J.P. Strange and
    4. T.L Griswold
    . 2011. Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:662–667.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Comer, P.J.,
    2. J.C. Hak,
    3. K. Kindscher,
    4. E. Muldavin and
    5. J. Singhurst
    . 2018. Continent-scale landscape conservation design for temperate grasslands of the Great Plains and Chihuahuan Desert. Natural Areas Journal 38:196–211.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Cusser, S. and
    2. K. Goodell
    . 2013. Diversity and distribution of floral resources influence the restoration of plant-pollinator networks on a reclaimed strip mine. Restoration Ecology 21:1–9.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Cusser, S. and
    2. K. Goodell
    . 2014. Using a centrality index to determine the contribution of restored and volunteer plants in the restoration of plant-pollinator mutualisms on a reclaimed strip mine. Ecological Restoration 32:179–188.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Daily,
    2. G.C.
    (ed.). 1997. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Covelo, CA: Island Press.
  10. ↵
    1. De Cáceres, M. and
    2. P. Legendre
    2009. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. www.sites.google.com/site/miqueldecaceres/.
  11. ↵
    1. De Cáceres, M.,
    2. P. Legendre,
    3. S.K. Wiser and
    4. L. Brotons
    . 2012. Using species combinations in indicator analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3(6): 973–982.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Drake, L.D.
    1980. Erosion control with prairie grasses in Iowa strip-mine reclamation. Pp. 4–6 in Proceedings of the 7th North American Prairie Conf., Springfield, MO.
  13. ↵
    1. Ebeling, A.,
    2. A. Klein,
    3. J. Schumacher,
    4. W.W. Weisser and
    5. T. Tscharntke
    . 2008. How does plant richness affect pollinator richness and temporal stability of flower visits? Oikos 117:1808–1815.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Forup, M.L. and
    2. J. Memmott
    . 2005. The restoration of plant-pollinator interactions in hay meadows. Restoration Ecology 13:265–274.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Fox, J. and
    2. S. Weisberg
    . 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression, Third edition. Thousand Oaks CA. Sage. https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/.
  16. ↵
    1. Fründ, J.,
    2. K.E. Linsenmair and
    3. N. Blüthgen
    . 2010. Pollinator diversity and specialization in relation to flower diversity. Oikos 119:1581–1590.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Geroff, R.K.,
    2. J. Gibbs and
    3. K.W. McCravy
    . 2014. Assessing bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity of an Illinois restored tallgrass prairie: Methodology and conservation considerations. Journal of Insect Conservation 18:951–964.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Harmon-Threatt, A.N. and
    2. S.D. Hendrix
    . 2015. Prairie restorations and bees: The potential ability of seed mixes to foster native bee communities. Basic and Applied Ecology 16:64–72.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Harrison, T.,
    2. J. Gibbs and
    3. R. Winfree
    . 2018. Forest bees are replaced in agricultural and urban landscapes by native species with different phenologies and life-history traits. Global Change Biology 24:287–296.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Havens, K. and
    2. P. Vitt
    . 2016. The importance of phenological diversity in seed mixes for pollinator restoration. Natural Areas Journal 36(4):531–537.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Heckman, J.R.,
    2. H.D. Holl,
    3. M. Sabre and
    4. J. Cairns
    . 1996. Pp. 453–461 in Proceedings of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation. Knoxville, TN.
  22. ↵
    1. Hilty, J.A.
    2017. Flower-visiting insects. www.illinoiswildflowers.info/flower_insects/index.htm.
  23. ↵
    1. Holl, K.D. and
    2. J. Cairns
    . 1994. Vegetational community development on reclaimed coal surface mines in Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 121:327–337.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Hopwood, J.L.
    2008. The contribution of roadside grassland restorations to native bee conservation. Biological Conservation 141:2632–2640.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Kaiser-Bunbury, C.N.,
    2. J. Mougal,
    3. A.E. Whittington,
    4. T. Valentin,
    5. R. Gabriel,
    6. J.M. Olesen and
    7. N. Blüthgen
    . 2017. Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function. Nature 542:223–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Kopec, K. and
    2. L.A. Burd
    . 2017. A systematic status review of North American and Hawaiian native bees. Center for Biological Diversity.
  27. ↵
    1. Kuznetsova, A.,
    2. P.B. Brockhoff and
    3. R.H.B. Christensen
    . 2017. LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82:1–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Lane, I.G.,
    2. C.R. Herron-Sweet,
    3. Z.M. Portman and
    4. D.P. Cariveau
    . 2020. Floral resource diversity drives bee community diversity in prairie restorations along an agricultural landscape gradient. Journal of Applied Ecology 57:2010–2018.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Lanterman, J.N.,
    2. P. Reehner,
    3. M. Varvaro,
    4. A. Lybbert,
    5. J. Smith,
    6. R.J. Mitchell and
    7. K. Goodell
    . 2021. Bumble bee species distributions and habitat associations in the Midwestern USA, a region of declining diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 30:865–887.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Lenth, R.
    2019. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.4.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmean.
  31. ↵
    1. Martinez Arbizu, P.
    2020. pairwiseAdonis: Pairwise multilevel comparison using adonis. R package version 0.4.
  32. ↵
    1. Menz, M.H.M.,
    2. R.D. Phillips,
    3. R. Winfree,
    4. C. Kremen,
    5. M.A. Aizen,
    6. S.D. Johnson and
    7. K.W. Dixon
    . 2011. Reconnecting plants and pollinators: Challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends in Plant Science 16:4–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Morandin, L.A. and
    2. C. Kremen
    . 2013. Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields. Ecological Applications 23:829–838.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Novotny, J.L. and
    2. K. Goodell
    . 2020. Rapid recovery of plant-pollinator interactions on a chronosequence of grassland-reclaimed mines. Journal of Insect Conservation 24:977–991.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
    . 2018. Annual evaluation report for the regulatory and abandoned mine land reclamation programs. (Publication No. 4242).
  36. ↵
    1. Oksanen, J,
    2. R. Kindt,
    3. P. Legendre,
    4. B. O’Hara,
    5. G.L. Simpson,
    6. P. Solymos,
    7. M.H. Stevens and
    8. H. Wagner
    . 2019. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5–6.
  37. ↵
    1. Pericak, A.A.,
    2. C.J. Thomas,
    3. D.A. Kroodsma,
    4. M.F. Wasson,
    5. M.R. Voss,
    6. N.E. Clinton,
    7. D.J. Campagna,
    8. Y. Franklin,
    9. E.S. Bernhardt and
    10. J.F. Amos
    . 2018. Mapping the yearly extent of surface coal mining in Central Appalachia using Landsat and Google Earth Engine. PLOS ONE 13:1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Potts, S.G.,
    2. B. Vulliamy,
    3. A. Dafni,
    4. G. Ne’eman and
    5. P. Willmer
    . 2003. Linking bees and flowers: How do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology 84:2628–2642.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Potts, S.G.,
    2. J.C. Beismeijer,
    3. C. Kremen,
    4. P. Neumann,
    5. O. Schweiger and
    6. W.E. Kunin
    . 2010. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts, and drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:345–353.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Robson, D.B.
    2008. The structure of the flower-insect visitor system in tall-grass prairie. Botany 86:1266–1278.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Ries, L.,
    2. D.M. Debinski and
    3. M.L. Wieland
    . 2001. Conservation value of roadside prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conservation Biology 15:401–411.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Rodgers, C.S. and
    2. R.C. Anderson
    . 1989. Establishment of grasses on sewage sludge-amended strip mine spoils. Pp. 103–107 in Prairie Pioneers: Ecology, History, and Culture: Proceedings of the Eleventh North American Prairie Conference, Lincoln, NE.
  43. ↵
    1. R Core Team
    . 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
  44. ↵
    1. Scott, D.A.,
    2. K.D. Eckhoff,
    3. N. Lorenz,
    4. R. Dick and
    5. R.M. Swab
    . 2021. Diversity is not everything. Land 10:1091.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Seastedt, T.R. and
    2. A.K. Knapp
    . 1993. Consequences of nonequilibrium resource availability across multiple time scales: The transient maxima hypothesis. The American Naturalist 141:621–633.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Skousen, J. and
    2. C.E. Zipper
    . 2014. Post-mining policies and practices in the Eastern USA coal region. International Journal of Coal Science and Technology 1:135–151.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Swab. R.M.,
    2. N. Lorenz,
    3. S. Byrd and
    4. R. Dick
    . 2017. Native vegetation in reclamation: Improving habitat and ecosystem function through using prairie species in mine land reclamation. Ecological Engineering 108:525–536.
    OpenUrl
    1. Tarrant, S.,
    2. J. Ollerton,
    3. M.L. Rahman,
    4. J. Tarrant and
    5. D. McCollin
    . 2013. Grassland restoration on landfill sites in the East Midlands, United Kingdom: An evaluation of floral resources and pollinating insects. Restoration Ecology 21:560–568.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Tonietto, R.K.,
    2. J.S. Ascher and
    3. D.J. Larkin
    . 2017. Bee communities along a prairie restoration chronosequence: Similar abundance and diversity, distinct composition. Ecological Applications 27:705–717.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Vanbergen, A.J.
    2013. Threats to an ecosystem service: Pressures on pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:251–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Williams, N.M.
    2011. Restoration of nontarget species: Bee communities and pollination function in riparian forests. Restoration Ecology 19:450–459.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    1. Winfree, R.,
    2. R. Aguilar,
    3. D.P. Vázquez,
    4. G. LeBuhn and
    5. M.A. Aizen
    . 2009. A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90:2068–2076.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Zinnen, J. and
    2. J.W. Matthews
    . 2022. Species composition and ecological characteristics of native seed mixes in the Midwest (USA). Ecological Restoration 40:247–258.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Zipper, C.E.,
    2. J.A. Burger,
    3. J.G. Skousen,
    4. P.N. Angel,
    5. C.D. Barton,
    6. V. Davis and
    7. J.A. Franklin
    . 2011. Restoring forests and associated ecosystem services on Appalachian coal surface mines. Environmental Management 47:751–765.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 41 (4)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 41, Issue 4
December 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
We Built It; Did They Come? Pollinator Diversity and Community Structure in a Post-Mining Prairie Restoration Project
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
We Built It; Did They Come? Pollinator Diversity and Community Structure in a Post-Mining Prairie Restoration Project
Zachary J. Beneduci, Drew A. Scott, Shana M. Byrd, Rebecca M. Swab
Ecological Restoration Dec 2023, 41 (4) 180-188; DOI: 10.3368/er.41.4.180

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
We Built It; Did They Come? Pollinator Diversity and Community Structure in a Post-Mining Prairie Restoration Project
Zachary J. Beneduci, Drew A. Scott, Shana M. Byrd, Rebecca M. Swab
Ecological Restoration Dec 2023, 41 (4) 180-188; DOI: 10.3368/er.41.4.180
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Mined Lands and Prairie Restoration
    • Mined Lands as an Opportunity for Pollinator Habitat Restoration
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Science and Management to Improve Seed-Based Restoration
  • Evaluating Restoration Techniques for Degraded Steppe Rangelands
  • Restoring Frequent Fire Results in Habitat Improvement for Bison but Minimal Early Reduction of Woody Encroachment
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • insect conservation
  • mined land
  • prairie conservation
  • reclamation
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire