Can Forest Restoration Affect the Genetic Diversity of Plants?

References

1. ↵
   1. Aavik, T. and
   2. A. Helm

   . 2018. Restoration of plant species and genetic diversity depends on landscape-scale dispersal. Restoration Ecology 26:S92–S102.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Brancalion, P.H.S.,
   2. D. Schweizer,
   3. U. Gaudare,
   4. J.R. Mangueira,
   5. F. Lamonato,
   6. F.T. Farah et al.

   2016. Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: the case of Brazil. Biotropica 48:856–867.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Broadhurst, L.M.

   2013. A genetic analysis of scattered Yellow Box trees (Eucalyptus melliodora A. Cunn. Ex Schauer, Myrtaceae) and their restored cohorts. Biological Conservation 161:48–57.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Broeck, A.V.,
   2. K. Cox,
   3. A. Van Braeckel,
   4. S. Neyrinck,
   5. N. De Regge and
   6. K. Van Looy

   . 2021. Reintroduced native Populus nigra in restored floodplain reduces spread of exotic poplar species. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:580653.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Céspedes, M.,
   2. M.V. Gutierrez,
   3. N.M. Holbrook and
   4. O.J. Rocha

   . 2003. Restoration of genetic diversity in the dry forest tree Swietenia macrophylla (Meliaceae) after pasture abandonment in Costa Rica. Molecular Ecology 12(12):3201–3212.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Chazdon, R.L.,
   2. P.H.S. Brancalion,
   3. D. Lamb,
   4. L. Laestadius,
   5. M. Calmon and
   6. C. Kumar

   . 2017. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conservation Letters 10:125–132.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Cordeiro, E.M.G.,
   2. C.M. Macrini,
   3. P.S. Sujii,
   4. K.D. Schwarcz,
   5. J.B. Pinheiro,
   6. R.R. Rodrigues et al.

   2019. Diversity, genetic structure, and population genomics of the tropical tree Centrolobium tomentosum in remnant and restored Atlantic forests. Conservation Genetics 20:1073–1085.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Crouzeilles, R. and
   2. M. Curran

   . 2016. Which landscape size best predicts the influence of forest cover on restoration success? A global meta-analysis on the scale of effect. Journal of Applied Ecology 53:440–448.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. DeWald, L.E. and
   2. K.M. Kolanoski

   . 2017. Conserving genetic diversity in ecological restoration: A case study with ponderosa pine in northern Arizona, USA. New Forests 48:337–361.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Dolan, R.W.,
    2. D.L. Marr and
    3. A. Schnabel

    . 2008. Capturing genetic variation during ecological restorations: An example from Kankakee sands in Indiana. Restoration Ecology 16:386–396.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Fant, J.B.,
    2. A. Kramer,
    3. E. Sirkin and
    4. K. Havens

    . 2013. Genetics of reintroduced populations of the narrowly endemic thistle, Cirsium pitcheri (Asteraceae). Botany 91(5):301–308.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Fotinos, T.D.,
    2. S. Namoff,
    3. C. Lewis,
    4. J. Maschinski,
    5. M.P. Griffit and
    6. E.J.B. von Wettberg

    . 2015. Genetic evaluation of a reintroduction of Sargent’s Cherry Palm, Pseudophoenix sargentii. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 142(1):51–62.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Gastauer, M.,
    2. A.S. Miazaki,
    3. R. Crouzeilles,
    4. P.A. Tavares,
    5. E.D.S.M. Lino and
    6. R.R. Rodrigues

    . 2021. Balancing natural forest regrowth and tree planting to ensure social fairness and compliance with environmental policies. Journal of Applied Ecology 58(11): 2371–2383.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Granado, R.,
    2. L.C. Pinto Neta,
    3. A.F. Nunes-Freitas,
    4. C.M. Voloch and
    5. C.F. Lira

    . 2018. Assessing genetic diversity after mangrove restoration in Brazil: Why is it so important? Diversity 10(2):27.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Helsen, K.,
    2. H. Jacquemyn,
    3. M. Hermy,
    4. K. Vandepitte and
    5. O. Honnay

    . 2013. Rapid buildup of genetic diversity in founder populations of the gynodioecious plant species Origanum vulgare after semi-natural grassland restoration. PLoS One 8:e67255.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Mutegi, E.,
    2. A.L. Stottlemyer,
    3. A.A. Snow and
    4. P.M. Sweeney

    . 2014. Genetic structure of remnant populations and cultivars of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) in the context of prairie conservation and restoration. Restoration Ecology 22:223–231.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Myers, N.,
    2. R.A. Mittermeier,
    3. C.G. Mittermeier,
    4. G.A.B. da Fonseca and
    5. J. Kent

    . 2010. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 468:895.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Neto, O.C.,
    2. A.V. Aguiar,
    3. A.D. Twyford,
    4. L.E. Neaves,
    5. R. Toby Pennington and
    6. A.V. Lopes

    . 2014. Genetic and ecological outcomes of Inga vera subsp. affinis (Leguminosae) tree plantations in a fragmented tropical landscape. PLoS One 9:e99903.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Pakkad, G.,
    2. S. Al Mazrooei,
    3. D. Blakesley,
    4. C. James,
    5. S. Elliott,
    6. T. Luoma-Aho et al.

    2008. Genetic variation and gene flow among Prunus cerasoides D. Don populations in northern Thailand: Analysis of a rehabilitated site and adjacent intact forest. New Forests 35:33–43.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Proft, K.M.,
    2. M.E. Jones,
    3. C.N. Johnson and
    4. C.P. Burridge

    . 2018. Making the connection: Expanding the role of restoration genetics in restoring and evaluating connectivity. Restoration Ecology 26:411–418.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Ritchie, A.L.,
    2. P.G. Nevill,
    3. E.A. Sinclair, and
    4. S.L. Krauss

    . 2017. Does restored plant diversity play a role in the reproductive functionality of Banksia populations? Restoration Ecology 25:414–423.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Rosa, I.M.D.,
    2. M.J. Smith,
    3. O.R. Wearn,
    4. D. Purves and
    5. R.M. Ewers

    . 2016. The environmental legacy of modern tropical deforestation. Current Biology 26:2161–2166.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Santini, F.,
    2. T. Andrisano,
    3. S. Leonardi,
    4. G. Ciaschetti,
    5. M. Labriola,
    6. G.G. Vendramin et al.

    2018. Tracking the origin of silver fir plantations along the boundary between different genetic clusters in central Apennines: Implications for their management. Forest Ecology and Management 408:220–227.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Santos, A.S.,
    2. E. Cazetta,
    3. P. Dodonov,
    4. D. Faria and
    5. F. A. Gaiotto

    . 2016. Landscape-scale deforestation decreases gene flow distance of a keystone tropical palm, Euterpe edulis Mart (Arecaceae). Ecology and Evolution 6:6586–6598.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Schwarcz, K.D.,
    2. E. de A. Silvestre,
    3. J.B. de Campos,
    4. P.S. Sujii,
    5. C. Grando,
    6. C.M.T. Macrini et al.

    2018. Shelter from the storm: Restored populations of the neotropical tree Myroxylon peruiferum are as genetically diverse as those from conserved remnants. Forest Ecology and Management 410:95–103.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Slaymaker, D.H.,
    2. M.S. Peek,
    3. J. Wresilo,
    4. D.C. Zeltner and
    5. Y.F. Saleh

    . 2015. Genetic structure of native and restored populations of American beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata Fern.) along the New Jersey coast. Journal of Coastal Research 31(6):1334–1343.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Souza, E.M.S.,
    2. G.S. Pereira,
    3. R. Silva-Mann,
    4. S.V. Álvares-Carvalho and
    5. R.A. Ferreira

    . 2016. A comparative framework of the Erythrina velutina tree species in reforested land and native populations. Genetics and Molecular Research. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15028534.
28. ↵
    1. St. Clair, A.B.,
    2. P.W. Dunwiddie,
    3. J.B. Fant,
    4. T.N. Kaye and
    5. A.T. Kramer

    . 2020. Mixing source populations increases genetic diversity of restored rare plant populations. Restoration Ecology 28:583–593.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Sujii, P.S.,
    2. M.E. Nagai,
    3. M.I. Zucchi,
    4. P.H.S. Brancalion and
    5. P.M.A. James

    . 2019. A genetic approach for simulating persistence of reintroduced tree species populations in restored forests. Ecological Modelling 403:35–43.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Sujii, P.S.,
    2. K.D. Schwarcz,
    3. C. Grando,
    4. E. de Aguiar Silvestre,
    5. G.M. Mori,
    6. P.H.S. Brancalion

    , et al. 2017. Recovery of genetic diversity levels of a Neotropical tree in Atlantic Forest restoration plantations. Biological Conservation 211:110–116.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Sujii, P.S.,
    2. E.V. Tambarussi,
    3. C. Grando,
    4. E. de Aguiar Silvestre,
    5. J.P.G. Viana,
    6. P.H.S. Brancalion et al.

    2021. High gene flow through pollen partially compensates spatial limited gene flow by seeds for a Neotropical tree in forest conservation and restoration areas. Conservation Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-021-01344-3.
32. ↵
    1. Taubert, F.,
    2. R. Fischer,
    3. J. Groeneveld,
    4. S. Lehmann,
    5. M. S. Müller,
    6. E. Rödig et al.

    2018. Global patterns of tropical forest fragmentation. Nature 554:519–522.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
33. ↵
    1. Thongkumkoon, P.,
    2. S. Chomdej,
    3. J. Kampuansai,
    4. W. Pradit,
    5. P. Waikham,
    6. S. Elliott et al.

    2019. Genetic assessment of three Fagaceae species in forest restoration trials. PeerJ Life and Environment 7:1–17.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Turner, T.F.,
    2. J.P. Wares and
    3. J.R. Gold

    . 2002. Genetic effective size is three orders of magnitude smaller than adult census size in an abundant, estuarine-dependent marine fish (Sciaenops ocellatus). Genetics 162:1329–1339.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    1. Vergara, W.,
    2. L.G. Lomeli,
    3. A.R. Rios,
    4. P. Isbell,
    5. S. Prager and
    6. R. De Camino

    . 2016. The Economic Case for Landscape Restoration in Latin America. Report by the World Resources Institute.
36. ↵
    1. Viana, J.P.G.,
    2. M.V.B.M. Siqueira,
    3. F.L. Araujo,
    4. C. Grando,
    5. P.S. Sujii,
    6. E. De Aguiar Silvestre et al.

    2018. Genomic diversity is similar between Atlantic Forest restorations and natural remnants for the native tree Casearia sylvestris Sw. PLoS One 13(3):e0192165.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Zamboni, A.,
    2. A. Thommazo,
    3. E.C.M. Hernandes and
    4. S. Fabbri

    . 2010. StArt uma ferramenta computacional de apoio à revisão sistemática. Pages 91–96 Congresso Brasileiro de Software (CBSoft’10), Salvador, Brazil.
38. ↵
    1. Zemanova, M.A.,
    2. H.L. Perotto-Baldivieso,
    3. E.L. Dickins,
    4. A.B. Gill,
    5. J.P. Leonard and
    6. D.B. Wester

    . 2017. Impact of deforestation on habitat connectivity thresholds for large carnivores in tropical forests. Ecological Processes 6:1–11.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Zeng, X. and
    2. G.A. Fischer

    . 2021. Using multiple seedlots in restoration planting enhances genetic diversity compared to natural regeneration in fragmented tropical forests. Forest Ecology and Management 482:118819.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Zhang, Z.Y.,
    2. H. Wang,
    3. W. Chen,
    4. X.M. Pang and
    5. Y.Y. Li

    . 2016. Genetic diversity and structure of native and non-native populations of the endangered plant Pinus dabeshanensis. Genetics and Molecular Research 15:1–11.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Zucchi, M.I.,
    2. P.S. Sujii,
    3. G.M. Mori,
    4. J.P.G. Viana,
    5. C. Grando,
    6. E. de A. Silvestre et al.

    2018. Genetic diversity of reintroduced tree populations in restoration plantations of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Restoration Ecology 26:694–701.

    OpenUrl