Documenting Restoration Efforts for Landscape Planning, Monitoring, Research, and Education in the Wet Tropics of Australia

References

1. ↵
   1. Atyeo, C. and
   2. R. Thackway

   . 2009. A Field Manual for Describing and Mapping Revegetation Activities in Australia. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, Australia.
2. ↵
   1. Baur, B.

   2014. Dispersal-limited species—a challenge for ecological restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology 15:559–564.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   Big Scrub Rainforest Landcare Group. 2005. Software for monitoring and evaluating the restoration of vegetation (MERV) in Subtropical Rainforest Restoration: A Practical Manual and Data Source for Landcare Groups, Land Managers and Rainforest Regenerators, 2nd ed. (accessed April 2023). www.clarencelandcare.com.au/wp-content/Brochures/MonitoringandEvaluation.pdf.
4. ↵
   1. Bradshaw, C.J.

   2012. Little left to lose: Deforestation and forest degradation in Australia since European colonization. Journal of Plant Ecology 5:109–120.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Brancalion, P.H.,
   2. A. Niamir,
   3. E. Broadbent,
   4. R. Crouzeilles,
   5. F.S. Barros,
   6. A.M. Almeyda Zambrano

   et al. 2019. Global restoration opportunities in tropical rainforest landscapes. Science Advances 5:eaav3223.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Catterall, C.P. and
   2. D.A. Harrison

   . 2006. Rainforest Restoration Activities in Australia’s Tropics and Subtropics. Rainforest CRC, Cairns, www.jcu.edu.au/rainforest/reports.htm.
7. ↵
   1. Cheesman, A.W.,
   2. N.D. Preece,
   3. P. van Oosterzee,
   4. P.D. Erskine and
   5. L.A. Cernusak

   . 2018. The role of topography and plant functional traits in determining tropical reforestation success. Journal of Applied Ecology 55:1029–1039.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Coleman, M.A.,
   2. G. Wood,
   3. K. Filbee-Dexter,
   4. A.J. Minne,
   5. H.D. Goold,
   6. A. Vergés

   et al. 2020. Restore or redefine: Future trajectories for restoration. Frontiers in Marine Science 7:237.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Collins, K.,
   2. W. Hunsaker and
   3. P. Kohlruss-Reuman

   . 2018. A tale of two databases. Directed Research project, Centre for Rainforest Studies at the School for Field Studies, Unpublished Directed Research Report; Beverly, Massachusetts.
10. ↵
    1. Comín F.A.,
    2. B. Miranda,
    3. R. Sorando,
    4. M.R. Felipe-Lucia,
    5. J.J. Jiménez,
    6. E. Navarro

    et al. 2018. Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 55:1155–1163.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Cooke S.J.,
    2. A.M. Rous,
    3. L.A. Donaldson,
    4. J.J. Taylor,
    5. T. Rytwinski,
    6. K.A. Prior

    et al. 2018. Evidence-based restoration in the Anthropocene—from acting with purpose to acting for impact. Restoration Ecology 26:201–205.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Crowley, K.

    2021. Fighting the future: The politics of climate policy failure in Australia (2015–2020). Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 12(5):e725.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Derhé M.A.,
    2. H.T. Murphy,
    3. N.D. Preece,
    4. M.J. Lawes and
    5. R. Menéndez

    . 2018. Recovery of mammal diversity in tropical forests: A functional approach to measuring restoration. Restoration Ecology 26:778–786.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Dick, K.

    2020. Monitoring Rainforest Revegetation Sites Through the Use of Ants—A Toolkit., Centre for Rainforest Studies at the School for Field Studies, Unpublished Directed Research Report. Beverly, Massachusetts.
15. ↵
    1. Durbecq, A.,
    2. R. Jaunatre,
    3. E. Buisson,
    4. A. Cluchier and
    5. A. Bischoff

    . 2020. Identifying reference communities in ecological restoration: The use of environmental conditions driving vegetation composition. Restoration Ecology 28(6):1445–1453.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Erskine, P.D.

    2002. Land clearing and forest rehabilitation in the Wet Tropics of north Queensland, Australia. Ecological Management and Restoration 3:136–138.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Freeman, A.

    2004. Constraints to community groups monitoring plants and animals in rainforest revegetation sites on the Atherton Tablelands of far north Queensland. Ecological Management and Restoration 5:199–204.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Gann, G.D.,
    2. T. McDonald,
    3. B. Walder,
    4. J. Aronson,
    5. C.R. Nelson,
    6. J. Jonson

    et al. 2019. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology. 27(S1):S1–S46.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Goosem, S. and
    2. N.I.J. Tucker

    . 2013. Repairing the Rainforest (second edition). Cairns, Australia: Wet Tropics Management Authority and Biotropica Australia Pty. Ltd.
20. ↵
    GRP. 2022. The Global Restore Project. www.globalrestoreproject.com/.
21. ↵
    1. Hansen, M.J. and
    2. D.J. Gibson

    . 2014. Use of multiple criteria in an ecological assessment of a prairie restoration chronosequence Applied Vegetation Science 17:63–73.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Hauser, W. and
    2. S. Heise-Pavlov

    . 2017. Can incidental sighting data be used to elucidate habitat preferences and areas of suitable habitat for cryptic species? Integrative Zoology 12(3):186–197.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Heise-Pavlov, S. and
    2. A. Gillanders

    . 2016. Exploring the use of a fragmented landscape by a large arboreal marsupial using incidental sighting records from community members. Pacific Conservation Biology 22:386–398.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Heise-Pavlov, S.,
    2. C. Semper and
    3. S. Burchill

    . 2021. Terrestrial activity patterns of the Lumholtz’s Tree-Kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzi) in a restored riparian habitat—Implications for its conservation. Ecological Management and Restoration 22(2):183–191.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Heise-Pavlov, S.,
    2. J. Rhinier and
    3. S. Burchill

    2018. The use of a replanted riparian habitat by the Lumholtz’s tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzi). Ecological Management and Restoration 19:76–80.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Jakovac, C.C.,
    2. A.B. Junqueira,
    3. R. Crouzeilles,
    4. M. Peña-Claros,
    5. R.C. Mesquita and
    6. F. Bongers

    . 2021. The role of land-use history in driving successional pathways and its implications for the restoration of tropical forests. Biological Reviews 96:1114–1134.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Kanowski, J. and
    2. C.P. Catterall

    . 2006. Monitoring Revegetation Projects for Biodiversity in Rainforest Landscapes. Toolkit Version. Cairns, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management.
28. ↵
    1. Keppel, G.,
    2. K. Mokany,
    3. G.W. Wardell-Johnson,
    4. B.L. Phillips,
    5. J.A. Welbergen and
    6. A.E Reside

    . 2015. The capacity of refugia for conservation planning under climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13(2):106–112.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Kimball, S.,
    2. M. Lulow,
    3. Q. Sorenson,
    4. K. Balazs,
    5. Y.C. Fang,
    6. S.J. Davis

    et al. 2015. Cost-effective ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 23:800–810.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Ladouceur, E. and
    2. N. Shackelford

    . 2021. The power of data synthesis to shape the future of the restoration community and capacity. Restoration Ecology 29:e13251.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Ladouceur, E.,
    2. N. Shackelford,
    3. K. Bouazza,
    4. L. Brudvig

    et al. 2022. Knowledge sharing for shared success in the decade on ecosystem restoration. Ecological Solutions and Evidence 3:e12117.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Lawes, M.J.,
    2. A.M. Moore,
    3. A.N. Andersen,
    4. N.D. Preece and
    5. D.C. Franklin

    . 2017. Ants as ecological indicators of rainforest restoration: Community convergence and the development of an Ant Forest Indicator Index in the Australian wet tropics. Ecology and Evolution 7:8442–8455.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Lilian, M.,
    2. C. Bastien,
    3. J.J. José,
    4. J.M.R. Benayas,
    5. B. Marie-Lise,
    6. M.R. Carolina

    et al. 2021. Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration. Ecological Indicators 123:107362.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Mahlum, S.,
    2. D. Cote,
    3. Y.F. Wiersma,
    4. C. Pennell and
    5. B. Adams

    . 2018. Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success. Restoration Ecology 26:952–963.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Méndez-Toribio, M.,
    2. C. Martínez-Garza and
    3. E. Ceccon

    . 2021. Challenges during the execution, results, and monitoring phases of ecological restoration: Learning from a country-wide assessment. PLoS ONE 16(4):e0249573.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Miller, B.P.,
    2. E.A. Sinclair,
    3. M.H. Menz,
    4. C.P. Elliott,
    5. E. Bunn,
    6. L.E. Commander

    et al. 2017. A framework for the practical science necessary to restore sustainable, resilient, and biodiverse ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 25(4):605–617.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Moran, C.,
    2. M. McCaffrey,
    3. A. McCaffrey,
    4. K. Freebody,
    5. P. Snodgrass,
    6. S. Conway

    et al. 2017. Rainforest Replanting Practice in the Upland Wet Tropics of Australia. Report provided by a grant from Terrain NRM to Trees for the Evelyn and Atherton Tablelands. www.trc.qld.gov.au/download/rainforest-replanting-practice-upland-wet-tropics-australia/.
38. ↵
    1. Moran, C.,
    2. D. Hudson and
    3. D. Skalton

    2019. Can biodiversity plantings earn income as carbon farms? TREAT Newsletter, Dry Season, www.treat.net.au/info/newsletter.
39. 1. Morán-Ordóñez, A.,
    2. A.L. Whitehead.,
    3. L.G. Luck,
    4. G.D. Cook,
    5. R. Maggini,
    6. J.A. Fitzsimons

    et al. 2017. Analysis of trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon farming and agricultural development in northern Australia reveals the benefits of strategic planning. Conservation Letters 10:94–104.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Morton, S.R.

    2000. Factors influencing shear strength and slope failures in basalt soils of northeastern New South Wales. In ISRM International Symposium. OnePetro, www.onepetro.org/ISRMIS/proceedings-abstract/IS00/All-IS00/ISRM-IS-2000-422/50525.
41. ↵
    1. Musman, M.

    2017. Revegetation and Slope Stabilization in the Atherton Tablelands of Queensland, Australia. Directed Research project, Centre for Rainforest Studies at the School for Field Studies, unpublished Directed Research report. Beverly, Massachusetts.
42. ↵
    1. Onus,
    2. G.

    2022. Scaling up Revegetation in the Wet Tropics. TREAT Newsletter, Storm Season. www.treat.net.au/_files/ugd/c3678b_c327a878a7554c0abc16efac7e022a9b.pdf.
43. ↵
    1. Pohlman, C.P.,
    2. D.Y.P. Tng and
    3. S.K. Florentine

    . 2021. Do primary rainforest tree species recruit into passively and actively restored tropical rainforest? Forest Ecology and Management 496:119453.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Pond, S.

    2017. Carbon in the air, carbon everywhere: a cost-benefit analysis of carbon sequestration on the Atherton Tablelands. Directed Research project, Centre for Rainforest Studies at the School for Field Studies, Unpublished Directed Research Report. Beverly, Massachusetts.
45. E.S.R.I., 2014. ArcGIS desktop software: Release 10.4.
46. ↵
    1. Reside, A.E.,
    2. J. Beher,
    3. A.J. Cosgrove,
    4. M.C. Evans,
    5. L. Seabrook,
    6. J.L. Silcock

    et al. 2017. Ecological consequences of land clearing and policy reform in Queensland. Pacific Conservation Biology 23:219–230.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Reside, A.E.,
    2. N. Butt and
    3. V.M. Adams

    . 2018. Adapting systematic conservation planning for climate change. Biodiversity and Conservation 27:1–29.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    RESTOR 2022. Available at https://restor.eco/.
49. ↵
    1. Rieger J.,
    2. J. Stanley and
    3. R. Traynor

    . 2014. Project Planning and Management for Ecological Restoration. Washington, DC: Island Press.
50. ↵
    1. Spathelf, P.,
    2. J. Stanturf,
    3. M. Kleine,
    4. R. Jandl,
    5. D. Chiatante and
    6. A. Bolte

    . 2018. Adaptive measures: Integrating adaptive forest management and forest landscape restoration. Annals of Forest Science 75(2):1–6.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Tucker, N.I. and
    2. T. Simmons

    . 2009. Restoring a rainforest habitat linkage in north Queensland: Donaghy’s Corridor. Ecological Management & Restoration 10(2):98–112.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Tucker, N.I.

    2022. The Three Corridor Project. TREAT Newsletter, Cool Season April to June. www.treat.net.au/copy-of-replanting-the-rainforest-1.
53. ↵
    1. Van Oosterzee, P.,
    2. H. Liu and
    3. N.D. Preece

    . 2020. Cost benefits of forest restoration in a tropical grazing landscape: Thiaki rainforest restoration project. Global Environmental Change 63:102105.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Vos, A. and
    2. K. Davies

    . 2021. Landholder perceptions of revegetation on the Atherton Tablelands, far North Queensland. Ecological Management and Restoration 22:64–71.

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    Wet Tropics Management Authority. 2021. State of Wet Tropics Report 2020–2021: Growing Opportunities—Landscape Restoration for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Recovery. Cairns, Australia.
56. ↵
    1. Wood, J.K.,
    2. W.G. Gold,
    3. J.L. Fridley,
    4. K. Ewing and
    5. D.K. Niyogi

    . 2017. An analysis of factors driving success in ecological restoration projects by a university-community partnership. Ecological Restoration 35:60–69.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text