Seasonal Shifts in Diversity and Composition of a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration Have Implications for Sampling Time

References

1. ↵
   1. Barak, R.S.,
   2. Z. Ma,
   3. L.A. Brudvig and
   4. K. Havens

   . 2021. Factors influencing seed mix design for prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 30(5): p.e13581.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Bates, D.,
   2. M. Mächler,
   3. B. Bolker and
   4. S. Walker

   . 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Benayas, J.M.R.,
   2. A.C. Newton,
   3. A. Diaz and
   4. J.M. Bullock

   . 2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: A meta-analysis. Science 325:1121–1124.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   1. Brudvig, L.A.

   2011. The restoration of biodiversity: Where has research been and where does it need to go? American Journal of Botany 98:549–558.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   1. Buisson, E.,
   2. S.T. Alvarado,
   3. S.L. Stradic and
   4. L.P.C. Morellato

   . 2017. Plant phenological research enhances ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 25:164–171.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Carter, D.L. and
   2. J.M. Blair

   . 2012. High richness and dense seeding enhance grassland restoration establishment but have little effect on drought response. Ecological Applications 22:1308–1319.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Craine, J.M.,
   2. E.M. Wolkovich,
   3. E. Gene Towne and
   4. S.W. Kembel

   . 2012. Flowering phenology as a functional trait in a tallgrass prairie. New Phytologist 193:673–682.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Dickens, S.J.M. and
   2. K.N. Suding

   . 2013. Spanning the science-practice divide: Why restoration scientists need to be more involved with practice. Ecological Restoration 31:134–140.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
9. ↵
   1. Dickson, T.L. and
   2. W.H. Busby

   . 2009. Forb species establishment increases with decreased grass seeding density and with increased forb seeding density in a northeast Kansas, U.S.A., experimental prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 17:597–605.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Goldblum, D.,
    2. B.P. Glaves,
    3. L.S. Rigg and
    4. B. Kleiman

    . 2013. The impact of seed mix weight on diversity and species composition in a tallgrass prairie restoration planting, Nachusa Grasslands, Illinois, USA. Ecological Restoration 31:154–167.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. Havens, K. and
    2. P. Vitt

    . 2016. The importance of phenological diversity in seed mixes for pollinator restoration. Natural Areas Journal 36:531–537.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Howe, H.F.

    1994. Response of early- and late-flowering plants to fire season in experimental prairies. Ecological Applications 4:121–133.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Jaksetic, N.,
    2. B.L. Foster,
    3. J.D. Bever,
    4. J. Schwarting and
    5. H.M. Alexander

    . 2018. Sowing density effects and patterns of colonization in a prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 26:245–254.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Kindscher, K. and
    2. L.L. Tieszen

    . 1998. Floristic and soil organic matter changes after five and thirty-five years of native tallgrass prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 6:181–196.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Kindt, R. and
    2. R. Coe

    . 2005. Tree Diversity Analysis. A Manual and Software for Common Statistical Methods for Ecological and Biodiversity Studies. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF).
16. ↵
    1. Kuznetsova, A.,
    2. P.B. Brockhoff and
    3. R.H.B. Christensen

    . 2017. lmer-Test package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82:1–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Li, D.,
    2. J.E.D. Miller and
    3. S. Harrison

    . 2019. Climate drives loss of phylogenetic diversity in a grassland community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116:19989–19994.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    1. Lockwood, J. and
    2. S. Pimm

    . 1999. When does restoration succeed? Pages 363–392 in P.A. Keddy and E. Weiher (eds), Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19. ↵
    1. Lubin, T.K.,
    2. P. Schultz,
    3. J.D. Bever and
    4. H.M. Alexander

    . 2019. Are two strategies better than one? Manipulation of seed density and soil community in an experimental prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 27:1021–1031.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Mandyam, K. and
    2. A. Jumpponen

    . 2008. Seasonal and temporal dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal and dark septate endophytic fungi in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem are minimally affected by nitrogen enrichment. Mycorrhiza 18:145–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Martin, L.,
    2. K. Moloney and
    3. B.J. Wilsey

    . 2005. An assessment of grassland restoration success using species diversity components. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:327–336.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). 2015 Climate Synopsis for the University of Kansas Field Station. https://biosurvey.ku.edu/sites/kbs.drupal.ku.edu/files/docs/Climate%20Synopsis.pdf.
23. ↵
    1. Polley, H.W.,
    2. J.D. Derner and
    3. B.J. Wilsey

    . 2005. Patterns of plant species diversity in remnant and restored tallgrass prairies. Restoration Ecology 13:480–487.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Reinholdt Jensen, M.,
    2. E. Egelyng Sigsgaard,
    3. S. Agersnap,
    4. J. Jessen Rasmussen,
    5. A. Baattrup-Pedersen,
    6. P. Wiberg-Larsen et al.

    2021. Seasonal turnover in community composition of stream-associated macroinvertebrates inferred from freshwater environmental DNA metabarcoding. Environmental DNA 3:861–876.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Suding, K.N.

    2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: Successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42:465–487.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Sun, S. and
    2. L.E. Frelich

    . 2011. Flowering phenology and height growth pattern are associated with maximum plant height, relative growth rate and stem tissue mass density in herbaceous grassland species. Journal of Ecology 99:991–1000.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Tilman, D.

    1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    USDA. 2015. Web soil survey. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. Accessed 6 Sep 2015.
29. ↵
    1. Weidlich, E.W.A.,
    2. C.R. Nelson,
    3. J.L. Maron,
    4. R.M. Callaway,
    5. B.M. Delory and
    6. V.M. Temperton

    . 2020. Priority effects and ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 29(1):e13317.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Whittington, H.R.,
    2. D. Tilman,
    3. P.D. Wragg and
    4. J.S. Powers

    . 2015. Phenological responses of prairie plants vary among species and year in a three-year experimental warming study. Ecosphere 6(10):1–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Wilsey, B.J.,
    2. P.P. Daneshgar and
    3. H.W. Polley

    . 2011. Biodiversity, phenology and temporal niche differences between native- and novel exotic-dominated grasslands. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 13:265–276.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Wolkovich, E.M.,
    2. T.J. Davies,
    3. H. Schaefer,
    4. E.E. Cleland,
    5. B.I. Cook,
    6. S.E. Travers et al.

    2013. Temperature-dependent shifts in phenology contribute to the success of exotic species with climate change. American Journal of Botany 100:1407–1421.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    1. Young, T.P.,
    2. J.M. Chase and
    3. R.T. Huddleston

    . 2001. Community succession and assembly: Comparing, contrasting and combining paradigms in the context of ecological restoration. Ecological Restoration 19:5–18.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text