Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Article

Seasonal Shifts in Diversity and Composition of a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration Have Implications for Sampling Time

Naomi Betson and Bryan Latimer Foster
Ecological Restoration, March 2023, 41 (1) 16-24; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.41.1.16
Naomi Betson
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Kansas Biological Survey and Center for Ecological Research, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: naomibetson{at}ku.edu
Bryan Latimer Foster
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Kansas Biological Survey and Center for Ecological Research, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Bray-Curtis principal coordinates analysis. Colors indicate season, circle fill indicates treatment. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Percent cover (mean ± 1 SE) of A) sown forbs, B) sown grasses, and C) nonsown species. Cover can exceed 100% due to overlap. Seasons that are significantly different (p < 0.05) are indicated with different letters. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    A) Average (mean ± 1 SE) species richness, B) evenness, and C) exponent of Shannon diversity. Species richness (mean ± 1 SE) of D) sown forbs, E) sown grasses, and F) nonsown species. Diversity metrics are at the 4-m2 scale. Seasons that are significantly different (p < 0.05) are indicated with different letters. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Prairie hens. Source: Goodrich, S.G. Goodrich. 1859. Animal Kingdom Illustrated. Vol 2 (New York, NY: Derby & Jackson), The Florida Center for Instructional Technology, College of Education, University of South Florida, fcit.usf.edu.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    The 15 species that contribute the most to the compositional differences between early and late-season surveys based on Bray-Curtis SIMPER analysis, their common names, functional groups (based on sowing and growth form), origin (native or nonnative), percent contributions to the compositional differences between seasons (% Cont.), abundance ranks based on average percent cover across both surveys (Cover Rank), and which season they are most abundant (Season). Symphyotrichum* refers to a mix of S. pilosum (frost aster) and S. ericoides (heath aster).

    Genus and SpeciesCommon NameFunctional GroupOrigin% Cont.Cover RankSeason
    Symphyotrichum*AsterNonsown forbNative5.20               7             Late
    Poa pratensisKentucky bluegrassNonsown grassNonnative5.15               4             Late
    Bromus inermisSmooth bromeNonsown grassNonnative5.03               5             Early
    Torilis arvensisSpreading hedgeparsleyNonsown forbNonnative4.90             11             Early
    Tripsacum dactyloidesEastern gammagrassSown grassNative4.09             10             Late
    Monarda fistulosaWild bergamotSown forbNative3.59               1             Early
    Andropogon gerardiiBig bluestemSown grassNative3.59               2             Late
    Bromus tectorumCheatgrassNonsown grassNonnative3.57             16             Early
    Helianthus grosseserratusSawtooth sunflowerSown forbNative3.38               8             Late
    Sorghastrum nutansIndian grassSown grassNative3.15               9             Late
    Penstemon digitalisSmooth beardtongueSown forbNative2.68               3             Early
    Ratibida pinnataGrey-head prairie coneflowerSown forbNative2.65               6             Late
    Vernonia baldwiniiWestern ironweedSown forbNative2.58             13             Early
    Symphyotrichum novae-angliaeNew England asterSown forbNative2.55             15             Late
    Eupatorium altissimumTall bonesetNonsown forbNative2.35             14             Late
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Percent contributions to the compositional differences between early and late samples based on SIMPER analysis with Bray-Curtis similarity, and percent of total cover (normalized to 100%) of each functional group (based on sowing and growth form).

    Functional Group% Contribution% of Total Cover
    Sown forb34%43%
    Sown grass16%18%
    Nonsown forb31%21%
    Nonsown graminoid16%14%
    Nonsown woody 4% 3%

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
    • ERv41n01_Betson_Supplementary_Materials.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 41 (1)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 41, Issue 1
March 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Seasonal Shifts in Diversity and Composition of a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration Have Implications for Sampling Time
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Seasonal Shifts in Diversity and Composition of a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration Have Implications for Sampling Time
Naomi Betson, Bryan Latimer Foster
Ecological Restoration Mar 2023, 41 (1) 16-24; DOI: 10.3368/er.41.1.16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Seasonal Shifts in Diversity and Composition of a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration Have Implications for Sampling Time
Naomi Betson, Bryan Latimer Foster
Ecological Restoration Mar 2023, 41 (1) 16-24; DOI: 10.3368/er.41.1.16
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Strategic Pathways for Environmental Restoration
  • Evaluating Restoration Techniques for Degraded Steppe Rangelands
  • Restoring Frequent Fire Results in Habitat Improvement for Bison but Minimal Early Reduction of Woody Encroachment
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • biodiversity
  • grassland
  • phenology
  • seeding density
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire