Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
EditorialEditorial
Open Access

How Should We Talk about Our Work?

Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration, December 2022, 40 (4) 227-228; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.40.4.227
Steven N. Handel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Ecological restoration is a kind of history lesson. We aim to replicate the past, sometimes by species composition and sometimes by ecological function. When we urge the public or clients to support a project, we invoke former landscape structure to support a healthier and more sustainable future. In many projects we select a moment from the past that we wish to replicate. We know the future will be different, climate change and other human-based stresses are barreling towards us, but that future is not yet well defined.

What moment from the past should we use as an historical model? We have various sources of information from 50 or 100 years ago for many habitats. However, we know that the landscapes of this continent have changed enormously by human actions since the first settlements after the Ice Age and more rapidly since European colonization. We aim for scientific clarity and authority. But the study of history, either ecological or of our civilization, is not an objective gathering of facts, as if we were using a mass spectrometer to catalog the chemicals in a laboratory beaker. History is explored and then explained for many reasons, mostly to satisfy the perspective and goals of the writer. In each of our ecological projects we make subjective decisions about the ecological model we will mimic, the moment from the past that will be the foundation for our restored habitats' future.

Recently a critique of historical writing was published that catalogs the subjectivity that accompanies the writing of human history (Menard 2022). That author's list of motivations for historical work rings true as a surrogate for the decisions we must make when we explain ecological restoration actions to our public.

To indoctrinate. Few members of the general public or of government agencies are trained in ecological science, although numbers are slowly growing as the environment degrades and concerns grow. We usually justify our restoration projects by explaining the importance of ecological services to our communities. Speaking with the press or with government officials may be more effective by sharing compelling stories of ecology grounded in fact. Long charts of numbers or species lists rarely get translated into enthusiasm. Indoctrination, in the best sense, is necessary to increase support and understanding of restoration's goals and value.

To entertain. Many people find joy in nature. The goals of restoration projects often include descriptions of the pleasure that the new habitat will offer visitors. Discussion of activities in public green spaces usually stress the beauty, relaxation, stress reduction, and interpersonal joy that moments in restored landscape can bring. The entertainment value of restoration should not be discounted as it entrains the public to appreciate our ecological actions. Including the local community, “citizen scientists,” in the installation of plants and in monitoring the results is both stewardship and socializing which can fairly be termed entertainment.

To warn. In many of our projects we add back habitat as a remedy for environmental degradation. Restoration plantings are visual warnings that so much of our landscape lacks ecological function and is on a descending ecological trajectory. A restoration plan is effectively a warning that what we have now is not good enough. It may become worse. The canard that nature heals itself must be challenged in a world where additional human-caused stresses, more than sea levels!, keep rising.

To justify. We spend time and money killing non-native invasive species. This looks awful to people who equate any greenery with nature, oblivious to “biotic pollution,” the biodiversity threat of aggressive species. Once we were cutting and spraying a large Phragmites australis stand and a neighbor ran up screaming, just screaming, that we could not do that. God put those plants here, they howled, we had no right to kill them. Flustered, embarrassed, we didn't know where to start with an ecological justification. So we cowardly fell into the easy response. “You'll have to talk to the local parks department.” We passed the explanatory buck.

In a more relaxed setting a long-winded story of vegetation change, colonization by invasive species, and the need for historic biodiversity could be explained, the historical past being the dream for an improved landscape. Our justification for big projects sometimes rests on ecological nostalgia, although we know the ecological past should not be confused with the yet-undetermined future.

To condemn. Knowledge of the former, richer ecological landscape can be used to paint the current conditions as damaged and faulty. We can point our muddy fingers at actions and inactions that have destroyed ecological function. If we can show the current landscape as a crime scene, we can win advocates for ecological restoration improvements. The now lost, once healthy, environment becomes evidence to condemn current degradation as a threat to our human communities and a reason to invest in biodiversity improvement.

Each of these justifications for ecological restoration is useful and can complement a carefully honed scientific rationale for restoration projects. Each of these arguments is subjective and emotional and only part of the rich story of environmental change. However, communication of our environment's history to build a better future must rely on effective storytelling. Statistical tests, Latin binomials, and experimental replications are part of our work, but historical storytelling may be more effective to convince and embrace our neighbors as the allies to our goals.

Figure
Storyteller. Source: The Editorial Board of the University Society Boys and Girls Bookshelf (New York, NY: The University Society, 1920), The Florida Center for Instructional Technology, College of Education, University of South Florida, fcit.usf.edu.

This open access article is distributed under the terms of the CC-BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0) and is freely available online at: http://er.uwpress.org

Recommended Reading

    1. Allison, S.R.
    2012. Ecological Restoration and Environmental Change: Renewing Damaged Ecosystems. New York: Routledge.
    1. Clewell, A.F. and
    2. J. Aronson
    . 2007. Ecological Restoration. Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
    1. Egan, D. and
    2. E.A. Howell
    (eds) 2001. The Historical Ecology Handbook. A Restorationist’s Guide to Reference Ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
    1. Menard, L.
    2022. Gibbon’s left testicle. What influences the writing of history? The New Yorker XCVIII, No. 9. April 18.
    1. Szabó, P.
    2010. Why history matters in ecology: An interdisciplinary perspective. Environmental Conservation 37:380–387.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 40 (4)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 40, Issue 4
December 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Should We Talk about Our Work?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
How Should We Talk about Our Work?
Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration Dec 2022, 40 (4) 227-228; DOI: 10.3368/er.40.4.227

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
How Should We Talk about Our Work?
Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration Dec 2022, 40 (4) 227-228; DOI: 10.3368/er.40.4.227
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Recommended Reading
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • An Iconic Journal’s Closure and Natural History in Ecological Restoration
  • Considerations for Ecological Restoration Inspired by Change in Las Vegas Desert Wetlands
  • Using Ecological Restoration to Aid Native Forests Afflicted by Invasive Pests
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire