Plant Community Recovery and Change Following Soil Transfer of a Forb-Dominated Meadow

References

1. ↵
   1. Abella, S.R.,
   2. J.L. Hodel and
   3. T.A. Schetter.

   2020. Unusually highquality soil seed banks in a Midwestern U.S. oak savanna region: variation with land use history, habitat restoration, and soil properties. Restoration Ecology 28:1100–1112.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Brown, S.C.

   1998. Remnant seed banks and vegetation as predictors of restored marsh vegetation. Canadian Journal of Botany 76:620–629.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Brown, S.C. and
   2. B.L. Bedford.

   1997. Restoration of wetland vegetation with transplanted wetland soil: An experimental study. Wetlands 17:424–437.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Bruelheide, H. and
   2. T. Flintrop.

   2000. Evaluating the transplantation of a meadow in the Harz Mountains, Germany. Biological Conservation 92:109–120.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bulot, A.,
   2. K. Potard,
   3. F. Bureau,
   4. A. Bérard and
   5. T. Dutoit.

   2017. Ecological restoration by soil transfer: impacts on restored soil profiles and topsoil functions. Restoration Ecology 25:354–366.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Bulot, A.,
   2. E. Provost and
   3. T. Dutoit.

   2014. A comparison of different soil transfer strategies for restoring a Mediterranean steppe after a pipeline leak (La Crau plain, South-Eastern Franc). Ecological Engineering 71:690–702.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Conlin, D.B. and
   2. J.J. Ebersole.

   2001. Restoration of an alpine disturbance: Differential success of species in turf transplants, Colorado, U.S.A. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 33:340–347.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
8. ↵
   1. Curtis, J.T. and
   2. R.P. McIntosh.

   1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 476–496.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Elliott, E.T. and
   2. D.C. Coleman.

   1988. Let the soil work for us. Ecological Bulletins 39:23–32.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Hölzel, N. and
    2. A. Otte.

    2003. Restoration of a species-rich flood meadow by topsoil removal and diaspore transfer with plant material. Applied Vegetation Science 6:131–140.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Kearns, S.K.

    1984. A comparison of transplanting times and methods for salvaging prairie forms and grasses. Pages 197–200 in G.K. Clambey and R.H. Pemble (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth North American Prairie Conference. Fargo, ND: Tri-College University Center for Environmental Studies.
12. ↵
    1. Kiehl, K.,
    2. A. Kirmer,
    3. T.W. Donath,
    4. L. Rasran and
    5. N. Hölzel.

    2010. Species introduction in restoration projects–Evaluation of different techniques for the establishment of semi-natural grasslands in Central and Northwestern Europe. Basic and Applied Ecology 11:285–299.

    OpenUrl
13. Little River Wetlands Project (LRWP). n.d. Seeds Lists. www.lrwp.org/eaglemarsh.
14. ↵
    1. Matthews, J.W.,
    2. A.L. Peralta,
    3. A. Soni,
    4. P. Baldwin,
    5. A.D. Kent and
    6. A.G. Endress.

    2009. Local and landscape correlates of non-native species invasion in restored wetlands. Ecography 32:1031–1039.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Matthews, J.W. and
    2. G. Spyreas.

    2010. Convergence and divergence in plant community trajectories as a framework for monitoring wetland restoration progress. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:1128–1136.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. McKnight, S.K.

    1992. Transplanted seed bank response to drawdown time in a created wetland in East Texas. Wetlands 12:79–90.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Mitsch, W.J. and
    2. J.G. Gosselink.

    2000. Wetlands. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18. ↵
    1. Oksanen, J.,
    2. F.G. Blanchet,
    3. M. Friendly,
    4. R. Kindt,
    5. P. Legendre,
    6. D. McGlinn, et al.

    2019. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5–6. CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
19. ↵
    R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
20. ↵
    Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. 2021. Seed Information Database. Version 7.1. data.kew.org/sid.
21. ↵
    1. Ruch, D.G.,
    2. J. Nelsen,
    3. R. Carlson,
    4. B. Fisher,
    5. A.H. Fleming,
    6. D. Gorney, et al.

    2016. Results from the 2014 Eagle Marsh biodiversity survey Allen County, Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 125:40–49.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    USDA NRCS. 2021. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC, USA. plants.usda.gov.
23. ↵
    1. Waldrop, M.P. and
    2. M.K. Firestone.

    2006. Response of microbial community composition and function to soil climate change. Microbial Ecology 52:716–724.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Weber, S.

    1982. Prairie sod transplant results assessed. Restoration and Management Notes 1:11.

    OpenUrl