Biochar Application and Soil Transfer in Tree Restoration: A Meta-Analysis and Field Experiment

References

1. ↵
   1. Abel, S.,
   2. A. Peters,
   3. S. Trinks,
   4. H. Schonsky,
   5. M. Facklam and
   6. G. Wessolek

   . 2013. Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202–203:183–191.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Amaranthus, M.P. and
   2. D.A. Perry

   . 1987. Effect of soil transfer on ectomycorrhiza formation and the survival and growth of conifer seedlings on old, nonreforested clear-cuts. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17:944–950.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Atkinson, C.J.,
   2. J.D. Fitzgerald and
   3. N.A. Hipps

   . 2010. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: A review. Plant and Soil 337:1–18.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Aung, A.,
   2. S.H. Han,
   3. W.B. Youn,
   4. L. Meng,
   5. M.S. Cho and
   6. B.B. Park

   . 2018. Biochar effects on the seedling quality of Quercus serrata and Prunus sargentii in a containerized production system. Forest Science and Technology 14:112–118.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Barnes, B. and
   2. W. Wagner

   . 2004. Michigan Trees, Revised and Updated: A Guide to the Trees of the Great Lakes Region. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
6. ↵
   1. Batson, S. and
   2. H. Burton

   . 2016. A systematic review of methods for handling missing variance data in meta-analysis of interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus. PlosOne 11:e0164827.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Biederman, L.A. and
   2. W.A. Harpole

   . 2013. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5:202–214.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Bieser, J.M.H. and
   2. S.C. Thomas

   . 2019. Biochar and high-carbon wood ash effects on soil and vegetation in a boreal clearcut. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 49:1124–1134.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Bingham, M.A. and
   2. S.W. Simard

   . 2011. Do mycorrhizal network benefits to survival and growth of interior Douglas-fir seedlings increase with soil moisture stress?: Networks Facilitate Water-Stressed Seedlings. Ecology and Evolution 1:306–316.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Botton, B. and
    2. M. Chalot

    . 1999. Nitrogen Assimilation: Enzymology in Ectomycorrhizas. Pages 333–372 in A. Varma and B. Hock B (eds), Mycorrhiza: Structure, Function, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
11. ↵
    1. Bruun, E.W.,
    2. C.T. Petersen,
    3. E. Hansen,
    4. J.K. Holm and
    5. H. Hauggaard-Nielsen

    . 2014. Biochar amendment to coarse sandy subsoil improves root growth and increases water retention. Soil Use and Management 30:109–118.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
12. ↵
    1. Budi, S.W. and
    2. L. Setyaningsih

    . 2013. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biochar improved early growth of Neem (Melia azedarach Linn.) seedling under Greenhouse conditions. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 19:103–110.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Chazdon, R.L.,
    2. P.H.S. Brancalion,
    3. L. Laestadius,
    4. A. Bennett-Curry,
    5. K. Buckingham,
    6. C. Kumar,
    7. J. Molle-Rocek,
    8. I.C. Guimaraes and
    9. S.J. Wilson

    . 2016. When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration. Ambio 45:538–550.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    1. Cho, M.S.,
    2. L. Meng,
    3. J.H. Song,
    4. S.H. Han,
    5. K. Bae,
    6. B.B. Park

    . 2017. The effects of biochars on the growth of Zelkova serrata seedlings in a containerized seedling production system. Forest Science and Technology 13:25–30.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Drake, J.A.,
    2. T.R. Cavagnaro,
    3. S.C. Cunningha,
    4. W.R. Jackson and
    5. A.F. Patti

    . 2016. Does Biochar Improve Establishment of Tree Seedlings in Saline Sodic Soils? Land Degradation and Development 27:52–59.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Fagbenro, J.A.,
    2. S.O. Oshunsanya and
    3. O.A. Onawumi

    . 2013. Effect of saw dust biochar and NPK 15: 15: 15 inorganic fertilizer on Moringa oleifera seedlings grown in an oxisol. Agrosearch 13:57–68.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Grossnickle, S.C

    . 2012. Why seedlings survive: Influence of plant attributes. New Forests 43:711–738.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Grove, S.,
    2. N.P. Saarman,
    3. G.S. Gilbert,
    4. B. Faircloth,
    5. K.A. Haubensak and
    6. I.M. Parker

    . 2019. Ectomycorrhizas and tree seedling establishment are strongly influenced by forest edge proximity but not soil inoculum. Ecological Applications 29:e01867.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Gurevitch, J. and
    2. L.V. Hedges

    . 1999. Statistical Issues in Ecological Meta-analyses. Ecology 80:1142–114.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Hammer, E.C.,
    2. Z. Balogh-Brunstad,
    3. I. Jakobsen,
    4. P.A. Olsson,
    5. S.L.S. Stipp and
    6. M.C. Rillig

    . 2014. A mycorrhizal fungus grows on biochar and captures phosphorus from its surfaces. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 77:252–260.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Hammitt, W.E. and
    2. B.V. Barnes

    . 1989. Composition and Structure of an Old-Growth Oak-Hickory Forest in Southern Michigan Over 20 Years. Seventh Central Hardwood Forest Conference, Carbondale, IL-USA, March 5–8. Available at: www.ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/ch/ch07/CHvolume07page247.pdf.
22. ↵
    1. Hardie, M.,
    2. B. Clothier,
    3. S. Bound,
    4. G. Oliver and
    5. D. Close

    . 2014. Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant and Soil 376:347–361.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Hawkins, B.J.,
    2. M.D. Jones and
    3. J.M. Kranabetter

    . 2015. Ectomycorrhizae and tree seedling nitrogen nutrition in forest restoration. New Forests 46:747–771.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Harley, J.L. and
    2. S.E. Smith

    . 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. London, UK: Academic Press.
25. ↵
    1. Hedges, L.V. and
    2. O. Ingram

    . 1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
26. 1. Hobbs, R.J. and
    2. J.A. Harris

    . 2001. Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth’s Ecosystems in the New Millennium. Restoration Ecology 9:239–246.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Ibáñez, I. and
    2. S. McCarthy-Neumann

    . 2016. Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on tree seedling growth: quantifying the parasitismmutualism transition along a light gradient. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 46:48–57.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Ishida, T.A.,
    2. K. Nara and
    3. T. Hogetsu

    . 2007. Host effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal communities: insight from eight host species in mixed conifer–broadleaf forests. New Phytologist 174:430–440.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Jaafar, N.M

    . 2014. Biochar as a Habitat for Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Pages 297–311 in Z.M. Solaiman, L.K., Abbott and A. Varma (eds) Mycorrhizal Fungi: Use in Sustainable Agriculture and Land Restoration. Soil Biology Vol. 41. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Jeffery, S.,
    2. F.G.A. Verheijen,
    3. M. van der Velde and
    4. A.C. Bastos

    . 2011. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 144:175–18.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Laird, D.,
    2. P. Fleming,
    3. B. Wang,
    4. R. Horton and
    5. D. Karlen

    . 2010. Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:436–442.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Lehmann, J. and
    2. S. Joseph

    . 2009. Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. Pages 1–10 in J. Lehmann and S. Joseph (eds) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
33. ↵
    1. Lehmann, J.,
    2. M. Rillig,
    3. J. Thies,
    4. C.A. Masiello,
    5. W.C. Hockaday and
    6. D. Crowley

    . 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota—A review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43:1812–1836.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Lima, S.L.,
    2. S. Tamiozzo,
    3. C. Palomin,
    4. F.A. Petter and
    5. B.H. Marimon-Junior

    . 2015. Interactions of Biochar and Organic Compound for Seedlings Production of Magonia pubescens A. St. Hil. Revista Árvore 39:655–661.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Major, J.,
    2. J. Lehmann,
    3. M. Rondo and
    4. C. Goodale

    . 2010. Fate of soilapplied black carbon: Downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Global Change Biology 16:1366–1379.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Miller, P.C

    . 1983. Comparison of Water Balance Characteristics of Plant Species in “Natural” Versus Modified Ecosystems. Pages 188–212 in H.A. Mooney and M. Godron (eds) Disturbance and Ecosystems. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis) Vol. 44. Berlin; Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Neuenkamp, L.,
    2. S. Prober,
    3. J.N. Price,
    4. M. Zobe and
    5. R.J. Standish

    . 2019. Benefits of mycorrhizal inoculation to ecological restoration depend on plant functional type, restoration context and time. Fungal Ecology 40:140–149.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. NOAA

    . 2020. National Climate Center. www.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-information.
39. ↵
    1. Noyce, G.,
    2. T. Jones,
    3. R. Fulthorpe and
    4. N. Basiliko

    . 2017. Phosphorus uptake and availability and short-term seedling growth in three Ontario soils amended with ash and biochar. Canadian Journal of Soil Science CJSS-2017-0007. doi.org/10.1139/CJSS-2017-0007.
40. ↵
    1. Obia, A.,
    2. J. Mulder,
    3. V. Martinsen,
    4. G. Cornelissen and
    5. T. Børresen

    . 2016. In situ effects of biochar on aggregation, water retention and porosity in light-textured tropical soils. Soil and Tillage Research 155:35–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. 1. O’Brien, M.J.,
    2. C.E. Gomola and
    3. T.R. Horto

    . 2011. The effect of forest soil and community composition on ectomycorrhizal colonization and seedling growth. Plant and Soil 341:321–331.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Oliet, J.A. and
    2. D.F. Jacobs

    . 2012. Restoring forests: Advances in techniques and theory. New Forests 43:535–541.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Parker, W.C.,
    2. D.C. Dey,
    3. S.G. Newmaster,
    4. K.A. Elliott and
    5. E. Boysen

    . 2001. Managing succession in conifer plantations: converting young red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) plantations to native forest types by thinning and underplanting. The Forestry Chronicle 77:721–734.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Piñeiro, J.,
    2. F.T. Maestre,
    3. L. Bartolomé and
    4. A. Valdecantos

    . 2013. Ecotechnology as a tool for restoring degraded drylands: A meta-analysis of field experiments. Ecological Engineering 61:133–144.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Reverchon, F.,
    2. H. Yang,
    3. T.Y. Ho,
    4. G. Yan,
    5. J. Wang,
    6. Z. Xu,
    7. C. Chen and
    8. D. Zhang

    . 2015. A preliminary assessment of the potential of using an acacia—biochar system for spent mine site rehabilitation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22:2138–2144.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Simard, S.W.,
    2. M.D. Jones and
    3. D.M. Durall

    . 2003. Carbon and Nutrient Fluxes Within and Between Mycorrhizal Plants. Pages 33–74 in M.G.A. van der Heijden and I.R. Sanders (eds) Mycorrhizal Ecology Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis). Vol. 157. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Smith, S.E. and
    2. D.J. Read

    . 2010. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. New York, NY: Academic Press–Elsevier.
48. ↵
    1. Solaiman, Z.M.,
    2. P. Blackwell,
    3. L.K. Abbott and
    4. P. Storer

    . 2010. Direct and residual effect of biochar application on mycorrhizal root colonisation, growth and nutrition of wheat. Soil Research 48:546–554.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Spokas, K.A.,
    2. B. Cantrell,
    3. J.M. Novak,
    4. D.W. Archer,
    5. J.A. Ippolito,
    6. H.P. Collins and
    7. K.A. Nichols

    . 2012. Biochar: A Synthesis of Its Agronomic Impact beyond Carbon Sequestration. Journal of Environment Quality 41:973–989.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Sujeeun, L. and
    2. S.C. Thomas

    . 2017. Potential of Biochar to Mitigate Allelopathic Effects in Tropical Island Invasive Plants: Evidence from Seed Germination Trials. Tropical Conservation Science 10:1940082917697264. doi.org/10.1177/1940082917697264.
51. ↵
    1. Sun, F. and
    2. S. Lu

    . 2013. Biochars improve aggregate stability, water retention, and pore-space properties of clayey soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 177:26–33.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Sweeney, B.W.,
    2. S.J. Czapka and
    3. T. Yerkes

    . 2002. Riparian forest restoration: increasing success by reducing plant competition and herbivory. Restoration Ecology 10:392–400.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Thomas, A.,
    2. R. O’Hara,
    3. U. Ligges and
    4. S. Sturts

    . 2006. Making BUGS Open. R News 6:12–17.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Thomas, S.C. and
    2. N. Gale

    . 2015. Biochar and forest restoration: A review and meta-analysis of tree growth responses. New Forests 46:931–946.

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    1. Tonn, N. and
    2. I. Ibáñez

    . 2017. Plant-mycorrhizal fungi associations along an urbanization gradient: implications for tree seedling survival. Urban Ecosystems 20:823–837.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Vosatka, M. and
    2. J.C. Dodd

    . 2002. Ecological considerations for successful application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculum. Pages 235–247 in S. Gianinazzi, H. Schüepp, J.M. Barea and K. Haselwandter K (eds) Mycorrhizal Technology in Agriculture. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser-Verlag.
57. ↵
    1. Warnock, D.D.,
    2. J. Lehmann,
    3. T.W. Kuyper and
    4. M.C. Rillig

    . 2007. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil—concepts and mechanisms. Plant and Soil 300:9–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science