Onto the Farm, into the Home: How Intrahousehold Gender Dynamics Shape Land Restoration in Eastern Kenya

References

1. ↵
   1. Acosta, M.,
   2. van Wessel M.,
   3. van Bommel S.,
   4. Ampaire E.L.,
   5. Twyman J.,
   6. Jassogne L.

   et al. 2019. What does it mean to make a ‘joint’ decision? Unpacking intra-household decision making in agriculture: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Development Studies 56:1-20.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Ambler, K.,
   2. van Doss C.,
   3. Kieran C. and
   4. Passarelli S.

   2019. He says, she says: Spousal disagreement in survey measures of bargaining power. Economic Development and Cultural Change doi:10.1086/703082.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Anderson, C.L.,
   2. Reynolds T.W. and
   3. Gugerty M.K.

   2017. Husband and wife perspectives on farm household decision-making authority and evidence on intra-household accord in rural Tanzania. World Development 90:169-183.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Badstue, L.,
   2. Van Eerdewijk A.,
   3. Danielsen K.,
   4. Hailemariam M. and
   5. Mukewa E.

   2020. How local gender norms and intra-household dynamics shape women’s demand for labour-saving technologies: Insights from maize-based livelihoods in Ethiopia and Kenya. Gender, Technology and Development doi:10.1080/09718524.2020.1830339.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Baudron, F.,
   2. Mwanza H.M.,
   3. Triomphe B. and
   4. Bwalya M.

   2007. Conservation agriculture in Zambia: A case study of Southern Province. African Conservation Tillage Network, Centre de Coopération Internationale de Recherche Agronomique pour le Dévelopment. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.
6. ↵
   1. Bernard, T.,
   2. Doss C.,
   3. Hidrobo M.,
   4. Hoel J. and
   5. Kieran C.

   2020. Ask me why: Patterns of intrahousehold decision-making. World Development doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104671.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Brancalion, P.H.S.,
   2. Niamir A.,
   3. Broadbent E.,
   4. Crouzeilles R.,
   5. Barros F.S.M.,
   6. Almeyda Zambrano A.M.

   . et al. 2019. Global restoration opportunities in tropical rainforest landscapes. Science Advances 5:1-11.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Bullock, R. and
   2. Tegbaru A.

   2019. Women’s agency in changing contexts: A case study of innovation processes in Western Kenya. Geoforum 105:78-88.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Carr, E.R. and
   2. Thompson M.C.

   2014. Gender and climate change adaptation in agrarian settings: Current thinking, new directions, and research frontiers. Geography Compass 8:182-197.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Chant, S. and
    2. Radcliffe S.A.

    . 1992. Migration and development: The importance of gender. Pages 1–29 in Chant S. (eds), Gender and Migration in Developing Countries. London: Belhaven Press.
11. ↵
    1. Coe, R.,
    2. Hughes K.,
    3. Sola P. and
    4. Sinclair F.

    2017. Planned comparisons demystified. ICRAF Working Paper No 263. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre.
12. ↵
    1. Coe, R.,
    2. Sinclair F. and
    3. Barrios E.

    . 2014. Scaling up agroforestry requires research “in” rather than “for” development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6:73-77.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Cole, S.M.,
    2. Kaminski A.M.,
    3. McDougall C.,
    4. Kefi A.S.,
    5. Marinda P.A.,
    6. Maliko M.

    et al. 2020. Gender accommodative versus transformative approaches: A comparative assessment within a postharvest fish loss reduction intervention. Gender, Technology and Development 24:48-65.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Conway, J.R.,
    2. Lex A. and
    3. Gehlenborg N.

    . 2017. UpSetR: An R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 33:2938-2940.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    1. Cowie, A.L.,
    2. Orr B.J.,
    3. Castillo Sanchez V.M.,
    4. Chasek P.,
    5. Crossman N.D.,
    6. Erlewein A.

    et al. 2018. Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for land degradation neutrality. Environmental Science and Policy 79:25-35.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Crossland, M.,
    2. Paez Valencia A.M.,
    3. Pagella T.,
    4. Mausch K.,
    5. Harris D.,
    6. Dilley L.

    et al. 2021. Women’s changing opportunities and aspirations amid male outmigration: Insights from Makueni County, Kenya. The European Journal of Development Research doi:10.1057/s41287–021–00362–8.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Danjuma, M.N. and
    2. Mohammed S.

    2015. Zai pits system: A catalyst for restoration in the drylands. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS) 8:01-04.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Deere, C.D. and
    2. Doss C.R.

    . 2006. The gender asset gap: What do we know and why does it matter? Feminist Economics 12:1-50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Deere, C.D. and
    2. Twyman J.

    . 2012. Asset ownership and egalitarian decision making in dual-headed households in Ecuador. Review of Radical Political Economics 44:313-320.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Derero, A.,
    2. Coe R.,
    3. Muthuri C.,
    4. Hadgu K.M. and
    5. Sinclair F.

    2020. Farmer-led approaches to increasing tree diversity in fields and farmed landscapes in Ethiopia. Agroforestry Systems doi:10.1007/s10457-020-00520-7.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Doss, C.R.

    2013. Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer 28:52-78.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Doss, C.R.

    2001. Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: Lessons from 25 years of experience. World Development 29:2075-2092.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Doss, C.R. and
    2. Meinzen-Dick R.

    2015. Collective action within the household: Insights from natural resource management. World Development 74:171-183.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Doss, C.R. and
    2. Morris M.L.

    2001. How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations?: The case of improved maize technology in Ghana. Agricultural Economics 25:27-39.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Doss, C.R. and
    2. Quisumbing A.R.

    2020. Understanding rural household behavior: Beyond Boserup and Becker. Agricultural Economics 51:47-58.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Farnworth, C.R.,
    2. Jafry T.,
    3. Bharati P.,
    4. Badstue L. and
    5. Yadav A.

    2020. From working in the fields to taking control: Towards a typology of women’s decision-making in wheat in India. European Journal of Development Research doi:10.1057/s41287-020-00281-0.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), International Fund for Agricultural Development and World Food Programme. 2020. Gender transformative approaches for food security, improved nutrition and sustainable agriculture—A compendium of fifteen good practices. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.
28. ↵
    1. Funk, C.,
    2. Peterson P.,
    3. Landsfeld M.,
    4. Pedreros D.,
    5. Verdin J.,
    6. Shukla S.

    et al. 2015. The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—A new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Scientific Data 2:1-21.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Gitau, A.N.,
    2. Gumbe L.O. and
    3. Biamah E.K.

    2006. Influence of soil water on stress-strain behaviour of a compacting soil in semiarid Kenya. Soil and Tillage Research 89:144-154.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Glover, D.,
    2. Sumberg J.,
    3. Ton G.,
    4. Andersson J. and
    5. Badstue L.

    . 2019. Rethinking technological change in smallholder agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture 48:169-180.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Haider, H.,
    2. Smale M. and
    3. Theriault V.

    2018. Intensification and intrahousehold decisions: Fertilizer adoption in Burkina Faso. World Development 105:310-320.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Hartung, C.,
    2. Anokwa Y.,
    3. Brunette W.,
    4. Lerer A.,
    5. Tseng C. and
    6. Borriello G.

    2010. Open Data Kit: Tools to build information services for developing regions. Pages 1–12 in Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
33. ↵
    1. Kabeer, N.

    1999. Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change 30:435-64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Kantor, P.,
    2. Morgan M. and
    3. Choudhury A.

    2015. Amplifying outcomes by addressing inequality: The role of gender-transformative approaches in agricultural research for development. Gender, Technology and Development 19:292-319.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. Kenya Food Security Steering Group (KFSSG). 2019. The long rains season assessment report. Nairobi, Kenya: Republic of Kenya.
36. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). 2019. Kenya population and housing census 2019. Volume IV: Distribution of Population by Socio-Economic Characteristics. Nairobi: Republic of Kenya.
37. ↵
    1. Kiptot, E. and
    2. Franzel S.

    2012. Gender and agroforestry in Africa: A review of women’s participation. Agroforestry Systems 84:35-58.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Kiptot, E.,
    2. Franzel S. and
    3. Degrande A.

    2014. Gender, agroforestry and food security in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6:104-109.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. LaRue, K.,
    2. Daum T.,
    3. Mausch K. and
    4. Harris D.

    2021. Who wants to farm? Answers depend on how you ask: A case study on youth aspirations in Kenya. The European Journal of Development Research doi:10.1057/s41287-020-00352-2.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Lecoutere, E. and
    2. Wuyts E.

    2020. Confronting the wall of patriarchy: Does participatory intrahousehold decision making empower women in agricultural households?. Journal of Development Studies doi:10.1080/00220388.2020.1849620.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. ↵
    1. De Leeuw, J.,
    2. Njenga M.,
    3. Wagner B. and
    4. Iiyama M.

    2014. Treesilience: An assessment of the resilience provided by trees in the drylands of Eastern Africa. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre.
42. ↵
    1. Lohbeck, M.,
    2. Albers P.,
    3. Boels L.E.,
    4. Bongers F.,
    5. Morel S.,
    6. Sinclair F.

    et al. 2020. Drivers of farmer-managed natural regeneration in the Sahel. Lessons for restoration. Scientific Reports 10:1-11.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. ↵
    1. Lovo, s.

    2016. Tenure insecurity and investment in soil conservation. Evidence from Malawi. World Development 78:219-229.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Magaju, C.,
    2. Winowiecki L.A.,
    3. Crossland M.,
    4. Frija A.,
    5. Ouerghemmi H.,
    6. Hagazi N.

    et al. 2020. Assessing context-specific factors to increase tree survival for scaling ecosystem restoration efforts in East Africa. Land 9:1-20.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. ↵
    1. Magruder, J.R.

    . 2018. An assessment of experimental evidence on agricultural technology adoption in developing countries. Annual Review of Resource Economics 10:299-316.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Manfre, C.,
    2. Rubin D. and
    3. Nordehn C.

    . 2017. Assessing how agricultural technologies can change gender dynamics and food security: Part three. Washington DC: United States Agency for International Development.
47. ↵
    1. Mazvimavi, K. and
    2. Twomlow S.

    2009. Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems 101:20-29.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Meijer, S.S.,
    2. Sileshi G.W.,
    3. Kundhlande G. and
    4. Catacutan D.

    2015. The role of gender and kinship structure in household decision-making for agriculture and tree planting in Malawi. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security 1:54-76.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Meinzen-Dick, R.

    2006. Women, land and trees. Pages 173–181 in Garrity D., Okono A., Grayson M. and Parrott S. (eds), World Agroforestry into the Future. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre.
50. ↵
    1. Meinzen-Dick, R.,
    2. Johnson N.,
    3. Quisumbing A.,
    4. Njuki J.,
    5. Behrman J.,
    6. Rubin D.

    et al. 2011. Gender, assets, and agricultural development programs: A conceptual framework. CAPRi Working Paper No. 99. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
51. ↵
    1. Meinzen-Dick, R.,
    2. Quisumbing A.,
    3. Behrman J.,
    4. Biermayr-Jenzano P.,
    5. Wilde V.,
    6. Noordeloos M.

    et al. 2012. Engendering agricultural research, development, and extension. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
52. Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MEF). 2019. National strategy for achieving and maintaining over 10% tree cover by 2022. Nairobi: Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Republic of Kenya.
53. ↵
    1. Minnemeyer, S.,
    2. Laestadious A.,
    3. Sizer N.,
    4. Carole S.L. and
    5. Potapov P.

    2011. A world of opportunity—A world of opportunities for forest and landscape restoration. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
54. ↵
    1. Mukadasi, B. and
    2. Nabalegwa M.

    2007. Gender mainstreaming and community participation in plant resource conservation in Buzaya county, Kamuli district, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 45:7-12.

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    1. Mukasa, C.,
    2. Tibazalika A.,
    3. Mwangi E.,
    4. Banana A.Y.,
    5. Bomuhangi A. and
    6. Bushoborozi J.

    2016. Strengthening women’s tenure rights and participation in community forestry. Infobrief No.155. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
56. ↵
    1. Muli, M.B.,
    2. Kengo D.,
    3. Mzingirwa A. and
    4. Musila R.

    2017. Performance of drought tolerant maize varieties under water harvesting technologies in the coastal region of Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 82:168-174.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Muok, B.,
    2. Kamene J.,
    3. Kemmochi K. and
    4. Ali A.

    1998. Socio-economic and resource survey of Kitui district. Social forestry extension model development project. Kitui, Kenya: Kenya Forestry Research Institute.
58. ↵
    1. Musangi, P.

    2017. Women land and property rights in Kenya. Paper presented to the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington, DC, March 20-24.
59. ↵
    1. Ndegwa, G.,
    2. Iiyama M.,
    3. Anhuf D.,
    4. Nehren U. and
    5. Schlüter S.

    2017. Tree establishment and management on farms in the drylands: evaluation of different systems adopted by small-scale farmers in Mutomo District, Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 91:1043-1055.

    OpenUrl
60. ↵
    1. Njuki, J.,
    2. Kaaria S.,
    3. Chamunorwa A. and
    4. Chiuri W.

    2011. Linking smallholder farmers to markets, gender and intra-household dynamics: Does the choice of commodity matter? The European Journal of Development Research 23:426-443.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Njuki, J.,
    2. Parkins J.R. and
    3. Kaler A.

    2016. Transforming Gender and Food Security in the Global South. New York, NY: Routledge.
62. ↵
    1. Njuki, J.,
    2. Waithanji E.,
    3. Sakwa B.,
    4. Kariuki J.,
    5. Mukewa E. and
    6. Ngige J.

    2014. A qualitative assessment of gender and irrigation technology in Kenya and Tanzania. Gender, Technology and Development 18:303-340.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
63. ↵
    1. Nyanga, P.H.,
    2. Johnsen F.H. and
    3. Kalinda T.H.

    2012. Gendered impacts of conservation agriculture and paradox of herbicide use among smallholder farmers. International Journal of Technology and Development Studies 3:1-24.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Nyasimi, M. and
    2. Huyer S.

    . 2017. Background: The gender gap in agriculture under a changing climate. Agriculture for Development 30:37-40.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Orwa, C.,
    2. Mutua A.,
    3. Kindt R.,
    4. Jamnadass R. and
    5. Simons A.

    2009. Agroforestree Database: A tree reference and selection guide. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre.
66. ↵
    1. Petesch, P.,
    2. Bullock R.,
    3. Feldman S.,
    4. Badstue L.,
    5. Rietveld A.,
    6. Bauchspies W.

    . et al. 2018. Local normative climate shaping agency and agricultural livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security 3:108-130.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    R Core Team. 2020. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org.
68. ↵
    1. Ragasa, C.,
    2. Sengupta D.,
    3. Osorio M.,
    4. Ourabahhaddad N. and
    5. Mathieson K.

    2014. Gender-specific approaches and rural institutions for improving access to and adoption of technological innovations. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.
69. ↵
    1. Rietveld, A.

    2017. Gender norms and agricultural innovation: Insights from Uganda. Pages 3–5 in Oborn K., Vanlauwe I., Phillips B., Thomas M., Brooijmans R., Atta-krah W. (eds), Sustainable Intensification in Smallholder Agriculture: An Integrated Systems Research Approach. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
70. ↵
    1. Rockström, J.,
    2. Kaumbutho P.,
    3. Mwalley J.,
    4. Nzabi A.W.,
    5. Temesgen M.,
    6. Mawenya L.

    et al. 2009. Conservation farming strategies in East and Southern Africa: Yields and rain water productivity from on-farm action research. Soil and Tillage Research 103:23-32.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
71. ↵
    1. Saha, S.,
    2. Goswami R. and
    3. Paul S.K.

    2018. Recursive male out-migration and the consequences at source: A systematic review with special reference to the left-behind women. Space and Culture, India 5:30-53.

    OpenUrl
72. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). 2018. The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Bonn: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
73. ↵
    1. Shibata, R.,
    2. Cardey S. and
    3. Dorward P.

    2020. Gendered intra-household decision-making dynamics in agricultural innovation processes: Assets, norms and bargaining. Journal of International Development 32:1101-1125.

    OpenUrl
74. ↵
    1. Sinclair, F. and
    2. Coe R.

    2019. The options by context approach: A paradigm shift in agronomy. Experimental Agriculture 55:1-13.

    OpenUrl
75. ↵
    1. Slavchevska, V.,
    2. Kaaria S. and
    3. Taivalmaa S.

    . 2016. Feminization of agriculture in the context of rural transformations: What is the evidence? Washington, DC: World Bank.
76. ↵
    1. Sparks, A.

    2018. Nasapower: A NASA POWER global meteorology, surface solar energy and climatology data client for R. Journal of Open Source Software 3:1035.

    OpenUrl
77. ↵
    1. Theis, S.,
    2. Lefore N.,
    3. Meinzen-Dick R. and
    4. Bryan E.

    2018. What happens after technology adoption? Gendered aspects of small-scale irrigation technologies in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Tanzania. Agriculture and Human Values 35:671-684.

    OpenUrl
78. ↵
    1. Tiffen, M.,
    2. Mortimore M. and
    3. Gichuki F.

    1994. More People, Less Erosion: Environmental Recovery in Kenya. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
79. ↵
    1. Wanyoike, F.

    2001. Dissemination and adoption of improved fodder trees: The case of Calliandra calothyrsus in Embu district, Kenya. MSc dissertation, University of Nairobi.
80. ↵
    1. Winowiecki, L.,
    2. Magaju C.,
    3. Nyaga J.,
    4. Ochenje I.,
    5. Wafula L.,
    6. Crossland M.

    et al. 2019. Farmer profiling data—Kenya. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre. hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766.1/FK2/E4MRCZ.
81. ↵
    World Agroforestry. 2020. Restoration of degraded land for food security and poverty reduction in East Africa and the Sahel: Taking successes in land restoration to scale. www.worldagroforestry.org/project/restoration-degraded-land-food-securityand-poverty-reduction-east-africa-and-sahel-taking.