Assessing the Social Benefits of Tree Planting by Smallholders in Vietnam: Lessons for Large-Scale Reforestation Programs

References

1. ↵
   1. Adams, C.,
   2. S.T. Rodrigues,
   3. M. Calmon and
   4. C. Kumar

   . 2016. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socio-economic status and local livelihoods: What we know and do not know. Biotropica 48: 731–744.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Barr, C.M. and
   2. J.A. Sayer

   . 2012. The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia-Pacific: Critical issues for REDD+. Biological Conservation 154:9–19.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bloomfield, G.,
   2. P. Meli,
   3. P.H.S. Brancalion,
   4. E. Terris,
   5. M. Guariguata and
   6. E. Garen

   . 2019. Strategic insights for capacity development on forest landscape restoration: Implications for addressing global commitments. Tropical Conservation Science 12:1940082919887589.
4. ↵
   1. Brancalion, P.H.S. and
   2. R.L. Chazdon

   . 2017. Beyond hectares: Four principles to guide reforestation in the context of tropical forest and landscape restoration. Restoration Ecology 25:491–496.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Brancalion, P.H.S. and
   2. K. Holl

   . 2020. Guidance for successful tree planting initiatives. Journal of Applied Ecology 57:2349–2361.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Chazdon, R.L,
   2. P.H.S. Brancalion,
   3. D. Lamb,
   4. L. Laestadius,
   5. M. Calmon and
   6. C. Kumar

   . 2017. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conservation Letters 10:125–132.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Clement, F. and
   2. J.M. Amezaga

   . 2008. Linking reforestation policies with land use change in northern Vietnam: Why local factors matter. Geoforum 39:265–277.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Clement, F. and
   2. J.M. Amezaga

   . 2009. Afforestation and forestry land allocation in northern Vietnam: Analysing the gap between policy intentions and outcomes. Land Use Policy 26:458–470.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Cochard, R.,
   2. D.T. Ngo,
   3. P.O. Waeber and
   4. C.A. Kull

   . 2017. Extent and causes of forest cover changes in Vietnam’s provinces 1993–2013: a review and analysis of official data. Environmental Reviews 25:199–217.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Cochard, R.,
    2. V.H.T. Nguyen,
    3. D.T. Ngo and
    4. C.A. Kull

    . 2020. Vietnam’s forest cover changes 2005–2016: Veering from transition to (yet more) transaction? World Development 135:105051.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Crowther, J.,
    2. H. Zimmer,
    3. H.T. Le,
    4. T.L. Quang and
    5. J.D. Nichols

    . 2020. Forestry in Vietnam: The potential role for native timber species. Forest Policy and Economics 116:102182.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Dang, T.K.P.,
    2. I.J. Visseren-Hamakers and
    3. B. Arts

    . 2018. Forest devolution in Vietnam: From rhetoric to performance. Land Use Policy 77:760–774.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Dinh, H.H,
    2. T.T. Nguyen,
    3. V.N. Hoang and
    4. C. Wilson

    . 2017. Economic incentive and factors affecting tree planting of rural households: Evidence from the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Journal of Forest Economics 29:14–24.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Dressler, W.H.,
    2. To, P.X. and
    3. S. Mahanty

    . 2013. How biodiversity conservation policy accelerates agrarian differentiation: The account of an upland village in Vietnam. Conservation and Society 11:130–143.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Erbaugh, J.T and
    2. J.A. Oldekop

    . 2018. Forest landscape restoration for livelihoods and well-being. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 32:76–83.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Frey, G.E.,
    2. F.W. Cubbage,
    3. T.T.T. Ha,
    4. R.R. Davis,
    5. J.B. Carle,
    6. V.X. Thon

    et al. 2018. Financial analysis and comparison of smallholder forest and state forest enterprise plantations in Central Vietnam. International Forestry Review 20:181–198.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Gann, G.D,
    2. T. McDonald,
    3. B. Walder,
    4. J. Aronson,
    5. C.R. Nelson,
    6. J. Jonson

    , et al. 2019. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restoration Ecology 27:4–46.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Gomiero, T.,
    2. D. Pettenella,
    3. G.P. Trieu and
    4. M.G. Paoletti

    . 2001. Vietnamese uplands: Environmental and socio-economic perspective of forest land allocation and deforestation Environment, Development and Sustainability 2:119–142.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Hai, N.T.,
    2. B. Dell,
    3. V.T. Phuong and
    4. R.J. Harper

    . 2020. Towards a more robust approach for the restoration of mangroves in Vietnam. Annals of Forest Science 77:18.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Harwood, C.E.,
    2. E.K.S. Nambiar,
    3. P.X. Dinh,
    4. L.X. Toan and
    5. L.T. Quang

    . 2017. Managing wood production from small grower acacia hybrid plantations on eroded soils in central Vietnam. Australian Forestry 80:286–293.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Hoang, M.H.,
    2. T.H. Do,
    3. M.T. Pham,
    4. M. van Noordwijk and
    5. P.A. Minang

    . 2013. Benefit distribution across scales to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam. Land Use Policy 31:48–60.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Holl, K.

    2017. Restoring tropical forests from the bottom up. Science 355 (6324):455–456.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    1. Holl, K. and
    2. P.H.S. Brancalion

    . 2020. Tree planting is not a simple solution. Science 368 (6491):580–581.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. ↵
    1. de Jong, W.

    2010. Forest rehabilitation and its implication for forest transition theory. Biotropica 42:3–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. de Jong, W.,
    2. Do Dinh Sam and
    3. Trieu Van Hung

    . 2006. Forest rehabilitation in Vietnam: realities and future. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
26. ↵
    1. Khuc, Q.V,
    2. T.A.T. Le,
    3. T.H. Nguyen,
    4. D. Nong,
    5. B.Q. Tran,
    6. P. Meyfroidt

    , et al. 2020. Forest cover change, households’ livelihoods, tradeoffs, and constraints associated with plantation forests in poor upland-rural landscapes: Evidence from North Central Vietnam. Forests 11:548.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Kumar, C.,
    2. S. Begeladze,
    3. M. Calmon and
    4. C. Saint-Laurent

    . 2015. Enhancing food security through forest landscape restoration: Lessons from Burkina Faso, Brazil, Guatemala, Viet Nam, Ghana, Ethiopia and Philippines. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
28. ↵
    1. Lamb, D

    . 2018. Undertaking large-scale forest restoration to generate ecosystem services. Restoration Ecology 26:657–666.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Lazos-Chavero, E,
    2. J. Zinda,
    3. A. Bennett-Curry,
    4. P. Balvanera,
    5. G. Bloomfield,
    6. C. Lindell

    et al. 2016. Stakeholders and tropical reforestation: Challenges, trade-offs, and strategies in dynamic environments. Biotropica 48:900–914.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Le, H.D.,
    2. C. Smith,
    3. J. Herbohn and
    4. S. Harrison

    . 2012. More than just trees: Assessing reforestation success in tropical developing countries. Journal of Rural Studies 28:5–19.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Le, N.L.,
    2. D. Wichelns,
    3. F. Milan,
    4. C.T. Hoanh and
    5. N.D. Phuong

    . 2016. Household opportunity costs of protecting and developing forest lands in Son La and Hoa Binh Provinces, Vietnam. International Journal of the Commons 10:902–928.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Malkamäki, A.,
    2. D. D’Amato,
    3. N.J. Hogarth,
    4. M. Kanninen,
    5. R. Pirard,
    6. A. Toppinen

    et al. 2018. A systematic review of the socio-economic impacts of large-scale tree plantations, worldwide. Global Environmental Change 53:90–103.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Mansourian, S. and
    2. D. Vallauri

    . 2014. Restoring forest landscapes: Important lessons learnt. Environmental Management 53:241–251.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Mansourian, S.,
    2. J.A. Stanturf,
    3. M. Derkyi and
    4. V.L. Engel

    . 2017. Forest landscape restoration: increasing the positive impacts of forest restoration or simply the area under tree cover? Restoration Ecology 25:178–183.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Maraseni, T.N.,
    2. H.L. Son,
    3. G. Cockfield,
    4. H.V. Duy and
    5. T.D. Nghia

    . 2017. Comparing the financial returns from Acacia plantations with different plantation densities and rotation ages in Vietnam. Forest Policy and Economics 83:80–87.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD)

    . 2011. Báo cáo dự án trồng mới 5 triệu ha rừng giai đoạn 1998–2010. Report on the 5 Million Hectare Reforestation Project 1998–2010. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
37. 1. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD)

    . 2020. Quyết định: Công bố hiện trạng rừng toàn quốc năm 2019. Decision: Announcing the current nationwide state of forests, 2019. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
38. ↵
    1. McElwee, P.D.

    2009. Reforesting ‘bare hills’ in Vietnam: Social and environmental consequences of the 5 Million Hectare Reforestation Program. Ambio 38:325–333.

    OpenUrlPubMed
39. ↵
    1. McElwee, P.D.

    2016. Forests Are Gold: Trees, People and Environmental Rule in Vietnam. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
40. ↵
    1. McElwee, P.D.,
    2. B. Huber and
    3. V.H. Nguyen

    . 2019. Hybridized outcomes of payments for ecosystem services policies in Vietnam: Between theory and practice. Development and Change 51:253–280.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. McLain, R.,
    2. S. Lawry,
    3. M.R. Guariguata and
    4. J. Reed

    . 2018. Toward a tenure-responsive approach to forest landscape restoration: A proposed tenure diagnostic for assessing restoration opportunities. Land Use Policy 103748.
42. ↵
    1. Meyfroidt, P. and
    2. E.F. Lambin

    . 2008. The causes of the reforestation in Vietnam. Land Use Policy 25:182–197.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Meyfroidt, P.,
    2. R. Roy Chowdhury,
    3. A. de Bremond,
    4. E. Ellis,
    5. K.H. Erb,
    6. T. Filatova

    , et al. 2018. Middle-range theories of land system change. Global Environmental Change 53:52–67.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Midgley, S.J.,
    2. P.R. Stevens and
    3. R.J. Arnold

    . 2017. Hidden assets: Asia’s smallholder wood resources and their contribution to supply chains of commercial wood. Australian Forestry 80:1–16.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Millet, J.,
    2. N. Tran,
    3. N.V. Ngoc,
    4. T. Tran and
    5. D. Prat

    . 2013. Enrichment planting of native species for biodiversity conservation in a logged tree plantation in Vietnam. New Forests 44:369–83.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Ministry of Forestry

    . 1991. Vietnam forestry sector review, Tropical Forestry Action Programme. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Forestry.
47. ↵
    1. Nam, V.N.,
    2. S.D Sasmito,
    3. D. Murdiyarso,
    4. J. Purbopuspito and
    5. R.A. MacKenzie

    . 2016. Carbon stocks in artificially and naturally regenerated mangrove ecosystems in the Mekong Delta. Wetlands Ecology and Management 24:231–44.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Nambiar, E.,
    2. K. Sadanandan,
    3. C.E. Harwood and
    4. D.K. Nguyen

    . 2015. Acacia plantations in Vietnam: research and knowledge application to secure a sustainable future. Southern Forests 77:1–10.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Nghiem, N.

    2012. Biodiversity conservation attitudes and policy tools for promoting biodiversity in tropical planted forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 22:373–403.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Nguyen, T.H.

    2009. Human ecological analysis of land and forest use by the Hmong people for harmonising with the governmental reforestation program in Vietnam. PhD dissertation, Universität Dresden.
51. ↵
    1. Nguyen, T.H.H,
    2. S. Hoshino and
    3. S. Hashimoto

    . 2015. Forest Stewardship Council Certificate for a group of planters in Vietnam: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Forest Research 20:35–42.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Nguyen, T.H.H,
    2. S. Hoshino,
    3. K. Onitsuka and
    4. T. Maraseni

    . 2019. Cost analysis of FSC forest certification and opportunities to cover the costs: A case study of Quang Tri FSC Group in Central Vietnam. Journal of Forest Research 24:1–6.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Nguyen, T.P.,
    2. V.T. Nguyen,
    3. L.P. Quoi and
    4. K.E. Parnell

    . 2016a. Community perspectives on an internationally funded mangrove restoration project: Kien Giang province, Vietnam. Ocean and Coastal Management 119:146–54.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Nguyen, T.P.,
    2. T.T. Luom and
    3. K.E. Parnell

    . 2017. Mangrove allocation for coastal protection and livelihood improvement in Kien Giang province, Vietnam: Constraints and recommendations. Land Use Policy 63:401–407.

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    1. Nguyen, T.T.,
    2. T. Koellner,
    3. Q.B. Le,
    4. C.K. Lambini,
    5. I. Choi,
    6. H. Shin

    , et al. 2014. An economic analysis of reforestation with a native tree species: The case of Vietnamese farmers. Biodiversity and Conservation 23:811–830.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Nguyen, T.T.P.,
    2. M. Masuda and
    3. S. Iwanaga

    . 2016b. The effect of forestland allocation to the livelihoods of local people in the North Central Coast of Vietnam: A case in Nam Dong district. Tropics 24:169–180.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Nguyen, T.T.P and
    2. M. Masuda

    . 2018. Land use after forestland allocation and the potential for farm forestry in a mountainous region of Northeast Vietnam. Small-Scale Forestry, Economics and Policy 17:485–503.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Nguyen, V.S. and
    2. D.A. Gilmour

    . 1999. Forest rehabilitation policy and practice in Vietnam: Proceedings of a national workshop. Hanoi, Vietnam: MARD.
59. ↵
    1. Nguyen, V.

    1995. Strategy for regreening barren lands and hills in Viet Nam. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Forestry.
60. ↵
    1. Nguyen, V.B.,
    2. A. Eyles,
    3. D. Mendham,
    4. T.L. Dong,
    5. D. Ratkowsky,
    6. K.J. Evans

    , et al. 2018. Contribution of harvest residues to nutrient cycling in a tropical Acacia mangium Willd. plantation. Forests 9:577.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Ohlsson, B.,
    2. S.M. Sandewall,
    3. R.K. Sandewall and
    4. N.H. Phon

    . 2005. Government plans and farmers intentions: A study on forest land use planning in Vietnam. Ambio 34:248–255.

    OpenUrlPubMed
62. ↵
    1. Ota, L.,
    2. J. Herbohn,
    3. N. Gregorio, and
    4. S. Harrison

    . 2020. Reforestation and smallholder livelihoods in the humid tropics. Land Use Policy 92:104455.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Paudyal, K.,
    2. Y.B. Samsudin,
    3. H. Baral,
    4. B. Okarda,
    5. V.T. Phuong,
    6. S. Paudel

    , et al. 2020. Spatial assessment of ecosystem services from planted forests in Central Vietnam. Forests 11:822.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Pham, T.D.,
    2. N. Kaida,
    3. K. Yoshino,
    4. X.H. Nguyen,
    5. H.T. Nguyen and
    6. D.T. Bui

    . 2018. Willingness to pay for mangrove restoration in the context of climate change in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Ocean and Coastal Management 163:269–77.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Pham, V.H.,
    2. V.D. Luu,
    3. T.T. Nguyen and
    4. O. Koji

    . 2017. Will restored mangrove forests enhance sediment organic carbon and ecosystem carbon storage? Regional Studies in Marine Science 14:43–52.

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. Phong, N.T.,
    2. K.E. Parnell and
    3. A. Cottrell

    . 2017. Human activities and coastal erosion on the Kien Giang Coast, Vietnam. Journal of Coastal Conservation 21:967–979.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. Pokorny, B.,
    2. L. Hoch and
    3. J. Maturana

    . 2010. Smallholder plantations in the tropics—Local people between outgrower schemes and reforestation programmes. Pages 140–70 in (eds) J. Bauhus, P. van der Meer and M. Kanninen, Ecosystem Goods and Services from Plantation Forests. London, UK: Earthscan.
68. ↵
    1. Richards, M.

    2019. Gender and wood-based value chains in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: Forest Trends.
69. ↵
    1. Rizzetti, D.,
    2. K. Swaans,
    3. J. Holden,
    4. J. Brunner,
    5. T. Le. and
    6. T. Nguyen

    . 2018. Assessing opportunities in forest landscape restoration in Quang Tri, Viet Nam. Hanoi, Vietnam: IUCN.
70. ↵
    1. Rudel, T.K,
    2. P. Meyfroidt,
    3. R. Chazdon,
    4. F. Bongers,
    5. S. Sloan,
    6. H.R. Grau

    , et al. 2020. Whither the forest transition? Climate change, policy responses, and redistributed forests in the twenty-first century. Ambio 49:74–84.

    OpenUrl
71. ↵
    1. Šálek, L. and
    2. R. Sloup

    . 2012. Economic evaluation of proposed pure and mixed stands in central Vietnam highlands. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 113:21–29.

    OpenUrl
72. ↵
    1. Sandewall, M.,
    2. H. Kassa,
    3. S. Wu,
    4. P.V. Khoa,
    5. Y. He and
    6. B. Ohlsson

    . 2015. Policies to promote household-based plantation forestry and their impacts on livelihoods and the environment: Cases from Ethiopia, China, Vietnam and Sweden. International Forestry Review 17:98–111.

    OpenUrl
73. ↵
    1. Sandewall, M.,
    2. B. Ohlsson,
    3. R.K. Sandewall and
    4. L.S. Viet

    . 2010. The expansion of farm-based plantation forestry in Vietnam. Ambio 39:567–579.

    OpenUrlPubMed
74. ↵
    1. Sang, P.M.,
    2. D. Lamb,
    3. M. Bonner and
    4. S. Schmidt

    . 2013. Carbon sequestration and soil fertility of tropical tree plantations and secondary forest established on degraded land. Plant and Soil 362:187–200.

    OpenUrl
75. ↵
    1. Sikor, T.

    2011. Financing household tree plantations in Vietnam: Current programmes and future options. Bogor: CIFOR.
76. ↵
    1. Sikor, T. and
    2. J.A. Baggio

    . 2014. Can smallholders engage in tree plantations? An entitlements analysis from Vietnam. World Development 64:S101–S112.

    OpenUrl
77. ↵
    1. Sikor, T. and
    2. Q.T. Nguyen

    . 2007. Why may forest devolution not benefit the rural poor? Forest entitlements in Vietnam’s Central Highlands. World Development 35:2010–2025.

    OpenUrl
78. ↵
    1. Simelton, Elisabeth, and
    2. B.V. Dam

    . 2014. Farmers in NE Viet Nam rank values of ecosystems from seven land uses. Ecosystem Services 9:133–138.

    OpenUrl
79. ↵
    1. Simelton, E.S.,
    2. D.C. Catacutan,
    3. T.C. Dao,
    4. B.V. Dam and
    5. T.D. Le

    . 2017. Factors constraining and enabling agroforestry adoption in Viet Nam: A multi-level policy analysis. Agroforestry Systems 91:51–67.

    OpenUrl
80. ↵
    1. Sowerwine,
    2. J.C.

    2004. Territorialisation and the politics of highland landscapes in Vietnam: Negotiating property relations in policy, meaning and practice. Conservation and Society 2:97–136.

    OpenUrl
81. 1. Socialist Republic of Vietnam (SRV)

    . 2005. Conclusions of the Standing Deputy Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung in a review workshop on the implementation of the 5 Million Hectares Reforestation Program and forest protection. Hanoi: Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
82. 1. Socialist Republic of Vietnam (SRV)

    . 2017. Decision No. 886/QD-TTG approving target program for sustainable forestry development during 2016–2020 period. Hanoi, Vietnam.
83. 1. Socialist Republic of Vietnam (SRV)

    . 2020. Báo cáo chiến lược phát triển lâm nghiệp Việt Nam Giai Đoan 2021–2030, tầm nhìn Đến năm 2050. Report on strategy to develop forestry in Vietnam from 2021–2030, with a vision to 2050. Hanoi, Vietnam.
84. ↵
    1. Sunderlin, William D and
    2. T.B. Huynh

    . 2005. Poverty alleviation and forests in Vietnam. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
85. ↵
    1. Thulstrup, A.W.

    2014. Plantation livelihoods in central Vietnam: Implications for household vulnerability and community resilience. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography 68:1–9.

    OpenUrl
86. ↵
    1. Thulstrup, A.W.

    2015. Livelihood resilience and adaptive capacity: Tracing changes in household access to capital in central Vietnam. World Development 74:352–362.

    OpenUrl
87. ↵
    1. Thulstrup, A.W.,
    2. T. Casse and
    3. T.T. Nielsen

    . 2013. The push for plantations: Drivers, rationales and social vulnerability in Quang Nam province, Vietnam. Pages 71–89 in (eds), O. Bruun and T. Casse On the Frontiers of Climate and Environmental Change: Vulnerabilities and Adaptations in Central Vietnam. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
88. ↵
    1. Tran, C.,
    2. T.T.Q. Chinh,
    3. Y. Zhang and
    4. Y. Xie

    . 2020. Economic performance of forest plantations in Vietnam: Eucalyptus, Acacia mangium, and Manglietia conifera. Forests 11:284.

    OpenUrl
89. ↵
    1. Tran, L. and
    2. K. Brown

    . 2019. The importance of ecosystem services to smallholder farmers in climate change adaptation: Learning from an ecosystem-based adaptation pilot in Vietnam. Agroforestry Systems 93:1949–1960.

    OpenUrl
90. ↵
    1. Tran, L.D.,
    2. R. Doyle,
    3. C.L. Beadle,
    4. R. Corkrey and
    5. N.X. Quat

    . 2014a. Impact of short-rotation Acacia hybrid plantations on soil properties of degraded lands in central Vietnam. Soil Research 52:271.

    OpenUrl
91. ↵
    1. Tran, N.T. and
    2. T. Sikor

    . 2006. From legal acts to actual powers: Devolution and property rights in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Forest Policy and Economics 8:397–408.

    OpenUrl
92. ↵
    1. Tran, T.T.H.,
    2. H. van Dijk and
    3. S.R. Bush

    . 2012. Mangrove conservation or shrimp farmer’s livelihood? The devolution of forest management and benefit sharing in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Ocean and Coastal Management 69:185–193.

    OpenUrl
93. ↵
    1. Tran, T.T.H.,
    2. M. Zeller and
    3. C.T. Hoang

    . 2014b. The ‘Five Million Hectare Reforestation Program’ in Vietnam: An analysis of its implementation and transaction costs, a case study in Hoa Binh province. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 53:341–375.

    OpenUrl
94. ↵
    1. Tran, T.P.H.,
    2. H. van Dijk and
    3. L. Visser

    . 2014c. Impacts of changes in mangrove forest management practices on forest accessibility and livelihood: A case study in mangrove-shrimp farming system in Ca Mau Province, Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Land Use Policy 36:89–101.

    OpenUrl
95. ↵
    1. Villamor, G.B.,
    2. D.C. Catacutan,
    3. V.A.T. Truong and
    4. L.T. Doan

    . 2017. Tree-cover transition in northern Vietnam from a gender-specific land-use preferences perspective. Land Use Policy 61:53–62.

    OpenUrl
96. ↵
    1. van Oosten, C.

    2013. Restoring landscapesߞgoverning place: A learning approach to forest landscape restoration. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 32:130627123019006.
97. ↵
    1. Vu, D.H.,
    2. E.S. Nambiar,
    3. L.T. Quang,
    4. D.S. Mendham and
    5. P.T. Dung

    . 2014. Improving productivity and sustainability of successive rotations of Acacia auriculiformis plantations in South Vietnam. Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science 77:51–58.

    OpenUrl
98. ↵
    1. Yamanoshita, M.Y. and
    2. M. Amano

    . 2012. Capability development of local communities for project sustainability in afforestation/reforestation Clean Development Mechanism. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17:425–40.

    OpenUrl
99. ↵
    1. Woo, S.Y.,
    2. T.T. Hung and
    3. P.S. Park

    . 2011. Stand structure and natural regeneration of degraded forestland in the Northern Mountainous region of Vietnam. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 7:251–261.

    OpenUrl
100. ↵
     1. World Bank

     . 2010. Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Forest law enforcement and governance. Hanoi, Vietnam: World Bank.
101. ↵
     1. World Bank

     . 2019. Forest country noteߞVietnam. Washington, DC: World Bank.
102. ↵
     1. Zeng, Y.,
     2. T.V. Sarira,
     3. L.R. Carrasco,
     4. K.Y. Chong,
     5. D.A. Friess,
     6. J.S.H. Lee

     , et al. 2020. Economic and social constraints on reforestation for climate mitigation in Southeast Asia. Nature Climate Change 10:842–844.

     OpenUrl
103. ↵
     1. Zhunusova, E.,
     2. T.H.S. Le,
     3. J.M. Schroeder,
     4. S. Ziegler,
     5. M. Dieter and
     6. S. Guenter

     . 2019. Smallholder decision-making on sawlog production: The case of Acacia plantation owners in central Vietnam. Forests 10:969.

     OpenUrl