Ramsar Convention and the Wise Use of Wetlands: Rethinking Inclusion

References

1. ↵
   1. Adaman, F.,
   2. S. Hakyemez and
   3. B. Ozkaynak

   2009. The political ecology of a Ramsar site conservation failure: The case of Burdur Lake, Turkey. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27. doi:783-800.10.1068/c0840.
2. ↵
   1. Agarwal, B.

   1994. A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge South Asian studies (USA).
3. ↵
   1. Akbulut, B.

   2012. Community–Based Resource Management in Turkey: ‘Je Participe, Tu Participes, Il Participe . . . Ils Profitent’1. Development and Change, 43:1133–1158.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Allendorf, T.,
   2. K. Khaing Swe,
   3. T. OO
   4. Y. Htut,
   5. M. Aung,
   6. M. Aung, et al

   . 2006. Community attitudes toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma). Environmental Conservation 33:344–352.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Bastian, L.,
   2. M. Gilligan, and
   3. B. Clabots

   . 2016. Gender and Protected Areas: Exploring National Reporting to the Ramsar Convention and the World Heritage Convention. Washington, DC: IUCN Global Gender office.
6. 1. SCarney, J.

   1993. Converting the wetlands, engendering the environment: The intersection of gender with agrarian change in the Gambia. Economic Geography 69:329–348.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Cleaver, F. and
   2. L. Whaley

   2018. Understanding process, power, and meaning in adaptive governance: A critical institutional reading. Ecology and Society 23: 49.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Clement, F.,
   2. W.J. Harcourt,
   3. D. Joshi and
   4. C. Sato

   . 2019. Feminist Political Ecologies of the Commons and Commoning. International Journal of the Commons 13:1–15.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Cohen-Shacham, E.,
   2. T. Dayan,
   3. R. de Groot,
   4. C. Beltrame,
   5. F. Guillet, and
   6. E. Feitelson

   . 2015. Using the ecosystem services concept to analyse stakeholder involvement in wetland management. Wetlands Ecology and Management 23:241–256.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Collard, R.C. and
    2. J. Dempsey

    . 2020. Two icebergs: Difference in feminist political economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52:237–247.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Collard, R.C.,
    2. J. Dempsey and
    3. J. Sundberg

    . 2015. A manifesto for abundant futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105.2:322–330.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. de la Torre-Castro, M.

    . 2019. Inclusive Management through Gender Consideration in Small-Scale Fisheries: The Why and the How. Frontiers in Marine Science 6:1–11.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Elias, M.,
    2. D. Joshi and
    3. R. Meinzen-Dick

    . 2021. Restoration for whom, by whom? Exploring the socio-political dimensions of restoration. Ecological Restoration 39:3–15.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    1. Elias, M.,
    2. B. Sijapati Basnett, and
    3. J. Dey de Pryck

    . 2020. Tackling Gender Inequality through Forest-Related Policies and Programmes. Pages 167–196 in Nikolakis, William, John Innes (eds.), The Wicked Problem of Forest Policy: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Sustainability in Forest Landscapes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. ↵
    1. Finlayson, C.M.

    . 2012. Forty years of wetland conservation and wise use. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 22:139–143.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Finlayson, C.M.,
    2. M.G. Bellio and
    3. J.B. Lowry

    . 2005. A conceptual basis for the wise use of wetlands in northern Australia: linking information needs, integrated analyses, drivers of change and human well-being. Marine and Freshwater Research 56:269–277.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Finlayson, C.M.,
    2. N. Davidson,
    3. D. Pritchard,
    4. G.R. Milton and
    5. H. MacKay

    . 2011. The Ramsar Convention and ecosystembased approaches to the wise use and sustainable development of wetlands. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 14.3-4:176–198.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Fraser, N.

    . 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. NY, NY: Routledge.
19. ↵
    1. Gardner, R.C. and
    2. M. Finlayson

    . 2018. Global wetland outlook: State of the world's wetlands and their services to people 2018. Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention.
20. ↵
    1. Gujja, B.

    . 1998. Wetlands: who can use them wisely? Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Wetlands and Development. 8–14 November, Dakar, Senegal.
21. ↵
    1. Gururani, S. and
    2. P. Vandergeest

    . 2014. Introduction: New Frontiers of Ecological Knowledge: Co-producing Knowledge and Governance in Asia. Conservation and Society 12:343–359.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Harrison, E.A. and
    2. E.E. Watson

    . 2012. Mind the Gap: Disciplinary Dissonance, Gender, and the Environment. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 25:933–944.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Huang, G. and
    2. M. Isobe

    . 2012. Carrying capacity of wetlands for massive migratory waterfowl. Hydrobiologia 697:5–14.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Jackson, C.

    . 1993. Doing what comes naturally? Women and environment in development. World Development 21:1947–1963.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Jackson, C.

    . 1997. Sustainable development at the sharp end: fieldworker agency in a participatory project. Development in Practice: an Oxfam Journal (United Kingdom).
26. ↵
    1. Kabeer, N.

    . 1994. Reversed realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London, UK: Verso.
27. ↵
    1. Kabeer, N.

    . 2015. Gender, poverty, and inequality: A brief history of feminist contributions in the field of international development. Gender & Development 23:189–205.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Kaijser, A. and
    2. A. Kronsell

    . 2014. Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Environmental Politics 23:417–433.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Kumar, R.,
    2. R. McInnes,
    3. C.M. Finlayson,
    4. N. Davidson,
    5. D. Rissik,
    6. S. Paul et al

    . 2020. Wetland ecological character and wise use: Towards a new framing. Marine and Freshwater Research A–E. doi: org/10.1071/MF20244.
30. ↵
    1. Leach, M.,
    2. G. Bloom,
    3. A. Ely,
    4. P. Nightingale,
    5. I. Scoones,
    6. E. Shah and
    7. A. Smith

    . 2007. Understanding Governance: pathways to sustainability. STEPS Working Paper 2, Brighton: STEPS Centre.
31. 1. Maldonado-Torres, N.

    . 2007. On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies 21:240–70, in Collard, R.C., J. Dempsey and J. Sundberg. 2015. A manifesto for abundant futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105:322–330.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Mathez-Stiefel, S.,
    2. J. Ayquipa-Valenzuela,
    3. R. Corrales-Quispe,
    4. L. Rosales-Richard and
    5. M. Valdivia-Díaz

    . 2016. Identifying Gender-Sensitive Agroforestry Options: Methodological Considerations from the Field. Mountain Research and Development. 36:417–430.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. McDougall, C.,
    2. L. Badstue,
    3. M. Elias,
    4. G. Fischer,
    5. D. Joshi,
    6. R. Pyburn
    7. A. Mulema,
    8. D. Majjar and
    9. V. Voss

    . In press. Beyond Gender and Development: How gender transformative approaches in agriculture and natural resource management can advance equality. In CGIAR Collaborative Platform for Gender Research Book 2021, CGIAR Gender Platform.
34. ↵
    1. Mies, M. and
    2. V. Shiva

    . 1993. Ecofeminism. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publications.
35. ↵
    1. Nehru, V.

    . 2015. The Political Economy of Reform in Myanmar: The Case of Rice and the Need for Patience. Sasakawa Peace Foundation, USA.
36. ↵
    1. Osumba, J.J.L.,
    2. J.B. Okeyo-Owuor and
    3. P.O. Raburu

    . 2010. Effect of harvesting on temporal papyrus (Cyperus papyrus) biomass regeneration potential among swamps in Winam Gulf wetlands of Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 18:333–341.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Ramsar Convention Secretariat

    . 1993. Additional Guidance for the Implementation of the Wise Use Concept, Japan: Meeting Proceedings.
38. 1. Ramsar Convention Secretariat

    . 2010a. Wise use of wetlands: Concepts and approaches for the wise use of wetlands. Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of wetlands. Switzerland. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 4.1.
39. 1. Ramsar Convention Secretariat

    . 2010b. Participatory skills: Establishing and strengthening local communities’ and indigenous people's participation in the management of wetlands. Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of wetlands. Switzerland. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 4.7.
40. ↵
    1. Ramsar Convention Secretariat

    . 2012. Resolution XI.9 An Integrated Framework and guidelines for avoiding, mitigating and compensating for wetland losses. Romania: Meeting Proceedings..
41. 1. Ramsar Convention Secretariat

    . 2014. Wise use of wetlands: Concepts and approaches for the wise use of wetlands. Ramsar Handbooks for the Wise Use of Wetlands. Switzerland. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 4.1.
42. 1. Ramsar Convention Secretariat

    . 2018a. Resolution XIII.18 Gender and Wetlands. United Arab Emirates: Meeting Proceedings.
43. 1. Ramsar Convention Secretariat

    . 2018b. Global Wetland Outlook: State of the World's Wetlands and their Services to People. Gland, Switzerland. Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
44. 1. Ramsar Convention Secretariat

    . 2018c. Resolution XII.15: Cultural Values and Practices of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities and Their Contribution to Climate-Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Wetlands. UAE: Meeting Proceedings.
45. ↵
    1. Rao, N.

    . 2017. Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice. World Development. 95:43–54.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Ravera, F.,
    2. I. Iniesta-Arandia,
    3. B. Martín-López,
    4. U. Pascual and
    5. P. Bose

    . 2016. Gender Perspectives in Resilience, Vulnerability and Adaptation to Global Environmental Change. Ambio. 45:235–247.

    OpenUrlPubMed
47. ↵
    1. Rist, S.,
    2. M. Chidambaranathan,
    3. C. Escobar,
    4. U. Wiesmann and
    5. A. Zimmermann

    . 2007. Moving from Sustainable Management to Sustainable Governance of Natural Resources: The Role of Social Learning Processes in Rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies. 23:23–37.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Scheffer, M.

    . 2009. Critical Transitions in Nature and Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. ↵
    1. Sellamuttu, S.,
    2. S. de Silva,
    3. N. Nagabhatla,
    4. C. Finlayson,
    5. C. Pattanaik and
    6. N. Prasad

    . 2012. The Ramsar Convention's Wise Use Concept in Theory and Practice: An Inter-Disciplinary Investigation of Practice in Kolleru Lake, India. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy. 15:228–250.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Srinivas, S. and
    2. U.S. Hlaing

    . 2015. Myanmar: Land Tenure Issues and the Impact on Rural Development. Myanmar: National Action Plan for Agriculture (NAPA). Yangon, Myanmar. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
51. ↵
    1. Stewart, F.

    . 2002. Horizontal Inequalities: A Neglected Dimension of Development. QEH Working Papers, Queen Elizabeth House. University of Oxford.
52. ↵
    1. Sundberg, J.

    . 2017. Feminist Political Ecology. International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth. Environment and Technology. Wiley Online Library.
53. ↵
    1. Winker, G. and
    2. N. Degele

    . 2011. Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: dealing with social inequality. European Journal of Women's Studies. 18:51–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. ↵
    1. Wongthong, P. and
    2. J. True

    . 2015. Community-Led Coastal Management in the Gulf of Mottama Project (CLCMGoMP) Updated situation analysis of the Gulf of Mottama Based on the rapid socio-ecological assessment. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation 1–35.
55. ↵
    1. Wood, A.

    2003. Wetlands, gender and poverty some elements in the development of sustainable and equitable wetland management. In Abebe, Y.D. and Geheb, K. (eds), Wetlands of Ethiopia. Proceedings of a seminar on the resources and status of Ethiopia's wetlands. Nairobi, Kenya: IUCN–The World Conservation Union, Wetlands and Water Resources Programme IUCN, Regional Office for Eastern Africa.