Restoration for Whom, by Whom? A Feminist Political Ecology of Restoration

References

1. ↵
   1. Adams, W.M.,
   2. I.D. Hodge and
   3. L. Sandbrook

   . 2014. New spaces for nature: The re-territorialisation of biodiversity conservation under neoliberalism in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39:574–588.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Agarwal, B.

   1997. “Bargaining” and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics 3:1–51.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Barney, K.

   2008. China and the production of forestlands in Lao PDR: A political ecology of transnational enclosure. Pages 91–107 in (eds), J. Nevins and N. Peluso Taking Southeast Asia to Market: Commodities, Nature, and People in the Neoliberal Age. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4. ↵
   1. Barr, C.M. and
   2. J.A. Sayer

   . 2012. The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia–Pacific: Critical issues for REDD+. Biological Conservation 154:9–19.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bassett, T.J. and
   2. A.W. Peimer

   . 2015. Political ecological perspectives on socio-ecological relations. Natures, Sciences, Sociétés 2:157–165.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Baviskar, A.

   2020. Uncivil Society: Ecology, Equity and the Commons in Delhi. New Delhi, India: Sage Yoda Press.
7. ↵
   1. Bebbington, A.,
   2. S. Guggenheim,
   3. E. Olson and
   4. M. Woolcock

   . 2004. Exploring social capital debates at the World Bank. The Journal of Development Studies 40:33–64.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Biermann, F.

   2007. ‘Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change 17:326–337.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Blaikie, P. and
   2. H. Brookfield

   . 1987. Land Degradation and Society. London, UK: Methuen.
10. 1. Bonn Challenge

    . 2020. Forest Landscape Restoration (accessed 20 May 2020). www.bonnchallenge.org.
11. ↵
    1. Bryant, R.L.

    1998. Power, knowledge and political ecology in the third world: A review. Progress in Physical Geography 22:79–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Butler, W.H. and
    2. C.A. Schultz

    (eds). 2019. A New Era for Collaborative Forest Management: Policy and Practice Insights from the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program. London, UK: Earthscan/Routledge.
13. ↵
    1. Carney, J. and
    2. M. Watts

    . 1990. Manufacturing dissent: Work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant society. Africa 60:207–241.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Chandhoke, N.

    2003. Governance and the pluralisation of the state: Implications for democratic citizenship. Economic and Political Weekly 38:2957–2968.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Chhatre, A.,
    2. S. Lakhanpal,
    3. A.M. Larson,
    4. F. Nelson,
    5. H. Ojha and
    6. J. Rao

    . 2012. Social safeguards and co-benefits in REDD+: A review of the adjacent possible. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4:654–660.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Clement, F.,
    2. W. Harcourt,
    3. D. Joshi and
    4. C. Sato

    . 2019. Feminist political ecologies of the commons and commoning. International Journal of the Commons 13:1–15.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Collard, R.C. and
    2. J. Dempsey

    . 2020. Two icebergs: Difference in feminist political economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52:237–247.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Collard, R.C.,
    2. J. Dempsey and
    3. J. Sundberg

    . 2015. A manifesto for abundant futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105:322–330.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Colfer, C.J.P.,
    2. B.S. Basnett and
    3. M. Ihalainen

    . 2018. Making Sense of ‘Intersectionality’: A Manual for Lovers of People and Forests (Occasional Paper 184). Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
20. ↵
    1. Cronkleton, P.,
    2. Y. Artati,
    3. H. Baral,
    4. K. Paudyal,
    5. E. Birhane,
    6. H. Kassa

    et al. 2017. How do property rights reforms provide incentives for forest landscape restoration? Comparing evidence from Nepal, China and Ethiopia. International Forestry Review 19:8–23.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Crossland, M.,
    2. A.M. Paez-Valencia,
    3. T. Pagella,
    4. C. Magaju,
    5. E. Kiura,
    6. L. Winowiecki

    et al. 2021. Onto the farm and into the household: Intrahousehold gender relations matter for scaling land restoration practices. Ecological Restoration 39:90–107.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    1. Davis, M.A. and
    2. L.B. Slobodkin

    . 2004a. The science and values of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 12:1–3.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Davis, M.A. and
    2. L.B. Slobodkin

    . 2004b. Restoration ecology: The challenge of social values and expectations (Forum). Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:44–45.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Diamond, J.

    1985. How and why eroded ecosystems should be restored. Nature 313(6004):629–630.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Djenontin, I.N.S.,
    2. S. Foli and
    3. L.C. Zulu

    . 2018. Revisiting the factors shaping outcomes for forest and landscape restoration in sub-Saharan Africa: A way forward for policy, practice and research. Sustainability 10:906.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Dove, M.R.

    1997. The epistemology of Southeast Asia’s anthropogenic grasslands: Issues of myth, science and development. Southeast Asian Studies 35:223–239.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Ehrenfeld, J.G.

    2000. Defining the limits of restoration: the need for realistic goals. Restoration Ecology 8:2–9.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Elmhirst, R.

    2011. Introducing new feminist political ecologies. Geoforum 42:129–132.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Elmhirst, R.,
    2. M. Siscawati,
    3. B. Sijapati Basnett and
    4. D. Ekowati

    . 2017. Gender and generation in engagements with oil palm in East Kalimantan, Indonesia: Insights from feminist political ecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44:1135–1157.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Emel, J. and
    2. R. Peet

    . 1989. Resource management and natural hazards. Pages 49–76 in (eds), R. Peet and N. Thrift New Models in Geography: The Political-Economy Perspective. London, UK: Unwin Hyman.
31. ↵
    1. Emel, J.

    1995. Are you man enough, big and bad enough? Ecofeminism and wolf eradication in the USA. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13:707–734.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Escobar, A.

    2008. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33. ↵
    1. Fairhead, J. and
    2. M. Leach

    . 1995. Reading forest history backwards: The interaction of policy and local land use in Guinea’s forestsavanna mosaic, 1893–1993. Environment and History 1:55–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Fairhead, J. and
    2. M. Leach

    . 1996. Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    . 2005. The State of Food and Agriculture 2005. Rome, Italy: FAO.
36. ↵
    1. Forsyth, T.

    2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
37. ↵
    1. Forsyth, T. and
    2. A. Walker

    . 2008. Forest Guardians, Forest Destroyers: The Politics of Environmental Knowledge in Northern Thailand. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
38. ↵
    1. Forsyth, T.

    2011. Politicizing environmental explanations: What can political ecology learn from sociology and philosophy of science?. Pages 31–46 in (eds), M. Goldman, P. Nadasdy and M. Turner Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. ↵
    1. Forsyth, T., and
    2. T. Sikor

    . 2013. Forests, development and the globalisation of justice. The Geographical Journal 179:114–121.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. ↵
    1. Gann, G.D.,
    2. T. McDonald,
    3. B. Walder,
    4. J. Aronson,
    5. C.R. Nelson,
    6. J. Jonson

    et al. 2019. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 27:S1–S46.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Goldman, M. and
    2. M.D. Turner

    . 2011. Introduction. Pages 1–23 in (eds), M.J. Goldman, P. Nadasdy and M.D. Turner Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42. ↵
    1. Gururani, S. and
    2. P. Vandergeest

    . 2014. New frontiers of ecological knowledge: Co-producing knowledge and governance in Asia. Conservation and Society 12:343–351.

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Haraway, D.

    1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London, UK: Free Association Books.
44. 1. Harcourt, W. and
    2. I.L. Nelson

    (eds). 2015. Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the ‘Green Economy’. London, UK: Zed Books.
45. ↵
    1. Harding, S.

    1995. Just add women and stir?. Pages 295–307 in In Missing Links: Gender Equity in Science and Technology for Development. Gender Working Group, the United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development. ITDG Publishing, UNIFEM, Ottawa, Canada: IDRC.
46. ↵
    1. Hecht, S. and
    2. A. Cockburn

    . 1989. The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the Amazon. London, UK: Verso.
47. ↵
    1. Higgs, E.

    1994. Expanding the scope of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 2:137–146.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Higgs, E.

    2003. Nature by Design: People, Natural Process, and Ecological Restoration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. ↵
    1. Higgs, E.,
    2. D.A. Falk,
    3. A. Guerrini,
    4. M. Hall,
    5. J. Harris,
    6. R.J. Hobbs

    et al. 2014. The changing role of history in restoration ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12:499–506.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Higgs, E.,
    2. J. Harris,
    3. S. Murphy,
    4. K. Bowers,
    5. R. Hobbs,
    6. W. Jenkins

    et al. 2018. On principles and standards in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 26:399–403.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Hobbs, R.J. and
    2. J.A. Harris

    , 2001. Restoration ecology: Repairing the earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration Ecology 9:239–246.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Hobbs, R.J.

    2004. Restoration ecology: The challenge of social values and expectations (Forum). Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:43–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. ↵
    1. Hull, R.B. and
    2. D.P. Robertson

    . 2000. The language of nature matters: We need a more public ecology. Pages 97–118 in (eds), P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hull Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
54. 1. Jasanoff, S.

    (ed). 2004. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London, UK: Routledge.
55. ↵
    1. Jones, S.

    2008. Political ecology and land degradation: How does the land lie 21 years after Blaikie and Brookfield’s Land Degradation and Society?. Geography Compass 2:671–694.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Kandel, M.,
    2. G. Agaba,
    3. R.S. Alare,
    4. T Addoah and
    5. K. Schreckenberg

    . 2021. Assessing social equity in farmer-managed natural regeneration (FMNR): Findings from northeastern Ghana. Ecological Restoration 39:64–76.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
57. ↵
    1. Kariuki, J. and
    2. R. Birner

    . 2021. A conceptual framework for exploring equity in ecological restoration: The case of a market-based programme in Kenya. Ecological Restoration 39:77–89.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
58. ↵
    1. Khadka, M.,
    2. S. Karki,
    3. B.S. Karky,
    4. R. Kotru and
    5. K.B. Darjee

    . 2014. Gender Equality Challenges to the REDD Initiative in Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 34:197–207.

    OpenUrl
59. ↵
    1. Kleinschmit, D.,
    2. B. Sijapati Basnett,
    3. A. Martin,
    4. N.D. Rai and
    5. C. Smith-Hall

    . 2015. Drivers of forests and tree-based systems for food security. Pages 87–110 in (eds), B. Vira, C. Wildburger and S. Mansourian Forests, Trees and Landscapes for Food Security and Nutrition. A Global Assessment Report, IUFRO World Series 33. Vienna, Austria: IUFRO.
60. ↵
    1. Kull, C.A.

    2004. Isle of Fire: The Political Ecology of Landscape Burning in Madagascar. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
61. ↵
    1. Kull, C.A.,
    2. X. Arnauld de Sartre and
    3. M. Castro-Larrañaga

    . 2015. The political ecology of ecosytem services. Geoforum 61:122–134.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
62. ↵
    1. Lackey, R.T.

    2004. Restoration ecology: The challenge of social values and expectations (Forum). Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:45–46.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
63. ↵
    1. Łapniewska, Z.

    2016. Reading Elinor Ostrom through a gender perspective. Feminist Economics 22:129–151.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Laris, P.

    2002. Burning the seasonal mosaic: Preventative burning strategies in the wooded savanna of southern Mali. Human Ecology 30:155–186.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
65. ↵
    1. Larson, A.M.,
    2. T. Dokken,
    3. A.E. Duchelle,
    4. S. Atmadja,
    5. I.A.P. Resosudarmo,
    6. P. Cronkleton

    et al. 2015. The role of women in early REDD+ implementation: Lessons for future engagement. International Forestry Review 17:43–65.

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. Larson, A.M. and
    2. J. Springer

    . 2016. Recognition and Respect for Tenure Rights. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN).
67. ↵
    1. Leach, M.,
    2. B. Reyers,
    3. X. Bai,
    4. E.S. Brondizio,
    5. C. Cook,
    6. S. Diaz

    et al. 2018. Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: A social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Global Sustainability 1:1–13.

    OpenUrl
68. ↵
    1. Lee, L.C.,
    2. D. McNeill,
    3. P. Ridings,
    4. M. Featherstone,
    5. D.K. Okamoto,
    6. N.B. Spindel

    et al. 2021. Chiixuu Tll iinasdll: Indigenous ethics and values lead ecological restoration for people and place in Gwaii Haanas. Ecological Restoration 39:45–51.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
69. ↵
    1. Lenton, T.M.

    2013. What early warning systems are there for environmental shocks?. Environmental Science and Policy 27:S60–S75.

    OpenUrl
70. ↵
    1. Li, T.M.

    2014. What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39:58–602.

    OpenUrl
71. 1. Lie, T.M.

    2017. After Development: Surplus population and the politics of entitlement. Development and Change 48:1247–1261.

    OpenUrl
72. ↵
    1. Light, A.

    1994. Hegemony and democracy: How politics in restoration informs the politics of restoration. Restoration and Management Notes 12:140–144.

    OpenUrl
73. ↵
    1. Light, A. and
    2. E.S. Higgs

    . 1996. The politics of ecological restoration. Environmental Ethics 18:227–247.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
74. ↵
    1. Lovo, S.

    2016. Tenure insecurity and investment in soil conservation: Evidence from Malawi. World Development 78:219–229.

    OpenUrl
75. 1. Maldonado-Torres, N.

    2007. On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies 21:240–270.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
76. ↵
    1. Mansourian, S.

    2017. Governance and forest landscape restoration: A framework to support decision-making. Journal for Nature Conservation 37:21–30.

    OpenUrl
77. ↵
    1. Mansourian, S.

    2021. Disciplines, sectors, motivations and power relations in Forest Landscape Restoration. Ecological Restoration 39:pp–pp.

    OpenUrl
78. ↵
    1. Martin, D.M.

    2017. Ecological restoration should be redefined for the twenty-first century. Restoration Ecology 25:668–673.

    OpenUrl
79. ↵
    1. McElwee, P. and
    2. T.H. Nghi

    . 2021. Assessing the social benefits of tree planting by smallholders in Vietnam: 2 lessons for large-scale restoration programs. Ecological Restoration 39:52–63.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
80. ↵
    1. McLain, R.,
    2. S. Lawry,
    3. M.R. Guariguata and
    4. J. Reed

    . 2018. Toward a tenure-responsive approach to forest landscape restoration: A proposed tenure diagnostic for assessing restoration opportunities. Land Use Policy 80:1–12.

    OpenUrl
81. ↵
    1. Mills, S.

    1995. In Service of The Wild: Restoring and Reinhabiting Damaged Land. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
82. 1. Mollet, S. and
    2. T. Kepe

    . 2018. Introduction: Land rights, biodiversity conservation and justice: Rethinking parks and people. Pages 1–13 in (eds) S. Mollet and T. Kepe Land Rights, Biodiversity Conservation and Justice Rethinking Parks and People. London, UK: Routledge.
83. ↵
    1. Moore, D.S.

    1993. Contesting terrain in Zimbabwe’s eastern highlands: Political ecology, ethnography, and peasant resource struggles. Economic Geography 69:380–401.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
84. ↵
    1. Mosse, D.

    2005. Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London, UK: Pluto Press.
85. ↵
    1. Mukadasi, B. and
    2. M. Nabalegwa

    . 2007. Gender mainstreaming and community participation in plant resource conservation in Buzaya county, Kamuli district, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 45:7–12.

    OpenUrl
86. ↵
    1. Neumann, R.P.

    2008. Probing the (in)compatibilities of social theory and policy relevance in Piers Blaikie’s political ecology. Geoforum 39:728–735.

    OpenUrl
87. ↵
    1. Neumann, R.P.

    2009. Political ecology: Theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography 33:398–406.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
88. ↵
    1. Osmani, S.R.

    2010. Theory of justice for an imperfect world: Exploring Amartya Sen’s idea of justice. Journal of Human Development Capabilities 11:599–607.

    OpenUrl
89. ↵
    1. Peach Brown, H.C.

    2011. Gender, climate change and REDD+ in the Congo Basin forests of Central Africa. International Forestry Review 13:163–176.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
90. 1. Peet, R. and
    2. M. Watts

    . 2004. Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development and Social Movements. 2nd Edition. London, UK: Routledge.
91. ↵
    1. Peluso, N.L.

    1992. Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley.
92. ↵
    1. Pérez, D. and
    2. E. Ceccon

    . 2017. Ecological restoration in the socio-environmental context of Latin America and the Caribbean. Pages 21–27 in (eds), E. Ceccon and D. Pérez Beyond Restoration Ecology: Social Perspectives in Latin America and the Caribbean. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Vázquez Mazzini Editores.
93. ↵
    1. Perreault, T.A.

    2003. Social capital, development, and indigenous politics in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Geographical Review 93:328–349.

    OpenUrl
94. ↵
    1. Perry, J.

    1994. Greening corporate environments: Authorship and politics in restoration. Restoration and Management Notes 12:145–147.

    OpenUrl
95. 1. Pham, T.T.,
    2. Y.H. Mai,
    3. M. Moeliono and
    4. M. Brockhaus

    . 2016. Women’s participation in REDD+ national decision-making in Vietnam. International Forestry Review 18:334–344.

    OpenUrl
96. ↵
    1. Quisumbing, A.R. and
    2. N. Kumar

    . 2014. Climate-smart agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia: The gender-differentiated impact of land rights knowledge. Pages 43–46 in (eds), C. Ringler, A.R. Quisumbing, E. Bryan and R.S. Meinzen-Dick Enhancing Women’s Assets to Manage Risk under Climate Change: Potential for Group-Based Approaches. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
97. ↵
    1. Rangan, H. and
    2. C.A. Kull

    . 2009. What makes ecology political? Rethinking scale in political ecology. Progress in Human Geography 33:28–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
98. ↵
    1. Ribot, J.

    2007. Institutional choice and recognition in the consolidation of local democracy. Democracy 50:43–49.

    OpenUrl
99. ↵
    1. Robbins, P.

    2004. Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. New York, NY: Blackwell.
100. ↵
     1. Rocheleau, D.,
     2. B. Thomas-Slayter and
     3. E. Wangari

     . 1996. Gender and environment: A feminist political ecology perspective. Pages 3–23 in (eds) D. Rocheleau, B. Thomas-Slayter and E. Wangari Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences. New York, NY: Routledge.
101. ↵
     1. Rocheleau, D.E.

     2008. Political ecology in the key of policy: From chains of explanation to webs of relation. Geoforum 39:716–727.

     OpenUrl
102. ↵
     1. Rocheleau, D.E.

     2015. A situated view of feminist political ecology from my networks, roots and territories. Pages 29–66 in (eds), W. Harcourt and I.L. Nelson Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the ‘Green Economy’. London, UK: Zed Books.
103. ↵
     1. Rockström, J.,
     2. W. Steffen,
     3. K. Noone,
     4. Å. Persson,
     5. F.S. Chapin III.,
     6. E. Lambin

     et al. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
104. ↵
     1. Roe, E.

     1995. Except Africa: Postscript to a special section on development narratives. World Development 23:1065–1069.

     OpenUrl
105. ↵
     1. Sandewall, M.,
     2. B. Ohlsson,
     3. R.K. Sandewall and
     4. L.S. Viet

     . 2010. The expansion of farm-based plantation forestry in Vietnam. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment 39:567–579.

     OpenUrl
106. ↵
     1. Sarmiento Barletti, J.P. and
     2. A.M. Larson

     . 2017. Rights abuse allegations in the context of REDD+ readiness and implementation: A preliminary review and proposal for moving forward. Infobrief 190. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
107. 1. Schroeder, R.

     1999. Shady Practices. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
108. ↵
     1. Scoones, I.

     2016. The politics of sustainability and development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41:293–319.

     OpenUrl
109. ↵
     1. Scoones, I.,
     2. P. Newell and
     3. M. Leach

     . 2015. The politics of green transformations. Pages 1–24 in (eds), I. Scoones, M. Leach and P. Newell The Politics of Green Transformations. Oxon, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
110. 1. Sen, A.K.

     2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
111. ↵
     1. Sen, A.,
     2. H. Unnikrishnan and
     3. H. Nagendra

     . 2021. Restoration of urban water commons: Navigating social-ecological fault lines and inequities. Ecological Restoration 39:120–129.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
112. 1. SER (Society for Ecological Restoration) International Science and Policy Working Group

     . 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Version 2. Tucson, AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration.
113. ↵
     1. Sigman, E. and
     2. M. Elias

     . 2021. Three Approaches to Restoration and Their Implications for Social Inclusion. Ecological Restoration 39:27–35.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
114. ↵
     1. Sijapati Basnett, B.,
     2. M. Elias,
     3. M. Ihalainen and
     4. A.M Paez Valencia

     . 2017. Gender matters in forest landscape restoration: A framework for design and evaluation. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
115. ↵
     1. Smith, B.E.

     2016. Life with mother and Marx: Work, gender, and class revisited (again). Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48:2085–2088.

     OpenUrl
116. ↵
     1. Stirling, A.

     2015. Emancipating transformations: From controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical progress. Pages 54–67 in (eds), I. Scoones, M. Leach and P. Newell The Politics of Green Transformations. New York, NY: Routledge.
117. ↵
     1. Sundberg, J.

     2017. Feminist political ecology: Sites of inspiration and formation. Pages 1–12 in: (eds) D. Richardson, N. Castree, M.F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, and R.A. Marston The International Encyclopedia of Geography. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
118. ↵
     1. Swaffield, J.

     2016. After a decade of critique: Neoliberal environmentalism, discourse analysis and the promotion of climateprotecting behaviour in the workplace. Geoforum 70:119–129.

     OpenUrl
119. ↵
     1. Swart, J.A.,
     2. H.J. Van Der Windt and
     3. J. Keulartz

     . 2001. Valuation of nature in conservation and restoration. Restoration Ecology 9:230–238.

     OpenUrl
120. ↵
     1. Swyngedouw, E. and
     2. M. Kaika

     . 2000. The environment of the city or . . . the urbanisation of nature. Pages 567–580 in (eds), G. Bridge and S. Watson A Companion to the City. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
121. ↵
     1. Tsing, A.L.

     2004. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, New Jersey and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.
122. 1. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme)

     . 2019. New UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration to inspire bold UN Environment Assembly decisions (accessed 20 May 2020). www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/story/new-un-decadeecosystem-restoration-inspire-bold-un-environment-assembly.
123. ↵
     1. UN-REDD

     . 2011. The Business Case for Mainstreaming Gender in REDD. Geneva, Switzerland: UN-REDD Program Secretariat.
124. ↵
     1. Unruh, J.D.

     2008. Carbon sequestration in Africa: The land tenure problem. Global Environmental Change 18:700–707.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
125. ↵
     1. Vayda, A.P.

     1983. Progressive contextualization: Methods for research in human ecology. Human Ecology 11:265–281.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
126. ↵
     1. Veldman, J.W.,
     2. G.E. Overbeck,
     3. D. Negreiros,
     4. G. Mahy,
     5. S. Le Stradic,
     6. G.W. Fernandes

     et al. 2015. Tyranny of trees in grassy biomes. Science 347(6221): 484–485.

     OpenUrlFREE Full Text
127. ↵
     1. Thulstrup, A.W.

     2015. Livelihood resilience and adaptive capacity: Tracing changes in household access to capital in central Vietnam. World Development 74: 352–362.

     OpenUrl
128. ↵
     1. Walker, P.A.

     2005. Political ecology: Where is the ecology?. Progress in Human Geography 29:73–82.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
129. ↵
     1. Wilson, A.

     2019. The Culture of Nature: North American Landscape from Disney to Exxon Valdez, Second Edition. Toronto, Canada: Between the Lines.
130. ↵
     1. Yang, Y.C.E.,
     2. S. Passarelli,
     3. R.J. Lovell and
     4. C. Ringler

     . 2018. Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services 31:58–67.

     OpenUrl
131. ↵
     1. Zimmerer, K.S. and
     2. T. Bassett

     . 2003. Approaching political ecology: Society, nature, and scale in human-environment studies. Pages 1–25 in (eds), K.S. Zimmerer and T. Bassett Political Ecology: An Integrative Approach to Geography and Environment Development Studies. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
132. ↵
     1. Zimmerer, K.S.

     2003. Geographies of seed networks for food plants (potato, ulluco) and approaches to agrobiodiversity conservation in the Andean countries. Society & Natural Resources 16:583–601.

     OpenUrl
133. ↵
     1. Zimmerer, K.S.

     2006. Cultural ecology: At the interface with political ecology-the new geographies of environmental conservation and globalization. Progress in Human Geography 30:63–78.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science