Equitable and Inclusive Landscape Restoration Planning: Learning from a Restoration Opportunity Assessment in India

References

1. ↵
   1. Agarwal, B.

   2010. Gender and Green Governance: The Political Economy of Women’s Presence Within and Beyond Community Forestry. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
2. ↵
   1. Basnett, B.S.,
   2. Elias M.,
   3. Ihalainen M. and
   4. Valencia A.M.P

   2017. Gender matters in forest landscape restoration: a framework for design and evaluation. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
3. ↵
   1. Beatty, C.,
   2. Cox N.A. and
   3. Kuzee M.

   2018. Biodiversity guidelines for forest landscape restoration opportunities assessments. 1stet al. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
4. ↵
   1. Bhanumurthy, N.R.,
   2. A H.K.,
   3. Nath,
   4. Bose S.,
   5. Adhikari P.D. and
   6. Jana A.

   2016. Madhya Pradesh State MDG Report 2014–15. Bhopal, India: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP) in collaboration with the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
5. ↵
   1. Boyd, E. and
   2. Folke C.

   2012. Adapting institutions: governance, complexity, and social-ecological resilience. In Boyd E. and Folke C. (eds), Adapting Institutions: Governance, Complexity, and Social-Ecological Resilience. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6. ↵
   1. Buckingham, K.,
   2. Ray S.,
   3. Arakwiye B.,
   4. Morales A.,
   5. Singh R.,
   6. Maneerattana D.

   , et al.2018. Mapping Social Landscapes: A Guide to Restoration Opportunities Mapping. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
7. ↵
   1. Buckingham, K.,
   2. Arakwiye, B.,
   3. Ray S.,
   4. Maneerattana O. and
   5. Anderson W.

   2020. Cultivating networks and mapping social landscapes: How to understand restoration governance in Rwanda Land Use Policy: 104546.
8. ↵
   1. Bullock, J.M.,
   2. Aronson J.,
   3. Newton A.C.,
   4. Pywell R.F. and
   5. Rey-Benayas J.M.

   2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:8.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Callon, M.

   . 2001. Actor Network Theory. Pages 62–66 in Smelser N.J. and Baltes P.B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
10. ↵
    1. Chaffin, J.M.,
    2. Gosnell H. and
    3. Cosens B.A.

    2014. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society 19:56.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Chaturvedi, R.,
    2. Duraisami M.,
    3. Jayahari K.M.,
    4. Kanchana C.B.,
    5. Singh R.,
    6. Segarin S.

    , et al.2018. Technical Note—Restoration Opportunities Atlas of India. Mumbai, India: World Resources Institute India.
12. ↵
    1. Chazdon, R.L.

    2008. Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320:1458-60.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Chazdon, R.L.,
    2. Brancalion P. HS.,
    3. Lamb D.,
    4. Laestadius L.,
    5. Calmon M. and
    6. Kumar C.

    2017. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conservation Letters 10:125-32.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Chazdon, R.L. and
    2. Guariguata M.

    2018. Decision support tools for forest landscape restoration: Current status and future outlook. In Occasional Paper 183. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
15. ↵
    1. Cleaver, F. and
    2. de Koning J.

    2015. Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons 9:1-18.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. de Koning, J. and
    2. Cleaver F.

    2012. Institutional Bricolage in Community Forestry: An Agenda for Future Research. Pages 277–90 in Arts B., Van Bommel S., Ros-tonen M. and Verschoor G. (eds), Forest-People Interfaces: Understanding Community Forestry and Biocultural Diversity. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
17. ↵
    1. Clement, F.,
    2. Harcourt W.J.,
    3. Joshi D. and
    4. Sato C.

    2019. Feminist political ecologies of the commons and commoning (editorial to the special feature). International Journal of the Commons 13:1-15.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Folke, C.,
    2. Hahn T.,
    3. Olsson P. and
    4. Norberg J.

    2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441-73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. Global Landscapes Forum (GLF). 2014. Global Landscapes Forum Website. Global Landscape Forum available at. University of Wisconsin. www.landscapes.org/glf-2014/about. (accessed December 23, 2020).
20. Government of India (GoI). 2011. District Table (Tehsil-Wise Distribution of Number & Area of Operational Holdings by Size Class/Size Group). Agriculture Census Division, Department of Agriculture, Co-Operation & Farmers Welfare Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. Government of India. agcensus.dacnet.nic.in.
21. ↵
    1. Gosain, A.K.,
    2. Ravindranath N.H.,
    3. Garg A.,
    4. Rao S. and
    5. INRM Team

    2014. Vulnerability Assessment of Madhya Pradesh Towards Climate Change—a Study under the MOEFF-GIZ Project on Climate Change Adaptation in Rural Areas in India. Bhopal, India: EPCO.
22. Institue of Livelihood Research and Training (ILRT). 2018. Undertaking Livelihoods Assessment for Eastern Madhya Pradesh Landscape: A Study of Sidhi District edited by Gautam R.S., Sharma U.S., Singh S., Kumar S. and Mahajan V. Report submitted to World Resources Institute India. Bhopal, India: ILRT.
23. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). 2019. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Settele J., Díaz S., Brondízio E.S. E.S., Ngo H.T., Guèze M., Agard J.. (eds). Bonn, Germany: IPBES secretariat.
24. Inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. Summary for Policymakers. p. 32 in Zhai P., Masson-Delmotte V., Pörtner H.O., Roberts D., Skea J., Shukla P.R., et al.(eds). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, SustainaLarge-Scale Forest Restoration.ble Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.
25. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and World Resources Institute (WRI). 2014. A guide to the Restoration Opportunities Assessment Methodology (ROAM): Assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub-national level In Working Paper (Road-test edition). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
26. ↵
    IUCN. 2017. Gender-Responsive Restoration Guidelines: A Closer Look at Gender in the Restoration Opportunities Assessment Methodology. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
27. ↵
    1. Lamb, D.

    2014. Large-Scale Forest Restoration. New York, NY: Routledge.
28. ↵
    1. McLain, R,
    2. Lawry S.,
    3. Guariguata M.R. and
    4. Reed J J.

    2019. Integrating Tenure and Governance into Assessments of Forest Landscape Restoration Opportunities. Bogor Indonesia: CIFOR.
29. ↵
    1. Mollinga, P.P.,
    2. Meinzen-Dick R.S. and
    3. Merrey D.J.

    2007. Politics, plurality and problemsheds: a strategic approach for reform of agricultural water resources management. Development Policy Review 25:699-719.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Mollinga, P.

    2010. Boundary Concepts for Interdisciplinary Analysis of Irrigation Water Management in South Asia. In ZEF Working Paper Series, No. 64. Bonn, Germany: University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
31. ↵
    1. Nightingale, A.

    2006. The nature of gender: work, gender, and environment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, no.24:165-185.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC). 2015. Land Use and Land Cover for Sidhi District, Madhya Pradesh.
33. ↵
    1. Olsson, P.,
    2. Folke C. and
    3. Hahn T.

    2004. Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9:2.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Pretty, J.

    . 2003. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, no 302:1912-14.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    1. Ribot, J.C.

    . 2002. African decentralization: Local actors, powers and accountability. In Democracy, Governance and Human Rights—Paper Number 8, 103. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
36. ↵
    1. Ribot, J.C.

    . 2010. Vulnerability does not fall from the sky: Toward multiscale, pro-poor climate policy. Pages 47–74 in Mearns R, Masson-Delmotte V. and Norton A, Social Dimensions of Climate Change: Equity and Vulnerability in a Warming World, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
37. ↵
    1. Rocheleau, D.E.,
    2. Thomas-Slayter B.P. and
    3. Wangari E.

    . 1996. Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues And Local Experiences. New York, NY: Routledge.
38. ↵
    1. Rocheleau, D and
    2. Edmunds D.

    . 1997. Women, men and trees: gender, power and property in forest and agrarian landscapes. World Development 25:1351-71.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Schiffer, E.

    . 2007. Net-Map Toolbox: Influence Mapping of Social Networks.
40. ↵
    1. Singh, R.,
    2. Shelar K.,
    3. Chaturvedi R.,
    4. Duraisami M. and
    5. Gautam R.S.

    . 2020. Restoring landscapes in india for climate and communities: Key findings from Madhya Pradesh’s Sidhi district, Mumbai, India: World Resources Institute India.
41. Society for Ecological Restoration (SER). 2020 What Is Ecological Restoration?” Society for Ecological Restoration, www.serrrc.org/what-is-ecological-restoration. (accessed on November 5, 2020).
42. ↵
    1. Steins, N.A.

    2001. New Directions in Natural Resource Management the Offer of Actor-Network Theory.” IDS Bulletin 32:18-25.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2019. New UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration offers unparalleled opportunity for job creation, food security and addressing climate change. In United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), New York.
44. ↵
    1. Tobi, H. and
    2. Kampen J.K.

    . 2018. Research Design: The Methodology for Interdisciplinary Research Framework. Quality and Quantity, 52:1209-25.

    OpenUrl