Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
EditorialResearch Article
Open Access

Post Burn Restoration Response of Encelia virginensis within a Small Wash System in the Mojave Desert

Dale A. Devitt, Fred Landau, Scott R. Abella, Matt D. Petrie, Ann M. McLuckie and John O. Kellam
Ecological Restoration, September 2020, 38 (3) 169-179; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.38.3.169
Dale A. Devitt
Dale Devitt (corresponding author), School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154. .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dale.devitt{at}unlv.edu
Fred Landau
Fred Landau, School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott R. Abella
Scott Abella, School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matt D. Petrie
Matt Petrie, School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann M. McLuckie
Ann McLuckie, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Hurricane, UT.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John O. Kellam
John Kella, Red Cliffs National Conservation Area, Bureau of Land Management, St. George UT.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Plot location based on elevation and distance between plots, with percent slope between plots listed. Plots are designated by number (P1–P5) followed by elevation in m.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Side wall slopes at each plot location with error bars. Vertical bars with different lettering are statistically different at the p < 0.05 level.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Monthly precipitation totals (cm) during the experimental period, along with yearly totals (cm) and historical monthly total-values (50 yr. averages). All precipitation was measured as rainfall.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Average monthly soil volumetric water contents (cm3 water/cm3 soil) along with error bars at the 10 (), 25 (Δ) and 43 (□) cm depths during the experimental period. All depths on all dates were significantly different from each other except on those dates that are marked with different letters (p < 0.05).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Percent survival of E. virginensis over time based on treatments, along with cumulative monthly precipitation minus monthly potential evapotranspiration (cm). No seeds were produced from plants growing in control or hydrogel treatments.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Probability of survival of E. virginensis over time based on elevation.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Probability of survival of E. virginensis over time based on imposed treatments.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Probability of survival of E. virginensis over time based on slope wash locations. Probablity of survival in upper elevation head water locations (A) vs. lower elevation wash locations (B).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Saturated Hydraulic conductivity (cm/hr) with USDA ratings (2019).

    PlotKs (Slope)Ks (Wash)Rating
    P1.985m0.361.07Very Slow/Slow
    P2.984m1.920.18Moderately Slow/Very Slow
    P3.967m0.680.61Slow/Slow
    P4.955m0.4725.10Slow/Moderately Rapid
    P5.936m1.47412.39Moderately Slow/Very Rapid
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Probability of survival p values based on Logrank tests for comparison of plots.

    SiteP1.985mP2.984mP3.967mP4.955mP5.936m
    P1.985m —0.9700.0260.0470.210
    P2.984m——0.0340.0680.250
    P3.967m————0.320
    P4.955m————0.390
    P5.936m—————
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Probability of survival p values based on Logrank tests for comparison of treatments.

    TreatmentCageCage + HydrogelHydrogelControl
    Cage—0.1400.2200.046
    Cage + Hydrogel——0.0030.001
    Hydrogel———0.280
    Control————
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Probability of survival p values based on Logrank tests for comparison of slope versus wash sites.

    Slope vs. WashAll WashWash (Plots P1, P2)Wash (Plots P3, P4, P5)
    All Slopes0.001——
    Slopes (P1, P2)—0.90—
    Slopes (P3, P4, P5)——0.001
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 38 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 38, Issue 3
1 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Post Burn Restoration Response of Encelia virginensis within a Small Wash System in the Mojave Desert
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Post Burn Restoration Response of Encelia virginensis within a Small Wash System in the Mojave Desert
Dale A. Devitt, Fred Landau, Scott R. Abella, Matt D. Petrie, Ann M. McLuckie, John O. Kellam
Ecological Restoration Sep 2020, 38 (3) 169-179; DOI: 10.3368/er.38.3.169

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Post Burn Restoration Response of Encelia virginensis within a Small Wash System in the Mojave Desert
Dale A. Devitt, Fred Landau, Scott R. Abella, Matt D. Petrie, Ann M. McLuckie, John O. Kellam
Ecological Restoration Sep 2020, 38 (3) 169-179; DOI: 10.3368/er.38.3.169
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Nurse Rocks as a Minimum-Input Restoration Technique for the Cactus Opuntia basilaris
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Restoration Techniques for Degraded Steppe Rangelands
  • Restoring Frequent Fire Results in Habitat Improvement for Bison but Minimal Early Reduction of Woody Encroachment
  • Species Interactions Critical to Restoration Success in an Urban Living Shoreline
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • arid land restoration
  • hydrogel
  • shrub cages
  • shrub survival
  • soil moisture
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire