The Effect of Planting Orientation and Iron Ore Mining Substrates on the Survival and Growth of Salix planifolia Cuttings in a Greenhouse Experiment

References

1. ↵
   1. Aebischer S.,
   2. Cloquet C.,
   3. Carignan J.,
   4. Maurice C.,
   5. Pienitz R.

   2015. Disruption of the geochemical metal cycle during mining: Multiple isotope studies of lake sediments from Schefferville, subarctic Québec. Chemical Geology 412:167–178.

   OpenUrlGeoRef
2. ↵
   1. Beauchamp S.,
   2. Jerbi A.,
   3. Frenette-Dussault C.,
   4. Pitre F.E.,
   5. Labrecque M.

   2018. Does the origin of cuttings influence yield and phytoextraction potential of willow in a contaminated soil? Ecological Engineering 111:125–133.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bourret M.M.,
   2. Brummer J.E.,
   3. Leininger W.C.

   2009. Establishment and growth of two willow species in a riparian zone impacted by mine tailings. Journal of Environmental Quality 38:693–701.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Boyter M.J.,
   2. Brummer J.E.,
   3. Leininger W.C.

   2009. Growth and metal accumulation of Geyer and mountain willow grown in topsoil versus amended mine tailings. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 198:17–29.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Cao Y.,
   2. Lehto T.,
   3. Piirainen S.,
   4. Kukkonen J.V.,
   5. Pelkonen P.

   2012. Effects of planting orientation and density on the soil solution chemistry and growth of willow cuttings. Biomass and Bioenergy 46:165–173.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Cao Y.,
   2. Lehto T.,
   3. Repo T.,
   4. Silvennoinen R.,
   5. Pelkonen P.

   2011. Effects of planting orientation and density of willows on biomass production and nutrient leaching. New Forests 41:361–377.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Courchesne F.,
   2. Turmel M.C.,
   3. Cloutier-Hurteau B.,
   4. Tremblay G.,
   5. Munro L.,
   6. Masse J.,
   7. Labrecque M.

   2017. Soil trace element changes during a phytoremediation trial with willows in southern Québec, Canada. International Journal of Phytoremediation 19:632–642.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Eapen D.,
   2. Barroso M.L.,
   3. Ponce G.,
   4. Campos M.E.,
   5. Cassab G.I.

   2005. Hydrotropism: root growth responses to water. Trends in Plant Science 10:44–50.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Edelfeldt S.,
   2. Lundkvist A.,
   3. Forkmanand J.,
   4. Verwijst T.

   2015. Effects of cutting length, orientation and planting depth on early willow shoot establishment. BioEnergy Research 8:796–806.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Environnement Canada

    . 2018. Données des stations pour le calcul des normales climatiques au Canada de 1971 à 2000. climat.meteo.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_f.html?searchType=stnName&txtStationName=Schefferville&searchMethod=contains&txtCentralLatMin=0&txtCentralLatSec=0&txtCentralLongMin=0&txtCentralLongSec=0&stnID=6098&dispBack=1.
11. ↵
    1. Fafard

    . 2016. Fiche technique. www.fafard.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Fiche-technique-Fibromoss-FR.pdf.
12. ↵
    1. Grenier V.,
    2. Pitre F.E.,
    3. Nissim W.G.,
    4. Labrecque M.

    2015. Genotypic differences explain most of the response of willow cultivars to petroleum-contaminated soil. Trees 29:871–881.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Heller M.C.,
    2. Keoleian G.A.,
    3. Mann M.K.,
    4. Volk T.A.

    2004. Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of generating electricity from willow biomass. Renewable Energy 29:1023–1042.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Jung K.,
    2. Duan M.,
    3. House J.,
    4. Chang S.X.

    2014. Textural interfaces affected the distribution of roots, water, and nutrients in some reconstructed forest soils in the Athabasca oil sands region. Ecological Engineering 64:240–249.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Kaczynski K.M.,
    2. Gage E.A.,
    3. Cooper D.J.

    2018. Evaluating success of alternative restoration methods for riparian willows: Seeding and ungulate exclosures. Ecological Restoration 36:127–133.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Keoleian G.A.,
    2. Volk T.A.

    2005. Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: Life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance. BPTS 24:385–406.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Kuzovkina Y.A.,
    2. Quigley M.F.

    2005. Willows beyond wetlands: Uses of Salix L. species for environmental projects. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 162:183–204.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Kuzovkina Y.A.,
    2. Volk T.A.

    2009. The characterization of willow (Salix L.) varieties for use in ecological engineering applications: Co-ordination of structure, function and autecology. Ecological Engineering 35:1178–1189.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Labrecque M.,
    2. Teodorescu T.I.

    2005. Field performance and biomass production of 12 willow and poplar clones in short-rotation coppice in southern Quebec (Canada). Biomass and Bioenergy 29:1–9.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Landberg T.,
    2. Greger M.

    1994. Can heavy metal tolerant clones of Salix be used as vegetation filters on heavy metal contaminated land. Willow Vegetation Filters for Municipal Waste waters and Sludges. A Biological Purification System 50:133–144.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Li X.,
    2. Zhang L.,
    3. Zhang Z.

    2006. Soil bioengineering and the ecological restoration of riverbanks at the Airport Town, Shanghai, China. Ecological Engineering 26:304–314.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Martino L.,
    2. Yan E.,
    3. LaFreniere L.

    2019. A hybrid phytoremediation system for contaminants in groundwater. Environmental Earth Sciences 78:664.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Mleczek M.,
    2. Rutkowski P.,
    3. Rissmann I.,
    4. Kaczmarek Z.,
    5. Golinski P.,
    6. Szentner K.,
    7. Stachowiak A.

    2010. Biomass productivity and phytoremediation potential of Salix alba and Salix viminalis. Biomass and Bioenergy 34:1410–1418.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Nissim W.G.,
    2. Labrecque M.

    2016. Planting microcuttings: An innovative method for establishing a willow vegetation cover. Ecological Engineering 91:472–476.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Paradise N.L.

    2017. Iron ore company of Canada Sherwood north pit project, Labrador west. www.mae.gov.nl.ca/env_assessment/projects/Y2017/1915/1915%20Registration%20Document.pdf.
26. ↵
    1. Tharakan P.J.,
    2. Volk T.A.,
    3. Nowak C.A.,
    4. Abrahamson L.P.

    2005. Morphological traits of 30 willow clones and their relationship to biomass production. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35:421–431.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Vervaeke P.,
    2. Luyssaert S.,
    3. Mertens J.,
    4. De Vos B.,
    5. Speleers L.,
    6. Lust N.

    2001. Dredged sediment as a substrate for biomass production of willow trees established using the SALIMAT technique. Biomass and Bioenergy 21:81–90.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Verwijst T.,
    2. Lundkvist A.,
    3. Edelfeldt S.,
    4. Forkman J.,
    5. Nordh N.E.

    2012. Effects of clone and cutting traits on shoot emergence and early growth of willow. Biomass and Bioenergy 37:257–264.

    OpenUrlCrossRef