Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
EditorialResearch Article
Open Access

Effect of Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) Seeding Date on Establishment and Resistance to Invasion by Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass)

Audrey J. Harvey, Stacy C. Simanonok, Lisa J. Rew, Timothy S. Prather and Jane M. Mangold
Ecological Restoration, September 2020, 38 (3) 145-152; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.38.3.145
Audrey J. Harvey
Audrey J. Harvey, Montana State University, College of Agriculture, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Bozeman, MT 59717.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stacy C. Simanonok
Stacy Simanonok, Montana State University, College of Agriculture, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Bozeman, MT 59717.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa J. Rew
Lisa J. Rew, Montana State University, College of Agriculture, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Bozeman, MT 59717.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy S. Prather
Timothy S. Prather, University of Idaho, Department of Plant Sciences, Moscow, ID 83844.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane M. Mangold
Jane Mangold, (corresponding author), Montana State University, College of Agriculture, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Bozeman, MT 59717,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Rangelands degraded by non-native annual grasses are commonly restored by integrating herbicide with fall seeding of native perennial grasses. Seeds are expected to remain dormant throughout winter and emerge in spring. However, restoration often fails due to annual grass seedlings out-competing seeded grasses because they emerge sooner and grow faster. At two sites in Montana, we tested eight seeding dates of Pseudoroegneria spicata to determine the effect on resistance to invasion by the annual grass Bromus tectorum. After one growing season, fall (November) and early spring (April) seeding resulted in larger P. spicata than later spring seeding (May) (829–1,180 tillers per m2 versus 349–561 tillers per m2) at one site, while seeding date had no effect on P. spicata at the second site. In the second season and after B. tectorum introduction, fall and early spring seeded P. spicata was more resistant to B. tectorum compared to late spring seeded. For example, B. tectorum was less dense (480 ± 101 tillers per m2) in P. spicata stands seeded 7 April than 12 May (943 ± 188 tillers per m2), and B. tectorum biomass was lower in fall-seeded stands (227 ± 81 g per m2) than stands seeded 12 May (533 ± 206 g per m2). Our results demonstrate that establishment and subsequent invasion resistance is enhanced by seeding native grasses from fall to early spring, presenting a wider timeframe for seeding than commonly practiced.

  • invasive grass
  • seasonal priority effect
  • seeding timing

Restoration Recap

  • We seeded the native perennial grass Pseudoroegneria spicata in November 2015 and weekly from April to early May 2016 to determine which seeding date resulted in the best stand establishment and greatest potential to resist invasion by the invasive annual grass Bromus tectorum.

  • Pseudoroegneria spicata stands seeded in fall (November) and early spring (April) had higher plant density and biomass than those seeded later in spring (late April through May).

  • Bromus tectorum was less abundant in P. spicata stands seeded in fall and early spring than in stands seeded in late spring, suggesting larger perennial grasses can limit invasion of annual grasses.

  • Seeding P. spicata after 206 growing degree days (GDD, first week of May) is not advised as there was a trend of decreasing P. spicata and increasing B. tectorum abundance after this date.

  • Land managers may have a wide window of opportunity for seeding native grasses, ranging from a fall dormant seeding through early spring, but care should be taken to not seed too late in spring.

Degraded range and wildlands are difficult to revegetate due to the persistence of non-native, annual grasses or secondary invasions following control of the target annual grass (Pearson et al. 2016, Schantz et al. 2016). In habitats dominated by non-native, invasive annual grasses, their seedlings can outcompete native perennial grass seedlings due to early emergence of the annual grasses (Wainwright et al. 2012). Earlier emergence by these invasive winter annual grasses compared to native plants allows for primary access to water and nutrients (Mangla et al. 2011a, Dickson et al. 2012). These benefits are amplified after germination and emergence because ruderal invasive annual grasses grow faster than native perennial grasses, compounding preemptive use of essential resources (Grotkopp and Rejmánek 2007, James and Drenovsky 2007, James 2008). Being the first to fill a vacant ecological niche is known as a priority effect (Wainwright et al. 2012). Seed banks of lands infested by invasive annual grasses are often dominated by those same species, limiting the recruitment of native plants.

Strategically modifying the seeding date of native plants to mitigate seasonal priority effects of invasive annual grasses during revegetation can be an ecologically-based management approach for improving native species recruitment and establishment (James et al. 2011, Farrell and Fehmi 2018). For example, the native grass Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) suppressed the non-native, invasive annual grass Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) in a greenhouse setting when seeded four weeks prior to seeding of B. tectorum (Orloff et al. 2013, Larson et al. 2018). Similar studies also support the effectiveness of seeding early to improve native grass establishment over invasive annual plants (Grman and Suding 2010, Boyd and James 2013). In the field, Boyd and Lemos (2015) attributed higher seedling survival of fall versus spring seeding to more established root systems from additional growing degree days (GDD). However, the success of direct seeding from fall versus spring seeding is still largely unknown in relation to its potential for resisting subsequent weed invasion.

During revegetation of invasive annual grass-infested areas in the semi-arid western United States, seeding of native perennial grasses like P. spicata often occurs in the fall, following a summer or fall herbicide application aimed at controlling annual grasses. Seeds are expected to remain dormant throughout winter and emerge in the spring at the earliest opportune time (Boyd and James 2013). However, fall dormant seeding has its limitations. First, fall dormant seedings expose seeds to predators and pathogens for several months before the seeds are expected to germinate, and some research suggests that seeds of native species may be more susceptible to predation than those of non-native species (Lucero and Callaway 2018). Furthermore, unanticipated germination prior to spring can put seedlings at risk of failure during winter freeze-thaw cycles (James et al. 2012). Revegetation failure can also result from the slow-growing nature of native perennial grasses, which do not typically reach reproductive maturity in the first growing season in contrast to quickly-growing annual grasses that complete their life cycle in less than a year (Schantz et al. 2016). Finally, though fall dormant seedings are common practice (Monsen and Stevens 2004), they eliminate the option of a spring herbicide application to control spring-emerging invasive grasses because such an application would also injure seedlings of the seeded species.

Delaying seeding until spring, as an alternative to seeding in the fall, has had varied success in terms of density and biomass of seeded perennial grasses (Schantz et al. 2015, 2016). Density of surviving seedlings from spring seeding can be similar or greater than that of fall seeding (Boyd and Lemos 2015). Spring seeding on a site where annual grass propagule pressure was low (between 150– 1,500 seeds per m2) and irrigation was available during the first growing season, resulted in satisfactory perennial grass establishment (Schantz et al. 2016). However, in semi-arid climates where irrigation is not available, delaying seeding until spring can be risky. Seedlings emerge, but may not grow enough, particularly in terms of root length, to survive seasonal drought (Schantz et al. 2016). Late spring-seeded perennial grasses also experience fewer GDD and accumulated precipitation than fall or early spring seedings (Boyd and Lemos 2015). Addressing how late in the spring seeding can occur while still resulting in satisfactory native perennial grass establishment is necessary to improve revegetation of invasive annual grass-infested range and wildlands.

The first objective of this study was to examine whether fall or early to late spring seeding resulted in higher establishment of the native perennial grass P. spicata over two growing seasons. Consistent with previous studies (Boyd and James 2013, Boyd and Lemos 2015), we hypothesized perennial grass density and biomass to be highest for fall and early spring-seeded cohorts when compared to late spring-seeded cohorts. We used P. spicata for this study because it is a large-statured, native bunchgrass that is common across mountain and foothill rangelands, is valued as a forage species for livestock and wildlife (Stubbendieck et al. 1997), and in Montana it is often one of the last native perennial grasses to persist in areas invaded by non-native species (J. Mangold, Montana State University, pers. comm.). Several cultivars of P. spicata have demonstrated successful establishment in other studies (Sheley et al. 2001, Sheley et al. 2006, Jacobs et al. 2006, Rinella et al. 2012, Mangold et al. 2015).

The second objective addressed whether P. spicata seeding date affected suppression of the invasive annual grass B. tectorum when it was introduced to the plots at the end of P. spicata’s first growing season. We hypothesized B. tectorum biomass and density would be lowest where P. spicata was seeded in fall and early spring when compared to late spring seeding, due to the predicted increase in density and biomass of P. spicata plants during the first growing season.

Methods

This study occurred at two field sites which were located at the Arthur H. Post Research Farm (45°40′38.01″ N 111° 9′19.49″ W) and Fort Ellis Research Farm (45°40′13.19″ N 110°58′48.13″ W), hereafter referred to as Post Farm and Fort Ellis, respectively, near Bozeman, Montana. Elevation at Post Farm and Fort Ellis are 1,450 m and 1,484 m, respectively. In 2016 and 2017, the total annual precipitation at Post Farm was 32.5 cm and 37.7 cm, and annual minimum/maximum temperatures were 1.21°C/14.8°C and 0.23°C/13.8°C, respectively (Table 1, NOAA 2018). In 2016 and 2017, the total annual precipitation at Fort Ellis was 46.7 cm and 60.7 cm, and minimum/maximum temperatures were 1.06°C/13.8°C and –0.1°C/13.0°C, respectively (Table 1, Weather Underground 2018).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Average spring (March–May), summer (June–August), fall (September–November), and total precipitation (cm) and average minimum and maximum temperatures (°C) for spring, summer, fall and annual at Post Farm and Fort Ellis across a 30-year period and years 2016 and 2017. *30-year averages (1981–2010) were based on the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) monthly data for this region and were only available at the Post Farm site

Prior to setting up the study, existing vegetation was manually removed, and the fallow fields were tilled. A completely randomized split-plot design was used to test eight seeding dates of P. spicata (whole plots, 1 m × 2 m with additional 0.5 m buffer) and two levels (absent and present) of B. tectorum competition (split-plots, 1 m × 1 m). Seeding treatments were replicated four times at each site for a total of 32 main plots and 64 split-plots per site.

The eight seeding date treatments were 8 November 2015 (fall) and seven weekly spring seeding dates from 1 April 2016 to 12 May 2016 (early to late spring, Table 2). Seeds of P. spicata (Goldar cultivar) were hand broadcasted evenly on the soil surface at 667 seeds per m2 (following Orloff et al. 2013) for each treatment at each site. Seeds were produced and obtained from Bruce Seed Farm near Townsend, Montana, approximately 100 km from the study sites. June of the first growing season was drier than the 30-year mean precipitation (Western Regional Climate Center 2019) at the Post Farm: we applied the equivalent of 1.27 cm of precipitation in June 2016 to address this deficit. All vegetation other than P. spicata was removed by hand throughout the first growing season. In September 2016, after the first growing season and when plants were in a reproductive state, P. spicata density (tillers per m2) was measured across whole plots (1 m × 2 m).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Seeding dates and cumulative growing degree days (GDD = sum of average daily temperature °C — temperature base 4.4°C between 1 March 2016 to 12 May 2016) for Pseudoroegneria spicata at Post Farm (PF) and Fort Ellis (FE) sites.

After the first growing season, B. tectorum seeds were sown into competition split-plots on 1 September 2016 at 1,112 seeds per m2 (following Orloff et al. 2013), using seeds collected from several sites near Bozeman, Montana. In both years, only target species, P. spicata and B. tectorum, were grown and all other species were removed by hand until data were collected from 23 June 2017–10 July 2017. Three randomly-placed 50 cm × 20 cm frames (Daubenmire 1959) per split-plot were used to sample density (tillers per m2) and aboveground biomass of P. spicata and B. tectorum. Biomass was clipped to 2 cm above ground level, dried at 37°C for 48 hours, and weighed to the nearest 0.1 gram.

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used on a general linear model with a Quasi-Poisson distribution to detect differences in P. spicata density (tillers per m2) by seeding date for each site for objective one. One replication of the Spring 5 seeding data at Post Farm was removed from analysis because the plots received run-off irrigation from an adjacent field and produced abnormally high P. spicata densities. In both years, P. spicata density across main plots was used to determine establishment for all seeding cohorts, whereas in the second year P. spicata density in the no competition plots were evaluated. Tukey pairwise comparisons were used to determine differences across seeding date treatments for each site.

For objective two, the effect of seeding date on P. spicata and B. tectorum was analyzed using ANOVA models. Specifically, an ANOVA on a linear mixed effects model was used to determine differences in P. spicata density and biomass, where fixed effects were seeding and competition treatments and site, and random effects accounted for plot-to-plot variation. When analyzing B. tectorum density, an ANOVA was used on a general linear model to determine seeding date treatment effects across sites. Data were over-dispersed, so a Quasi-Poisson distribution was used. When analyzing B. tectorum biomass, an ANOVA was used on a linear model to determine seeding date treatment effects across sites. Tukey pairwise comparisons were used to determine differences between seeding groups and competition levels.

For all analyses, all models were explored for normality, independence, and constant variance assumptions and median values are shared. Graphical interpretations and analyses were conducted using R Software 3.5.1 (R Core Team 2018), specifically dplyr, lme4, emmeans, and ggplot2 packages (Bates et al. 2015, Lenth et al. 2018, Wickham 2016, Wickham et al. 2018).

Results

Pseudoroegneria spicata Density and Biomass

Seeding treatments affected P. spicata density after one growing season, but the effect depended on site (F7,110 = 2.759, p = 0.011). At Fort Ellis, Spring 2 resulted in 1,180 ± 169 tillers per m2 (estimate ± standard error), which was similar to Fall (1,009 ± 176 tillers per m2), Spring 1 (1,038 ± 122 tillers per m2), Spring 3 (856 ± 180 tillers per m2), and Spring 5 (829 ± 223 tillers per m2) (Figure 1). Spring 4, Spring 6, and Spring 7 had similarly low densities at 472 ± 72 tillers per m2, 561 ± 134 tillers per m2, and 349 ± 63 tillers per m2, respectively. At Post Farm, there was no effect of seeding treatment on P. spicata density. Densities ranged from 1,054 ± 47 tillers per m2 in Spring 4 to 1,706 ± 207 tillers per m2 in Spring 1 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Pseudoroegneria spicata density (tillers per m2 ± SE) after one growing season (2016) at two sites in southwestern Montana. Seeding dates are Fall (11 November 2015), S1 (1 April 2016), S2 (7 April 2016), S3 (13 April 2016), S4 (21 April 2016), S5 (29 April 2016), S6 (5 May 2016), S7 (12 May 2016). Similar letters indicate no difference in density across treatments within a site (α = 0.05).

After two growing seasons, seeding treatment affected density of P. spicata (F7,47 = 3.344, p = 0.005) (Table 3). Spring 7, which resulted in 1,221 ± 158 tillers per m2, was lower than Spring 1 and Spring 2 (1,988 ± 145 and 1,895 ± 110 tillers per m2, respectively) (Figure 2). Density of P. spicata was otherwise similar across seeding treatments and ranged from 1,221 to 1,988 tillers per m2.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Pseudoroegneria spicata and Bromus tectorum density (tillers per m2 ± SE) across seeding treatments after two growing seasons (2017) at two sites in southwestern Montana. Seeding dates are Fall (11 November 2015), S1 (1 April 2016), S2 (7 April 2016), S3 (13 April 2016), S4 (21 April 2016), S5 (29 April 2016), S6 (5 May 2016), S7 (12 May 2016). Similar letters indicate no difference in a species’ density across treatments (α = 0.05).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) table for Pseudoroegneria spicata density (tillers per m2) and biomass (g per m2) after two growing seasons (2017). Competition indicates presence or absence of Bromus tectorum.

Density of P. spicata was also affected by competition from B. tectorum, where the effect varied by site (F1,54 = 23.63, p < 0.001) (Table 3). At Fort Ellis, the no competition treatment (control) yielded higher density of P. spicata (1,735 ± 122 tillers per m2) than the B. tectorum competition treatment (1,161 ± 107 tillers per m2), while B. tectorum competition had no effect on P. spicata density at Post Farm (mean = 1,748 ± 55 per m2).

After two growing seasons, biomass of P. spicata was affected by seeding treatment (F7,47 = 3.423, p = 0.005) (Table 3). Biomass was lower in seeding treatments Spring 7 and Spring 4 (560 ± 88.9 g per m2 and 578 ± 74.6 g per m2, respectively) compared to Fall (888 ± 77.9 g per m2) (Figure 3). Otherwise, biomass was similar across most seeding treatments (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Pseudoroegneria spicata and Bromus tectorum biomass (g per m2 ± SE) across seeding treatments after two growing seasons (2017) at two sites in southwestern Montana. Seeding dates are Fall (11 November 2015), S1 (1 April 2016), S2 (7 April 2016), S3 (13 April 2016), S4 (21 April 2016), S5 (29 April 2016), S6 (5 May 2016), S7 (12 May 2016). Similar letters indicate no difference in a species’ biomass across treatments (α = 0.05).

Biomass of P. spicata was affected by competition treatment, and the effect varied by site (F1,54 = 9.731, p = 0.003) (Table 3). At Fort Ellis, the no competition treatment yielded higher P. spicata biomass (687 ± 57.2 g per m2) than the B. tectorum competition treatment (455 ± 51.8 g per m2). Competition from B. tectorum had no effect on P. spicata biomass at Post Farm (mean = 859 ± 31.2 g per m2).

Bromus tectorum Density and Biomass

There was a difference in B. tectorum density due to the main effects of site (F1,54 = 173.2, p < 0.001) and seeding treatment (F7,55 = 4.500, p < 0.001; Table 4). Fort Ellis had higher density of B. tectorum (1,019 ± 59 tillers per m2) than Post Farm (356 ± 29 tillers per m2). Averaged across sites, B. tectorum density was higher in Spring 7 (943 ± 188 tillers per m2) than Fall (553 ± 88 tillers per m2) and Spring 2 (480 ± 101 tillers per m2) (Figure 2). All other seeding treatments were similar to each other.

Biomass showed a similar pattern to density: there was a difference in B. tectorum biomass across the main effects of site (F1,47 = 158.0, p < 0.001) and seeding treatment (F7,47 = 2.397, p = 0.035; Table 4). Fort Ellis had higher B. tectorum biomass (636 ± 53.4 g per m2) than Post Farm (26.3 ± 6.0 g per m2). Averaged across sites, B. tectorum biomass was higher in Spring 7 (533 ± 206 g per m2) than Fall (227 ± 80.7 g per m2) (Figure 3). All other seeding treatments were similar to each other.

Discussion

Fall (i.e., November) and early spring (i.e., April) seeding generally resulted in greater establishment of P. spicata after one and two growing seasons than late spring seeding, as has been observed in other studies (Boyd and Davies 2012, Boyd and James 2013, Rinella and James 2017). The effect of seeding date was more pronouced in the first year at Fort Ellis, with the exception of Spring 5 at both sites. We believe the Spring 5 seeding cohort benefited from 2.2 cm of snow that fell from 23 April to 28 April 2016 (NOAA 2018) across both sites. The legacy of seeding date was less pronounced in the second year, as would be expected, though greater establishment of P. spicata in the fall (i.e., biomass) and early spring (i.e., density) than late spring was evident across the two sites. Our results generally support the first hypothesis and previous studies, indicating fall and early spring seeding produce larger perennial grasses than late spring seeding dates (James et al. 2012, Boyd and Lemos 2015). We recognize that other native grasses may differ in optimal seeding time, but given that P. spicata is arguably one of the most important native grasses on western rangeland, our study provides important information on best practices for its establishment.

The second hypothesis that B. tectorum density and biomass was expected to be lowest where P. spicata was highest in fall and early spring seeding was also generally supported. In particular, the high density of P. spicata in the Spring 2 treatment (i.e., seeded 7 April) had the greatest competitive effect on B. tectorum density. Pseudoroegneria spicata biomass also was greatest in the Fall as compared to late spring (i.e., seeded 21 April and 12 May) seeding which subsequently led to lower B. tectorum biomass. This study also indicates that seeding after the first week of May (above 206 GDD; Table 2) is not ideal as there was a trend of decreasing P. spicata abundance and subsequent increase in B. tectorum abundance at the latest spring seeding date. This trend was consistent across both sites, suggesting results found here may hold true across locations that have similar climatic conditions as southwestern Montana.

Across both sites there was no competition by seeding date interaction which suggests once P. spicata is established, the effect of competition from B. tectorum is lessened. We did not measure resource availability (e.g., soil moisture or nutrient concentrations), and we acknowledge that competition in fallow and tilled fields used in this study is not like that in impacted rangelands. Furthermore, establishment of P. spicata was higher than that seen in studies that occurred in range or wildlands infested with B. tectorum or other invasive plants (Whitson and Koch 1998, Sheley et al. 2001, Mangold et al. 2015). However, our results support that P. spicata, once established, can be highly competitive against secondary invasion (Rinella et al. 2012, USDA-NRCS 2012). Providing seeded species with a seasonal priority effect can shift competitive dynamics in a positive direction (Orloff et al. 2013), and along with other research suggests large and robust perennial grasses can limit invasion by annual grasses (Whitson and Koch 1998, Humphrey and Schupp 2004, James et al. 2008, Davies and Johnson 2017, Young et al. 2005).

Despite evidence suggesting precipitation is a key factor influencing revegetation success in semi-arid regions (Hardegree et al. 2013, Hardegree et al. 2016), wetter conditions at Fort Ellis compared to Post Farm did not have a substantial impact on P. spicata establishment and competitive dynamics with B. tectorum. In fact, abundance of P. spicata was lower at Fort Ellis than Post Farm; and, perhaps accordingly, abundance of B. tectorum was higher at Fort Ellis. Other revegetation studies have failed to find a beneficial effect of additional moisture on seedling success. For example, experimental observations in Oregon found no effect of additional watering on final density and biomass of P. spicata that was seeded fall (Boyd and James 2013) or spring (James and Svejcar 2010). However, it should be noted that in our study there was more variability at Fort Ellis in the response of P. spicata density to seeding date during the first year of the study, and there was an effect of the competition treatment during the second year of the study. Of further note, annual precipitation at Fort Ellis during our study was higher than the 30-year average precipitation and within the recommended precipitation zone (at least 30.5 cm) for the cultivar of P. spicata used in this study (USDA-NRCS 2012). Of the recommended USDA cultivars of P. spicata, “Goldar,” which was used in this study, is well adapted for rapid growth under dry conditions at or above 30.5 cm of annual rainfall above 1,000 m elevation (USDA-NRCS 2012).

One of the foremost risks to seeding a degraded site with native species is competition from invasive seedlings (Ray-Mukherjee et al. 2011). Decreasing seeds of undesirable species in the seed bank to a level that allows native species to establish (less than 1,500 seeds per m2; Schantz et al. 2016) can prove difficult when natural seed rain of B. tectorum can be as high as 12,000 seeds per m2 (Humphrey and Schupp 2001). Applying management tactics that eliminate or reduce seed production, like herbicides or targeted grazing, over multiple years or using herbicides with multiple years of annual grass control (Sebastian et al. 2016, Sebastian et al. 2017a, Sebastian et al. 2017b) can reduce the seed bank of invasive annual grasses and minimize competition with seeded species. Continued practice of fall dormant seeding at the recommended rate (approximately 17 pounds per acre for P. spicata ) (Sheley et al. 2008) is supported by this study, but practitioners should consider early spring seeding as an option as well. Our findings suggest that land managers can delay seeding until early spring without compromising native grass establishment. Spring seeding offers the option of applying a non-selective, non-persistent herbicide like glyphosate to control B. tectorum seedlings that emerged over the winter and into early spring (Kyser et al. 2012, Kyser et al. 2013), eliminating competition for at least one growing season. If seeding is delayed until spring, though, seeding after the first week of May (or GDD greater than 206) is not recommended as it could result in decreased establishment.

Our results show that providing native perennial grasses with a seasonal priority effect can improve their resistance to invasion by weedy annual grasses. The success of varied seeding dates indicates a wide range of opportunity available to land managers when seeding native grasses with fall (November) and early spring (April) seeding producing favorable results. However, we also found a trend of decreasing P. spicata, as well as increasing B. tectorum, when cohorts were seeded after 206 GDD. Further studies could help consolidate the optimum range of P. spicata seeding dates for different regions across the West. In addition, testing the effect of seeding date for other important native grass species of mountain and foothill rangelands in the West is also encouraged.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Wood pewee. Chambers W. and R. Chambers. 1881. Encyclopaedia - A Dictionary of Universal Knowledge for the People. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott & Co. The Florida Center for Instructional Technology, fcit.usf.edu.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by Montana Noxious Weed Trust Fund, and L.J.R. and J.M.M. are supported by NIFA-USDA Hatch MONB000363 and MONB00359, respectively.

This open access article is distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) and is freely available online at:http://jhr.uwpress.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bates D.,
    2. Mächler M.,
    3. Bolker B.M.,
    4. Walker S.C.
    2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Boyd C.S.,
    2. Davies K.
    2012. Spatial variability in cost and success of revegetation in a Wyoming big sagebrush community. Environmental Management 50:441–450.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Boyd C.S.,
    2. James J.J.
    2013. Variation in timing of planting influences bluebunch wheatgrass demography in an arid system. Rangeland Ecology and Management 66:117–126.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Boyd C.S.,
    2. Lemos J.A.
    2015. Evaluating winter/spring seeding of a native perennial bunchgrass in the sagebrush steppe. Rangeland Ecology and Management 68:494–500.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Daubenmire R.F.
    1959. A canopy-cover method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Science 33:43–64.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Davies K.,
    2. Johnson D.
    2017. Established perennial vegetation provides high resistance to reinvasion by exotic annual grasses. Rangeland Ecology and Management 70:748–754.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Dickson T.L.,
    2. Hopwood J.L.,
    3. Wilsey B.J.
    2012. Do priority effects benefit invasive plants more than native plants? An experiment with six grassland species. Biological Invasions 14:2617–2624.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Farrell H.L.,
    2. Fehmi J.S.
    2018. Seeding alters plant community trajectory: Impacts of seeding, grazing and trampling on semi-arid re-vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science 21:240–249.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Grman E.,
    2. Suding K.N.
    2010. Within-year soil legacies contribute to strong priority effects of exotics on native California grassland communities. Restoration Ecology 18:664–670.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Grotkopp E.,
    2. Rejmánek M.
    2007. High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: Phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 94:526–532.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Hardegree S.P.,
    2. Moffet C.A.,
    3. Flerchinger G.N.,
    4. Cho J.,
    5. Roundy B.A.,
    6. Jones T.A.,
    7. Pierson F.B.
    2013. Hydrothermal assessment of temporal variability in seedbed microclimate. Rangeland Ecology and Management 66:127–135.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Hardegree S.P.,
    2. Jones T.A.,
    3. Roundy B.A.,
    4. Shaw N.L.,
    5. Monaco T.A.
    2016. Assessment of range planting as a conservation practice. Rangeland Ecology and Management 69:337–347.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Humphrey L.D.,
    2. Schupp E.W.
    2001. Seed banks of Bromus tectorum dominated communities in the Great Basin. Western North American Naturalist 61:85–92.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Humphrey L.D.,
    2. Schupp E.W.
    2004. Competition as a barrier to establishment of a native perennial grass (Elymus elymoides) in alien annual grass (Bromus tectorum) communities. Journal of Arid Environments 58:405–422.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Jacobs J.S.,
    2. Sing S.E.,
    3. Martin J.M.
    2006. Influence of herbivory and competition on invasive weed fitness: Observed effects of Cyphocleonus achates (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and grass-seeding treatments on spotted knapweed performance. Environmental Entomology 35:1590–1596.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. James J.J.,
    2. Drenovsky R.E.
    2007. A basis for relative growth rate differences between native and invasive forb seedlings. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60:395–400.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. James J.J.
    2008. Effect of soil nitrogen stress on the relative growth rate of annual and perennial grasses in the Intermountain West. Plant and Soil 310:201–210.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. James J.J.,
    2. Davies K.W.,
    3. Sheley R.L.,
    4. Aanderud Z.T.
    2008. Linking nitrogen partitioning and species abundance to invasion resistance in the Great Basin. Oecologia 156:637–648.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. James J.J.,
    2. Svejcar T.J.
    2010. Limitations to postfire seedling establishment: The role of seeding technology, water availability, and invasive plant abundance. Rangeland Ecology and Management 63:491–495.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. James J.J.,
    2. Drenovsky R.E.,
    3. Monaco T.A.,
    4. Rinella M.J.
    2011. Managing soil nitrogen to restore annual grass-infested plant communities: effective strategy or incomplete framework? Ecological Applications 21:490–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. James J.J.,
    2. Rinella M.J.,
    3. Svejcar T.J.
    2012. Grass seedling demography and sagebrush steppe restoration. Rangeland Ecology and Management 65:409–417.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Kyser G.B.,
    2. Creech J.E.,
    3. Zhang J.,
    4. DiTomaso J.M.
    2012. Selective control of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) in California sagebrush scrub using low rates of glyphosate. Invasive Plant Science and Management 5:1–8.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kyser G.B.,
    2. Wilson R.G.,
    3. Zhang J.,
    4. Ditomaso J.M.
    2013. Herbicide-assisted restoration of Great Basin sagebrush steppe infested with medusahead and downy brome. Rangeland Ecology and Management 66:588–596.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Larson C.D.,
    2. Lehnhoff E.A.,
    3. Noffsinger C.,
    4. Rew L.J.
    2018. Competition between cheatgrass and bluebunch wheatgrass is altered by temperature, resource availability, and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Oecologia 186:855–868.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Lenth R.,
    2. Singmann H.,
    3. Love J.,
    4. Buerkner P.,
    5. Herve M.
    2018. Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. CRAN. CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
  24. ↵
    1. Lucero J.E.,
    2. Callaway R.M.
    2018. Native granivores reduce the establishment of native grasses but not invasive Bromus tectorum. Biological Invasions 20:3491–3497.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Mangla S.,
    2. Sheley R.L.,
    3. James J.J.,
    4. Radosevich S.R.
    2011a. Intra and interspecific competition among invasive and native species during early stages of plant growth. Plant Ecology 212:531–542.
    OpenUrl
    1. Mangla S.,
    2. Sheley R.L.,
    3. James J.J.,
    4. Radosevich S.R.
    2011b. Role of competition in restoring resource poor arid systems dominated by invasive grasses. Journal of Arid Environments 75:487–493.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Mangold J.M.,
    2. Orloff N.,
    3. Parkinson H.,
    4. Halstvedt M.
    2015. Integrating herbicides and re-seeding to restore rangeland infested by an invasive forb-annual grass complex. Ecological Restoration 33:16–19.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Monsen S.B.,
    2. Stevens R.
    2004. Seedbed preparation and seeding practices. Pages 121–154 in Monsen S.B., Stevens R., Shaw N.L., comps. Restoring western ranges and wildlands. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-136.
  28. ↵
    1. NOAA
    . 2018. Daily summary station details from 2017 and 2018 for station Bozeman 6 W Experimental Farm, MT US C00241047 (accessed November 24, 2018). www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web.
    1. Orloff N.,
    2. Mangold J.M.,
    3. Menalled F.D.
    2013. Role of size and nitrogen in competition between annual and perennial grasses. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6:87–98.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Pearson D.E.,
    2. Ortega Y.K.,
    3. Runyon J.B.,
    4. Butler J.L.
    2016. Secondary invasion: The bane of weed management. Biological Conservation 197:8–17.
    OpenUrl
    1. R Core Team
    2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org.
  30. ↵
    1. Ray-Mukherjee J.,
    2. Jones T.A.,
    3. Adler P.B.,
    4. Monaco T.A.
    2011. Immature seedling growth of two North American native perennial bunchgrasses and the invasive grass Bromus tectorum. Rangeland Ecology and Management 64:358–365.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rinella M.J.,
    2. Mangold J.M.,
    3. Espeland E.K.,
    4. Sheley R.L.,
    5. Jacobs J.S.
    2012. Long-term population dynamics of seeded plants in invaded grasslands. Ecological Applications 22:1320–1329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Rinella M.J.,
    2. James J.J.
    2017. A modelling framework for improving plant establishment during ecological restoration. Ecological Modelling 361:177–183.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Schantz M.C.,
    2. Sheley R.L.,
    3. James J.J.
    2015. Role of propagule pressure and priority effects on seedlings during invasion and restoration of shrub-steppe. Biological Invasions 17:73–85.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Schantz M.C.,
    2. Sheley R.L.,
    3. James J.J.,
    4. Hamerlynck E.P.
    2016. Role of dispersal timing and frequency in annual grass-invaded Great Basin ecosystems: How modifying seeding strategies increases restoration success. Western North American Naturalist 76:36–52.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Sebastian D.J.,
    2. Sebastian J.R.,
    3. Nissen S.J.,
    4. Beck K.G.
    2016. A potential new herbicide for invasive annual grass control on rangeland. Rangeland Ecology and Management 69:195–198.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Sebastian D.J.,
    2. Fleming M.B.,
    3. Patterson E.L.,
    4. Sebastian J.R.,
    5. Nissen S.J.
    2017a. Indaziflam: a new cellulose-biosynthesis-inhibiting herbicide provides long-term control of invasive winter annual grasses. Pest Management Science 73:2149–2162.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Sebastian D.J.,
    2. Nissen S.J.,
    3. Sebastian J.R.,
    4. Beck K.G.
    2017b. Seed bank depletion: The key to long-term downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) management. Rangeland Ecology and Management 70:477–483.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Sheley R.L.,
    2. Jacobs J.S.,
    3. Lucas D.E.
    2001. Revegetating spotted knapweed infested rangeland in a single entry. Journal of Range Management 54:144–151.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Sheley R.L.,
    2. Mangold J.M.,
    3. Anderson J.L.
    2006. Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland. Ecological Monographs 76:365–379.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Sheley R.L.,
    2. Mangold J.M.,
    3. Goodwin K.,
    4. Marks J.
    2008. Revegetation guidelines for the Great Basin: Considering invasive weeds. USDA Agricultural Research Service.
  39. ↵
    1. Stubbendieck J.,
    2. Hatch S.,
    3. Butterfield C.
    1997. North American Range Plants, 5th edition. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  40. ↵
    1. USDA-NRCS
    . 2012. Release brochure for “Goldar” bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata). USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho.
  41. ↵
    1. Wainwright C.E.,
    2. Wolkovich E.M.,
    3. Cleland E.E.
    2012. Seasonal priority effects: implications for invasion and restoration in a semi-arid system. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:234–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Weather Underground
    . 2018. Weather history details from 2017 and 2018 for station one mile east of Bozeman, MT KMTBOZEM46 (accessed November 24, 2018). www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KMTBOZEM46#history.
  43. ↵
    1. Western Regional Climate Center
    . 2019. NCDC 1981–2019 Monthly Normals for station Bozeman 6 W Exp Farm, Montana (accessed June 20, 2019). wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?mtboz1.
  44. ↵
    1. Whitson T.D.,
    2. Koch D.W.
    1998. Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) with herbicides and perennial grass competition. Weed Technology 12:391–396.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Wickham H.
    2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. ggplot2.tidyverse.org.
  46. ↵
    1. Wickham H.,
    2. Francois R.,
    3. Henry L.,
    4. Müller K.,
    5. RStudio
    . 2018. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. CRAN. CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.
    1. Young T.P.,
    2. Zefferman E.P.,
    3. Vaughn K.J.,
    4. Fick S.
    2015. Initial success of native grasses is contingent on multiple interactions among exotic grass competition, temporal priority, rainfall and site effects. AoB PLANTS 7:1–9.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 38 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 38, Issue 3
1 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) Seeding Date on Establishment and Resistance to Invasion by Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Effect of Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) Seeding Date on Establishment and Resistance to Invasion by Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass)
Audrey J. Harvey, Stacy C. Simanonok, Lisa J. Rew, Timothy S. Prather, Jane M. Mangold
Ecological Restoration Sep 2020, 38 (3) 145-152; DOI: 10.3368/er.38.3.145

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effect of Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) Seeding Date on Establishment and Resistance to Invasion by Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass)
Audrey J. Harvey, Stacy C. Simanonok, Lisa J. Rew, Timothy S. Prather, Jane M. Mangold
Ecological Restoration Sep 2020, 38 (3) 145-152; DOI: 10.3368/er.38.3.145
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Spring Seeding Integrated with a Spring Glyphosate Application Promotes Establishment of Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) in Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass)-infested Rangelands
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effects of Restoration on Small Headwater Stream Quality
  • Container Type but not Substrate or Hydrogel affects Establishment of Sandhill Milkweed (Asclepias humistrata)
  • Natural Regeneration Dynamics of Himalayan Forests
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • invasive grass
  • seasonal priority effect
  • seeding timing
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire