Detecting Invasive Amur Honeysuckle in Urban Green Spaces of Cincinnati, Ohio Using Landsat-8 NDVI Difference Images

References

1. ↵
   1. Barnsley M.J.,
   2. Barr S.,
   3. Hamid A.,
   4. Muller J-P.,
   5. Sadler G.J.,
   6. Shepherd J.W.

   1993. Analytical tools to monitor urban areas. Pages 147–184 in Mather P. (ed) Geographical Information Handling: Research Applications. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
2. ↵
   1. Bolund P.,
   2. Hunhammar S.

   1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29:293–301.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Borgmann K.,
   2. Rodewald A.

   2005. Forest restoration in urbanizing landscapes: Interactions between land uses and exotic shrubs. Restoration Ecology 13:334–340.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bradley B.

   2014. Remote detection of invasive plants: A review of spectral, textural and phenological approaches. Biological Invasions 16:1411–1425.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Braun E.L.

   1961. Woody plants of Ohio: Trees, Shrubs, and Woody Climbers Native, Naturalized, and Escaped. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
6. ↵
   1. Conover D.,
   2. Geiger D.

   1993. Glyphosate controls Amur honeysuckle in native woodland restoration. Ecological Restoration 11:168–169.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
7. ↵
   1. Conover D.,
   2. Geiger D.

   1999. Update on Glyphosate control of Amur honeysuckle. The Ohio Woodland Journal 6:1–13.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Conover D.,
   2. Geiger D.,
   3. Sisson T.

   2016. Dormant season foliar spraying slows the spread of wintercreeper, English ivy, and lesser periwinkle in wooded natural areas. Ecological Restoration 34:19–21.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
9. 1. Conover D.,
   2. Sisson T.

   2016. Resurgence of native plants after removal of Amur honeysuckle from Bender Mountain Preserve, Ohio. Ecological Restoration 34:187–190.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
10. ↵
    1. Conover D.,
    2. Sisson T.,
    3. Boone D.,
    4. Riestenberg M.

    2017. A list of the vascular plants of Bender Mountain Preserve (including parts of the Delhi Township Property and Sisters’ Hill. Ohio Biological Survey Notes 7:21–33.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Elmqvist T.,
    2. Colding J.,
    3. Barthel S.,
    4. Borgström S.,
    5. Duit A.,
    6. Lundberg J.,
    7. Bengtsson J.

    2004. The dynamics of Social-Ecological systems in urban landscapes: Stockholm and the national urban park, Sweden. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1023:308–322.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. ↵
    1. Gardner R.H.,
    2. O’Neill R.V.,
    3. Turner M.G.

    1993. Ecological Implications of Landscape Fragmentation. In Humans as Components of Ecosystems. New York, NY: Springer.
13. ↵
    1. Gibson C.W.D.

    1998. Brownfield: Red Data: the Values Artificial Habitats Have for Uncommon Invertebrates. Peterborough, UK: English Nature.
14. ↵
    1. Giner N.M.,
    2. Rogan J.

    2012. A comparison of Landsat ETM+ and high-resolution aerial orthophotos to map urban/suburban forest cover in Massachusetts, USA. Remote Sensing Letters 3:667–676.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Gong P.,
    2. Marceau D.,
    3. Howarth P.

    1992. A comparison of spatial feature extraction algorithms for land-use classification with SPOT HRV data. Remote Sensing of Environment 40:137–151.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Harris C.,
    2. Jiang H.,
    3. Liu D.,
    4. Brian Z.,
    5. He K.

    2009. Testing the roles of species native origin and family membership in intentional plant introductions using nursery data across the state of Kentucky. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 136:122–128.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Hartman K.,
    2. McCarthy B.

    2004. Restoration of a forest under-story after the removal of an invasive shrub, Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii). Restoration Ecology 12:154–165.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Hartman K.,
    2. McCarthy B.

    2008. Changes in forest structure and species composition following invasion by a non-indigenous shrub, Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii). The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 245–259.
19. ↵
    1. Hutchinson T.,
    2. Vankat J.

    1998. Landscape structure and spread of the exotic shrub Lonicera maackii (Amur honeysuckle) in southwestern Ohio forests. The American Midland Naturalist 139:383–391.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Johnston S.,
    2. Henry M.,
    3. Gorchov D.

    2012. Using Advanced Land Imager (ALI) and Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) for the detection of the invasive shrub Lonicera maackii in southwestern Ohio forests. GIScience and Remote Sensing 49:450–462.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Luken J.,
    2. Thieret J.

    1996. Amur honeysuckle, its fall from grace. BioScience 46:18–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. McEwan R.,
    2. Birchfield K.,
    3. Schoergendorfer A.,
    4. Arthur M.

    2009. Leaf phenology and freeze tolerance of the invasive shrub Amur honeysuckle and potential native competitors. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 136:212–221.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Moody Michael,
    2. Richard Mack

    . 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: The importance of nascent foci. Journal of Applied Ecology 25:1009–1021.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Mörtberg U.,
    2. Wallentinus H.G.

    2000. Red-listed forest bird species in an urban environment—assessment of green space corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning 50:215–226.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Opdam P.,
    2. Foppen R.,
    3. Reijnen M.,
    4. Schotman A.

    1995. The landscape ecological approach in bird conservation: integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning. Ibis 137: S139–S146.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Reichard S.H.,
    2. White P.

    2001. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. BioScience 51:103–113.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Rouse J.W. Jr.,
    2. Haas R.H.,
    3. Schell J.A.,
    4. Deering D.W.

    1973. Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation (green wave effect) of natural vegetation. NASA, Technical Report 19740022555.
28. ↵
    1. Saunders D.A.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.,
    3. Margules C.R.

    1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5:18–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Shouse M.,
    2. Liang L.,
    3. Fei S.

    2013. Identification of understory invasive exotic plants with remote sensing in urban forests. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 21:525–534.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. USGS

    . (2019). Landsat 8 surface reflectance code (LaSRC) product guide. prd-wret.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/palladium/production/atoms/files/LSDS-1368_L8_SurfaceReflectanceCode-LASRC_ProductGuide-v2.pdf.
31. ↵
    1. White J.,
    2. Carreiro M.,
    3. Zipperer W.

    2014. Woody plant communities along urban, suburban, and rural streams in Louisville, Kentucky, USA. Urban Ecosystems 17:1061–1094.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Wilfong B.,
    2. Gorchov D.,
    3. Henry M.

    2009. Detecting an invasive shrub in deciduous forest understories using remote sensing. Weed Science 57:512–520.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. With K.A.,
    2. Gardner R.H.,
    3. Turner M.G.

    1997. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 78:151–169.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science