Adapting Wetland Restoration Practices in Urban Areas: Perspectives from Xochimilco in Mexico City

References

1. ↵
   1. Alpert P

   . 1996. Integrated Conservation and Development Projects. BioScience 46:845–855.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Ayala-Perez V.,
   2. Arce N.,
   3. Carmona R

   . 2013. Spatio-temporal distribution of wintering aquatic birds in the Cienega de Tlahuac, Chalco lacustrine plain, Mexico. Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad 8:327–337.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Banson K.E.,
   2. Nguyen N.C.,
   3. Bosch O.J.H

   . 2016. Using system archetypes to identify drivers and barriers for sustainable agriculture in Africa: A case study in Ghana. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 33:79–99.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bartra R

   . 2011. Axolotiada. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
5. ↵
   1. Biswas S.R.,
   2. Mallik A.U.,
   3. Choudhury J.K.,
   4. Nishat A

   . 2009. A unified framework for the restoration of Southeast Asian man-groves-bridging ecology, society and economics. Wetlands Ecology and Management 17:65–383.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Browne M.,
   2. Fraser G.,
   3. Snowball J

   . 2018. Economic evaluation of wetland restoration: A systematic review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 26:1120–1126.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Bustamante Castellanos E

   . 2013. Evaluación del potencial pesquero de la tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), en la zona lacustre de Xochimilco, México DF. BS thesis, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
8. ↵
   1. Candiani V.S

   . 2014. Dreaming of Dry Land Environmental Tranformation in Colonial Mexico City. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9. ↵
   1. Chambers J.,
   2. Del M.,
   3. Aguila Mejía R.,
   4. Reátegui Ramírez,
   5. Sandbrook C

   . 2019. Why joint conservation and development projects often fail: An in-depth examination in the Peruvian Amazon. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 0:1–34.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Chaparro-Herrera D.J. de,
    2. Nandini S.,
    3. Sarma S. S. S.,
    4. Zambrano L

    . 2011. Feeding behaviour of larval Ambystoma mexicanum. Amphibia-Reptilia 32:509–517.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Cilliers S

    . 2010. Social aspects of urban biodiversity—An overview. Pages 81–100 in P.W., Norbert Müller J.G.K. (eds), Urban Biodiversity and Design. London, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
12. ↵
    1. Contreras V.,
    2. Martínez-Meyer E.,
    3. Valiente E.,
    4. Zambrano L

    . 2009. Recent decline and potential distribution in the last remnant area of the microendemic Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). Biological Conservation 142:2881–2885.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Conway G.R.,
    2. Barbier E.B.

    2013. Page 195 in After the Green Revolution: Sustainable Agriculture for Development. London, UK: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
14. ↵
    1. Elmqvist T.,
    2. Andersson E.,
    3. Frantzeskaki N.,
    4. McPhearson T.,
    5. Olsson P.,
    6. Gaffney O.,
    7. et al.

    2019. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nature Sustainability 2:267–273.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Feinman G.M.,
    2. Rabiela T.R.

    1997. Presente, pasado y futuro de las chinampas. The Hispanic American Historical Review 77:328–329.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Giddings B.,
    2. Hopwood B.,
    3. O’Brien G

    . 2002. Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development 10:187–196.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. González E.,
    2. Torres C.

    2014. La sustentabilidad agrícola de las Chinampas en el valle de México: caso Xochimilco. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios. 699–709 doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.173283.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Gonzalez Pozo A.,
    2. Roberto Chiapa F.

    2016. Las chinampas: patrimonio mundial de la Ciudad de México. Revista de Patrimonio: Economía Cultural y Educación para la Paz (MEC-EDUPAZ) 1:158–190.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Gregory McPherson E

    . 1992. Accounting for benefits and costs of urban greenspace. Landscape and Urban Planning 22:41–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Handel S.N

    . 2016. The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People Who Want to Do Ecological Restoration. Ecological Restoration 34:171–172.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Handel S.N

    . 2018. The Digital and the Organic. Ecological Restoration 9:167–168.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Holling C.S.,
    2. Berkes F.,
    3. Folke C

    . 1998. Science, sustainability, and resource management. Pages 350–352 in Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanism for Building Resilience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. ↵
    1. von Humboldt A

    . 2014. Ensayo Político sobre el Reino de la Nueva España. Sixth edition. Mexico City, Mexico: Porrua.
24. ↵
    1. Ibarra A.A.,
    2. Zambrano L.,
    3. Valiente E.L.,
    4. Ramos-Bueno A

    . 2013. Enhancing the potential value of environmental services in urban wetlands: An agro-ecosystem approach. Cities 31:438–443.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Jellinek S.,
    2. Wilson K.A.,
    3. Hagger V.,
    4. Mumaw L.,
    5. Cooke B.,
    6. Guerrero A.M.,
    7. et al.

    2019. Integrating diverse social and ecological motivations to achieve landscape restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 56:246–252.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Khoury C.K.,
    2. Bjorkman A.D.,
    3. Dempewolf H.,
    4. Ramirez-Villegas J.,
    5. Guarino L.,
    6. Jarvis A.,
    7. et al.

    2014. Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:4001–4006.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    1. Lot-Helgueras A.,
    2. Novelo A.

    2004. Iconografía y Estudio de las Plantas Acuáticas de la Ciudad de México y sus Alrededores. Mexico City, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
28. ↵
    1. Mayer A.,
    2. Rietkerk M.

    2006. The dynamic regime concept for ecosystem management and restoration. BioScience 54: 1013–1020.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Mazari-Hiriart M.,
    2. Ponce-de-León S.,
    3. López-Vidal Y.,
    4. Islas-Macías P.,
    5. Amieva-Fernández R.I.,
    6. Quiñones-Falconi F

    . 2008. Microbiological implications of periurban agriculture and water reuse in Mexico City. PLoS ONE 3:1–8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
30. ↵
    1. Merlín-Uribe Y.,
    2. Contreras-Hernández A.,
    3. Astier-Calderón M.,
    4. Jensen O.P.,
    5. Zaragoza R.,
    6. Zambrano L

    . 2013a. Urban expansion into a protected natural area in Mexico City: Alternative management scenarios. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56:1–14.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Merlín-Uribe Y.,
    2. González-Esquivel C.E.,
    3. Contreras-Hernández A.,
    4. Zambrano L.,
    5. Moreno-Casasola P.,
    6. Astier M

    . 2013b. Environmental and socio-economic sustainability of chinampas (raised beds) in Xochimilco, Mexico City. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 11:216–233.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Mesquita C.A.B.,
    2. Holvorcem C.G.D.,
    3. Lyrio C.H.,
    4. De Menezes P.D.,
    5. Da Silva Dias J.D.,
    6. Azevedo J.F

    . 2010. COOPLANTAR: A Brazilian initiative to integrate forest restoration with job and income generation in Rural Areas. Ecological Restoration 28:199–207.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    1. Millard A

    . 2010. Cultural Aspects of Urban Biodiversity. Pages 56–80 in Muller N., Werner P., Kelcey J.G. (eds), Urban Biodiversity and Design. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell doi: 10.1002/9781444318654.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Morehart C.T

    . 2012. Mapping ancient chinampa landscapes in the Basin of Mexico: A remote sensing and GIS approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 39:2541–2551.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Naiman R.J

    . 2013. Socio-ecological complexity and the restoration of river ecosystems. Inland Waters 3:391–410.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Naveh Z

    . 2005. Epilogue: Toward a transdisciplinary science of ecological and cultural landscape restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:228–234.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Nyström M.,
    2. Jouffray J.B.,
    3. Norström A.V.,
    4. Crona B.,
    5. Søgaard Jørgensen P.,
    6. Carpenter S.R.,
    7. et al.

    2019. Anatomy and resilience of the global production ecosystem. Nature 575:98–108.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
38. ↵
    1. Rietkerk M.,
    2. Dekker S.C.,
    3. De Ruiter P.C.,
    4. Van De Koppel J.

    2004. Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science 305:1926–1929.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. ↵
    1. Rojas Rabiela T

    . 2004. Las cuencas lacustres del Altiplano Central. Arqueología Mexicana 12:20–27.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Scheffer M

    . 1998. Ecology of Shallow Lakes. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
41. ↵
    1. Scheffer M.,
    2. Carpenter S.R.,
    3. Foley J.A.,
    4. Folke C.,
    5. Walker B

    . 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Scheffer M.,
    2. Carpenter S.R.

    2003. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: Linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:648–656.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Scheffer M.,
    2. Portielje R.,
    3. Zambrano L

    . 2003. Fish facilitate wave resuspension of sediment. Limnology and Oceanography 48:1920–1926.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Smith J.J.,
    2. Timoshevskaya N.,
    3. Timoshevskiy V.A.,
    4. Keinath M.C.,
    5. Hardy D.,
    6. Voss S.R

    . 2018. A Chromosome-Scale Assembly of the Enormous (32 Gb) Axolotl Genome. bioRxiv DOI 10.1101/373548.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. ↵
    1. Sosa-Rodriguez F.S

    . 2010. Impacts of water-management decisions on the survival of a city: From ancient Tenochtitlan to modern Mexico City. International Journal of Water Resources Development 26:675–687.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Sterk M.,
    2. van de Leemput I.A.,
    3. Peeters E.T

    . 2017. How to conceptualize and operationalize resilience in socio-ecological systems? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 28:108–113.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Sundkvist Å.,
    2. Milestad R.,
    3. Jansson A.M

    . 2005. On the importance of tightening feedback loops for sustainable development of food systems. Food Policy 30:224–239.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Swanstrom T

    . 2008. Regional resilience: A critical examination of the ecological framework. Univerisity of Californiua Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Working Paper Series No. 2008,07.
49. ↵
    1. Swanwick C.,
    2. Dunnett N.,
    3. Woolley H

    . 2003. Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: An overview. Built Environment 29:94–106.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. ↵
    1. Thomas R

    . 1978. Logical analysis of systems comprising feedback loops. Journal of Theoretical Biology 73:631–656.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. Tovar Garza A

    . 2014. Determinación de la estructura trófica de refugios experimentales en Xochimilco, México. MS thesis, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
52. ↵
    1. Valiente E.,
    2. H. Tovar A,
    3. Eslava-Sandoval D.,
    4. Zambrano L

    . 2010. Creating refuges for the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). Ecological Restoration 8:257–265.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Vazquez-Mendoza D.L

    . 2018. Etiqueta chinampera: una herramienta para la conservación de Xochimilco y del axolote, Ciudad de México. BS thesis. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
54. ↵
    1. Vitz M

    . 2019. A City on a Lake: Urban Political Ecology and the Growth of Mexico City. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
55. ↵
    1. VonBertrab A

    . 2013. De tilapias, chinampas y ajolotes: discursos sobre la restauración ecológica en el lago de Xochimilco. PhD dissertation. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
56. ↵
    1. VonBertrab A.,
    2. Zambrano L.

    2010. Participatory monitoring and evaluation of a Mexico City wetland restoration effort. Ecological Restoration 8:343–353.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Voss S.R.,
    2. Woodcock M.R.,
    3. Zambrano L

    . 2015. A Tale of two axolotls. BioScience DOI 10.1093/biosci/biv153.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
58. ↵
    1. Xu J.Y.,
    2. Chen L.D.,
    3. Lu Y.H.,
    4. Fu B.J

    . 2007. Sustainability evaluation of the grain for green project: From local people’s responses to ecological effectiveness in Wolong nature reserve. Environmental Management DOI 10.1007/s00267-006-0113-1.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
59. ↵
    1. Zambrano L.,
    2. Contreras V.,
    3. Mazari-Hiriart M.,
    4. Zarco-Arista A.E

    . 2009. Spatial heterogeneity of water quality in a highly degraded tropical freshwater ecosystem. Environmental management 43:249–63.

    OpenUrlPubMed
60. ↵
    1. Zambrano L.,
    2. Cortes H.,
    3. Merlo-Galeazzi A

    . 2015. Eat and be eaten: reciprocal predation between axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum) and crayfish (Cambarellus montezumae) as they grow in size. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 48:13–23.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Zambrano L.,
    2. Ortiz-Haro A.,
    3. Levy-Gálvez K

    . 2014. El axolote como especie bandera en Xochimilco. Pages 421–438 in Gonzalez-Zuarth C.A., Vallarino A, Jimemez J.C., Pfeng A.M Bioindicadores: Guardianes de Nuestro Futuro Ambiental. Mexico: Ecosur.
62. ↵
    1. Zambrano L.,
    2. Pacheco-Muñoz R.,
    3. Fernández T

    . 2018. Influence of solid waste and topography on urban floods: The case of Mexico City. Ambio 47:771–780.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Zambrano L.,
    2. Scheffer M.

    2001. Catastrophic response of lakes to benthivorous fish introduction. Oikos 94:344–350.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Zambrano L.,
    2. Valiente E.,
    3. Vander Zanden M.J.

    2010a. Stable isotope variation of a highly heterogeneous shallow freshwater system. Hydrobiologia 646:327–336.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
65. ↵
    1. Zambrano L.,
    2. Valiente E.,
    3. Vander Zanden M.J.

    2010b. Food web overlap among native axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) and two exotic fishes: carp (Cyprinus carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Xochimilco, Mexico City. Biological Invasions 12:3061–3069.

    OpenUrl