Use of Four Grassland Types by Small Mammal Species in Southern Minnesota

References

1. ↵
   1. Bakker K.,
   2. Higgins K.

   2009. Planted grasslands and native sod prairie: equivalent habitat for grassland birds? Western North American Naturalist 69:235–242.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Batzli G.O.,
   2. Harper S.J.,
   3. Lin Y.K.,
   4. Desy E.A.

   1999. Experimental analysis of population dynamics: scaling up to the landscape. Pages 107–127 in Barrett G.W., Peles J.D. (eds), Ecology of Small Mammals at the Landscape Level: Experimental Approaches. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
3. ↵
   1. Bowles J.B.

   1981. Iowa’s mammal fauna: an era of decline. Proceedings Iowa Academy Science 88:38–42.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Ceballos G.,
   2. Davidson A.,
   3. List R.,
   4. Pacheco J.,
   5. Manzano-Fischer P.,
   6. Santos-Barrera G.,
   7. Cruzado J.

   2010. Rapid decline of a grassland system and its ecological and conservation implications. PLOS One 5:e8562.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Churchfield S.,
   2. Hollier J.,
   3. Brown V.K.

   1997. Community structure and habitat use of small mammals in grasslands of different successional age. Journal of Zoology 242:519–530.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Clark B.K.,
   2. Kaufman D.W.,
   3. Finck E.J.,
   4. Kaufman G.A.

   1989. Small mammals in tall-grass prairie: patterns associated with grazing and burning. Prairie Naturalist 21:177–184.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Cole F.R.,
   2. Batzli G.O.

   1979. Nutrition and population dynamics of the prairie vole, (Microtus ochrogaster), in central Illinois. Journal of Animal Ecology 48:455–470.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Danielson B.J.

   1995. The relative importance of regional vs. local habitat variables in explaining the distributions of small mammals. Paper presented at the 16th Midwest Conference on Population Biology Meeting, Ames, IA.
9. ↵
   1. Davidson A.,
   2. Detling J.K.,
   3. Brown J.H.

   2012. Ecological roles and conservation challenges of social, burrowing, herbivorous mammals in the world’s grasslands. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:477–486.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. DeGolier T.,
    2. Port J.,
    3. Schottler S.

    2015. Small mammal habitat preferences in a patchwork of adjacent reconstructed grasslands subject to semiannual burns. Ecological Restoration 33:388–394.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. DeJaco C.,
    2. Batzli G.

    2013. Palatability of plants to small mammals in nonnative grasslands of east-central Illinois. Journal of Mammalogy 94:427–435.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Delibes-Mateos M.,
    2. Smith A.T.,
    3. Slobodchikoff C.N.,
    4. Swenson J.E.

    2011. The paradox of keystone species persecuted as pests: A call for the conservation of abundant small mammals in their native range. Biological Conservation 144:1335–1346.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Ebenhard T.

    1990. A colonization strategy in field voles (Microtus agrestis): reproductive traits and body size. Ecology 71:1833–1848.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Fischer J.,
    2. Tibor H.,
    3. Kuemmerle T.

    2012. Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conservation Letters 5:167–175.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Getz L.L.,
    2. Verner L.,
    3. Cole F.R.,
    4. Hofmann J.E.,
    5. Avalos D.E.

    1979. Comparisons of population demography of Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus. Acta Theriologica 24:319–349.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Getz L.L.,
    2. Hofmann J.E.

    1999. Diversity and stability of small mammals in tallgrass prairie habitat in central Illinois, USA. Oikos 85:356–363.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Getz L.,
    2. Oli M.K.,
    3. Hofmann J.E.,
    4. McGuire B.

    2005. Habitat-specific demography of sympatric vole populations over 25 years. Journal of Mammalogy 86:561–568.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Glorvigen P.,
    2. Gundersen G.,
    3. Andreassen H.P.,
    4. Ims R.

    2013. The role of colonization in the dynamics of patchy populations of a cyclic vole. Oecologia 173:161–167

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Harper S.J.,
    2. Batzli G.O.

    1996. Monitoring use of runways by voles with passive integrated transponders. Journal of Mammalogy 77:364–369.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Henderson R.A.,
    2. Sample D.W.

    1995. Grassland communities. Pages 116–129 in Addis J. (ed), Wisconsin’s biodiversity as a management issue: a report to Department of Natural Resources’ managers. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
21. ↵
    1. Henderson R.

    1998. Plant species composition of Wisconsin prairies. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin No. 188.
22. ↵
    1. Heske E.J.

    1999. Habitat use by small mammals in an intensively managed grassland wildlife sanctuary-final year. Center for Wildlife Ecology, Illinois Natural History Survey Final report for FY 99.
23. ↵
    1. Horvath A.,
    2. March I.J.,
    3. Wolf J.H.

    2001. Rodent diversity and land use in Montebello, Chiapas, Mexico. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 36:169–176.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Howe H.F.,
    2. Brown J.S.,
    3. Zorn-Arnold B.

    2002. A rodent plague on prairie diversity. Ecology Letters 5:30–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Hulme P.E.

    1994. Post-dispersal seed predation in grassland: its magnitude and sources of variation. Journal of Ecology 82:645–652.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Kaufman D.W.,
    2. Kaufman G.A.

    2008. Effects of haying on small mammals in mixed grass prairie of central Kansas. Transactions Kansas Academy Science 111:275–282.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Kaufman D.W.,
    2. Kaufman G.A.

    2017. Small mammals in anthropogenic brome fields as compared to native tallgrass prairie in the northern Flint Hills of Kansas. Transactions Kansas Academy Science 120:157–169.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Kezar S.J.,
    2. Jenks J.A.

    2004. Relative abundance of small mammals in native and restored tallgrass prairie. Proceedings of South Dakota Academy of Sciences 83:33–37.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Klatt B.J.,
    2. Getz L.L.

    1987. Vegetation characteristics of Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus habitats in east-central Illinois. Journal of Mammalogy 68:569–577.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. ↵
    1. Klatt B,
    2. Getz L.,
    3. McGuire B.

    2015. Interspecific interactions and habitat use by prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and meadow voles (M. pennsylvanicus). The American Midland Naturalist 173:241–252.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Klimstra R.L.,
    2. Moorman C.E.,
    3. Converse S.J.,
    4. Royle J.A.,
    5. Harper C.A.

    2015. Small mammal use of native warm-season and non-native cool-season grass forage fields. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39:49–55.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Krebs C.

    2013. Population Fluctuations in Rodents. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33. ↵
    1. Korpimäki E.,
    2. Norrdahl K.,
    3. Huitu O.,
    4. Klemola T.

    2005. Predator induced synchrony in population oscillations of coexisting small mammal species. Proceedings of The Royal Society 272:193–202.

    OpenUrlPubMed
34. ↵
    1. Lin Y.K.,
    2. Batzli G.O.

    2001. The influence of habitat quality on dispersal, demography and population dynamics of voles. Ecological Monographs 71:245–275.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Mulligan M.,
    2. Schooley R.L.,
    3. Ward M.P.

    2013. Effects of connectivity and regional dynamics on restoration of small mammal communities in midwestern grasslands. Restoration Ecology 21:678–685.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Neuhaus R.

    2015. A comparison of the effects of burning, haying, and mowing on plants and small mammals in a tall-grass prairie reconstruction. M.S. Thesis, University of Northern Iowa.
37. ↵
    1. Osbourne J.D.,
    2. Anderson J.T.,
    3. Spurgeon A.B.

    2005. Effects of habitat on small-mammal diversity and abundance in West Virginia. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:814–822.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Parameter R.R.,
    2. MacMahon J.A.,
    3. VanderWall S.B.

    1984. The measurement of granivory by desert rodents, birds, and ants: A comparison of an energetics approach and a seed-dish technique. Journal of Arid Environments 7:75–92.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Pearson D.E.,
    2. Ruggiero L.F.

    2003. Transect versus grid trapping arrangements for sampling small-mammal communities. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:454–459.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Port J.,
    2. Schottler S.

    2017. The effect of floristic composition on bird communities in a set of four grassland reconstruction types. Ecological Restoration 35:112–119.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
41. ↵
    1. Queiroz C.,
    2. Beilin R.,
    3. Falke C.,
    4. Lindberg R.

    2014. Farmland abandonment: Threat or opportunity for biodiversity conversation? A global review. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12:288–296.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. Reddin C.,
    2. Krementz D.

    2016. Small mammal communities in eastern red cedar forest. The American Midland Naturalist 175:113–119.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Rumble M.,
    2. Gobeille J.

    2001. Small mammals in successional prairie woodlands of the northern Great Plains. U.S. Department of Agriculture Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Paper RMRS-RP-28.
44. ↵
    1. Samson F.,
    2. Knopf F.

    1996. Prairie conservation. Preserving North America’s most endangered ecosystem. Washington, DC: Island Press.
45. ↵
    1. Sauer J.,
    2. Hines J.,
    3. Fallon J.

    2008. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966–2007. Version 5.15.2008. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.
46. ↵
    1. Schmidt K.A.,
    2. Lee E.,
    3. Ostfeld R.S.,
    4. Sieving K.

    2008. Eastern chipmunks increase their perception of predation risk in response to titmouse alarm calls. Behavioral Ecology 19:759–763.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    1. Schottler S.,
    2. Port J.,
    3. DeGolier T.

    2008. Influence of floristic diversity on songbird nesting preferences in a suite of adjacent reconstructed grasslands (Wisconsin). Ecological Restoration 26:195–198.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
48. ↵
    1. Schwartz O.A.,
    2. Whitson P.D.

    1987. A 12–year study of vegetation and mammal succession on a reconstructed tall-grass prairie in Iowa. The American Midland Naturalist 117:240–249.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Sena K.L.,
    2. Brammell B.,
    3. Smith S.R.

    2016. Converting abandoned hayfield to switchgrass increases small mammal relative abundance. Journal of the Kentucky Academy of Science 77:11–18.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Stone E.

    2007. Measuring impacts of restoration on small mammals in a mixed-grass Colorado prairie. Ecological Restoration 25:183–190.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
51. ↵
    1. Wovcha D.,
    2. Delaney B.,
    3. Nordquist G.

    1995. Minnesota St. Croix River Valley and the Anoka Sandplain. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.