Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleErratum

Erratum for Vol. 37, No. 1, 2019

Ecological Restoration, September 2019, 37 (3) ii; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.37.3.ii
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

For the front cover image, the photo was incorrectly labeled as being located in Minnesota, but should have been labeled as a site in Illinois. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Front Cover Feature: Since 1999, erosion along the Kennedy Space Center coastline in Florida has increased as a result of frequent storm surges. To protect valuable national assets and infrastructure at the site, a system of created dunes has been installed. In a case study, Bolt et al. document how these created dunes have benefitted two protected wildlife species: Gopherus polyphemus (gopher tortoise, whose footprints are pictured here) and Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris (southeastern beach mouse). Image credit: Rebecca Bolt

Back Cover Features: Top: Marshes are often nitrogen limited even though sufficient nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) are critical to sustain plant productivity and support biogeochemical processes such as decomposition and denitrification in these systems. Noll et al. examined the development of wetland soils over five decades in a constructed salt marsh. Their findings help restoration ecologists identify target soil properties such as bulk density, C, N, and C:N, for gauging wetland restoration success and estimating the time frame necessary for recovery. Image credit: Christopher Craft. Middle: In the arid and semiarid regions of Patagonia, Argentina, millions of hectares have been desertified by cattle ranching and hydrocarbon extraction activities. Restoring habitat in this region is a large undertaking that requires cooperation among diverse landholders. Through a case study, Pérez et al. present a multi-step and multiyear model for Environmental Education (EE) developed to engage stakeholders in ecological restoration. As a result of the EE process, residents worked cooperatively with government and industry to establish native species nurseries and revegetate degraded lands. Image credit: Daniel Pérez.

Bottom: Biocultural restoration aims to reestablish both the ecological and cultural components at a site. Hummingbirds have been a culturally relevant wildlife group in Mexico since pre-Columbian times but are absent from many cultural heritage sites due to ecological degradation. To help re-establish a connection between people and their cultural and natural heritage, Barajas-Arroyo et al. conducted biocultural species enhancement at an archaeological site. They report on vegetation parameters necessary to attract target hummingbird species, and document how this enhancement has impacted visitor experiences at the site. Image credit: Roberto Lindig-Cisneros

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 37 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 37, Issue 3
1 Sep 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Erratum for Vol. 37, No. 1, 2019
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Erratum for Vol. 37, No. 1, 2019
Ecological Restoration Sep 2019, 37 (3) ii; DOI: 10.3368/er.37.3.ii

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Erratum for Vol. 37, No. 1, 2019
Ecological Restoration Sep 2019, 37 (3) ii; DOI: 10.3368/er.37.3.ii
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Erratum
  • Erratum for Vol. 34, No. 1, 2016
Show more Erratum

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire