Restoration of Society-Nature Relationship Based on Education: A Model and Progress in Patagonian Drylands

References

1. ↵
   1. Aronson J.

   2010. What can and should be legalized in ecological restoration? Revista Árvore Viçosa 34:451–454.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Avila L.J.,
   2. Morando M.,
   3. Pérez D.R.,
   4. Sites J.W. Jr.

   2009. A new species of Liolaemus from Añelo sand dunes, northern Patagonia, Neuquén, Argentina, and molecular phylogenetic relationships of the Liolaemus wiegmannii species group (Squamata, Iguania, Liolaemini) Zootaxa 2234:39–55.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Brailovsky A.E.,
   2. Foguelman. D.

   2004. Memoria Verde: Historia Ecológica de la Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Sudamericana.
4. ↵
   1. Busso C.A.,
   2. Fernández. O.A.

   2017. Arid and semiarid rangelands of Argentina. Pages 261–291 in Gaur M.K., Squires V.R. (eds), Climate Variability Impacts on Land Use and Livelihoods in Drylands. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
5. ↵
   1. Bywater K.

   2014. Investigating the Benefits of Participatory Action Research for Environmental Education. Policy Futures in Education 12:920–932.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Castillo A.,
   2. Gaudiano. G.E.

   2009. Educación ambiental y manejo de ecosistemas en México. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Instituto Nacional de Ecología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
7. ↵
   1. CEGN.

   2006. Environmental education in Canadá. An overview for grant-makers (accessed 22 April 2019). Canadian Environmental Grantmakers’ Network. www.cegn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/EEBrief_Eng.pdf.
8. 1. Cibilis A.,
   2. Borrelli. P.

   2005. Grasslands of Patagonia. In Suttie J., Reynolds S., Batello C. (eds). Grasslands of the World. Plant Production and Protection Series No. 34. Rome, Italy: FAO.
9. ↵
   1. Cherlet M.,
   2. Hutchinson C.,
   3. Reynolds J.,
   4. Hill J.,
   5. Sommer S.,
   6. von Maltitz. G.

   2018. World Atlas of Desertification. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
10. ↵
    1. DSI.

    2016. Documento sectorial integral. Ganadería ovina y caprina. Ministerio de Desarrollo Territorial, Provincia de Neuquén, Argentina. (accessed 27 January 2018). www.agroindustria.gob.ar/sitio/areas/d_ovinos/informes_/nacionales/_archivos//000001_Neuqu%C3%A9n/000000_Plan%20ganadero%20Caprino%20y%20Ovino%20de%20Neuquen%202016.pdf.
11. 1. Elliott S.D.,
    2. Blakesley D.,
    3. Hardwick. K.

    2013. Restoring Tropical Forests: a Practical Guide. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens.
12. ↵
    1. Eshach. H

    2007. Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, Non-Formal, and Informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 16:171–190.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Fiori S.,
    2. Zalba S.

    2003. Potential impacts of petroleum exploration and exploitation on biodiversity in a Patagonian nature reserve, Argentina. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:1261–1270.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. González F.M.,
    2. Pérez D.R.

    2017. Contributions of ecological facilitation for restoring environments with high conservation value in the Argentine Patagonia. PHYTON International Journal of Experimental Botany 86:332–339.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Hensley N.

    2013. Curriculum as bioregional text: Place, experience, and sustainability. Journal of Sustainability Education 5:1–9.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Hovardas T.

    2015. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis: A template for addressing the social dimension in the study of socio scientific issues. AEJES 1:11–12.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Leff E.

    2010. Latin American Environmental Thought: a Heritage of Knowledge for Sustainability. ISEE, Publicación Ocasional 9:1–16 www.cep.unt.edu/papers/leff-eng.pdf.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. MacDonald C.

    2012. Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research methodology option. Canadian Journal of Action Research 1:34–50.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Martin. G

    2011. Guía comunidades de práctica. Serie metodológica en gestión de conocimiento, proyecto compartir conocimiento para el desarrollo. Unidad de Gestión de Conocimiento. Centro Regional del PNUD para América Latina y el Caribe.
20. ↵
    1. Mazzoni E.,
    2. Vazquez E.

    2009. Desertification in Patagonia. Developments in Earth Surface Processes 13:351–377.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. McBride B.B.,
    2. Brewer C.A.,
    3. Berkowitz A.R.,
    4. Borrie W.T.

    2013. Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere 4:67.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. McCann. E

    2011. Restoration based education: teach the children well. Pages 315–334 in Egan D., Hjerpe E.E., Abrams J. (eds), Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration. Washington, DC: Island Press.
23. 1. McCann E.P.,
    2. Schusler. T.

    2017. Ecological Restoration. Pages 251–260 in Krasny M. E., Kudryavtsev A. (eds) Urban Environmental Education Review. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. 1. McDonald T.,
    2. Gann G.D.,
    3. Jonson J.,
    4. Dixon. K.W.

    2016. International standards for the practice of ecological restoration— including principles and key concepts. Society for Ecological Restoration, Washington, D.C., U.S.
25. ↵
    1. McGinnis M.V.

    2005. Bioregionalism. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis e-Library and Routledge.
26. ↵
    1. Pérez D.R.,
    2. Rovere A.,
    3. Farinaccio. F.

    2010. Rehabilitación en el Desierto: Ensayos con Plantas Nativas en Aguada Pichana, Neuquén, Patagonia. Buenos Aires: Vázquez Mazzini Eds.
27. ↵
    1. Pérez D.R.,
    2. Ceccon. E.

    2017. Social participation in ecological restoration: An expanding research field in Latin America and the Caribbean. Pages 369–374 in Ceccon E., Pérez (Coords). D.R. Beyond Restoration Ecology: Social Perspectives in Latin America and the Caribbean. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Vázquez Mazzini Eds.
28. 1. Pérez D.R.,
    2. González F.,
    3. Rodriguez Araujo M.E.,
    4. Farinaccio F.,
    5. Paredes D.,
    6. Chrobak R.,
    7. Meinardi. M.

    2017. Ecological Restoration based on environmental education in arid regions of the Argentinean Patagonia. Pages 43–54 in Ceccon E., Pérez (Coords). D.R. Beyond Restoration Ecology: Social Perspectives in Latin America and the Caribbean. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Vázquez Mazzini Eds.
29. ↵
    1. Pérez D.R.,
    2. Farinaccio F.M.,
    3. Aronson J.

    2019. Towards a dryland framework species approach. Research in progress in the Monte Austral of Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 161:1–10.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Pyrko I.,
    2. Dörfler V.,
    3. Eden C.

    2017. Thinking together: What makes Communities of Practice work? Human Relations 4: 389–409.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. PRODOC.

    2005. Documento del proyecto manejo sustentable de ecosistemas áridos y semiáridos para el control de la desertificación en la Patagonia (accessed 10 March 2018). Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable, Buenos Aires, Argentina. studylib.es/doc/104214/versi%C3%B3n-23-11-06---gef-patagonia.
32. 1. Salomone J.M.

    2013. Deterioro de tierras y estabilización de médanos en la provincia de Chubut. In: Restauración Ecológica en la Diagonal Árida de la Argentina. Pérez D.R., Rovere A.E., Rodriguez Araujo M.E. (eds). Buenos Aires. Argentina: Vázquez Mazzini Editors.
33. ↵
    1. Soriano A.,
    2. Nogués Loza M,
    3. Burkart. S.

    1995. Plant biodiversity in the extra-andean Patagonia: Comparisons with neighboring and related vegetation units. Pages 36–45 in Montes L., Oliva G.E. (eds). Actas del Taller Internacional sobre Recursos Fitogenéticos, Desertificación y Uso Sustentable de los Recursos Naturales de la Patagonia. Río Gallegos, Argentina, November 1994. INTA Centro Regional Patagonia Sur.
34. ↵
    1. Sauvé L.

    2005. Currents in environmental education: Mapping a complex and evolving pedagogical field. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 10:11–34.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Scott W.,
    2. Gough S.

    2003. Rethinking relationships between education and capacity building: Remodeling the learning process. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 4:213–219.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Skalicky J.,
    2. West. M.

    2012. UTAS community of practice initiative (accessed 10 March /2018) www.teaching-learning.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/185605/CoP-Reader-Complete.pdf.
37. ↵
    1. SMA.

    2011. Disposición de revegetación. Boletín oficial de la Sub-secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Provincia de Neuquén (accessed 10 March 2019). boficial.neuquen.gov.ar/pdf/bo11061703250.pdf.
38. StatSoft.com. 2004. STATISTICA, v 7.0. Tulsa, OK; USA.
39. 1. Stenhouse. L

    2007. Investigación y Desarrollo del Curriculum. Madrid, España: Ediciones Morata.
40. ↵
    1. Stevenson R.B.,
    2. Robottom. I.

    2012. Critical action research and environmental education: conceptual congruencies and imperatives in practice. Pages 469–479 in Stevenson R.B., Brody M., Dillon J., Wals A.E.J. (eds). International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
41. ↵
    1. Wenger E.

    2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization Articles 7:225–246.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science