Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleEditorial

The Living Dead and the Practice of Landscape Restoration

Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration, September 2019, 37 (3) 140-141; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.37.3.140
Steven N. Handel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Ecology and evolution are historical sciences; the patterns around us mesh current interactions with past events. Consequently, today’s habitats are the products of species’ adaptations, the forces that are molding our current landscapes, and long-gone events that have brought today’s species mixes forward to us. This includes single species presence and abundance (we are rarely at equilibrium), but also the species’ contemporary interactions that are necessary for reproduction and dispersal. Restoring species would be oh-so-easy if we could just identify the plant palette, install, and wait for the associated animals and microbes to appear from the landscape, like an ecological Santa on his biodiversity sled.

This does not happen. This is an old story. Elimination of required mutualists through extinction or habitat disturbances (by humans or other causes) can cause local populations to shrivel. Either they cannot reproduce at a level where birth rates match death rates, or dispersal to new microsites becomes too infrequent and local populations disappear. In our scrambled world of biodiversity, non-native species are enormous stressors, pushing out the effective, historical mutualists from long-lasting community dynamics.

Signs of species that have lost their historical mutualists and other community interactions are everywhere. Here in eastern North America, we have Osage oranges (Maclura pomifera) that lack the large herbivores (giant ground sloths?) that dispersed the huge fruits; smaller mammals chew fruits and disperse seed but produce very different seed shadows. Honey locust trees (Gleditsia triacanthos) have long branched thorns; they may have been useful against large Pleistocene herbivores, now gone, but our small mammals use them as ladders when climbing to eat the developing sweet fruits. The “living dead” label refers to the species that suffer because they can’t reproduce without the right partners. The plants can be large and green, but the next cohort of seedlings may be rare or non-existent. Like the zombies of pop movies, they seem to stay alive but with no normal road to reproductive success.

Plants with features like these large fruits and thorns are not hopeless. Other sympatric species, some non-native, can form guilds that continue to pollinate, disperse, and defend, even if they played no role in local evolutionary history. Non-native pollinators can visit flowers of many plant species, replacing native pollinators that may be locally extirpated. Small mammals can take bites from Osage oranges, and some ingested seeds could be dispersed away from the mother plant. Slow and steady frugivory can replace the big gulp of our missing Ice Age neighbors. Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), a very common but European bird in North America, can disperse thousands of tree seeds, replacing the once common dispersers such as thrushes (family Muscicapidae) who now are very uncommon because of forest destruction throughout their range. The new food web works in a fashion as new partners take over the role of past ones. Ecological love rekindled, if you will.

We are surrounded by new interactions replacing the historical ones and sometimes the new partnerships allow persistence of the associated species, despite the ahistorical nature of the relationship. In island biology, we find “disharmonies,” community structures that lack a clear analog in ancestral, continental ecological habitats. Our whole continental world, now beset with climate change, nonnative species pools, and fragmentation may be becoming a supersized island, with new interactions determining the winners and losers of the demographic races. Additionally, the extinction of specialist mutualists as habitats shrink and become isolated cut metapopulation processes, hastening species loss.

The dead may live again in our changing habitats, as these new interactions allow some species to persist. But how does this effect our restoration practices? We still try to match our species lists in a restoration project with reasonable nearby or recent past community species richness. The unknown presence and abundance of local mutualists in this changed world may be addressed by doing an environmental gamble and increasing the diversity in our initial palettes and constructed habitat zones. Introducing more plant species may be spinning an ecological roulette wheel, giving us more chances to create partnerships that will do the demographic job of sustaining populations on our projects.

We are ignorant of all the species interactions we now have, some new, some old. But we know that even more changes will be occurring as the biotic and physical conditions of landscapes continue to change. Greater species richness at the beginning of a restoration project may be the ecological insurance to overcome the lack of historical interactions that once were needed to maintain ecological structure and function. Putting more bets on our restoration roulette wheel can ensure that sometimes our projects win. They persist. We can think of this approach as multiple guesses on a restoration multiple choice test. Eventually you may pass. Restoration success, albeit defined by an atypical community functioning, may be produced.

Figure

European Starlings. Goodrich, S.G. 1859. Animal Kingdom Illustrated Vol 2. New York, NY: Derby & Jackson. The Florida Center for Instructional Technology, fcit.usf.edu.

Recommended Readings

    1. Dick C.W.
    2001. Genetic rescue of remnant tropical trees by an alien pollinator. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 268:2391–2396.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ehrlich P.R.
    2017. What should conservation biologists be doing? An homage to Ilkka Hanski. In Annales Zoologici Fennici. 54:7–12.
    OpenUrl
    1. Guimarães P.R. Jr.,
    2. Galetti M.,
    3. Jordano P
    2008. Seed dispersal anachronisms: rethinking the fruits extinct megafauna ate. PloS One 3(3):e1745.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Janzen D.H.
    2001. Latent extinctions—the Living Dead. Pages 689–699 in Levin S.A. (ed). Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, vol. 3. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rumeu B.,
    2. Devoto M.,
    3. Traveset A.,
    4. Olesen J.M.,
    5. Vargas P.,
    6. Nogales M.,
    7. Heleno R.
    2017. Predicting the consequences of disperser extinction: richness matters the most when abundance is low. Functional Ecology 31:1910–1920.
    OpenUrl
    1. Soga M.,
    2. Yamaura Y.,
    3. Koike S.
    2013. From ecological pessimism to conservation chance: reviving living dead in changing landscapes. Animal Conservation 16:16–18.
    OpenUrl
    1. Valiente-Banuet A.,
    2. Aizen M.A.,
    3. Alcántara J.M.,
    4. Arroyo J.,
    5. Cocucci A.,
    6. Galetti. M.,
    7. et al.
    2015. Beyond species loss: the extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Functional Ecology 29:299–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 37 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 37, Issue 3
1 Sep 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Living Dead and the Practice of Landscape Restoration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
The Living Dead and the Practice of Landscape Restoration
Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration Sep 2019, 37 (3) 140-141; DOI: 10.3368/er.37.3.140

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Living Dead and the Practice of Landscape Restoration
Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration Sep 2019, 37 (3) 140-141; DOI: 10.3368/er.37.3.140
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Recommended Readings
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • An Iconic Journal’s Closure and Natural History in Ecological Restoration
  • Considerations for Ecological Restoration Inspired by Change in Las Vegas Desert Wetlands
  • Using Ecological Restoration to Aid Native Forests Afflicted by Invasive Pests
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire