Seeding, Herbicide, and Fungicide Impact on Perennial Grass Establishment in Cheatgrass Infested Habitats

References

1. ↵
   1. Bates D.M.,
   2. Maechler M.,
   3. Bolker B.M.,
   4. Walker S

   . (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Beckstead J,
   2. Meyer S.E.,
   3. Molder C.J.,
   4. Smith C

   . 2007. A race for survival: can Bromus tectorum seeds escape Pyrenophora semeniperda-caused mortality by germinating quickly? Annals of Botany 99:907–914.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. DiTomaso J.M.,
   2. Masters R.A.,
   3. Peterson V.F

   . 2010. Rangeland invasive plant management. Rangelands 32:43–47.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Dooley S.R.,
   2. Beckstead J

   . 2010. Characterizing the interaction between a fungal seed pathogen and a deleterious rhizobacterium for biological control of cheatgrass. Biological Control 53:197–203.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Ehlert K.A.,
   2. Engel R.E.,
   3. Mangold J.M

   . 2015. Imazapic activity in a semiarid climate in downy brome (Bromus tectorum)-infested rangeland and CRP sites. Weed Technology 29:472–479.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Ehlert K.A.,
   2. Mangold J.M.,
   3. Engel R.E

   . 2014. Integrating the herbicide imazapic and the fungal pathogen Pyrenophora semeniperda to control Bromus tectorum. Weed Research 54:418–424.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Elseroad A.C.,
   2. Rudd N.T

   . 2011. Can imazapic increase native species abundance in cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) invaded native plant communities? Rangeland Ecology & Management 64:641–648.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Humphrey L.,
   2. Schupp E.W

   . 2004. Competition as a barrier to establishment of a native perennial grass (Elymus elymoides) in alien annual grass (Bromus tectorum) communities. Journal of Arid Environments 58:405–422.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Jacobs J.S.,
   2. Carpinelli M.F.,
   3. Sheley R.L

   . 1998. Revegetation weed-infested rangeland: what we’ve learned. Rangelands 20:10–15.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. James J.J.,
    2. Svejcar T

    . 2010. Limitations to postfire seedling establishment: the role of seeding technology, water availability, and invasive plant abundance. Rangeland Ecology & Management 63:491–495.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Lenth R.V

    . 2016. Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software 69:1–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Mangla S.,
    2. Sheley R.L.,
    3. James J.J.,
    4. Radosevich S.R

    . 2011. Intra and interspecific competition among invasive and native species during early stages of plant growth. Plant Ecology 212:531–542.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Mangold J.M.,
    2. Orloff N.,
    3. Parkinson H.,
    4. Halstvedt M

    . 2015. Integrating herbicides and re-seeding to restore rangeland infested by an invasive forb-annual grass complex. Ecological Restoration 33:16–19.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
14. ↵
    1. Mordecai E.A

    . 2013. Consequences of pathogen spillover for cheatgrass-invaded grasslands: coexistence, competitive exclusion, or priority effects. The American Naturalist 181:737–747.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Morris C.,
    2. Monaco T.A.,
    3. Rigby C.W

    . 2009. Variable impacts of imazapic rate on downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and seeded species in two rangeland communities. Invasive Plant Science and Management 2:110–119.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. O’Hanlon-Manners D.L.,
    2. Kotanen P.M

    . 2004. Evidence that fungal pathogens inhibit recruitment of a shade-intolerant tree, white birch (Betula papyrifera), in understory habitats. Oecologia 140: 650–653.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. ↵
    1. Orloff L.N.,
    2. Mangold J.M.,
    3. Menalled F.D

    . 2015. Site-specific effects of exotic annual grass control integrated with revegetation. Ecological Restoration 33:147–155.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    1. Orrock J.L.,
    2. Christopher C.C.,
    3. Dutra H.P

    . 2012. Seed bank survival of an invasive species, but not of two native species, declines with invasion. Oecologia 168:1103–1110.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. ↵
    1. Prostko E.P.,
    2. Grey T.L.,
    3. Morgan R.N.,
    4. Davis J.W

    . 2005. Oat (Avena sativa) response to imazapic residues. Weed Technology 19:875–878.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Rice P.M

    . 2005. Downy brome, Bromus tectorum L. Pages 147–170 in Duncan C.A., Clark J.K.Invasive Plants of Range and Wildlands and Their Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America.
21. ↵
    1. Sbatella G.M.,
    2. Wilson R.G.,
    3. Enloe S.F.,
    4. Hicks C

    . 2011. Propoxycarbazone-sodium and imazapic effects on downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and newly seeded perennial grasses. Invasive Plant Science and Management 4:78–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Sheley R.L.,
    2. Mangold J.M.,
    3. Anderson J.L

    . 2006. Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland. Ecological Monographs 76:365–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Shinn S.L.,
    2. Thill D.C

    . 2004. Tolerance of several perennial grasses to imazapic. Weed Technology 18:60–65.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Svejcar T.,
    2. James J.,
    3. Hardegree S.,
    4. Sheley R

    . 2014. Incorporating plant mortality and recruitment into rangeland management and assessment. Rangeland Ecology & Management 67:603–613.

    OpenUrl