The Influence of Species Richness and Forb Seed Density on Grassland Restoration in the Badlands of North Dakota, USA

References

1. ↵
   1. Anderson M.J.,
   2. Gorley R.N.,
   3. Clarke K.R.

   2008. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. PRIMER-E: Plymouth, UK.
2. ↵
   1. Biondini M.E

   . 2007. Plant diversity, production, stability, and susceptibility to invasion in restored northern tall grass prairies (United States). Restoration Ecology 15:77–87.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Biondini M.E.,
   2. Norland J.E.,
   3. Grygiel C.E

   . 2011. Plant richness-biomass relationships in restored northern Great Plains grasslands (USA). International Journal of Ecology 2011:1–13.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Blumenthal D.M.,
   2. Jordan N.R.,
   3. Russelle M.P

   . 2003. Soil carbon addition controls weeds and facilitates prairie restoration. Ecological Applications 13:605–615.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Brudvig L.A.,
   2. Barak R.S.,
   3. Bauer J.T.,
   4. Caughlin T.T.,
   5. Laughlin D.C.,
   6. Larios L.,
   7. Matthews J.W.,
   8. et al

   . 2017. Interpreting variation to advance predictive restoration science. Journal of Applied Ecology 54:1018–1027.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Cameron S.A.,
   2. Lozier J.D.,
   3. Strange J.S.,
   4. Cordes N.,
   5. Solter L.F.,
   6. Griswold T.L

   . 2011. Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. PNAS 108:662–667.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   1. DiAllesandro A.,
   2. Kobiela B.P.,
   3. Biondini M

   . 2013. Invasion as a function of species diversity: A case study of two restored North Dakota grasslands. Ecological Restoration 31:186–194.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   1. Dickson T.L.,
   2. Busby W.H

   . 2009. Forb species establishment increases with decreased grass seeding density and with increased forb seeding density in a northeast Kansas, USA, experimental prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 17:597–605.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Dixon C.,
   2. Comeau P.,
   3. Askerooth K,
   4. Norland J,
   5. Sedivec K

   . 2017. Prairie reconstruction guidebook for North Dakota. North Dakota State University Cooperative Extension, R1840.
10. ↵
    1. Foster BL,
    2. Murphy C.A.,
    3. Keller K.R.,
    4. Aschenbach T.A.,
    5. Questad B.L.,
    6. Kindscher K

    . 2007. Restoration of prairie community structure and ecosystem function in an abandoned hayfield: A sowing experiment. Restoration Ecology 15:652–661.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Funk J.L.,
    2. Cleland E.E.,
    3. Suding K.N.,
    4. Zavaleta E.S

    . 2008. Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23:695–703.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Godfread C

    . 1994. The vegetation of the Little Missouri Badlands of North Dakota. Pages 17–24 in Proceedings: Leafy Spurge Strategic Planning Workshop, Dickinson, ND. United States Department of the Interior and United States Department of Agriculture.
13. ↵
    1. Grygiel C.E.,
    2. Norland J.E.,
    3. Biondini M.E

    . 2009. Precision prairie reconstruction (PPR): A technique for increasing native forb species richness in an established grass matrix. Ecological Restoration 27:458–466.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    1. Grygiel C.E.,
    2. Norland J.E.,
    3. Biondini M.E

    . 2012. Can carbon and phosphorous amendments increase native forbs in a restoration process? A case study in the northern tall-grass prairie (USA). Restoration Ecology 20:122–130.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Hitchmough J

    . 2012. Diversification of grassland in urban greenspace with planted, nursery-grown forbs. Landscape Architecture 4:16–27.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Hoekstra J.M.,
    2. Boucher T.M.,
    3. Ricketts T.H.,
    4. Roberts C

    . 2005. Confronting a biome crisis: Global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology Letters 8:23–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Kennedy T.A.,
    2. Naeem S.,
    3. Howe K.M.,
    4. Knops J.M.,
    5. Tilman D.,
    6. Reich P

    . 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417:636–637.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Kirmer A.,
    2. Baasch A.,
    3. Tischew S

    . 2012. Sowing of low and high diversity seed mixtures in ecological restoration of surface mined-land. Applied Vegetation Science 15:198–207.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Larson D.L.,
    2. Bright J.B.,
    3. Drobney P.,
    4. Larson J.L.,
    5. Palaia N.,
    6. Rabie P.A.,
    7. et al

    . 2011. Effects of planting method and seed mix richness on the early stages of tallgrass prairie restoration. Biological Conservation 144:3127–3139.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Larson D.L.,
    2. Bright J.B.,
    3. Drobney P.,
    4. Larson J.L.,
    5. Palaia N.,
    6. Rabie P.A,
    7. et al

    . 2013. Using prairie restoration to curtail invasion of Canada thistle: The importance of limiting similarity and seed mix richness. Biological Invasions 15:2049–2063.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Larson D.L.,
    2. Bright J.B.,
    3. Drobney P.,
    4. Larson J.L.,
    5. Vacek S

    . 2017. Persistence of native and exotic plants 10 years after prairie reconstruction. Restoration Ecology 25:953–961.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Levang-Brilz N.,
    2. Biondini M. E

    . 2002. Growth rate, root development and nutrient uptake of 55 plant species from the great plains grasslands, U.S.A. Plant Ecology 165:117–144.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Masters R.A.,
    2. Nissen S.J.,
    3. Gaussoin R.E.,
    4. Beran D.D.,
    5. Stougaard R.N

    . 1996. Imidazolinone herbicides improve restoration of Great Plains grasslands. Weed Technology 10:392–403.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Millikin A.R.,
    2. Jarchow M.E.,
    3. Olmstead K.L.,
    4. Krentz R.E.,
    5. Dixon M.D

    . 2016. Site preparation drives long-term plant community dynamics in restored tallgrass prairie: A case study in southeastern South Dakota. Environmental Management 58:597–605.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Munson S.M.,
    2. Lauenroth W.K

    . 2009. Plant population and community response to removal of the dominant species. Journal of Vegetation Science 20:224–232.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Munson S.M.,
    2. Lauenroth W.K

    . 2011. Plant community recovery following restoration in semiarid grasslands. Restoration Ecology 20:656–663.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Norland J.,
    2. Fasching S.,
    3. Dixon C.,
    4. Askerooth K.,
    5. Kelsey K.,
    6. Wang G

    . 2013. Reduced establishment of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) using functionally similar native forbs. Ecological Restoration 31:143–146.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. Norland J.,
    2. Larson T.,
    3. Dixon C.,
    4. Askerooth K

    . 2015. Outcomes of past grassland reconstructions in eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota: analysis of practices. Ecological Restoration 33:409–417.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Norland J.E.,
    2. Dixon C.S.,
    3. Larson D.L.,
    4. Askerooth K.L.,
    5. Geaumont B.A

    . 2018. Prairie reconstruction unpredictability and complexity: What is the rate of reconstruction failures? Ecological Restoration 36:263–266.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. ↵
    1. Potts S.G.,
    2. Biesmeijer J.C.,
    3. Kremen C.,
    4. Neumann P.,
    5. Schweiger O.,
    6. Kunin W.E

    . 2010. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:345–353.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Peck J.E

    . 2016. Multivariate Analysis for Ecologists: Step-by-Step. Second Edition. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software Design.
32. ↵
    1. Piper J.K.,
    2. Pimm S.L

    . 2002. The creation of diverse prairie-like communities. Community Ecology. 3:205–216.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Reitsma K.D.,
    2. Dunn B.H.,
    3. Mishra U.,
    4. Clay S.A.,
    5. DeSutter T.,
    6. Clay D.E

    . 2015. Land-use change impact on soil sustainability in a climate and vegetation transition zone. Agronomy Journal 107:2363–2372.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Samson F.,
    2. Knopf F

    . 1994. Prairie conservation in North America. BioScience 44:418–421.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Sheley R.L.,
    2. Half M.L

    . 2006. Enhancing native forb establishment and persistence using a rich seed mix. Restoration Ecology 14:627–635.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Simmers S.M.,
    2. Galatowitsch S.M

    . 2010. Factors affecting revegetation of oil field access roads in semiarid grasslands. Restoration Ecology 18:27–39.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture

    . 2018. Web Soil Survey (accessed 20 November, 2018). websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov.
38. ↵
    1. Tilman D.,
    2. Reich P.B.,
    3. Knops J,
    4. Wedin D,
    5. Mielke T,
    6. Lehman C

    . 2001. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294:843–845.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. ↵
    1. United States Department of Agriculture

    . 2005. Soil survey of Billings County. Natural Resources Conservation Services (accessed 14 March, 2017) www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_MANUSCRIPTS/north_dakota/billingsND2005/Billings.pdf.
40. ↵
    1. Wilkerson M.L.,
    2. Ward K.L.,
    3. Williams N.M.,
    4. Ullmann K.S.,
    5. Young T.P

    . 2014. Diminishing returns from higher density restoration seedings suggest trade-offs in pollinator seed mixes. Restoration Ecology 22:782–789.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Wilsey B.J.,
    2. Polley H.W

    . 2006. Aboveground productivity and root-shoot allocation differ between native and introduced grass species. Oecologia 150:300–309.

    OpenUrlPubMed
42. ↵
    1. Wimberly M.C.,
    2. Janssen L.L.,
    3. Hennessy D.A.,
    4. Lori M.,
    5. Chowdhury N.M.,
    6. Feng H

    . 2017. Cropland expansion and grassland loss in eastern Dakotas: New insights from a farm-level survey. Land Use Policy 63:160–173.

    OpenUrl