Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleEditorial

Birnam Woods, Moving Closer, Shadows Our Work

Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration, March 2019, 37 (1) 1-2; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.37.1.1
Steven N. Handel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The impossibility of a forest that could move served to quiet fears of the future for a troubled king:

Apparition:

Macbeth shall never vanquish’d be until

Great Birnam wood to high Dunsinane hill

Shall come against him.

Macbeth responds:

That will never be

Who can impress the forest, bid the tree

Unfix his earth-bound root?

(Macbeth, Act 4, scene 1)

Then, in one of the play's most vivid scenes, it happened. Soldiers masked by tree boughs marched through Scotland towards the king, and his terrifying fate, once impossible to imagine, unfolds.

We now move from ancient literature to the feckless present, from the playwright's imagination to our reality of escalating climate change and its biotic consequences. With the globe warming, the distributions of land and sea species may move, as each entity's spatial niche changes location (or disappears). There is a dynamic relationship between the removal of the appropriate climatic envelope for a species and its ability to move to a place where the migrating favorable climate can be found. Movement of diaspores depends on wind, water currents, or mutualists, and for plants, speed of movement may not match the rate of loss of favorable locations. The speed of movement is also slowed for most species by the physical barriers that people have added to the landscape. Roads, tall buildings, agricultural and sports fields all can slow movement of diaspores and the consequent establishment of new populations. Climate continues to change potential vegetation zones, but seed carriers may not keep pace. Loss of range results.

Many surveys have shown that trees, insects, and other taxa have already moved beyond their historic zones because of climate change. Public agencies have cataloged the expected loss of even common species from their current range. This will have severe economic and social consequences as well as habitat structure effects. The change in vegetation zones that is occurring corresponds in our time to the moving woods that Shakespeare fancifully created in his Macbeth. Art has become reality.

The natural movement of woodlands is not an effective solution to our climate transition, as community members move at different rates and the functioning of the displaced habitat elements is challenged by a probable loss of associated species necessary for sustainability. We rarely know the full membership of a mature community necessary for function. For example, the increasing awareness of the role of microbial species in community ecology function has added to the problem. Restoration ecologists could act to reintroduce necessary mutualists that have tarried behind the plant species we are interested in securing, but this plan assumes a depth of knowledge about interspecific associations that is simply not available.

This “assisted migration” of species seems helpful as an act of ecosystem kindness, but ecological damage by human-led movement of species has a terrible track record, even leading to ecosystem destruction, and is discouraged by many careful workers that have studied plant and animal migrations and introductions. We are left with an insecurity about proper restoration action to parry the movement of habitats as the local climate shifts. Do we stand aside and let species move at their own pace, knowing that long-established species associations are being broken? Do we build social and financial assets to move certain species to new geographies, knowing the real dangers that such actions have caused in the recent past?

The unfolding environmental realities that frame our restoration ecology work must be confronted. It is difficult enough to succeed is restoring habitats in local, rather static, settings. The changes in species distributions that have already been recorded present us with even more uncertainly. Our contemporary analog of Birnam Wood “unfixing earth-bound root” is real, not creative literature. The playwright's ending was death to the protagonist. What restoration actions can save the moving woods? Does the intelligent action appear like in action?

Recommended Readings

    1. Aitken S.N.,
    2. Yeaman S.,
    3. Holliday J.A.,
    4. Wang T.,
    5. Curtis-McLane S.
    2008. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes, for tree populations. Evolutionary Applications 1:95–111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chen I.C.,
    2. Hill J.K.,
    3. Ohlemüller R.,
    4. Roy D.B.,
    5. Thomas C.D.
    2011. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Grimm N.B.,
    2. Chapin F.S.,
    3. Bierwagen B.,
    4. Gonzalez P.,
    5. Groffman P.M.,
    6. Luo Y.,
    7. et al
    . 2013. The impacts of climate change on ecosystem structure and function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:474–482.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Hällfors M.H.,
    2. Aikio S.,
    3. Schulman L.E.
    2017. Quantifying the need and potential of assisted migration. Biological Conservation 205:34–41.
    OpenUrl
    1. Iverson L.R.,
    2. Schwartz M.W.,
    3. Prasad A.M.
    2004. How fast and far might tree species migrate in the eastern United States due to climate change? Global Ecology and Biogeography 13:209–219.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Loss S.R.,
    2. Terwilliger L.A.,
    3. Peterson A.C.
    2011. Assisted colonization: integrating conservation strategies in the face of climate change. Biological Conservation 144:92–100.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ricciardi A.,
    2. Simberloff D.
    2009. Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:248–253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Thomas C.D.
    , 2011. Translocation of species, climate change, and the end of trying to recreate past ecological communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26:216–221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. U.S. Global Change Research Program
    . 2018. Fourth National Climate Assessment. Volume II: Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States. nca2018.globalchange.gov.
    1. Zhu K.,
    2. Woodall C.W.,
    3. Clark J.S.
    2012. Failure to migrate: lack of tree range expansion in response to climate change. Global Change Biology 18:1042–1052.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 37 (1)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 37, Issue 1
1 Mar 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Birnam Woods, Moving Closer, Shadows Our Work
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Birnam Woods, Moving Closer, Shadows Our Work
Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration Mar 2019, 37 (1) 1-2; DOI: 10.3368/er.37.1.1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Birnam Woods, Moving Closer, Shadows Our Work
Steven N. Handel
Ecological Restoration Mar 2019, 37 (1) 1-2; DOI: 10.3368/er.37.1.1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Recommended Readings
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Exploring Synergies Between Ecological Restoration and Reclamation
  • A Checkup on Ecological Restoration’s New Initiatives and Article Types
  • An Iconic Journal’s Closure and Natural History in Ecological Restoration
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire