Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
EditorialResearch Article
Open Access

Floristic Development in Three Oligohaline Tidal Wetlands after Dike Removal

Brenda C. Clifton, W. Gregory Hood and Steve R. Hinton
Ecological Restoration, September 2018, 36 (3) 238-251; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.36.3.238
Brenda C. Clifton
(corresponding author), Skagit River System Cooperative, P.O. Box 368, La Conner, WA 98296, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bclifton{at}skagitcoop.org
W. Gregory Hood
Skagit River System Cooperative, P.O. Box 368, La Conner, WA 98296.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve R. Hinton
Skagit River System Cooperative, P.O. Box 368, La Conner, WA 98296.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Location of restoration and reference sites within the South Fork Skagit River Delta, Washington, USA (WADNR 2005, WADOE 2011).

  • Table 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 2.

    Description of indicators used to interpret shrubs and trees (S&T), cattail (CT), reed canarygrass (RCG), emergent herbaceous plant (EHP), open water (OW), and anthropogenic modification (AM) classifications from aerial photos.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Maps of cover and ground truth transect locations at the restoration and reference sites in 2000 and 2011/2013 within the South Fork Skagit River Delta, Washington, USA.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Box-and-whiskers plot of key species vegetation elevation distributions along survey transects throughout the restoration and reference sites. Sample sizes are written above the outliers. The sum of the species points differs from the total number of transect points due to open water (no species) or overlapping species at the same point. The median elevation for each species is shown by the middle horizontal line separating the upper box (2nd quartile) and lower box (3rd quartile). Asterisks denote outlying individuals.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Myrica gale. USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database. Britton, N.L. and A. Brown. 1913. An Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada and the British Possessions. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Site restoration actions, aerial photo, and ground-truth survey timetables for three restorations and two reference sites in the Skagit River Delta, Washington State, USA.

    SiteRestoration ActionYear(s) CompletedAerial Photos UsedGround Surveys Performed
    Reference SitesN/AN/A2000; 20112001; 2012
    Deepwater SloughDike removal20002000; 20112001; 2012
    Milltown IslandDike breaching/channel creation1999; 2006-2009; 20122000; 20112012
    Wiley SloughDike removal20092000; 20132013
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Change in reed canarygrass (RCG), shrubs and trees (S&T), emergent herbaceous plant (EHP), cattail (CT), open water (OW), and anthropogenic modification (AM) percent cover in the restoration and reference sites over eleven or thirteen years.

    Reference Marsh Cover (%)Wiley Slough Cover (%)Deepwater Slough Cover (%)Milltown Island Cover (%)
    20002011200020132000201120002011
    RCG3.64.11.01.922.24.743.440.0
    S&T33.132.144.35.827.915.048.947.2
    EHP33.319.50.241.61.212.81.65.8
    CT22.137.51.012.531.060.75.46.6
    OW7.96.83.035.96.66.80.70.4
    AM0.00.050.52.311.10.00.00.0
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Error matrix for 2000 Deepwater Slough, Milltown Island, Reference Sites, and Wiley vegetation mapping. RCG is the reed canarygrass classification, S&T is the shrubs and trees classification, EHP is the emergent herbaceous plant classification, CT is the cattail classification, OW is the open water classification.

    Classified in Ground Truth as:TotalAccuracy
    RCGS&TEHPCTOW
    Classified in Orthophoto as:RCG1900102095%
    S&T0170101894%
    EHP0125223083%
    CT2807708789%
    OW000000—
    Total212625812155—
    Accuracy90%65%100%95%0%—89%
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Error matrix for 2011 Deepwater Slough, Milltown Island, and Reference Sites and 2013 Wiley vegetation mapping. RCG is the reed canarygrass classification, S&T is the shrubs and trees classification, EHP is the emergent herbaceous plant classification, CT is the cattail classification, OW is the open water classification.

    Classified in Ground Truth as:TotalAccuracy
    RCGS&TEHPCTOW
    Classified in Orthophoto as:RCG15522531021373%
    S&T3142810016387%
    EHP18427233633382%
    CT262029777585791%
    OW03263117723775%
    Total2021713608821881803—
    Accuracy77%83%76%88%94%—85%
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 36 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 36, Issue 3
1 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Floristic Development in Three Oligohaline Tidal Wetlands after Dike Removal
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Floristic Development in Three Oligohaline Tidal Wetlands after Dike Removal
Brenda C. Clifton, W. Gregory Hood, Steve R. Hinton
Ecological Restoration Sep 2018, 36 (3) 238-251; DOI: 10.3368/er.36.3.238

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Floristic Development in Three Oligohaline Tidal Wetlands after Dike Removal
Brenda C. Clifton, W. Gregory Hood, Steve R. Hinton
Ecological Restoration Sep 2018, 36 (3) 238-251; DOI: 10.3368/er.36.3.238
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Lessons Learned and Value of Early Post-Construction Monitoring of a Large Tidal Wetland Restoration Project
  • Strategic Pathways for Environmental Restoration
  • Evaluating Restoration Techniques for Degraded Steppe Rangelands
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • estuarine wetland restoration
  • Phalaris arundinacea
  • Skagit River
  • Typha angustifolia
  • vegetation elevation distribution
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire