Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
EditorialResearch Article
Open Access

Soil Seed Banks in Stock-piled Topsoils in the Western Rio Grande Plains, Texas

Mylea C. Lovell, Sandra Rideout-Hanzak, David E. Ruppert, Veronica Acosta-Martinez, Forrest S. Smith, Paula Maywald Stumberg, Keith A. Pawelek, Anthony D. Falk and David B. Wester
Ecological Restoration, September 2018, 36 (3) 226-237; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.36.3.226
Mylea C. Lovell
Texas A&M Forest Service, 7914 US-62, Idalou, TX 79329.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Rideout-Hanzak
Department of Animal, Rangeland and Wildlife Sciences and Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David E. Ruppert
Department of Agriculture, Agribusiness and Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veronica Acosta-Martinez
Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Lubbock, TX 78363.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Forrest S. Smith
South Texas Natives, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula Maywald Stumberg
Land Steward Consultants, LTD, San Antonio, TX 78258.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith A. Pawelek
South Texas Natives, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony D. Falk
South Texas Natives, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David B. Wester
(corresponding author), Department of Animal, Rangeland and Wildlife Sciences and Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, 1150 Engineering Ave, MSC 228, Kingsville, TX 78363, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.wester{at}tamuk.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Table 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 3.

    Mean (SE) seed bank species richness and seed bank size (m-2) in the stock-pile and in undisturbed soils at the Hixon study area at four sampling depths and five sampling dates. 1Date: F4,50 = 24.42, p = 0.0001. Location: F1,50 = 0.11, p = 0.7331. Interaction: F4,50 = 0.24, p = 0.9126. 2Date: F4,50 = 25.26, p = 0.0001. Location: F1,50 = 3.42, p = 0.0706. Interaction: F4,50 = 3.15, p = 0.0201. 3Date: F4,50 = 22.08, p = 0.0001. Location: F1,50 = 0.58, p = 0.4514. Interaction: F4,50 = 7.71, p = 0.1607. 4Date: F4,50 = 21.38, p = 0.0001. Location: F1,50 = 3.79, p = 0.0575. Interaction: F4,50 = 2.82, p = 0.0357. 5Date: F4,50 = 29.14, p = 0.0001. Location: F1,50 = 1.38 p = 0.2422. Interaction: F4,50 = 1.08, p = 0.3058. 6Date: F4,50 = 26.92, p = 0.0001. Location: F1,50 = 13.29, p = 0.0010. Interaction: F4,50 = 7.32, p = 0.0002. 7Date: F4,50 = 17.29, p = 0.0001. Location: F1,50 = 7.41, p = 0.0098. Interaction: F4,50 = 5.51, p = 0.0009. 8Date: F4,50 = 19.65, p = 0.0001. Location: F1,50 = 20.34, p = 0.0020. Interaction: F4,50 = 13.76, p = 0.0001. 9Sampling date means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD). 10Sampling date means within a location followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD). 11Location means within a sampling date followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD).

  • Table 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 4.

    Mean (SE) seed bank species richness and seed bank size (m-2) in the stock-pile at the San Ysidro study area at four sampling depths and five sampling dates. 1Date: F4,75 = 1.95, p = 0.1290. Depth: F3,75 = 11.69, p = 0.0001. Interaction: F12,75 = 1.96, p = 0.0409. 2Date: F4,75 = 2.45, p = 0.0781; Depth: F3,75 = 19.65, p = 0.0001. Interaction: F12,75 = 2.58, p = 0.0061. 3Sampling date means at a depth followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD test). 4Sampling depth means within a sampling date followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD test).

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Total precipitation in 2013 (A) and 2014 (B) and mean total number of seedlings (m–2) at four depths in the stock-pile and in undisturbed soil on five sampling dates (plots on top) at the Hixon study site, Texas, USA. Black dots at the specified dates represent cumulative precipitation three weeks prior to sample collection. Precipitation data for Cotulla Airport, Texas, USA (NOAA 2015).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Total precipitation in 2013 (A) and 2014 (B) and mean total number of seedlings (m−2) at four depths in the stock-pile and in undisturbed soil on five sampling dates (plots on top) at the San Ysidro study site, Texas, USA. Black dots at the specified dates represent cumulative precipitation three weeks prior to sample collection. Precipitation data for Carrizo Springs Weather Station, Texas, USA (NOAA 2015).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Mean (SE) seed bank species richness and seed bank size (m–2) in the stock-pile at the Hixon study area at four sampling depths and five sampling dates. 1Date: F4,25 = 36.63, p = 0.0001. Depth: F3,75 = 3.47, p = 0.0196. Interaction: F12,75 =1.71, p = 0.0842. 2Sampling date means within a depth followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD test). 3Sampling depth means at a sampling date followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD test). 4Date: F4,25 = 16.98, p = 0.0001. Depth: F3,75 = 3.30, p = 0.0232. Interaction: F12,75 = 1.68, p = 0.089.

    Depath (cm)Sampling DateMean
    June 2013August 2013April 2014May 2014July 2014
    Richness10–100.64bc2A3 (0.31)3.18aA (0.0.66)0.51bcA (0.16)1.02bA (0.0.25)0.38cA (0.17)1.14 (0.24)
    10–200.38bA (0.17)2.29aBC (0.44)0.64bA (0.23)0.64bAB (0.23)0.64bA (0.23)0.91 (0.17)
    20–300.51bA (0.25)2.67aAB (0.0.43)0.38bA (0.17)0.25bB (0.16)0.38bA (0.17)0.84 (0.20)
    30–400.76abA (0.0.20)1.27aC (0.32)0.25bcA (0.25)0.25bcB (0.16)0.25bcA 0.16)0.56 (0.12)
    Mean0.57 (0.11)2.35 (0.27)0.44 (0.10)0.54 (0.12)0. 41 (0.09)
    Size40–100.89bcA2,3 (0.41)6.48aA (1.95)0.76cA (0.28)1.65bA (0.36)0.51cA (0.25)2.06 (0.57)
    10–200.51bA (0.25)6.35aA (2.42)0.76bA (0.28)0.89bAB (0.36)0.89bA (0.36)1.88 (0.62)
    20–300.51bA (0.25)4.19aA (1.02)0.38bA (0.17)0.38bB (0.26)0.38bA (0.17)1.17 (0.35)
    30–401.14abA (0.55)1.65aA (0.46)0.38bA (0.38)0.25bB (0.16)0.25bA (0.16)0.74 (0.19)
    Mean0.76 (0.19)4.67 (0.87)0.57 (0.14)0.79 (0.18)0.51 (0.13)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Mean (SE) total number of native1 and exotic2 seedlings (m-2) in the stock-pile at the Hixon study site over four sampling depths and five sampling dates, and in undisturbed soil at five sampling dates. 1Date: F4,25 = 18.90, p = 0.0001. Depth: F3,75 = 2.44, p = 0.0694. Interaction: F12,75 = 1.27, p = 0.2596. 2Date: F4,75 = 5.78, p = 0.0018. Depth: F3,75 = 2.61, p = 0.0581. Interaction: F12,75 = 1.66, p = 0.0629. 3Sampling date means for native species followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD test). 4Sampling depth means for native species followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD test). 5Sampling date means at a depth for exotic species followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD test). 6Sampling depth means at a sampling date for exotic species followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD test). 7Undisturbed date means for an origin of species followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD test).

    Depth (cm)Species originSampling DateMean
    June 2013August 2013April 2014May 2014July 2014
    0–10Native0.98 (0.41)4.57 (1.43)0.25 (0.16)0.51 (0.25)0.51 (0.25)1.77a4 (0.55)
    Exotic0.00c5A6 (0.00)1.91aA (0.67)0.51bcA (0.32)1.14abA (0.38)0.00cA (0.00)0.71 (0.21)
    10–20Native0.38 (0.26)4.57 (1.79)0.00 (0.00)0.13 (0.13)0.76 (0.39)1.53a (0.62)
    Exotic0.13bA (0.13)1.79aA (0.78)0.76aA (0.28)0.76aAB (0.28)0.13bA (0.13)0.71 (0.20)
    20–30Native0.38 (0.17)3.05 (0.98)0.13 (0.13)0.00 (0.00)0.13 (0.13)0.97ab (0.38)
    Exotic0.13bA (0.13)1.14aA (0.26)0.25bA (0.16)0.38bB (0.26)0.25bA (0.16)0.43 (0.11)
    30–40Native0.64 (0.23)1.40 (0.0.36)0.00 (0.00)0.13 (0.13)0.13 (0.13)0.60b (0.17)
    Exotic0.51aA (0.38)0.25aA (0.16)0.38aA (0.38)0.13aB (0.13)0.13aA (0.13)0.28 (0.11)
    Native Mean0.75b3 (0.18)4.46a (0.85)0.13c (0.07)0.25c (0.11)0.50bcA (0.17)
    Exotic Mean0.19(0.11)1.27 (0.29)0.48 (0.14)0.60 (0.15)0.13 (0.06)
    UndisturbedNative0.25b7 (0.0.25)10.92a (1.36)0.00b (0.00)0.38b (0.26)0.13b (0.13)2.34 (0.84)
    Exotic0.13a (0.13)1.50a (1.38)0.25a (0.16)2.54a (0.92)0.51a (0.25)0.99 (0.36)
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Mean (SE) seed bank species richness and seed bank size (m-2) in the stock-pile and in undisturbed soils at the San Ysidro study area at four sampling depths and five sampling dates. 1Date: F4,50 = 1.61, p = 0.1864. Location: F1,50 = 2.24, p = 0.1372. Interaction: F4,50 = 2.24, p = 0.0672. 2Date: F4,50 = 1.51, p = 0.2154. Location: F1,50 = 0, p = 1.000. Interaction: F4,50 = 1.47, p = 0.2251. 3Date: F4,50 = 0.31, p = 0.8741. Location: F1,50 = 18.15, p = 0.0043. Interaction: F4,50 = 2.69, p = 0.0380. 4Date: F4,50 = 0.39, p = 0.8209. Location: F1,50 = 5.00, p = 0.0318. Interaction: F4,50 = 1.37, p = 0.2575. 5Date F4,50 = 1.41, p = 0.2448. Location: F1,50 = 18.83, p = 0.0001. Interaction: F4,50 = 1.57, p = 0.2025. 6Date: F4,50 = 0.58, p = 0.6776. Location: F1,50 = 14.78, p = 0.0007. Interaction: F4,50 = 0.55, p = 0.7037. 7Date: F4,50 = 1.25, p = 0.2971. Location: F1,50 = 25.30, p = 0.0001. Interaction: F4,50 = 1.75, p = 0.1569. 8Date: F4,50 = 0.49, p = 0.7479. Location: F1,50 = 17.55, p = 0.0001. Interaction: F4,50 = 0.58, p = 0.6801. 9Sampling date means within a location followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD). 10Location means within a sampling date followed by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD). 11Location means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD). 12 Sampling date means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.10, protected LSD).

    Sampling Depth in Pile (cm)ResponseLocationSampling Date
    June 2013August 2013April 2014May 2014July 2014Mean
    0-10Richness1Pile0.00bB90.00) 10׳)1.02aA (0.32)1.14aA (0.17)1.40aA (0.31)1.52aA (0.62)1.02 (0.18)
    Undisturbed1.65aA (0.46)2.16aA (1.95)0.38aB (0.26)1.79aA (0.43)1.27aA (0.32)1.45 (0.25)
    Mean0.83 (0.33)1.59 (0.51)0.76 (0.19)1.59 (0.26)1.40 (0.34)
    Size2Pile0.00 (0.00)1.91 (0.64)3.68 (1.24)2.92 (0.80)4.18 (1.33)2.54a11 0.48)
    Undisturbed1.79 (0.51)3.81 (1.99)1.65 (1.37)3.05 (0.86)2.41 (0.89)2.54a (0.53)
    Mean1.17a12 (0.47)3.75a (1.36)3.50a (1.22)3.92a (0.73)4.33a (1.06)
    10-20Richness3Pile0.38a9B10 (0.26)0.25aB (0.16)1.27aA (0.58)0.64aB (0.31)0.51aB (0.16)0.61 (0.15)
    Undisturbed1.65aA (0.46)2.16aA (0.950.38aA (0.26)1.78aA (0.43)1.27aA (0.32)1.45 (0.25)
    Mean1.01 (0.32)1.21 (0.54)0.83 (0.33)1.21 (0.21)0.89 (0.21)
    Size4Pile0.38 (0.26)0.25 (0.16)2.79 (1.51)1.02 (0.54)1.02 (0.47)1.09b11 (0.36)
    Undisturbed1.78 (0.51)3.81 (1.99)1.65 (1.37)3.05 (0.86)2.41 (0.89)2.54a (0.51)
    Mean1.08a12 (0.24)2.03a (1.29)2.22a (0.99)2.03a (0.57)1.71a (0.52)
    20-30Richness5Pile0.13 (0.13)0.51 (0.25)0.51 (0.25)0.38 (0.17)0.13 (0.13)0.33b11 (0.09)
    Undisturbed1.65 (0.46)2.16 (0.95)0.38 (0.26)1.79 (0.43)1.27 (0.32)1.45a (0.25)
    Mean0.89a12 (0.32)1.33a (53)0.44a (0.17)1.08a (0.30)0.70a (0.24)
    Size6Pile0.13 (0.13)0.51 (0.25)0.76 (0.39)0.38 (0.17)0.13 (0.13)0.38b11(0.11)
    Undisturbed1.79 (0.51)3.81 (1.99)1.65 (1.37)3.05 (0.86)2.41 (0.89)2.54a (0.53)
    Mean0.95a12 (0.35)2.16a (1.08)1.21a 0.69)1.71a (0.58)1.27a (0.54)
    30-40Richness7Pile0.13 (0.13)0.25 (0.17)0.38 (0.26)0.13 (0.13)0.00 (0.00)0.18b11(0.07)
    Undisturbed1.65 (0.46)2.16 (0.95)0.38 (0.26)1.79 (0.43)1.27 (0.32)1.45a (0.25)
    Mean0.89a12 (0.32)1.21a (0.54)0.38a (0.18)0.95a (0.32)0.64 (0.25)
    Size8Pile0.25 (0.25)0.25 (0.16)0.38 (0.26)0.13 (0.13)0.00 (0.00)0.20b11 (0.08)
    Undisturbed1.79 (0.51)3.81 (1.99)1.65 (1.37)3.05 (0.86)2.41 (0.89)2.54a (0.53)
    Mean1.02a12 (0.36)2.03a (1.09)1.02a (0.69)1.59a (0.60)1.21a (0.56)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 36 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 36, Issue 3
1 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Soil Seed Banks in Stock-piled Topsoils in the Western Rio Grande Plains, Texas
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Soil Seed Banks in Stock-piled Topsoils in the Western Rio Grande Plains, Texas
Mylea C. Lovell, Sandra Rideout-Hanzak, David E. Ruppert, Veronica Acosta-Martinez, Forrest S. Smith, Paula Maywald Stumberg, Keith A. Pawelek, Anthony D. Falk, David B. Wester
Ecological Restoration Sep 2018, 36 (3) 226-237; DOI: 10.3368/er.36.3.226

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Soil Seed Banks in Stock-piled Topsoils in the Western Rio Grande Plains, Texas
Mylea C. Lovell, Sandra Rideout-Hanzak, David E. Ruppert, Veronica Acosta-Martinez, Forrest S. Smith, Paula Maywald Stumberg, Keith A. Pawelek, Anthony D. Falk, David B. Wester
Ecological Restoration Sep 2018, 36 (3) 226-237; DOI: 10.3368/er.36.3.226
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Management Implications
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Restoration Techniques for Degraded Steppe Rangelands
  • Restoring Frequent Fire Results in Habitat Improvement for Bison but Minimal Early Reduction of Woody Encroachment
  • Species Interactions Critical to Restoration Success in an Urban Living Shoreline
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • exotic species
  • native species
  • oil and gas well-pad restoration
  • seed bank size
  • seed bank species composition
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire