Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
EditorialSocio-Ecological Linkages
Open Access

Building Resilience in Ecological Restoration Processes: A Social-Ecological Perspective

Katrina Krievins, Ryan Plummer and Julia Baird
Ecological Restoration, September 2018, 36 (3) 195-207; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.36.3.195
Katrina Krievins
(corresponding author), Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada L2S 3A1, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Ryan Plummer
Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada L2S 3A1.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Baird
Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada L2S 3A1.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abelson A.,
    2. Halpern B.S.,
    3. Reed D.C.,
    4. Orth R.J.,
    5. Kendrick G.A.,
    6. Beck M.W.,
    7. et al.
    2015. Upgrading marine ecosystem restoration using ecological-social concepts. BioScience 66:156–163.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Allen C.D.,
    2. Savage M.,
    3. Falk D.A.,
    4. Suckling K.F.,
    5. Swetnam T.W.,
    6. Schulke T.,
    7. et al.
    2002. Ecological restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa pine ecosystems: A broad perspective. Ecological Applications 12:1418–1433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Allison S.K.
    2012. Ecological Restoration and Environmental Change: Renewing Damaged Ecosystems. New York, NY: Routledge.
  4. ↵
    1. Beechie T.J.,
    2. Sear D.A.,
    3. Olden J.D.,
    4. Pess G.R.,
    5. Buffington J.M.,
    6. Moir H.,
    7. et al.
    2010. Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience 60:209–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Beichler S.A.,
    2. Hasibovic S.,
    3. Davidse B.J.,
    4. Deppisch S.
    2014. The role played by social-ecological resilience as a method of integration in interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society 19:4.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Bendor T.
    2009. A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policy. Landscape and Urban Planning 89:17–27.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Bennett E.M.,
    2. Cumming G.S.,
    3. Peterson G.D.
    2005. A systems models approach to determining resilience surrogates for case studies. Ecosystems 8:945–957.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Benson M.H.,
    2. Garmestani A.S.
    2011. Can we manage for resilience? The integration of resilience thinking into natural resource management in the United States. Environmental Management 48:392–399.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Biggs R.,
    2. Schlüter M.,
    3. Biggs D.,
    4. Bohensky E.L.,
    5. BurnSilver S.,
    6. Cundill G.,
    7. et al.
    2012. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annual Reviews of Environment and Resources 37:421–448.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Bliss J.C.,
    2. Fischer A.P.
    2011. Toward a political ecology of ecosystem restoration. Pages 135–148 in Egan D., Hjerpe E.E., Abrams J. (eds), Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration: Integrating Science, Nature, and Culture. Washington DC: Island Press.
  11. ↵
    1. Blythe J.L.
    2015. Resilience and social thresholds in small-scale fishing communities. Sustainability Science 10:157–165.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Bullock J.M.,
    2. Aronson J.,
    3. Newton A.C.,
    4. Pywell R.F.,
    5. Rey-Benayas J.M.
    2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:541–549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Carpenter S.R.,
    2. Cottingham K.L.
    1997. Resilience and restoration of lakes. Conservation Ecology 1:2.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Choi Y.D.
    2004. Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: Toward “futuristic” restoration. Ecological Research 19:75–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Choi Y.D.
    2007. Restoration ecology to the future: A call for new paradigm. Restoration Ecology 15:351–353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Clewell A.F.,
    2. Aronson J.
    2013. Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession. 2nd ed. Washington DC: Island Press.
  17. ↵
    1. Clewell A.F.,
    2. Rieger J.,
    3. Munro J.
    2005. Guidelines for Developing and Managing Ecological Restoration Projects. 2nd ed. Tucson, AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration International.
    1. Cumming G.S.,
    2. Barnes G.,
    3. Perz S.,
    4. Schmink M.,
    5. Sieving K.E.,
    6. Southworth J.,
    7. et al.
    2005. An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems 8:941–944.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Daigle J.M.,
    2. Havinga D.
    1996. Restoring Nature’s Place: A Guide to Naturalizing Ontario Parks and Greenspace. Schomberg, ON: Ecological Outlook and Ontario Parks Association.
  19. ↵
    1. DellaSala D.A.,
    2. Martin A.,
    3. Spivak R.,
    4. Schulke T.,
    5. Bird B.,
    6. Criley M.
    2003. A citizen’s call for ecological forest restoration: Forest restoration principles and criteria. Ecological Restoration 21:14–23.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Deppisch S.,
    2. Hasibovic S.
    2013. Social-ecological resilience thinking as a bridging concept in transdisciplinary research on climate-change adaptation. Natural Hazards 67:117–127.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Egan D.,
    2. Hjerpe E.E.,
    3. Abrams J.
    2011. Why people matter in ecological restoration. Pages 1–20 in Egan D., Hjerpe E.E., Abrams J. (eds), Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration: Integrating Science, Nature, and Culture. Washington DC: Island Press.
  22. ↵
    1. Fischer J.,
    2. Peterson G.D.,
    3. Gardner T.A.,
    4. Gordon L.J.,
    5. Fazey I.,
    6. Elmqvist T.,
    7. et al.
    2009. Integrating resilience thinking and optimisation for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 549–554.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Folke C.
    2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16: 253–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Folke C.,
    2. Colding J.,
    3. Berkes F.
    2003. Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. Pages 352–387 in Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. (eds), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  25. ↵
    1. Galatowitsch S.M.
    2012. Ecological Restoration. Boston, MA: Sinauer Press.
  26. ↵
    1. Gann G.D.,
    2. Lamb D.
    (eds). 2006. Ecological Restoration: A Means of Conserving Biodiversity and Sustaining Livelihoods (version 1.1). Tucson, AZ and Gland, Switzerland: Society for Ecological Restoration International and IUCN.
  27. ↵
    1. Gregory C.,
    2. Fisher K.,
    3. Brierley G.,
    4. Clifford N.
    2011. Approaches to participation in sustainable river management: A comparative analysis of contemporary practices in Europe and New Zealand. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability 7:85–107.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Hallett L.M.,
    2. Diver S.,
    3. Eitzel M.V.,
    4. Olson J.J.,
    5. Ramage B.S.,
    6. Sardinas H.,
    7. et al.
    2013. Do we practice what we preach? Goal setting for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 21:312–319.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Harris J.A.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.,
    3. Higgs E.,
    4. Aronson J.
    2006. Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14:170–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Hilderbrand R.H.,
    2. Watts A.C.,
    3. Randle A.M.
    2005. The myths of restoration ecology. Ecology and Society 10:19.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Cramer V.A.
    2008. Restoration ecology: Interventionist approaches for restoring and maintaining ecosystem function in the face of rapid environmental change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33:39–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Hallett L.M.,
    3. Ehrlich P.R.,
    4. Mooney H.A.
    2011. Intervention ecology: Applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. BioScience 61:442–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Harris J.A.
    2001. Restoration ecology: Repairing the Earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration Ecology 9:239–246.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Hobbs R.J.,
    2. Norton D.A.
    1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4:93–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Holling C.S.
    1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 4:1–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Imhof J.G.,
    2. FitzGibbon J.E.
    2014. Restoring streams and their watersheds by building the capacity of local communities: a watershed and stream rehabilitation training program. Presentation at the Adaptation in the Great Lakes Region Conference, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 24–26.
  37. ↵
    1. Jackson S.T.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.
    2009. Ecological restoration in the light of ecological history. Science 325:567–569.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Janssen M.A.
    2007. An update on the scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Ecology and Society 12:9.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Jungwirth M.,
    2. Muhar S.,
    3. Schmutz S.
    2002. Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Fresh water Biology 47:867–887.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Kondolf G.M.
    1995. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3:133–136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Lake P.S.,
    2. Bond N.,
    3. Reich P.
    2007. Linking ecological theory with stream restoration. Freshwater Biology 52:597–615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Lindenmayer D.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.,
    3. Montague-Drake R.,
    4. Alexandra J.,
    5. Bennett A.,
    6. Burgman M.,
    7. et al.
    2008. A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecology Letter 11:78–91.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. McDonald T.,
    2. Gann G.D.,
    3. Jonson J.,
    4. Dixon K.W.
    2016. International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration— Including Principles and Key Concepts. Washington, DC: Society for Ecological Restoration.
  44. ↵
    1. Miller F.,
    2. Osbahr H.,
    3. Boyd E.,
    4. Thomalla F.,
    5. Bharwani S.,
    6. Ziervogel G.,
    7. et al.
    2010. Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society 15:11.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Moilanen A.,
    2. Van Teeffelen A.J.,
    3. Ben-Haim Y.,
    4. Ferrier S.
    2009. How much compensation is enough? A framework for incorporating uncertainty and time discounting when calculating offset ratios for impacted habitat. Restoration Ecology 17:470–478.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    1. Naiman R.J.
    2013. Socio-ecological complexity and the restoration of river ecosystems. Inland Waters 3:391–410.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Nellemann C.,
    2. Corcoran E.
    (eds). 2010. Dead Planet, Living Planet—Biodiversity and Ecosystem Restoration for Sustainable Development. Arendal, Norway: UNEP/Earthprint.
  48. ↵
    1. Noss R.F.,
    2. Franklin J.F.,
    3. Baker W.L.,
    4. Schoennagel T.,
    5. Moyle P.B.
    2006. Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4:481–487.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) and Watershed Science Centre
    2002. Adaptive Management of Stream Corridors in Ontario. Peterborough, ON: Watershed Science Centre.
  50. ↵
    1. Ostrom E.
    2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:15181–15187.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Ostrom E.
    2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Allan J.D.,
    4. Lake P.S.,
    5. Alexander G.,
    6. Brooks S.,
    7. et al.
    2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Falk D.A.,
    3. Zedler J.B.
    2006. Ecological theory and restoration ecology. Pages 1–13 in Falk D.A., Palmer M.A., Zedler J.B. (eds), Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  54. ↵
    1. Parks Canada
    2008. Principles and Guidelines for Ecological Restoration in Canada’s Protected Natural Areas. Gatineau, QC: National Parks Directorate, Parks Canada Agency.
  55. ↵
    1. Perring M.P.,
    2. Standish R.J.,
    3. Price J.N.,
    4. Craig M.D.,
    5. Erickson T.E.,
    6. Ruthrof K.X.,
    7. et al.
    2015. Advances in restoration ecology: Rising to the challenges of the coming decades. Ecosphere 6:1–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Peterson G.D.
    2002. Estimating resilience across landscapes. Conservation Ecology 6:17.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Pickett S.T.A.,
    2. Parker V.T.
    1994. Avoiding the old pitfalls: Opportunities in a new discipline. Restoration Ecology 2:75–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. ↵
    1. Plummer R.
    2010. Social-ecological resilience and environmental education: Synopsis, application, implications. Environmental Education Research 16:493–509.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Plummer R.,
    2. Baird J.,
    3. Moore M-L.,
    4. Brandes O.,
    5. Imhof J.,
    6. Krievins K.
    2014. Governance of aquatic systems: What attributes and practices promote resilience? International Journal of Water Governance 4:1–18.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Quinlan A.E.,
    2. Berbés-Blázquez M.,
    3. Haider L.J.,
    4. Peterson G.
    2015. Measuring and assessing resilience: Broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Applied Ecology 53:677–687.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Rieger J.,
    2. Stanley J.,
    3. Traynor R.
    2014. Project Planning and Management for Ecological Restoration. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  62. ↵
    1. Sanderson E.W.,
    2. Jaiteh M.,
    3. Levy M.A.,
    4. Redford K.H.,
    5. Wannebo A.V.,
    6. Woolmer G.
    2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52:891–904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. Seavy N.E.,
    2. Gardali T.,
    3. Golet G.H.,
    4. Griggs F.T.,
    5. Howell C.A.,
    6. Kelsey R.,
    7. et al.
    2009. Why climate change makes riparian restoration more important than ever: recommendations for practice and research. Ecological Restoration 27:330–338.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Smith B.,
    2. Clifford N.J.,
    3. Mant J.
    2014. The changing nature of river restoration. WIREs Water 1:249–261.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Suding K.N.
    2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: Successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42:465–487.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Suding K.N.,
    2. Gross K.L.
    2006. The dynamic nature of ecological systems: Multiple states and restoration trajectories. Pages 190–209 in Falk D.A., Palmer M., Zedler J.B. (eds), Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  67. ↵
    1. Suding K.N.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.
    (2009). Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24:271–279.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    1. Suding K.N.,
    2. Gross K.L.,
    3. Houseman G.R.
    2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:46–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  69. ↵
    1. Suding K.N.,
    2. Higgs E.,
    3. Palmer M.,
    4. Callicott J.B.,
    5. Anderson C.B.,
    6. Baker M.,
    7. et al.
    2015. Committing to ecological restoration: Efforts around the globe need legal and policy clarification. Science 348:638–640.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Tyler S.,
    2. Moench M.
    2012. A framework for urban climate resilience. Climate and Development 4:311–326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    1. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS)
    2007. Chapter 4: Stream restoration design process (accessed September 2016) directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=17780.wba.
  72. ↵
    1. Vitousek P.M.,
    2. Mooney H.A.,
    3. Lubchenco J.,
    4. Melillo J.M.
    1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Walker B.,
    2. Salt D.
    2012. Resilience Practice: Building Capacity to Absorb Disturbance and Maintain Function. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  74. ↵
    1. Wantzen K.M.,
    2. Ballouche A.,
    3. Longuet I.,
    4. Bao I.,
    5. Bocoum H.,
    6. Cissé L.,
    7. et al.
    2016. River culture: an eco-social approach to mitigate the biological and cultural diversity crisis in riverscapes. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 16:7–18.
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Wilson M.A.,
    2. Browning C.J.
    2012. Investing in natural infrastructure: Restoring watershed resilience and capacity in the face of a changing climate. Ecological Restoration 30:96–98.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Wortley L.,
    2. Hero J-M.,
    3. Howes M.
    2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: A review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21:537–543.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. ↵
    1. Young T.P.,
    2. Chase J.M.,
    3. Huddleston R.T.
    2001. Community succession and assembly: Comparing, contrasting and combining paradigms in the context of ecological restoration. Ecological Restoration 19:5–18.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Xu L.,
    2. Marinova D.
    2013. Resilience thinking: A bibliometric analysis of socio-ecological research. Scientometrics 96:911–927.
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. Zellmer S.,
    2. Gunderson L.
    2008. Why resilience may not always be a good thing: Lessons in ecosystem restoration from Glen Canyon and the Everglades. Nebraska Law Review 87: 893–949.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 36 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 36, Issue 3
1 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Building Resilience in Ecological Restoration Processes: A Social-Ecological Perspective
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Building Resilience in Ecological Restoration Processes: A Social-Ecological Perspective
Katrina Krievins, Ryan Plummer, Julia Baird
Ecological Restoration Sep 2018, 36 (3) 195-207; DOI: 10.3368/er.36.3.195

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Building Resilience in Ecological Restoration Processes: A Social-Ecological Perspective
Katrina Krievins, Ryan Plummer, Julia Baird
Ecological Restoration Sep 2018, 36 (3) 195-207; DOI: 10.3368/er.36.3.195
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Evolution of Perspectives in Ecological Restoration
    • The Emergence of Social-Ecological Resilience in Thinking and Practice
    • A Framework to Incorporate Resilience Thinking in Ecological Restoration
    • Applying the Framework to Assess Resilience Thinking and Practice: A Case Study
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Bridging Education and Restoration: How School Partnerships Can Support Long-Term Ecosystem Recovery
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Biocultural Species Enhancement in the Archaeological Site of Tzintzuntzan, the “Place of Hummingbirds”
  • Towards Increased Community-Engaged Ecological Restoration: A Review of Current Practice and Future Directions
Show more Socio-Ecological Linkages

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • complex adaptive systems
  • resilience practice
  • resilience
  • restoration framework
  • stream rehabilitation
  • Trout Unlimited Canada
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire