Terrestrial Fauna are Agents and Endpoints in Ecosystem Restoration Following Dam Removal

References

1. ↵
   1. Abbas F.,
   2. Merlet J.,
   3. Morellet N.,
   4. Verheyden H.,
   5. Hewison A.J.M.,
   6. Cargnelutti B.,
   7. et al

   . 2012. Roe deer may markedly alter forest nitrogen and phosphorus budgets across Europe. Oikos 121:1271–1278.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Adler R. W.

   2007. Restoring Colorado River ecosystems: A troubled sense of immensity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
3. ↵
   1. Albert A.,
   2. Auffret A.G.,
   3. Cosyns E.,
   4. Cousins S.A.O.,
   5. D’hondt B.,
   6. Eichberg C.,
   7. et al.

   2015. Seed dispersal by ungulates as an ecological filter: a trait-based meta-analysis. Oikos 124:1109–1120.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Babbitt B.

   2002. What goes up, may come down: Learning from our experiences with dam construction in the past can guide and improve dam removal in the future. BioScience 52:656–658.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Bellmore J.R.,
   2. Duda J.J.,
   3. Craig L.S.,
   4. Greene S.L.,
   5. Torgerson C.E.,
   6. Collins M.J.,
   7. et al

   . 2016. Status and trends of dam removal research in the United States. WIREs Water 4:e1164.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Ben-David M.,
   2. Hanley T.,
   3. Schell D.

   1998. Fertilization of terrestrial vegetation by spawning Pacific salmon: The role of flooding and predator activity. Oikos 83:47–55.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Blackie B.A.

   2002. River-dependent bird species as potential indicators of ecosystem response to removal of dams on the Elwha River, Washington. MS thesis, Oregon State University.
8. ↵
   1. Bricker M.,
   2. Pearson D.,
   3. Maron J.

   2010. Small-mammal seed predation limits the recruitment and abundance of two perennial grassland forbs. Ecology 91:85–92.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Cederholm C.J.,
   2. Houston D. B.,
   3. Cole D.L.,
   4. Scarlett W.J.

   1989. Fate of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) carcasses in spawning streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46:1347–1355.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Cederholm C.J.,
    2. Kunze M.D.,
    3. Murota T.,
    4. Sibatani A.

    1999. Pacific salmon carcasses: essential contributions of nutrients and energy for aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Fisheries 24:6–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    1. Cederholm C.J.,
    2. Johnson D.H.,
    3. Bilby R.E.,
    4. Dominguez L.G.,
    5. Garrett A.M.,
    6. Graeber W.H.,
    7. et al

    . 2000. Pacific salmon and wildlife– ecological contexts, relationships, and implications for management: special edition technical report. Olympia, Washington: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
12. ↵
    1. Chenoweth J.,
    2. Acker S.A.,
    3. McHenry M.L.

    2011. Revegetation and restoration plan for Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell. Olympic National Park and the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, Port Angeles, Washington. www.nps.gov/olym/naturescience/elwha-restoration-docs.htm.
13. ↵
    1. Christie K.S.,
    2. Reimchen T.E.

    2008. Presence of salmon increases passerine density on Pacific Northwestern streams. The Auk 125:51–59.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Corbin J.D.,
    2. Holl K.D.

    2012. Applied nucleation as a forest restoration strategy. Forest Ecology and Management 265:37–46.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Draut A.,
    2. Ritchie A.C.

    2015. Sedimentology of new fluvial deposits on the Elwha River, Washington, USA, formed during large-scale dam removal. River Research and Applications 31: 42–61.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
16. ↵
    1. Duda J.J.,
    2. Freilich J.E.,
    3. Schreiner E.G.

    2008. Baseline studies in the Elwha River ecosystem prior to dam removal: introduction to the special issue. Northwest Science 82(sp1):1–12.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Duda J.J.,
    2. Wieferich D.J.,
    3. Bristol R.S.,
    4. Bellmore R.J.,
    5. Hutchison V.,
    6. Vittum K.,
    7. et al

    . 2016. The Dam Removal Information Portal (DRIP): A map-based resource linking scientific studies and associated geospatial information about dam removals. USGS Open File Report 2016–1132. dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161132.
18. ↵
    1. East A.E.,
    2. Pess G.R.,
    3. Bountry J.A.,
    4. Magirl C.S.,
    5. Ritchie A.C.,
    6. Logan J.B.,
    7. et al

    . 2015. Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: river channel and floodplain geomorphic change. Geomorphology 228:765–786.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Foley M.M.,
    2. Duda J.J.,
    3. Beirne M.M.,
    4. Paradis R.,
    5. Ritchie A.,
    6. Warrick J.A.

    2015. Rapid water quality change in the Elwha River estuary complex during dam removal. Limnology and Oceanography 60:1719–1732.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Foley M.M.,
    2. Bellmore J.R.,
    3. O’Connor J.E.,
    4. Duda J.J.,
    5. East A.E.,
    6. Grant G.E.,
    7. et al

    . 2017a. Dam removal: Listening in. Water Resources Research 53:5229–5246.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Foley M.M.,
    2. Warrick J.A.,
    3. Ritchie A.,
    4. Stevens A.W.,
    5. Shafroth P.B.,
    6. Duda J.J.,
    7. et al

    . 2017b. Coastal habitat and biological community response to dam removal on the Elwha River. Ecological Monographs 87:552–577.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Frank D. A.,
    2. Inouye R.S.,
    3. Huntly N.,
    4. Minshall G.W.,
    5. Anderson J.E.

    1994. The biogeochemistry of a north-temperate grassland with native ungulates: nitrogen dynamics in Yellowstone National Park. Biogeochemistry 10:163–180.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Fraser L.H.,
    2. Harrower W.L.,
    3. Garris H.W.,
    4. Davidson S.,
    5. Hebert P.D.,
    6. Howie R.,
    7. et al

    . 2015. A call for applying trophic structure in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 23:503–507.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Gelarden C.J.,
    2. McLaughlin J.F.

    2013. Forecasting avian responses to Elwha River restoration. Ecological Restoration 31:31–45.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Gende S.M.,
    2. Willson M.F.

    2001. Passerine densities in riparian forests of southeast Alaska: potential effects of anadromous spawning salmon. Condor 103:624–629.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Gill R. M.A.,
    2. Beardall V.

    2001. The impact of deer on woodlands: the effects of browsing and seed dispersal on vegetation structure and composition. Forestry 74:209–218.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Gregory S.,
    2. Li H.,
    3. Li J.

    2002. The conceptual basis for ecological responses to dam removal: resource managers face enormous challenges in assessing the consequences of removing large dams from rivers and evaluating management options. BioScience 52:713–723.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Hart D.D.,
    2. Poff N.L.

    2002. A special section on dam removal and river restoration. BioScience 52:653–655.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Helfield J.M.,
    2. Naiman R.J.

    2001. Effects of salmon-derived nitrogen on riparian forest growth and implications for stream productivity. Ecology 82:2403–2409.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Helfield J.M.,
    2. Naiman R.J.

    2006. Keystone interactions: salmon and bear in riparian forests of Alaska. Ecosystems 9:167–180.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Hjältén J.,
    2. Nilsson C.,
    3. Jørgensen D.,
    4. Bell D.

    2016. Forest-stream links, anthropogenic stressors, and climate change: implications for restoration planning. BioScience 66:646–654.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Hobbs N.T.

    1996. Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. The Journal of Wildlife Management 60:695–713.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Hocking M.D.,
    2. Reimchen T.E.

    2006. Consumption and distribution of salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) nutrients and energy by terrestrial flies. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:2076–2086.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Jenkins K.J.,
    2. Chelgren N.D.,
    3. Sager-Fradkin K.A.,
    4. Happe P.J.,
    5. Adams M.J.

    2015. Occupancy patterns of mammals and lentic amphibians in the Elwha River riparian zone before dam removal. River Research and Applications 31:193–206.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Jones M.E.,
    2. Davidson N.

    2016. Applying an animal-centric approach to improve ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 24:836–842.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Kloehn K.K.,
    2. Beechie T.J.,
    3. Morley S.A.,
    4. Coe H.J.,
    5. Duda J.J.

    2008. Influence of dams on river-floodplain dynamics in the Elwha River, Washington. Northwest Science 82(sp1):224–235.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Knapp R. L.

    2009. North American beaver (Castor canadensis) habitat use in the Olympic Peninsula’s Elwha Valley. MS Thesis, Western Washington University.
38. ↵
    1. Kollmann J.,
    2. Meyer S.T.,
    3. Bateman R.,
    4. Conradi T.,
    5. Gossner M.M.,
    6. Mendonça M Souza,
    7. et al

    . 2016. Integrating ecosystem functions into restoration ecology—recent advances and future directions. Restoration Ecology 24:722–730.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Major J.J.,
    2. East A.E.,
    3. O’Connor J.E.,
    4. Grant G.E.,
    5. Wilcox A.C.,
    6. Magirl C.S.,
    7. et al

    . 2017. Geomorphic responses to dam removals in the United States–a two-decade perspective. Pages 355–383 in D. Tsutsumi D., Laronne J.B. (eds), Gravel-Bed Rivers: Processes and Disasters. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
40. ↵
    1. McAlpine C.,
    2. Catterall C.P.,
    3. Nally R.M.,
    4. Lindenmayer D.,
    5. Reid J.L.,
    6. Holl K.D.,
    7. et al

    . 2016. Integrating plant- and animal-based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14:37–45.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. McHenry M.L.,
    2. Pess G.R.

    2008. An overview of monitoring options for assessing the response of salmonids and their aquatic ecosystems in the Elwha River following dam removal. Northwest Science 82(sp1):29–47.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. McLaughlin J.F.

    2013. Engaging birds in vegetation restoration after Elwha dam removal. Ecological Restoration 31:46–56.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. ↵
    1. Morley S.A.,
    2. Duda J.J.,
    3. Coe H.J.,
    4. Kloehn K.,
    5. McHenry M.

    2008. Benthic invertebrates and periphyton in the Elwha River basin: current conditions and predicted response to dam removal. Northwest Science 82(sp1):179–196.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Morley S.A.,
    2. Coe H.J.,
    3. Duda J.J.,
    4. Dunphy L.S.,
    5. McHenry M.L.,
    6. Beckman B.R.,
    7. et al

    . 2016. Seasonal variation exceeds of salmon carcass additions on benthic food webs in the Elwha River. Ecosphere 7(8):e01422. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1422.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. ↵
    1. Naiman R.J.,
    2. Johnston C.A.,
    3. Kelley J.C.

    1988. Alteration of North American streams by beaver. BioScience 38:753–762.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. O’Connor J.E.,
    2. Duda J.J.,
    3. Grant G. E.

    2015. 1000 dams down and counting. Science 348:496–497.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
47. ↵
    1. Ostfeld R.S.,
    2. Manson R.H.,
    3. Canham C.D.

    1997. Effects of rodents on survival of tree seeds and seedlings invading old fields. Ecology 78:1531–1542.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. ↵
    1. Peipoch M.,
    2. Brauns M.,
    3. Hauer F.R.,
    4. Weitere M.,
    5. Valett H.M.

    2015. Ecological simplification: human influences on riverscape complexity. BioScience 65:1057–1065.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. ↵
    1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Allan J.D.,
    4. Lake P.S.,
    5. Alexander G.,
    6. Brooks S.,
    7. et al

    . 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. ↵
    1. Pess G.R.,
    2. McHenry M.L.,
    3. Beechie T.J.,
    4. Davies J.

    2008. Biological impacts of the Elwha River dams and potential salmonid responses to dam removal. Northwest Science 82(sp1):72–90.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Peters R.J.,
    2. Duda J.J.,
    3. Pess G.R.,
    4. Zimmerman M.,
    5. Crain P.,
    6. Hughes Z.,
    7. et al

    . 2014. Guidelines for monitoring and adaptively managing Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steel-head (O. mykiss) restoration in the Elwha River. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lacey, Washington.
52. ↵
    1. Pollock M.M.,
    2. Lewallen G.,
    3. Woodruff K.,
    4. Jordan C.E.,
    5. Castro J.M.

    (eds). 2015. The Beaver Restoration Guidebook: Working with Beaver to Restore Streams, Wetlands, and Floodplains. Version 1.02. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. www.fws.gov/oregonfwo/ToolsForLandowners/RiverScience/Beaver.
53. ↵
    1. Quinn T.P.,
    2. Carlson S.M.,
    3. Gende S.M.,
    4. Rich H.B. Jr.

    2009. Transportation of Pacific salmon carcasses from streams to riparian forests by bears. Canadian Journal of Zoology 87:195–203.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. ↵
    1. Robinson G.R.,
    2. Handel S.N.

    1993. Forest restoration on a closed landfill: rapid addition of new species by bird dispersal. Conservation Biology 7:271–278.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. ↵
    1. Ruess R.W.,
    2. McNaughton S.J.

    1987. Grazing and the dynamics of nutrient and energy regulated microbial processes in the Serengeti grasslands. Oikos 49:101–110.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. ↵
    1. Ruzicka K.J.,
    2. Groninger J.W.,
    3. Zaczek J.J.

    2010. Deer browsing, forest edge effects, and vegetation dynamics following bottomland forest restoration. Restoration Ecology 18:702–710.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Sager-Fradkin K.A.,
    2. Jenkins K.J.,
    3. Happe P.J.,
    4. Beecham J.J.,
    5. Wright R.G.,
    6. Hoffman R.A.

    2008. Space and habitat use by black bears in the Elwha Valley prior to dam removal. Northwest Science 82(sp1):164–178.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Schreiner E.G.,
    2. Krueger K.A.,
    3. Houston D.B.,
    4. Happe P.J.

    1996. Understory patch dynamics and ungulate herbivory in old-growth forests of Olympic National Park, Washington. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26:255–265.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. ↵
    1. Seagle S.W.

    2003. Can ungulates foraging in a multiple-use landscape alter forest nitrogen budgets? Oikos 103:230–234.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
60. ↵
    1. Shafroth P.B.,
    2. Friedman J.M.,
    3. Auble G.T.,
    4. Scott M.L.,
    5. Braatne J.H.

    2002. Potential responses of riparian vegetation to dam removal: dam removal generally causes changes to aspects of the physical environment that influence the establishment and growth of riparian vegetation. BioScience 52:703–712.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. ↵
    1. Snyder B.A.,
    2. Hendrix P.F.

    2008. Current and potential roles of soil macroinvertebrates (earthworms, millipedes, and isopods) in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 16:629–636.

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. Society for Ecological Restoration

    . 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Tucson, AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration.
63. ↵
    1. Stanley E.H.,
    2. Doyle M.W.

    2003. Trading off: the ecological effects of dam removal. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:15–22.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Tonra C.M.,
    2. Sager-Fradkin K.,
    3. Morley S.A.,
    4. Duda J.J.,
    5. Marra P.P.

    2015. The rapid return of marine-derived nutrients to a freshwater food web following dam removal. Biological Conservation 192:130–134.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Tonra C.M.,
    2. Sager-Fradkin K.,
    3. Marra P.P.

    2016. Barriers to salmon migration impact body condition, offspring size, and life history variation in an avian consumer. Ecography 39:1056–1065.

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. Tullos D.D.,
    2. Collins M.J.,
    3. Bellmore J.R.,
    4. Bountry J.A.,
    5. Connolly P.J.,
    6. Shafroth P.B.,
    7. et al

    . 2016. Synthesis of common management concerns associated with dam removal. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 52:1179–1206.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. Warrick J.A.,
    2. Bountry J.A.,
    3. East A.E.,
    4. Magirl C.S.,
    5. Randle T.J.,
    6. Gelfenbaum G.,
    7. et al

    . 2015. Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Source-to-sink sediment budget and synthesis. Geomorphology 246:729–750.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
68. ↵
    1. Willson M. F.

    1993. Mammals as seed-dispersal mutualists in North America. Oikos 67:159–176.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
69. ↵
    1. Woodward A.,
    2. Schreiner E.G.,
    3. Crain P.,
    4. Brenkman S.J.,
    5. Happe P.J.,
    6. Acker S.A.,
    7. et al

    . 2008. Conceptual models for research and monitoring of Elwha Dam removal—management perspective. Northwest Science 82(sp1):59–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. ↵
    1. Wortley L.,
    2. Hero J. M.,
    3. Howes M.

    2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21:537–543.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
71. ↵
    1. Wunderle J.M.

    1997. The role of animal seed dispersal in accelerating native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. Forest Ecology and Management 99:223–235.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
72. ↵
    1. Zanini L.,
    2. Ganade G.

    2005. Restoration of Araucaria forest: the role of perches, pioneer vegetation, and soil fertility. Restoration Ecology 13:507–514.

    OpenUrlCrossRef