Evaluating Riparian Restoration Success: Long-Term Responses of the Breeding Bird Community in California’s Lower Putah Creek Watershed

References

1. ↵
   1. Bates D.M.,
   2. Maechler M.,
   3. Bolker B.M.,
   4. Walker S.

   2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Browne W.J.,
   2. Subramanian S.,
   3. Jones K.,
   4. Goldstein H.

   2005. Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit overdispersion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society 168:599–613.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Buckland S.T.,
   2. Anderson D.R.,
   3. Burnham K.P.,
   4. Laake J.L.,
   5. Borchers D.L.,
   6. Thomas L.

   2001. Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
4. ↵
   1. Buddle C.M.,
   2. Higgins S.,
   3. Rypstra A.L.

   2004. Ground-dwelling spider assemblages inhabiting riparian forests and hedgerows in an agricultural landscape. American Midland Naturalist 151: 15–26.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Calhoun A.J.K.,
   2. Arrigoni J.,
   3. Brooks R.P.,
   4. Hunter M.L.,
   5. Richter S.C.

   2014. Creating successful vernal pools: A literature review and advice for practitioners. Wetlands 34:1027–1038.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Capon S.J.,
   2. Chambers L.E.,
   3. Mac Nally R.,
   4. Naiman R.J.,
   5. Davies P.M.,
   6. Marshall N.,
   7. et al.

   2013. Riparian ecosystems in the 21st century: Hotspots for climate change adaptation? Ecosystems 16:359–381.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Carver E.,
   2. Caudill J.

   2013. Banking on nature: The economic benefits to local communities of National Wildlife Refuge visitation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
8. ↵
   1. Cornell Lab of Ornithology

   . 2013. All about birds: online guide to birds and birdwatching. www.allaboutbirds.org.
9. ↵
   1. Cristescu R.H.,
   2. Rhodes J.,
   3. Frére C.,
   4. Banks P.B.

   2013. Is restoring flora the same as restoring fauna? Lessons learned from koalas and mining rehabilitation. Journal of Applied Ecology 50:423–431.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Dybala K.E.,
    2. Clipperton N.,
    3. Gardali T.,
    4. Golet G.H.,
    5. Kelsey R.,
    6. Lorenzato S.,
    7. et al.

    2017. Population and habitat objectives for avian conservation in California’s Central Valley riparian ecosystems. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 15:5.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Gardali T.,
    2. Holmes A.L.,
    3. Small S.L.,
    4. Nur N.,
    5. Geupel G.R.,
    6. Golet G.H.

    2006. Abundance patterns of landbirds in restored and remnant riparian forests on the Sacramento River, California, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 14:391–403.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Gardali T.,
    2. Seavy N.E.,
    3. DiGaudio R.T.,
    4. Comrack L.A.

    2012. A climate change vulnerability assessment of California’s at-risk birds. PLOS One 7:e29507–e29507.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    1. George T.L.,
    2. Zack S.

    2001. Spatial and temporal considerations in restoring habitat for wildlife. Restoration Ecology 9:272–279.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Golet G.H.,
    2. Gardali T.,
    3. Howell C.A.,
    4. Hunt J.,
    5. Luster R.A.,
    6. Rainey W.,
    7. et al.

    2008. Wildlife response to riparian restoration on the Sacramento River. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 6: jmie_sfews_10998.
15. ↵
    1. Hulvey K.B.,
    2. Standish R.J.,
    3. Hallett L.M.,
    4. Starzomski B.M.,
    5. Murphy S.D.,
    6. Nelson C.R.,
    7. et al.

    2013. Incorporating novel ecosystems into management frameworks. Pages 157–171 in Hobbs R. J., Higgs E. S., Hall C. M. (eds), Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons
16. ↵
    1. Kiernan J.D.,
    2. Moyle P.B.,
    3. Crain P.K.

    2012. Restoring native fish assemblages to a regulated California stream using the natural flow regime concept. Ecological Applications 22:1472–1482.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Knopf F.L.,
    2. Johnson R.R.,
    3. Rich T.D.,
    4. Samson F.B.,
    5. Szaro R.C.

    1988. Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bulletin 100:272–284.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Knopf F.L.,
    2. Samson F.B.

    1994. Scale perspectives on avian diversity in western riparian ecosystems. Conservation Biology 8:669–676.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Kremen C.,
    2. Bugg R.L.,
    3. Nicola N.,
    4. Smith S.A.,
    5. Thorp R.W.,
    6. Williams N.M.

    2002. Native bees, native plants, and crop pollination in California. Fremontia 30:41–49.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Krovoza J.

    2000. Historic accord settles lawsuit, sets permanent creek flows to satisfaction of all parties; now future of creek looks bright. Putah Creek News 13:1–8.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Laake J.L.,
    2. Borchers D.L.,
    3. Thomas L.,
    4. Miller D.,
    5. Bishop J.

    2015. mrds: Mark-Recapture Distance Sampling. R package version 2.1.12.
22. ↵
    1. Liu X.,
    2. Taylor L.O.,
    3. Hamilton T.L.,
    4. Grigelis P.E.

    2013. Amenity values of proximity to National Wildlife Refuges: An analysis of urban residential property values. Ecological Economics 94:37–43.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Matzek V.,
    2. Puleston C.,
    3. Gunn J.

    2015. Can carbon credits fund riparian forest restoration? Restoration Ecology 23:7–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Miller D.L.

    2015. Distance: distance sampling detection function and abundance estimation. R package version 0.9.3.
25. ↵
    1. Moyle P.B.

    2014. Novel aquatic ecosystems: The new reality for streams in California and other Mediterranean climate regions. River Research and Applications 30:1335–1344.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. North American Bird Conservation Initiative (NABCI)

    . 2000. Bird conservation region descriptions. Arlington, Virginia.
27. ↵
    1. Naiman R.J.,
    2. Decamps H.,
    3. McClain M.E.

    2010. Riparia: Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Streamside Communities. Burlington, MA: Academic Press
28. ↵
    1. Oksanen J.,
    2. Blanchet F.G.,
    3. Kindt R.,
    4. Legendre P.,
    5. Minchin P.R.,
    6. O’Hara R.B.,
    7. et al.

    2013. vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.0–9.
29. ↵
    1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Ambrose R.F.,
    3. Poff N.L.R.

    1997. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:291–300.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Perry L.G.,
    2. Reynolds L.V.,
    3. Beechie T.J.,
    4. Collins M.J.,
    5. Shafroth P.B.

    2015. Incorporating climate change projections into riparian restoration planning and design. Ecohydrology 8:863–879.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Point Blue Conservation Science

    . 2017. Climate-Smart Restoration Toolkit: Tools for preparing restoration projects for climate change (accessed July 21 2017). www.pointblue.org/our-science-and-services/conservation-science/habitat-restoration/climate-smart-restorationtoolkit.
32. ↵
    1. R Core Team

    . 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
33. ↵
    1. Ralph C.J.,
    2. Geupel G.R.,
    3. Pyle P.,
    4. Martin T.E.,
    5. DeSante D.F.

    1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. U.S. Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-144-www.
34. ↵
    1. Sacramento County Superior Court

    . 2002. Notice of entry of second amended judgement entered in the Regents of the University of California’s cross-complaint in Solano Irrigation District et al. v. the names of all appropriative water rights holders. www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/board_decisions/adopted_orders/judgments/docs/putahcreek/noticeofentry3.pdf.
35. ↵
    1. Sauer J.R.,
    2. Hines J.E.,
    3. Fallon J.E.,
    4. Pardieck K.L.,
    5. Ziolkowski D.J.,
    6. Link W.A.

    2014. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966–2013, version 01.30.2015. United States Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbs.html.
36. ↵
    1. Sauer J.R.,
    2. Link W.A.

    2011. Analysis of the North American Breeding Bird Survey using hierarchical models. Auk 128:87–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Seavy N.E.,
    2. Gardali T.,
    3. Golet G.H.,
    4. Griggs F.T.,
    5. Howell C.A.,
    6. Kelsey R.,
    7. et al.

    2009. Why climate change makes riparian restoration more important than ever: Recommendations for practice and research. Ecological Restoration 27:330–338.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
38. ↵
    1. Shanahan S.A.,
    2. Nelson S.M.,
    3. Van Dooremolen D.M.,
    4. Eckberg J.R.

    2011. Restoring habitat for riparian birds in the lower Colorado River watershed: An example from the Las Vegas Wash, Nevada. Journal of Arid Environments 75:1182–1190.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Shuford W.D.,
    2. Gardali T.

    2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Camarillo, California: Western Field Ornithologists and California Department of Fish and Game.
40. ↵
    1. Spellerberg I.F.,
    2. Fedor P.J.

    2003. A tribute to Claude-Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the “Shannon-Wiener” Index. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12:177–179.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Thomas L.,
    2. Buckland S.T.,
    3. Rexstad E.A.,
    4. Laake J.L.,
    5. Strindberg S.,
    6. Hedley S.L.,
    7. et al.

    2010. Distance software: Design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:5–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Thomas L.,
    2. Burnham K.P.,
    3. Buckland S.T.

    2004. Temporal inferences from distance sampling surveys. Pages 71–107 in Buckland S.T., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P., Laake J.L., Borchers D.L., Thomas L. (eds), Advanced Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43. ↵
    1. Trochet J.A.,
    2. Engilis A. Jr.

    2014. Tracy Storer and the bird life of Putah Creek in by-gone days. Central Valley Bird Club Bulletin 16:70–86.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Trochet J.R.,
    2. Engilis A. Jr.,
    3. Truan M.L.,
    4. Engilis I.,
    5. Dybala K.E.,
    6. Walsh R.G.,
    7. Whisler E.

    2017. New and extralimital records of breeding birds for Putah Creek, California. Western Birds 48:154–172.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Truan M.L.,
    2. Engilis A. Jr.,
    3. Trochet J.R.

    2010. Putah Creek Terrestrial Wildlife Monitoring Program: Comprehensive Report. Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, Museum of Wildlife and Fish Biology, University of California, Davis.
46. ↵
    1. Wood S.N.

    2006. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
47. ↵
    1. Wood S.,
    2. Scheipl F.

    2014. gamm4: Generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. R package version 0.2–3.