Tree Seedling Survival Depends on Canopy Age, Cover and Initial Composition: Trade-offs in Forest Restoration Enrichment Planting

References

1. ↵
   1. Aide T.M.,
   2. Zimmerman J.K.,
   3. Pascarella J.B.,
   4. Rivera L.,
   5. Marcano-Vega H.

   2000. Forest regeneration in a chronosequence of tropical abandoned pastures: Implications for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 8:328–338.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Barbosa A.M.,
   2. Brown J.A.,
   3. Jimenez-Valverde A.,
   4. Real R.

   2016. modEvA: Model Evaluation and Analysis. R package version 1.3.2.cran.r-project.org/package=modEvA.
3. ↵
   1. Bassett I.,
   2. Simcock R.,
   3. Mitchell N.

   2005. Consequences of soil compaction for seedling establishment: Implications for natural regeneration and restoration. Austral Ecology 30:827–833.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Bates D.,
   2. Maechler M.,
   3. Bolker B.,
   4. Walker S.

   2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Burrows C.J.,
   2. Lord J.M.

   1993. Recent colonisation by Nothofagus fusca at Cass, Canterbury. New Zealand Journal of Botany 31:139–146.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Clarkson B.D.,
   2. Bryan C.,
   3. Clarkson F.

   2012. Reconstructing Hamilton’s indigenous ecosystems: The Waiwhakareke Natural Heritage Park. City Green 4:60–67.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Clarkson B.D.,
   2. Kirby C.L.

   2016. Ecological restoration in urban environments in New Zealand. Ecological Management & Restoration 17:180–190.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Dodd M.B.,
   2. McGowan A.W.,
   3. Power I.L.,
   4. Thorrold B.S.

   2005. Effects of variation in shade level, shade duration and light quality on perennial pastures. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 48:531–543.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Druce A.

   1966. Tree-ring dating of recent volcanic ash and lapilli, Mt Egmont. New Zealand Journal of Botany 4:3–41.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Duggan I.C.

    2012. Urban planning provides potential for lake restoration through catchment re-vegetation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11:95–99.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Gelman A.,
    2. Hill J.

    2006. Data analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
12. ↵
    1. Griscom H.P.,
    2. Ashton M.S.

    2011. Restoration of dry tropical forests in Central America: a review of pattern and process. Forest Ecology and Management 261:1564–1579.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Hall G.M.J.

    2001. Mitigating an organization’s future net carbon emissions by native forest restoration. Ecological Applications 11:1622–1633.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Hilderbrand R.H.,
    2. Watts A.C.,
    3. Randle A.M.

    2005. The myths of restoration ecology. Ecology and Society 10:19.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Kelly D.

    1987. Slow recovery of Beilschmiedia tawa after severe frosts in inland Taranaki, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 10:137–140.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Knowles B.,
    2. Beveridge A.

    1982. Biological flora of New Zealand 9. Beilschmiedia tawa (A. Cunn.) Benth. et Hook. f. ex Kirk (Lauraceae) tawa. New Zealand Journal of Botany 20:37–54.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Lamb D.,
    2. Erskine P.D.,
    3. Parrotta J.A.

    2005. Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628–1632.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    1. Ledgard N.,
    2. Davis M.

    2006. Rehabilitation of Mountain Beech (Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides) Forest after Fire. Australasian Plant Conservation: Journal of the Australian Network for Plant Conservation 14:19–20.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Lefcheck J.S.

    2015. piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7:573–579.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Lusk C.H.,
    2. Laughlin D.C.

    2016. Regeneration patterns, environmental filtering and tree species coexistence in a temperate forest. New Phytologist 213:657–668.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. MacKay D.B.,
    2. Wehi P.M.,
    3. Clarkson B.D.

    2011. Evaluating restoration success in urban forest plantings in Hamilton, New Zealand. Urban Habitats 6.
22. ↵
    1. Martínez-Garza C.,
    2. Howe H.F.

    2003. Restoring tropical diversity: beating the time tax on species loss. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:423–429.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Nakagawa S.,
    2. Schielzeth H.

    2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4:133–142.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Ogden J.

    1985. An introduction to plant demography with special reference to New Zealand trees. New Zealand Journal of Botany 23:751–772.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Ogden J.,
    2. Stewart G.H.

    (eds). 1995. Community Dynamics of the New Zealand Conifers. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
26. ↵
    1. Oliver C.D.,
    2. Larson B.C.

    1990. Forest Stand Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. ↵
    1. Orlovich D.A.,
    2. Cairney J.G.

    2004. Ectomycorrhizal fungi in New Zealand: Current perspectives and future directions. New Zealand Journal of Botany 42:721–738.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Overdyck E.,
    2. Clarkson B.D.

    2012. Seed rain and soil seed banks limit native regeneration within urban forest restoration plantings in Hamilton City, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 36:177–190.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Overdyck E.,
    2. Clarkson B.D.,
    3. Laughlin D.C.,
    4. Gemmill C.E.

    2013. Testing broadcast seeding methods to restore urban forests in the presence of seed predators. Restoration Ecology 21:763–769.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Padilla F.M.,
    2. Pugnaire F.I.

    2006. The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4:196–202.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Porteous T.

    1993. Native Forest Restoration: a practical guide for landowners. Wellington, New Zealand: QEII National Trust.
32. ↵
    1. Reid J.L.

    2015. Indicators of success should be sensitive to compositional failures: reply to Suganuma and Durigan. Restoration Ecology 23:519–520.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Schleicher A.,
    2. Biedermann R.,
    3. Kleyer M.

    2011. Dispersal traits determine plant response to habitat connectivity in an urban landscape. Landscape Ecology 26:529–540.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Schulze M.

    2008. Technical and financial analysis of enrichment planting in logging gaps as a potential component of forest management in the eastern Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management 255:866–879.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Smale M.C.,
    2. Whaley P.T.,
    3. Smale P.N.

    2001. Ecological Restoration of Native Forest at Aratiatia, North Island, New Zealand. Restoration Ecology 9:28–37.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Standish R.J.

    2002. Experimenting with methods to control Tradescantia fluminensis, an invasive weed of native forest remnants in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 26:161–170.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Standish R.J.,
    2. Robertson A.W.,
    3. Williams P.A.

    2001. The impact of an invasive weed Tradescantia fluminensis on native forest regeneration. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:1253–1263.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Suganuma M.S.,
    2. Durigan G.

    2015. Indicators of restoration success in riparian tropical forests using multiple reference ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 23:238–251.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. van Epenhuijsen K.C.,
    2. Henderson R.C.,
    3. Carpenter A.,
    4. Burge G.K.

    2000. The rise and fall of manuka blight scale: a review of the distribution of Eriococcus orariensis (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in New Zealand. New Zealand Entomologist 23:67–70.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Walker L.R.R.,
    2. Walker J.,
    3. Moral R.D.

    2007. Forging a New Alliance Between Succession and Restoration. Pages 1–18 in Walker L., Walker J., Hobbs R. (eds), Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession. New York, NY: Springer
41. ↵
    1. Wallace K.J.,
    2. Laughlin D.C.,
    3. Clarkson B.D.

    2017. Exotic weeds and fluctuating microclimate can constrain native plant regeneration in urban forest restoration. Ecological Applications 27: 1268–1279.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Wardle P.

    1991. Vegetation of New Zealand. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
43. ↵
    1. Wood S.

    2006. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
44. ↵
    1. Wood S.,
    2. Scheipl F.

    2014. gamm4: Generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. R package version 0.2–3. cran.r-project.org/package=gamm4.
45. ↵
    1. Wood S.N.

    2011. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 73:3–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science