Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Passive Roadside Restoration Reduces Management Costs and Fosters Native Habitat

Sara K. Wigginton and Laura A. Meyerson
Ecological Restoration, March 2018, 36 (1) 41-51; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.36.1.41
Sara K. Wigginton
(corresponding author), The University of Rhode Island, 1 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Laura A. Meyerson
The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. American Associate of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
    . 2011. U.S. Department of Transportation: Guide to Roadside Vegetation Management.
  2. ↵
    1. Bazzaz F.A.
    1968. Succession on abandoned fields in the Shawnee Hills, Southern Illinois Ecology 49:924–936.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Brown R.,
    2. Gorres J.,
    3. Sawyer S.
    2011. Development of Salt Tolerant Grasses for Roadside Use. U.S. Department of Transportation and Rhode Island Department of Transportation Technical Report RTD-07–2A.
  4. ↵
    1. Brown R.N.,
    2. Sawyer C.D.
    , 2012. Plant species diversity of highway roadsides in southern New England. Northeastern Naturalist 19:25–42.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Bryson G.M.,
    2. Barker A.V.
    2002. Sodium accumulation in soils and plants along Massachusetts roadsides. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 33:67–78.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Cadotte M.W.,
    2. Yasui S.L.E,
    3. Livingstone S.,
    4. Maclvor J.S.
    2017. Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? Biological Invasions 19:3489–3503.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC)
    . 2012. Preventing the Spread of Invasive Plants: Best Management Practices for Land Managers (3rd ed). Cal-IPC Publication 2012–03. Berkley, CA. www.cal-ipc.org/resources/library/landmanagers.
  8. ↵
    1. Clevenger A.P.,
    2. Chruszcz B.,
    3. Gunson K.E.
    2003. Spatial patterns and factors influencing small vertebrate fauna road-kill aggregations. Biological Conservation 109:15–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Dubner S.J.
    2017. How stupid is our obsession with lawns? [Radio broadcast]. C. Werth (producer), Freakanomics. New York: New York Public Radio.
  10. ↵
    1. Federal Highway Association (FHWA)
    . 2011. Our Nation’s Highways 2011. U.S. Department of Transportation. www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/pubs/hf/pl11028.
  11. ↵
    1. Fenderson L.E.,
    2. Kovach A.I.,
    3. Litvaitis J.A.,
    4. O’Brien K.M.,
    5. Boland K.M.,
    6. Jakubas W.J.
    2014. A multiscale analysis of gene flow for the New England cottontail, an imperiled habitat specialist in a fragmented landscape. Ecology and Evolution 4:1853–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Fryer J.L.
    2011. Celastrus orbiculatus. Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture. www.feis-crs.org/feis.
  13. ↵
    1. Forman R.T.T.,
    2. Sperling D.,
    3. Bissonette J.A.,
    4. Clevenger A.P.,
    5. Cutshall C.D.,
    6. Dale V.H.,
    7. et al.
    2003. Page 481 in Road Ecology; Science and Solutions. Washington D.C.: Island Press
  14. ↵
    1. Forman R.T.T.
    2004. Road ecology’s promise: What’s around the bend? Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 46:8–21.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Forman R.T.T.,
    2. McDonald R.
    2007. A massive increase in roadside woody vegetation: goals, pros, and cons. Pages 229–238 in Proceedings, Center for Transportation and the Environment. Raleigh: North Carolina State University
  16. ↵
    1. García-Palacios P.,
    2. Bowker M.A.,
    3. Maestre F.T.,
    4. Soliveres S.,
    5. Valladares F.,
    6. Papadopoulos J.,
    7. Escudero A.
    2011. Ecosystem development in roadside grasslands: Biotic control, plant-soil interactions and dispersal limitations. Ecological Applications 21:2806–2821.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Guyton J.,
    2. Jones J.C.,
    3. Entsminger E.
    2014. Alternative Mowing Regimes’ Influence on Native Plants and Deer. Mississippi Department of Transportation Technical Report SS228.
  18. ↵
    1. Harper-Lore B.L.
    2000. Preventing Wildflowers from Becoming Weedy. Pages 23–24 in Harper-Lore B.L., Wilson M. (eds). Roadside Use of Native Plants. Washington D.C.: Island Press
  19. ↵
    1. Harrison G.
    2014. Economic impact of ecosystem services provided by ecologically sustainable roadside right of way vegetation management practices. Florida Department of Transportation.
  20. ↵
    1. Hopwood J.L.
    2008. The contribution of roadside grassland restorations to native bee conservation. Biological Conservation 141: 2632–2640.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Innes R.J.
    2012. Toxicodendron radicans, T. rydbergii. Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture. www.feis-crs.org/feis.
  22. ↵
    1. Kayhanian M.,
    2. Singh A.,
    3. Suverkropp C.,
    4. Borroum S.
    2002. The impact of annual average daily traffic on highway runoff pollutant concentrations. UC Davis Road Ecology Center.
  23. ↵
    1. Laurance W.F.,
    2. Clements G.R.,
    3. Sloan S.,
    4. O’Connell C.S.,
    5. Mueller N.D.,
    6. Goosem M.,
    7. Arrea I.B.
    2014. A global strategy for road building. Nature 513:229–232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Leddy K.,
    2. Nelson K.J.
    1999. An analysis of Rhode Island land use. Page 47 in Statewide Planning Program. Rhode Island Department of Administration.
  24. ↵
    1. Magee D.,
    2. Ahles H.
    2007. Flora of the Northeast: A Manual of the Vascular Flora of New England and Adjacent New York. 2nd ed. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press
  25. ↵
    1. Martin L.J.,
    2. Blossey B.,
    3. Ellis E.
    2012. Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:195–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. McCleery R.A.,
    2. Holdorf A.R.,
    3. Hubbard L.L.,
    4. Peer B.D.
    2015. maximizing the wildlife conservation value of road right-of-ways in an agriculturally dominated landscape. PLOS One 10:1–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
    . 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Ecosystems. Washington D.C.: Island Press
  28. ↵
    1. Mortensen D.A.,
    2. Rauschert E.S.J.,
    3. Nord A.N.,
    4. Jones B.P.
    2009. Forest roads facilitate the spread of invasive plants. Invasive Plant Science and Management 2:191–199.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Munger G.T.
    2002. Rosa multiflora. Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture. www.feis-crs.org/feis.
  30. ↵
    1. Munger G.T.
    2003. Elaeagnus umbellata. Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture. www.feis-crs.org/feis/.
  31. ↵
    1. Nagase A.,
    2. Dunnett N.
    2012. Amount of water runoff from different vegetation types on extensive green roofs: Effects of plant species, diversity and plant structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 104:356–363.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Papanastasis V.P.
    2007. Land Abandonment and Old Field Dynamics in Greece. Pages 247–264 in Cramer V.A., Hobbs R.J (eds) Old Field Dynamics and Restoration of Abandoned Farmlands. Washington, D.C.: Island Press
  33. ↵
    1. Perron C.
    2008. Best management practices for roadside invasive plants. Page 30 in New Hampshire Department of Transportation. www.nh.gov/dot/bureaus/environment/documents.htm.
  34. ↵
    1. Phillips C.E.
    1962. Some Grasses of the Northeast: A Key to Their Identification by Vegetative Characteristics. Field manual no. 2. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware, Agricultural Experimental Station
  35. ↵
    1. Pleasants J.
    2016. Milkweed restoration in the Midwest for monarch butterfly recovery: Estimates of milkweed lost, milkweeds remaining and milkweeds that must be added to increase the monarch population. Insect Conservation and Diversity 10:42–53.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Porensky L.P.,
    2. Legar E.A.,
    3. Davison J.,
    4. Miller W.W.,
    5. Goergen E.M.,
    6. Espeland E.K.,
    7. Carroll-Moore E.M.
    2014. Arid old-field restoration: Native perennial grasses suppress weeds and erosion, but also suppress native shrubs. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 184:135–144.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Rammohan P.
    2006. Performance of vegetated roadsides in removing stormwater pollutants. Master’s Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station.
  38. ↵
    1. Reaser J.K.,
    2. Meyerson L.A.,
    3. Cronk Q.,
    4. Poorter M.D.,
    5. Eldrege L.G.,
    6. Green E.,
    7. et al.
    2007. Ecological and socioeconomic impacts of invasive alien species in island ecosystems. Environmental Conservation 34:1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
    . 2017. Overview of Climate in Rhode Island. www.dem.ri.gov/climate/climate-overview-ri.php.
  40. ↵
    1. Rhode Island Geographic Information System (RIGIS)
    . 2003. Traffic Counts. Rhode Island Geographic Information System Data Distribution System. Rhode Island Division of Planning and the University of Rhode Island. www.rigis.org.
  41. ↵
    1. Rhode Island Office of Management and Budget
    . 2012. Rhode Island Transportation: Review of Functions an Organization. Page 6 in Report to the House and Senate Finance Committees. Department of Administration.
  42. ↵
    1. Ries L.,
    2. Debinski D.M.,
    3. Wieland M.L.
    2001. Conservation value of roadside prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conservation Biology 15:401–411.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Sonntag D.,
    2. Gao H.O.,
    3. Morse P.,
    4. O’Reilly M.
    2011. Energy and Emission Rates of Highway Mowing Activities. TRB 2011 Annual Meeting 13901:1–17.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Stohlgren T.J.,
    2. Falkner M.B.,
    3. Schell L.D.
    1995. A Modified-Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method. Vegetatio 117: 113–121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Water
    . 1990. The National Water Quality Inventory Report to Congress.
  46. ↵
    1. Valtonen A.,
    2. Saarinen K.
    2005. A highway intersection as an alternative habitat for a meadow butterfly: Effect of mowing, habitat geometry and roads on the ringlet (Aphantopus hyperantus) . Annales Zoologici Fennici 42:545–556.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Vilà M.,
    2. Ibáñez I.
    2011. Plant invasions in the landscape. Landscape Ecology 26:461–472.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. ↵
    1. Walsh R.A.
    1995. Dichanthelium acuminatum. Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture. www.feis-crs.org/feis.
  49. ↵
    1. Watkins R.Z.,
    2. Chen J.,
    3. Pickens J.,
    4. Brosofske K.D.
    2003. Effects of forest roads on understory plants in a managed hardwood landscape. Conservation Biology 17:411–419.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. William W.R.,
    2. Sautter E.H.
    1988. Soils of Rhode Island Landscapes. University of Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station in cooperation with the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No.492.
  51. ↵
    1. Zouhar K.
    2005. Elaeagnus angustifolia. Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture. www.feis-crs.org/feis.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 36 (1)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 36, Issue 1
1 Mar 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Passive Roadside Restoration Reduces Management Costs and Fosters Native Habitat
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Passive Roadside Restoration Reduces Management Costs and Fosters Native Habitat
Sara K. Wigginton, Laura A. Meyerson
Ecological Restoration Mar 2018, 36 (1) 41-51; DOI: 10.3368/er.36.1.41

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Passive Roadside Restoration Reduces Management Costs and Fosters Native Habitat
Sara K. Wigginton, Laura A. Meyerson
Ecological Restoration Mar 2018, 36 (1) 41-51; DOI: 10.3368/er.36.1.41
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Choosing Plant Diversity Metrics: A Tallgrass Prairie Case Study
  • A Conceptual Planning Framework to Improve Integration of Reclamation with Site Remediation
  • Genetic Diversity, Mating System, and Reproductive Output of Restored Melaleuca acuminata Populations are Comparable to Natural Remnant Populations
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • early successional habitat
  • fragmentation
  • invasive species
  • mowing
  • road ecology
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire