Long-term Outcomes of Natural-process Riparian Restoration on a Regulated River Site: The Rio Grande Albuquerque Overbank Project after 16 Years

References

1. ↵
   1. Abbe T.B.,
   2. Montgomery D.R.

   1996. Large woody debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated Rivers-Research and Management 12:201–221.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Beechie T.J.,
   2. Sear D.A.,
   3. Olden J.D.,
   4. Pess G.R.,
   5. Buffington J.M.,
   6. Moir H.,
   7. et al.

   2010. Process-based Principles for Restoring River Ecosystems. Bioscience 60:209–222.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bernhardt E. S.,
   2. Palmer M.A.,
   3. Allan J.D.,
   4. Alexander G.,
   5. Barnas K.,
   6. Brooks S.,
   7. et al.

   2005. Ecology—Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   1. Bhattacharjee J.,
   2. Taylor J.P. Jr.,
   3. Smith L.M.,
   4. Spence L.E.

   2008. The Importance of Soil Characteristics in Determining Survival of First-Year Cottonwood Seedlings in Altered Riparian Habitats. Restoration Ecology 16:563–571.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bhattacharjee J.,
   2. Taylor J.P.,
   3. Smith L.M.

   2006. Controlled flooding and staged drawdown for restoration of native cottonwoods in the Middle Rio Grande Valley, New Mexico, USA. Wetlands 26:691–702.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Breck S.W.,
   2. Wilson K.R.,
   3. Andersen D.C.

   2003. Beaver herbivory and its effect on cottonwood trees: influence of flooding along matched regulated and unregulated rivers. USDA National Wildlife Research Center—Staff Publications. Paper 82. digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/82
7. ↵
   1. Brierley G.,
   2. Reid H.,
   3. Fryirs K.,
   4. Trahan N.

   2010. What are we monitoring and why? Using geomorphic principles to frame eco-hydrological assessments of river condition. Science of the Total Environment 408:2025–2033.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Brock J.H.

   1998. Invasion, ecology and management of Elaeagnus angustifolia (Russian olive) in the southwestern U.S.A. Pages 123–136 in Starfinger U., Edwards K., Kowarik I., Williamson M. (eds.) Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers.
9. ↵
   1. Brock J.H.

   2003. Elaeagnus angustifolia (Russian olive) seed banks from invaded riparian habitats in northeastern Arizona. Pages 267–276 in Child L.E., Brock J.H., Brundu G., Prach K., Pyšek P., Wade P.M, Williamson M. (eds.) Plant Invasions: Ecological Threats and Management Solutions. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers.
10. ↵
    1. Bunting D.P.,
    2. Kurc S.,
    3. Grabau M.

    2013. Long-term vegetation dynamics after high-density seedling establishment: implications for riparian restoration and management. River Research and Applications 29:1119–1130.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Cooper D. J.,
    2. Merritt D.M.,
    3. Andersen D.C.,
    4. Chimner R.A.

    1999. Factors controlling the establishment of Fremont cottonwood seedlings on the upper Green River, USA. Regulated Rivers-Research and Management 15:419–440.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Cooper D. J.,
    2. D’Amico D.R.,
    3. Scott M.L.

    2003. Physiological and morphological response patterns of Populus deltoides to alluvial groundwater pumping. Environmental Management 31:215–226.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Crawford C.S.,
    2. Cully A.C.,
    3. Leutheuser R.,
    4. Sifuentes M.S.,
    5. White L.H.,
    6. Wilber J.P.

    1993. Middle Rio Grande Ecosystem: Bosque Biological Management Plan. Biological Interagency Team, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM. econtent.unm.edu/cdm/ref/collection/NMWaters/id/3805.
14. ↵
    1. Crawford C.S.,
    2. Ellis L. M.,
    3. Shaw D.,
    4. Umbreit N.E.

    1999. Restoration and monitoring in the Middle Rio Grande Bosque: current status of flood pulse related efforts. Pages 158–163 in Finch D.M., Whitney J.C., Kelly J.F., Loftin S.R. (eds). Rio Grande Ecosystems: Linking Land, Water, and People. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
15. ↵
    1. Eichhorst K.D.,
    2. Shaw D.C.,
    3. Schuetz J.F.,
    4. Keithley M.,
    5. Crawford C.S.

    2012. Bosque Ecosystem Monitoring Program (BEMP): Comprehensive Report: 1997–2009. Open-File Report 12–5, Bosque School, Albuquerque, NM. www.bosqueschool.org/Reports.aspx.
16. ↵
    1. Everitt B.L.

    1998. Chronology of the spread of tamarisk in the central Rio Grande. Wetlands 18:658–668.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Follstad Shah J. J.,
    2. Dahm C.N.,
    3. Gloss S.P.,
    4. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. River and Riparian Restoration in the Southwest: Results of the National River Restoration Science Synthesis Project. Restoration Ecology 15:550–562.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Friedman J.M.,
    2. Auble G.T.,
    3. Shafroth P.B.,
    4. Scott M.L.,
    5. Merigliano M.F.,
    6. Preehling M.D.,
    7. Griffin E.K.

    2005. Dominance of non-native riparian trees in western USA. Biological Invasions 7:747–751.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Gurnell A.M.,
    2. Petts G.E.,
    3. Hannah D.M.,
    4. Smith B.P.G.,
    5. Edwards P.J.,
    6. Kollmann J.,
    7. et al.

    2001. Riparian vegetation and island formation along the gravel-bed Fiume Tagliamento, Italy. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26:31–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Hooper D.U.,
    2. Chapin F.S.,
    3. Ewel J.J.,
    4. Hector A.,
    5. Inchausti P.,
    6. Lavorel S.,
    7. et al.

    2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75:3–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Hultine K.R.,
    2. Bush S.E.,
    3. Ehleringer J.R.

    2010. Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwood and willow before, during, and after two years of soil water removal. Ecological Applications 20:347–361.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Hupp C.R.,
    2. Osterkamp W.R.

    1996. Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphic processes. Geomorphology 14:277–295.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Jemison R.

    2003. Relationships between hydrology, exotic plants, and fuel loads in the Middle Rio Grande. Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest 33:85–92.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Katz G.L.,
    2. Shafroth P.B.

    2003. Biology, ecology and management of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. (Russian olive) in western North America. Wetlands 23:763–777.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Lagasse P.F.

    1981. Geomorphic response of the Rio Grande to dam construction. Pages 27–46 in Wells S.G., Lambert W. (eds), Environmental Geology and Hydrology in New Mexico, Special Publication 10. Albuquerque, NM: New Mexico Geological Society.
26. ↵
    1. Latterell J.J.,
    2. Bechtold J.S.,
    3. O’Keefe T.C.,
    4. Van Pelt R.,
    5. Naiman R J.

    2006. Dynamic patch mosaics and channel movement in an unconfined river valley of the Olympic Mountains. Freshwater Biology 51:523–544.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Makar P.W.,
    2. AuBuchon J.

    2012. Channel Changes on the Middle Rio Grande. Pages 2556–2569 in Loucks E. (ed), World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries. ASCE. dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784412312.
28. ↵
    1. Milford E.,
    2. Muldavin E.

    2004. River Bars of the Middle Rio Grande: a comparative study of plant and arthropod diversity. Final Report, Rio Grande Bosque Initiative, U.S. Fish and Wild-life Service, Albuquerque, NM. nhnm.unm.edu/pubs.
29. ↵
    1. Milford E.,
    2. Muldavin E.,
    3. Arbetan P.,
    4. Mann K.

    2009. River bar biodiversity studies: aerial insects, vegetation structure, and bird habitat. Final Report, Rio Grande Bosque Initiative, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM. Natural Heritage New Mexico Publ. No. 09–GTR-347. nhnm.unm.edu/pubs.
30. ↵
    1. Molles M.C.,
    2. Crawford C.S.,
    3. Ellis L.M.,
    4. Valett H.M.,
    5. Dahm C.N.

    1998. Managed flooding for riparian ecosystem restoration—Managed flooding reorganizes riparian forest ecosystems along the middle Rio Grande in New Mexico. Bioscience 48:749–756.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Montgomery D.R.,
    2. Piegay H.

    2003. Wood in rivers: interactions with channel morphology and processes. Geomorphology 51:1–5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Ortiz R.M.

    2004. A river in transition: geomorphic and bed sediment response to Cochiti Dam on the Middle Rio Grande, Bernalillo to Albuquerque, New Mexico. M.S. dissertation University of New Mexico.
33. ↵
    1. Palmer M.,
    2. Allan J.D.,
    3. Meyer J.,
    4. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. River restoration in the twenty-first century: Data and experiential future efforts. Restoration Ecology 15:472–481.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Allan J.D.,
    4. Lake P.S.,
    5. Alexander G.,
    6. Brooks S.,
    7. et al.

    2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Poff N.L.,
    2. Allan J.D.,
    3. Bain M.B.,
    4. Karr J.R.,
    5. Prestegaard K.L.,
    6. Richter B.D.,
    7. et al.

    1997. The natural flow regime. Bioscience 47:769–784.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Porter M.D.,
    2. Massong T.M.

    2004. Analyzing changes in river channel morphology using GIS for Rio Grande silvery minnow habitat assessment. GIS/Spatial Analyses in Fishery and Aquatic Sciences 505:433–446.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Reynolds L.V.,
    2. Cooper D.J.

    2010. Environmental tolerance of an invasive riparian tree and its potential for continued spread in the southwestern US. Journal of Vegetation Science 21:733–743.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Richard G.,
    2. Julien P.

    2003. Dam impacts on and restoration of an alluvial river-Rio Grande, New Mexico. International Journal of Sediment Research 18:89–96.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
39. ↵
    1. Richard G.A.,
    2. Julien P.Y.,
    3. Baird D.C.

    2005. Statistical analysis of lateral migration of the Rio Grande, New Mexico. Geomorphology 71:139–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
40. ↵
    1. Richter B.D.,
    2. Richter H.E.

    2000. Prescribing flood regimes to sustain riparian ecosystems along meandering rivers. Conservation Biology 14:1467–1478.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Rood S.B.,
    2. Gourley C.R.,
    3. Ammon E.M.,
    4. Heki L.G.,
    5. Klotz J.R.,
    6. Morrison M.L.,
    7. et al.

    2003. Flows for floodplain forests: A successful riparian restoration. Bioscience 53:647–656.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Roseman E.F.,
    2. DeBruyne R.L.

    2015. The renaissance of ecosystem integrity in North American large rivers. Restoration Ecology 23:43–45.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Shafroth P.B.,
    2. Cleverly J.R.,
    3. Dudley T.L.,
    4. Taylor J.P.,
    5. Van Riper C.,
    6. Weeks E.P.,
    7. Stuart J.N.

    2005. Control of Tamarix in the Western United States: Implications for water salvage, wildlife use, and riparian restoration. Environmental Management 35:231–246.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Sher A.A.,
    2. Marshall D.L.

    2003. Seedling competition between native Populus deltoides (Salicaceae) and exotic Tamarix ramosissima (Tamaricaceae) across water regimes and substrate types. American Journal of Botany 90:413–422.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
45. ↵
    1. Sher A.A.,
    2. Marshall D.L.,
    3. Gilbert S.A.

    2000. Competition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance. Conservation Biology 14:1744–1754.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. Sher A.A.,
    2. Marshall D.L.,
    3. Taylor J.P.

    2002. Establishment patterns of native Populus and Salix in the presence of invasive nonnative Tamarix. Ecological Applications 12:760–772.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    1. Stanford J.A.,
    2. Ward J.V.,
    3. Liss W.J.,
    4. Frissell C.A.,
    5. Williams RN.,
    6. Lichatowich J.A.,
    7. Coutant C.C.

    1996. A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers-Research and Management 12:391–413.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Stannard M.,
    2. Ogle D.,
    3. Holzworth L.,
    4. Scianna J.,
    5. Sunleaf E.

    2002. History, Biology, Ecology, Suppression, and Revegetation of Russian–Olive Sites (Elaeagnus angustifolia, L.). USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Materials Technical Note No. MT-43.
49. ↵
    1. Stromberg J.C.

    1997. Growth and survivorship of Fremont cottonwood, Gooding willow, and salt cedar seedlings after large floods in central Arizona. Great Basin Naturalist 57:198–208.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
50. ↵
    1. Stromberg J.C.

    2001. Restoration of riparian vegetation in the southwestern United States: importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. Journal of Arid Environments 49:17–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. Stromberg J.C.,
    2. Beauchamp V.B.,
    3. Dixon M.D.,
    4. Lite S.J.,
    5. Paradzick C.

    2007a. Importance of low-flow and high-flow characteristics to restoration of riparian vegetation along rivers in the arid south-western United States. Freshwater Biology 52:651–679.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. ↵
    1. Stromberg J.C.,
    2. Lite S.J.,
    3. Marler R.,
    4. Paradzick C.,
    5. Shafroth P.B.,
    6. Shorrock D.,
    7. et al.

    2007b. Altered stream-flow regimes and invasive plant species: the Tamarix case. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:381–393.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. ↵
    1. Tashjian P.,
    2. Massong T.

    2006. The implications of recent flood-plain evolution on habitat within the Middle Rio Grande, New Mexico. Proceedings of the Eighth Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference (8th FISC), April 2–6, 2006, Reno, NV, USA.
54. ↵
    1. Taylor J.P.,
    2. McDaniel K.C.

    1998. Restoration of saltcedar (Tamarix sp.)-infested floodplains on the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge. Weed Technology 12:345–352.

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    1. Taylor J.P.,
    2. Wester D.B.,
    3. Smith L.M.

    1999. Soil disturbance, flood management, and riparian woody plant establishment in the Rio Grande floodplain. Wetlands 19:372–382.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. ↵
    1. Taylor J.P.,
    2. Smith L.M.,
    3. Haukos D.A.

    2006. Evaluation of woody plant restoration in the Middle Rio Grande: Ten years after. Wetlands 26:1151–1160.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Weber M.A.,
    2. Stewart S.

    2009. Public values for river restoration options on the Middle Rio Grande. Restoration Ecology 17:762–771.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Weisberg P.J.,
    2. Mortenson S.G.,
    3. Dilts T.E.

    2013. Gallery Forest or Herbaceous Wetland? The Need for Multi-Target Perspectives in Riparian Restoration Planning. Restoration Ecology 21:12–16.

    OpenUrl