Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticlePerspective

Forest Landscape Restoration: Progress in the Last Decade and Remaining Challenges

Stephanie Mansourian, Nigel Dudley and Daniel Vallauri
Ecological Restoration, December 2017, 35 (4) 281-288; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.35.4.281
Stephanie Mansourian
Corresponding author, Consultancy, 36 Mont d’Eau du Milieu, 1276 Gingins, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Geography and Environment department, Geneva, Switzerland, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Nigel Dudley
Equilibrium Research, 47 The Quays, Cumberland Road, Bristol BS1 6UQ, UK; Industry Fellow, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Vallauri
WWF France, 6 rue des Fabres, F-13001 Marseille, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abell R.,
    2. Asquith N.,
    3. Boccaletti G.,
    4. Bremer L.,
    5. Chapin E.,
    6. Erickson-Quiroz A.,
    7. et al
    . 2017. Beyond the source: the environmental, economic and community benefits of source water protection. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.
  2. ↵
    1. Alexander S.,
    2. Nelson C.R.,
    3. Aronson J.,
    4. Lamb D.,
    5. Cliquet A.,
    6. Erwin K.L.,
    7. et al
    . 2011. Opportunities and challenges for ecological restoration within REDD+. Restoration Ecology 19:683–689.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Aronson J.,
    2. Milton S.J.,
    3. Blignaut J.
    2007. Restoring Natural Capital: Science, Business and Practice. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  4. ↵
    1. Baruah M.,
    2. Bobtoya S.,
    3. Mbile P.,
    4. Walters G.
    2016. Governance of restoration and institutions: working with Ghana’s community resource management areas. World Development Perspectives 3:38–41.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Berrahmouni N.,
    2. Parfondry M.,
    3. Regato P.,
    4. Sarre A.
    2015. Restoration of degraded forests and landscapes in drylands: guidelines and way forward. Unasylva 66:37.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Brancalion P.H.,
    2. Pinto S.R.,
    3. Pugliese L.,
    4. Padovezi A.,
    5. Rodrigues R.R.,
    6. Calmon M.
    2016. Governance innovations from a multi-stakeholder coalition to implement large-scale Forest Restoration in Brazil. World Development Perspectives 3:15–17.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Bruce J.,
    2. Fortmann L.,
    3. Nhira C.
    1993. Tenures in transition, tenures in conflict: examples from the zimbabwe social forest. Rural Sociology 58:626–642.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Chandler R.B.,
    2. King D.I.,
    3. Raudales R.,
    4. Trubey R.,
    5. Chandler C.,
    6. Chávez V.J.A.
    2013. A small-scale land-sparing approach to conserving biological diversity in tropical agricultural landscapes. Conservation Biology 27:785–795.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Chazdon R.
    2008. Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320:1458–1460.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Chazdon R.L.,
    2. Brancalion P.H.,
    3. Lamb D.,
    4. Laestadius L.,
    5. Calmon M.,
    6. Kumar C.
    2017. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conservation Letters 10:125–132.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Clewell A.F.,
    2. Aronson J.
    2013. Motivations for the Restoration of Ecosystems. Conservation Biology 20:420–428.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Colfer C.J.P.,
    2. Feintrenie L.
    2011. A dozen indicators for assessing governance in forested landscapes. Pages 217–232 in Colfer C.J.P., Pfund J.-L., Collaborative Governance of Tropical Landscapes. London, UK: Earthscan.
  13. ↵
    1. Dudley N.
    2012. Authenticity in Nature: Making Choices about the Naturalness of Ecosystems. London, UK: Earthscan.
  14. ↵
    1. Dudley N.,
    2. Schlaepfer R.,
    3. Jackson W.,
    4. Jeanrenaud J.-P.,
    5. Stolton S.
    2006. Forest Quality. Assessing Forests at a Landscape Scale. London, UK: Earthscan.
  15. ↵
    1. Egan D.,
    2. Hjerpe E.E.,
    3. Abrams J.
    2011. Why people matter in ecological restoration. Pages 1–19 in Egan D., Hjerpe E.E., Abrams J. Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics.
  16. ↵
    1. Evans K.,
    2. Guariguata M.R.
    2016. Success from the ground up: participatory monitoring and forest restoration. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
  17. ↵
    1. FAO
    . 2015. Global forest resources assessment 2015: how are the world’s forests changing? Rome, Italy: FAO.
  18. ↵
    1. FAO and Profor
    . 2011. Framework for assessing and monitoring forest governance. Rome, Italy: FAO.
  19. ↵
    1. Ferretti-Gallon K.,
    2. Busch J.
    2014. What drives deforestation and stops it? a meta-analysis of spatially explicit econometric studies. Working paper 361. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
  20. ↵
    1. Galatowitsch S.M.
    2012. Ecological Restoration. Boston, MA: Sinauer.
  21. ↵
    1. Ghazoul J.,
    2. Burivalova Z.,
    3. Garcia-Ulloa J.,
    4. King L.A.
    2015. Conceptualizing forest degradation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30:622–632.
    OpenUrl
    1. Görg C.
    2007. Landscape governance: the “politics of scale” and the “natural” conditions of places. Geoforum 38:954–966.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Guariguata M.R.,
    2. Brancalion P.H.
    2014. Current challenges and perspectives for governing forest restoration. Forests 5: 3022–3030.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Hansen M.C.,
    2. Potapov P.V.,
    3. Moore R.,
    4. Hancher M.,
    5. Turubanova S.A.,
    6. Tyukavina A.
    2013. High-resolution global maps of 21st-Century forest cover change. Science 342:850–853.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Hardcastle J.,
    2. Rambaldi G.,
    3. Long B. B.,
    4. Lanh L.,
    5. Son D.Q.
    2004. The use of participatory three-dimensional modelling in community-based planning in Quang Nam province, Vietnam. PLA Notes 49.
  25. ↵
    1. IUCN and WRI
    . 2014. A guide to the restoration opportunities assessment methodology (ROAM). Gland, Switzerland and Washington DC: IUCN and WRI.
  26. ↵
    1. Korhonen-Kurki K.,
    2. Sehring J.,
    3. Brockhaus M.,
    4. Di Gregorio M.
    2014. Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance. Climate Policy 14:167–186.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Lamb D.
    2014. Large-Scale Forest Restoration. London, UK: Earth-scan.
  28. ↵
    1. Lamb D.,
    2. Stanturf J.,
    3. Madsen P.
    2012. What is forest landscape restoration? Pages 3–23 in Stanturf J., Lamb D., Madsen P. Forest Landscape Restoration. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  29. ↵
    1. Lambin E.F.,
    2. Meyfroidt P.
    2011. Global land use, economic globalization and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:3465–3472.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Latawiec A.E.,
    2. Strassburg B.B.,
    3. Brancalion P.H.,
    4. Rodrigues R.R.,
    5. Gardner T.
    2015. Creating space for large-scale restoration in tropical agricultural landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13:211–218.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Li L.,
    2. Liu J.,
    3. Long H.,
    4. de Jong W.,
    5. Youn Y.C.
    2017. Economic globalization, trade and forest transition-the case of nine Asian countries. Forest Policy and Economics 76:7–13.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Maes J.,
    2. Egoh B.,
    3. Willemen L.,
    4. Liquete C.,
    5. Vihervaara P.,
    6. Schägner J.P.
    2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services 1:31–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Mansourian S.
    2016. Understanding the Relationship between governance and forest landscape restoration. Conservation and Society 14:267–278
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Mansourian S.,
    2. Vallauri D.,
    3. Dudley N.
    2005. Forest Restoration in Landscapes: Beyond Planting Trees. New York, NY: Springer.
  35. ↵
    1. Mansourian S.,
    2. Vallauri D.
    2014. Restoring forest landscapes: important lessons learnt. Environmental Management 53: 241–251.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Mansourian S.,
    2. Aquino L.,
    3. Erdmann T.K.,
    4. Pereira F.
    2014. A comparison of governance challenges in forest restoration in Paraguay’s privately-owned forests and Madagascar’s co-managed state forests. Forests 5:763–783.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Mansourian S.,
    2. Stanturf J.A.,
    3. Adutwumwaa Derkyi M.A.,
    4. Engel V.L.
    2017. Forest Landscape Restoration: Increasing the positive impacts of forest restoration or simply the area under tree cover? Restoration Ecology 25:178–183.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. McDonald T.,
    2. Gann G.D.,
    3. Jonson J.,
    4. Dixon K.W.
    2016. International standards for the practice of ecological restoration—including principles and key concepts. Washington, DC: Society for Ecological Restoration.
  39. ↵
    1. Melo F.P.,
    2. Pinto S.R.,
    3. Brancalion P.H.,
    4. Castro P.S.,
    5. Rodrigues R.R.,
    6. Aronson J.,
    7. Tabarelli M.
    2013. Priority setting for scaling-up tropical forest restoration projects: Early lessons from the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact. Environmental Science & Policy 33:395–404.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Mills A.J.,
    2. Vyver M.V.,
    3. Gordon I.J.,
    4. Patwardhan A.,
    5. Marais C.,
    6. Blignaut J.,
    7. et al.
    2015. Prescribing Innovation within a large-scale restoration programme in degraded subtropical thicket in South Africa. Forests 6:4328–4348.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Murcia C.,
    2. Guariguata M.R.,
    3. Andrade A.,
    4. Andrade G.I.,
    5. Aronson J.,
    6. Escobar E.M.
    2015. Challenges and prospects for scaling-up ecological restoration to meet international commitments: Colombia as a case study. Conservation Letters 9:213–220.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Naudts K.,
    2. Chen Y.,
    3. McGrath M.J.,
    4. Ryder J.,
    5. Valade A.,
    6. Otto J.,
    7. Luyssaert S.
    2016. Europe’s forest management did not mitigate climate warming. Science 351:597–600.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Newton A.C.,
    2. Tejedor N.
    2011. Principles and Practice of Forest Landscape Restoration: Case Studies from the Drylands of Latin America. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
  44. ↵
    1. Parrotta J.,
    2. Wildburger C.,
    3. Mansourian S.
    2012. Understanding relationships between biodiversity, carbon, forests and people: the key to achieving REDD+ objectives. A global assessment report. Vienna, Austria: IUFRO.
  45. ↵
    1. Phalan B.,
    2. Green R.E.,
    3. Dicks L.V.,
    4. Dotta G.,
    5. Feniuk C.,
    6. Lamb A.
    2016. How can higher-yield farming help to spare nature? Science 351:450–451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Phalan B.,
    2. Onial M.,
    3. Balmford A.,
    4. Green R.E.
    2011. Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333:1289–1291.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Phelps J.,
    2. Webb E.L.,
    3. Agrawal A.
    2010. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 328:312–313.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Reed J.,
    2. Van Vianen J.,
    3. Deakin E.L.,
    4. Barlow J.,
    5. Sunderland T.
    2016. Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future. Global Change Biology 22:2540–2554.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Rietbergen-McCracken J.S.,
    2. Maginnis S.,
    3. Sarre A.
    2007. The Forest Landscape Restoration Handbook. London, UK: Earth-scan.
  50. ↵
    1. Sayer J.,
    2. Sunderland T.,
    3. Ghazoul J.,
    4. Pfund J.L.,
    5. Sheil D.,
    6. Meijaard E.
    2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:8349–8356.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Sayer J.,
    2. Margules C.,
    3. Boedhihartono A.K.,
    4. Dale A.,
    5. Sunderland T.,
    6. Supriatna J.,
    7. Saryanthi R.
    2015. Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success? Sustainability Science 10:345–355.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Schultz C.A.,
    2. Jedd T.,
    3. Beam R.D.
    2012. The collaborative forest landscape restoration program: a history and overview of the first projects. Journal of Forestry :381–391.
  53. ↵
    1. Schulz J.J.,
    2. Schröder B.
    2017. Identifying suitable multifunctional restoration areas for forest landscape restoration in central Chile. Ecosphere 8:e01644.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Seppälä R.,
    2. Buck A.,
    3. Katila P.
    2009. Adaptation of forests and people to climate change: a global assessment report. IUFRO World Series vol. 22. Vienna, Austria: International Union of Forest Research Organizations.
  55. ↵
    1. Sloan S.
    2016. Tropical forest gain and interactions amongst agents of forest change. Forests 7:55.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Stanturf J.,
    2. Madsen P.,
    3. Lamb D.
    2012. A Goal-Oriented Approach to Forest Landscape Restoration. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
  57. ↵
    1. Stanturf J.A.,
    2. Kant P.,
    3. Barnekow Lillesø J.-P.,
    4. Mansourian S.,
    5. Kleine M.,
    6. Graudal L.,
    7. Madsen P.
    2015. Forest Landscape Restoration as a Key Component of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Vienna, Austria: IUFRO.
  58. ↵
    1. Suding K.,
    2. Higgs E.,
    3. Palmer M.,
    4. Callicott J.B.,
    5. Anderson C.B.,
    6. Baker M.,
    7. et al.
    2015. Committing to ecological restoration. Science 348:638–640.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Sunderland T.C.H.,
    2. Baudron F.,
    3. Ickowitz A.,
    4. Padoch C.,
    5. Ros-Tonen M.A.F.,
    6. Sandbrook C.,
    7. et al.
    2015. Response options across the landscape. Pages 183–210 in Vira B., Wildburger C., Mansourian S. Forests and Food: Addressing Hunger and Nutrition Across Sustainable Landscapes. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
  60. ↵
    1. Sunderlin W.D.,
    2. Angelsen A.,
    3. Belcher B.,
    4. Burgers P.,
    5. Nasi R.,
    6. Santoso L.,
    7. Wunder S.
    2005. Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Development 33:1383–1402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Vallauri D,
    2. Aronson J.,
    3. Barbero M.
    2002. An analysis of forest restoration 120 years after reforestation of badlands in the southwestern Alps. Restoration Ecology 10:16–26.
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. van Oosten C.
    2013. Restoring landscapes—governing place: a learning approach to forest landscape restoration. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 32:659–676.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Wilson S.J.,
    2. Cagalanan D.
    2016. Governing restoration: Strategies, adaptations and innovations for tomorrow’s forest landscapes. World Development Perspectives 4:11–15.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Wortley L.,
    2. Hero J.-M.,
    3. Howes M.
    2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21:537–543.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. ↵
    1. World Resources Institute (WRI)
    . 2009. Assessing Forest Governance. Washington, DC: WRI.
  66. ↵
    1. World Resources Institute (WRI)
    . 2014. Atlas of Forest and Landscape Restoration Opportunities. Washington, DC: WRI.
  67. ↵
    1. WWF and IUCN
    . 2000. Minutes of the forests reborn workshop in Segovia. Segovia, Spain. Unpublished.
  68. ↵
    1. Zheng H.,
    2. Wang G.
    2014. Achieving ecological restoration by working with local people: A Chinese scholar seeks win-win paths. Ecology and Society 19:35.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 35 (4)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 35, Issue 4
1 Dec 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Forest Landscape Restoration: Progress in the Last Decade and Remaining Challenges
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Forest Landscape Restoration: Progress in the Last Decade and Remaining Challenges
Stephanie Mansourian, Nigel Dudley, Daniel Vallauri
Ecological Restoration Dec 2017, 35 (4) 281-288; DOI: 10.3368/er.35.4.281

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Forest Landscape Restoration: Progress in the Last Decade and Remaining Challenges
Stephanie Mansourian, Nigel Dudley, Daniel Vallauri
Ecological Restoration Dec 2017, 35 (4) 281-288; DOI: 10.3368/er.35.4.281
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Progress in 13 Priority Areas of Work for FLR Since 2005
    • An Agenda for the Future
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • An Exploratory Assessment of Federal Land Restoration Contractors and Their Views on the Restoration Industry
  • A Stepwise Approach to Increasing Ecological Complexity in Forest Landscape Restoration
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Grassland Vegetation Response to a Decade of Ecological Restoration in an Urban Park in Central Texas
  • The Ecological Benefits of Positive Public Perception on Public Access Ecological Restorations
  • Urban Lake Shoreland Restoration
Show more Perspective

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Bonn Challenge
  • forest quality
  • Forest Restoration in Landscapes: Beyond Planting Trees
  • landscape governance
  • stakeholder engagement
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire