Long-Term Response of Stream and Riparian Restoration at Wilson Creek, Kentucky USA

References

1. 1. Agouridis C.,
   2. Angel P.,
   3. Taylor T.,
   4. Barton C.,
   5. Warner R.,
   6. Yu X.,
   7. Wood C.

   2012. Water quality characteristics of discharge from reforested loose-dumped mine spoil in eastern Kentucky. Journal of Environmental Quality 41:454–468.

   OpenUrlGeoRefPubMed
2. 1. Andrews D.M.

   2006. Hyporheic zone development and water quality improvement in a restored riparian area. MS thesis, University of Kentucky.
3. 1. Andrews D.M.,
   2. Barton C.D.,
   3. Kolka R.K.,
   4. Rhoades C.C.,
   5. Dattilo A.J.

   2011. Soil and water characteristics in restored cane-brake and forest riparian zones. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47:772–784.

   OpenUrlGeoRef
4. 1. Andrews D.M.,
   2. Barton C.D.,
   3. Czapka S.J.,
   4. Kolka R.K.,
   5. Sweeney B.W.

   2010. Influence of tree shelters on seedling success in an afforested riparian zone. New Forests 39:157–167.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Bash J.S.,
   2. Ryan C.M.

   2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: is anyone monitoring? Environmental Management 29:877–885.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 1. Bernhardt E.S.,
   2. Palmer M.,
   3. Allan J.D.,
   4. Alexander G.,
   5. Barnas K.,
   6. Brooks S.,
   7. et al.

   2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Bruland G.L.,
   2. Richardson C.J.,
   3. Whalen S.C.

   2006. Spatial variability of denitrification potential and related soil properties in created, restored, and paired natural wetlands. Wetlands 26: 1042–1056.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Bukaveckas P.A.

   2007. Effects of channel restoration on water velocity, transient storage, and nutrient uptake in a channelized stream. Environmental Science and Technology 41:1570–1576.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 1. Campbell J.N.

   1985. The land of cane and clover: presettlement vegetation in the so called bluegrass region of Kentucky. Herbarium report, University of Kentucky Library, Lexington, Kentucky.
10. 1. Clatterbuck W.K.,
    2. Oliver C.D.,
    3. Burkhardt E.C.

    1987. The silvi-cultural potential of mixed stands of cherrybark oak and American sycamore: spacing is the key. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 11:158–161.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Craft C.,
    2. Broome S.,
    3. Campbell C.

    2002. Fifteen years of vegetation and soil development after brackish-water marsh creation. Restoration Ecology 10:248–258.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Conner W.H.,
    2. Inabinette L.W.,
    3. Brantley E.F.

    2000. The use of tree shelters in restoring forest species to a floodplain delta: 5-year results. Ecological Engineering 15:S47–S56.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Dosskey M.G.,
    2. Bertsch P.M.

    1994. Forest sources and pathways of organic matter transport to a blackwater stream: a hydrologic approach. Biogeochemistry 24:1–19.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
14. 1. Dosskey M.G.,
    2. Vidon P.,
    3. Gurwick N.P.,
    4. Allan C.J.,
    5. Duval T.P.,
    6. Lowrance R.

    2010. The Role of Riparian Vegetation in Protecting and Improving Chemical Water Quality in Streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA):1–18.
15. 1. Dubois M.R.,
    2. Chappelka A.H.,
    3. Robbins E.,
    4. Somers G.,
    5. Baker K.

    2000. Tree shelters and weed control: effects on protection, survival and growth of cherrybark oak seedlings planted on a cutover site. New Forests 20:105–118.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Follstad Shah J.J.,
    2. Dahm C.N.,
    3. Gloss S.P.,
    4. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. River and riparian restoration in the Southwest: results of the National River Restoration Science Synthesis Project. Restoration Ecology 15:550–562.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Galat D.L.,
    2. Fredrickson L.H.,
    3. Humburg D.D.,
    4. Bataille K.J.,
    5. Bodie J.R.,
    6. Dohrenwend J.,
    7. et al.

    1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands natural and controlled flooding as complementary processes along the lower Missouri River. BioScience 48:721–733.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 1. Gentry J.A.

    2007. Leaf litter decomposition as a functional assessment of a natural stream channel restoration project. MS thesis, University of Louisville.
19. 1. Greenberg A.E.,
    2. Clesceri L.S.,
    3. Eaton A.D.

    1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
20. 1. Hafner S.D.,
    2. Groffman P.M.

    2005. Soil nitrogen cycling under litter and coarse woody debris in a mixed forest in New York State. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37:2159–2162.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Harmon M.E.,
    2. Franklin J.F.,
    3. Swanson F.W.,
    4. Sollins P.,
    5. Gregory S.V.,
    6. Lattin J.D.,
    7. et al.

    1986. Ecology of Coarse Woody Debris in Temperate Ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15:133–302.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Hook D.D.

    1984. Waterlogging tolerance of lowland tree species of the south. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 8:136–149.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Jones H.P.,
    2. Schmitz O.J.

    2009. Rapid Recovery of Damaged Ecosystems. PLoS ONE 4:e5653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005653.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 1. Kaushal S.S.,
    2. Groffman P.M.,
    3. Mayer P.M.,
    4. Striz E.,
    5. Gold A.J.

    2008. Effects of stream restoration on denitrification in an urbanizing watershed. Ecological Applications 18:789–804.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. 1. Kondolf G.M.,
    2. Anderson S.,
    3. Lave R.,
    4. Pagano L.,
    5. Merenlender A.,
    6. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: what can we learn? Restoration Ecology 15:516–523.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Kondolf G.M.,
    2. Micheli E.R.

    1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19:1–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Lepori F.,
    2. Palm D.,
    3. Malmqvist B.

    2005. Effects of stream restoration on ecosystem functioning: detritus retentiveness and decomposition. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:228–238.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Loehle C.

    2000. Strategy space and the disturbance spectrum: a life-history model for tree species coexistence. The American Naturalist 156:14–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 1. Malakoff D.

    2004. Profile—Dave Rosgen: the river doctor. Science 305:937–939.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. 1. Moreno-Mateos D.,
    2. Power M.E.,
    3. Comín F.A.,
    4. Yockteng R.

    2012. Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems. PloS Biol 10:e1001247.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
31. 1. Mulvaney R.L.

    1996. Extraction of exchangeable ammonium and nitrate. Pages 1129–1131 in Sparks D.L. (ed), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3—Chemical Methods. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
32. 1. Nakamura K.,
    2. Tockner K.,
    3. Amano K.

    2006. River and wetland restoration: Lessons from Japan. BioScience 56:419–429.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. 1. Oliver C.D.,
    2. Clatterbuck W.K.,
    3. Burkhardi E.C.

    1990. Spacing and stratification patterns of cherrybark oak and American sycamore in mixed, even-aged stands in the southeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 31:67–79.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Palmer M.,
    2. Allan J.D.,
    3. Meyer J.,
    4. Bernhardt E.S.

    2007. River restoration in the twenty-first century: data and experiential knowledge to inform future efforts. Restoration Ecology 15:472–481.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Richardson C.J.,
    2. Flanagan N.E.,
    3. Ho M.,
    4. Pahl J.W.

    2011. Integrated stream and wetland restoration: a watershed approach to improved water quality on the landscape. Ecological Engineering 37:25–39.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Roley S.S.,
    2. Tank J.L.,
    3. Stephen M.L.,
    4. Johnson L.T.,
    5. Beaulieu J.J.,
    6. Witter J.D.

    2012. Floodplain restoration enhances denitrification and reach-scale nitrogen removal in an agricultural stream. Ecological Applications 22:281–297.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. 1. Rooney T.P.,
    2. Waller D.M.

    2003. Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 181:165–176.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Rosgen D.L.

    1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology.
39. 1. Schnell S.,
    2. King G.M.

    1994. Mechanistic analysis of ammonium inhibition of atmospheric methane consumption in forest soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60:3514–3521.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. 1. Sexstone A.J.,
    2. Parkin T.B.,
    3. Tiedje J.M.

    1985. Temporal response of soil denitrification rates to rainfall and irrigation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49:99–103.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Sommer T.R.,
    2. Nobriga M.L.,
    3. Harrell W.C.,
    4. Batham W.,
    5. Kimmerer W.J.

    2001. Floodplain rearing of juvenile Chinook salmon: evidence of enhanced growth and survival. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:325–333.

    OpenUrl
42. 1. Stanturf J.A.,
    2. Conner W.H.,
    3. Gradiner E.S.,
    4. Schweitzer C.J.,
    5. Ezell A.W.

    2004. Recognizing and overcoming difficult site conditions for afforestation of bottomland hardwoods. Ecological Restoration 22:183–193.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
43. 1. Sullivan S.M.P.,
    2. Watzin M.C.

    2009. Stream-floodplain connectivity and fish assemblage diversity in the Champlain Valley, Vermont, USA. Journal of Fish Biology 74:1394–1418.

    OpenUrlPubMed
44. 1. Sweeney B.W.,
    2. Czapka S.J.,
    3. Yerkes T.

    2002. Riparian forest restoration: increasing success by reducing plant competition and herbivory. Restoration Ecology 10:392–400.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Sweeney B.W.,
    2. Czapka S.J.

    2004. Riparian forest restoration: why each site needs an ecological prescription. Forest Ecology and Management 192:361–373.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Tockner K.,
    2. Stanford J.A.

    2002. Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation 29:308–330.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Tuley G.

    1983. Shelters improve the growth of young trees in the forest [UK]. Quarterly Journal of Forestry 77:77–87.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Tuley G.

    1985. The growth of young oak trees in shelters. Forestry 58:181–195.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
49. 1. Unghire J.M.,
    2. Sutton-Grier A.E.,
    3. Flanagan N.E.,
    4. Richardson C.J.

    2011. Spatial impacts of stream and wetland restoration on riparian soil properties in the North Carolina Piedmont. Restoration Ecology 19:738–746.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Vannote R.L.,
    2. Minshall G.W.,
    3. Cummins K.W.,
    4. Sedell J.R.,
    5. Cushing C.E.

    1980. The River Continuum Concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 37:130–137.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. 1. Ward J.V.,
    2. Tockner K.,
    3. Schiemer F.

    1999. Biodiversity of flood-plain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 15:125–139.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. West D.H.,
    2. Chappelka A.H.,
    3. Tilt K.M.,
    4. Ponder H.G.,
    5. Williams J.D.

    1999. Effect of tree shelters on survival, growth, and wood quality of 11 tree species commonly planted in the southern United States. Journal of Arboriculture 25:69–75.

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Wittmer R.F.,
    2. Immel M.J.

    1977. A comparison of five tree species for intensive fiber production. Forest Ecology and Management 1:249–254.

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Woods A.J.,
    2. Omernik J.M.,
    3. Martin W.H.,
    4. Pond G.J.,
    5. Andrews W.M.,
    6. Call S.M.,
    7. Comstock J.A.,
    8. Taylor D.D.

    2002. Ecoregions of Kentucky (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, VA., U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,000,000).
55. 1. Xu J.M.,
    2. Tang C.,
    3. Chen Z.L.

    2006. The role of plant residues in pH change of acid soils differing in initial pH. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38:709–719.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. 1. Yan F.,
    2. Schubert S.,
    3. Mengel K.

    1996. Soil pH increase due to biological decarboxylation of organic anions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28:617–624.

    OpenUrl
57. 1. Zhang L.,
    2. Mitsch W.J.

    2007. Sediment chemistry and nutrient influx in a hydrologically restored bottomland hardwood forest in Midwestern USA. River Research and Applications 23:1026–1037.

    OpenUrl
58. 1. Zedler J.B.

    2003. Wetlands at your service: reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:65–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRef