Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Native Plants and Local Ecotypes in Ecological Restoration

References

1. 1. Allison S.K.

   2002. When is a restoration successful? Results from a 45-year-old tallgrass prairie restoration. Ecological Restoration 20:10–17.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. 1. Bierzychudek P.

   1982. Life histories and demography of shade-tolerant temperate forest herbs: A review. New Phytologist 90: 757–776.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Bischoff A.,
   2. Steinger T.,
   3. Müller-Schärer H.

   2010. The importance of plant provenance and genotypic diversity of seed material used for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 18:338–348.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
4. 1. Brudvig L.A.,
   2. Mabry C.M.,
   3. Mottl L.M.

   2011. Dispersal, not understory light competition, limits restoration of Iowa woodland understory herbs. Restoration Ecology 19:24–31.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Burton P.J.,
   2. Burton C.M.

   2002. Promoting genetic diversity in the production of large quantities of native plant seed. Ecological Restoration 20:117–123.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
6. 1. Cullina W.

   2000. The New England Wild Flower Society Guide to Growing and Propagating Wildflowers. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
7. 1. Dillman D.A.,
   2. Smyth J.D.,
   3. Christian L.M.

   2014. Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York, NY: Wiley.
8. 1. Etterson J.R.,
   2. Shaw R.G.

   2001. Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294:151–154.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 1. Falk D.A.,
   2. Knapp E.E.,
   3. Guerrant E.O.

   2001. An Introduction to Restoration Genetics. Tucson, AZ: .Plant Conservation Alliance, Bureau of Land Management, US Department of the Interior.
10. 1. Gerken Golay M.E.,
    2. Bice P.M.,
    3. Thompson J.R.

    2014. Collaborative learning about forest understory restoration and management: Identifying goals and sharing knowledge. Journal of Forestry 112:327–336.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Gerken Golay M.E.,
    2. Manatt R.,
    3. Mabry C.,
    4. Thompson J.,
    5. Kolka R.

    2013. Restoration of herbaceous forest plants: Persistence, growth and reproductive success of local and non-local propagules. Ecological Restoration 31:378–387.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. Herman B.,
    2. Packard S.,
    3. Pollack C.,
    4. Houseal G.,
    5. Sinn S.,
    6. O’Leary C.,
    7. et al.

    2014. Decisions . . . Decisions . . . How to source plant material for native plant restoration projects. Ecological Restoration 32:236–238.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
13. 1. Houseal G.,
    2. Smith D.

    2000. Source-identified seed: The Iowa roadside experience. Ecological Restoration 18:173–183.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
14. 1. Hufford K.M.,
    2. Mazer S.J.

    2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Jastrow J.D.

    1987. Changes in soil aggregation associated with tallgrass prairie restoration. American Journal of Botany 74: 1656–1664.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Johnson G.R.,
    2. Sorensen F.C.,
    3. Clair J.B. St.,
    4. Cronn R.C.

    2004. Pacific northwest forest tree seed zones: A template for native plants? Native Plants Journal 5:131–140.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Joshi J.,
    2. Schmid B.,
    3. Caldeira M.C.,
    4. Dimitrakopoulos P.G.,
    5. Good J.,
    6. Harris R.,
    7. et al.

    2001. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecology Letters 4:536–544.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Kawecki T.J.,
    2. Ebert D.

    2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecology Letters 7:1225–1241.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Kindscher K.,
    2. Tieszen L.L.

    1998. Floristic and soil organic matter changes after five and thirty-five years of native tallgrass prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 6:181–196.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Kramer A.T.,
    2. Larkin D.J.,
    3. Fant J.B.

    2015. Assessing potential seed transfer zones for five forb species from the Great Basin Floristic Region, USA. Natural Areas Journal 35:174–188.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Linhart Y.B.,
    2. Grant M.C.

    1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:237–277.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Loveless M.D.,
    2. Hamrick J.L.

    1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:65–95.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Mabry C.M.

    2004. The number and size of seeds in common versus restricted forest herbaceous species in central Iowa, USA. Oikos 107:497–504.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Martin L.M.,
    2. Moloney K.A.,
    3. Wilsey B.J.

    2005. An assessment of grassland restoration success using species diversity components. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:237–336.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. McGraw J.B.,
    2. Antonovics J.

    1983. Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes: I. Ecotypic differentiation and life-cycle stages of selection. Journal of Ecology 71:879–897.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. McKay J.K.,
    2. Christian C.E.,
    3. Harrison S.,
    4. Rice K.J.

    2005. “How local is local?”—A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:432–440.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. McLachlan S.M.,
    2. Bazely D.R.

    2001. Recovery patterns of under-story herbs and their use as indicators of deciduous forest regeneration. Conservation Biology 15:98–110.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. McLachlan S.M.,
    2. Knispell A.L.

    2005. Assessment of long-term tallgrass prairie restoration in Manitoba, Canada. Biological Conservation 124:75–88.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Metzger F.,
    2. Schultz J.

    1984. Understory response to 50 years of management of a northern hardwood forest in Upper Michigan. American Midland Naturalist 112:209–223.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Millar C.J.,
    2. Libby W.J.

    1989. Restoration: Disneyland or a native ecosystem. Fremontia 17:3–10.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Mlot C.

    1990. Restoring the prairie. BioScience 40:804–809.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
32. 1. Mottl L.M.,
    2. Mabry C.M.,
    3. Farrar D.R.

    2006. Seven-year survival of perennial herbaceous transplants in temperate forest restoration. Restoration Ecology 14:330–338.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Packard S.,
    2. Mutel C.F.

    (eds). 1997. The Tallgrass Prairie Restoration Handbook: For Prairies, Savannas, and Forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.
34. 1. Primack R.B.

    1996. Lessons from ecological theory: Dispersal, establishment, and population structure. Pages 209–233 in Falk D.A., Millar C.I., Olwell M. (eds). Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
35. 1. Ruhren S.,
    2. Handel S.N.

    2003. Herbivory constrains survival, reproduction and mutualisms when restoring nine temperate forest herbs. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 130:34–42.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Saari C.,
    2. Glisson W.

    2012. Survey of Chicago region restoration seed source policies. Ecological Restoration 30:162–165.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
37. 1. Schramm P.

    1990. Prairie restoration: A twenty-five year perspective on establishment and management. Pages 169–178 in Smith D.D., Jacobs C.A. (eds), Proceedings of the Twelfth North American Prairie Conference. Cedar Falls, IA: University of Northern Iowa.
38. 1. Steiner D.

    1996. Maintaining standards: Differences between the standard deviation and the standard error and when to use each. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 41:498–502.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 1. Thompson J.R.

    1992. Prairies, Forests and Wetlands: The Restoration of Natural Landscape Communities in Iowa. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.