Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleSocial-Ecological Linkages

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Native Plants and Local Ecotypes in Ecological Restoration

Emily A. Altrichter, Janette R. Thompson and Catherine M. Mabry
Ecological Restoration, September 2017, 35 (3) 218-227; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.35.3.218
Emily A. Altrichter
Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janette R. Thompson
Corresponding author, Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, 339 Science Hall II, 2310 Pammel Drive, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Catherine M. Mabry
Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Many scientists and land managers recommend using local ecotypes for restoration projects. However, there is not a scientific consensus on what constitutes “local.” To gain information about production and use of locally sourced plant material, we surveyed two stakeholder groups, conservation professionals and nursery professionals, to learn if there were differences between these stakeholder groups in terms of use, sale, or perception of native and local ecotype plant material. Our survey results indicated that both conservation and nursery professionals are aware of the ecological and functional value of native plant communities, and are also familiar with associated plant sourcing issues. However, nursery professionals provide less local ecotype and source-certified plant material in their businesses than would meet the need expressed by conservation professionals for these materials. Conservation professionals also indicated that their organizations did not necessarily have specific guidelines for sourcing local ecotype native plant material. Although nursery professionals are aware of restoration techniques and the usefulness of local ecotypes, this does not appear to translate into provision of larger quantities of native, local ecotype, or source-certified plant material. We found that members of both stakeholder groups rely on trusted authorities and professional training for information, presenting an opportunity to reach both groups through combined workshops to encourage communication and facilitate availability of native plants for restoration.

  • forest herbaceous species
  • nursery production of native species
  • restoration practices
  • source-certified
  • survey

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 35 (3)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 35, Issue 3
1 Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Native Plants and Local Ecotypes in Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Native Plants and Local Ecotypes in Ecological Restoration
Emily A. Altrichter, Janette R. Thompson, Catherine M. Mabry
Ecological Restoration Sep 2017, 35 (3) 218-227; DOI: 10.3368/er.35.3.218

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Native Plants and Local Ecotypes in Ecological Restoration
Emily A. Altrichter, Janette R. Thompson, Catherine M. Mabry
Ecological Restoration Sep 2017, 35 (3) 218-227; DOI: 10.3368/er.35.3.218
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Using Online Surveys and Landscape Preferences to Enhance Nearshore Restoration
  • Limits to Local Sourcing in Herbaceous Plant Restoration
  • Genetic Differentiation and Phenotypic Plasticity of Forest Herbaceous Species in Iowa, Central United States
  • Regional Genetic Differences in Forest Herbaceous Species
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Restoring Walden Woods and the Idyll of Thoreau I: From Literary Landscape to Politicized Landscape
  • Restoring Walden Woods and the Idyll of Thoreau II: A Recent Historical Tracing of Changing and Renegotiated Restoration Goals
Show more Social-Ecological Linkages

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • forest herbaceous species
  • nursery production of native species
  • restoration practices
  • source-certified
  • survey
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire