Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Ecological Restoration
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Ecological Restoration

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Article

The Management of Typha domingensis (Typhaceae) affects Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in the Palo Verde Wetland, Guanacaste, Costa Rica

Florencia A. Trama, Federico L.S. Rizo Patron Viale, Anjali S. Kumar, Jennifer L. Stynoski, Michael B. McCoy Colton and Monika C. Springer
Ecological Restoration, June 2017, 35 (2) 175-189; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.35.2.175
Florencia A. Trama
(corresponding author) Centro Neotropical de Entrenamiento en Humedales. Jr. Puerto Inca #174 Apt. 302. Urb. Los Olivos-Surco. Lima 33, Lima. Peru. .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ftrama{at}centroneotropicalperu.org
Federico L.S. Rizo Patron Viale
Centro Neotropical de Entrenamiento en Humedales. Jr. Puerto Inca #174 Apt. 302. Urb. Los Olivos-Surco. Lima 33, Lima. Peru.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anjali S. Kumar
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer L. Stynoski
Department of Biology, Colorado State University, 200 West Lake St., Fort Collins, CO 80524.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael B. McCoy Colton
Associated Colleges of the Midwest, Costa Rican Office, San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monika C. Springer
Museo de Zoología, Escuela de Biología y Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (CIMAR), Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Location of management plots (A, B, C) in the Palo Verde wetland (in gray), Guanacaste, Costa Rica.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Taxa accumulation curve according to Abundance Estimator based on coverage (ACE) for each plot (closed circles-Plot A, open circles-Plot B and triangles- Plot C) and number of blocks (six blocks of each plot are combined for each plot/sampling date) in the Palo Verde wetland.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Mean values and interaction patterns for each plot and sampling date in the Palo Verde wetland, August 2003-2004. A) Taxa Richness per plot, B) Taxa Richness per sampling date, C) Macroinvertebrate abundance per plot, D) Macroinvertebrate abundance per sampling date.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Estimated surface responses for the adjustment of: A) Taxa richness (vegetation cover = T. domingensis) and B) Abundance of macroinvertebrates to a linear model (LM) versus the significant independent variables (depth, dissolved oxygen, sampling date, and vegetation cover).

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Dragonfly. Hooker W. 1882. Natural History. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers. The Florida Center for Instructional Technology, fcit.usf.edu.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Collected macroinvertebrates in the Palo Verde wetland (Guanacaste, Costa Rica) for each management plot. Abundance classification for each taxa: rare or I, 1 individual; occasional or II, 2-10 individuals; frequent or III, 11-50 individuals; and abundant or IV, > 50 individuals (Trama et al. 2009b).

    TaxaPlot APlot BPlot C
    # IndividualsAbundance
    class
    # IndividualsAbundance
    class
    # IndividualsAbundance
    class
    Oligochaeta35III2II116IV
    Hirudinea17III93IV28III
    Mollusca
    Basommatophora
     Bulinidae
     Gundlachia radiata1I
     Lymnaeidae1I1I2II
     Physidae103IV131IV235IV
     Planorbiidae
     Planorbella sp.81IV34III21III
     Biomphalaria sp.4II2II
     Antillorbis aeruginosus35III10II39III
     Drepanotrema anatinum119IV60IV75IV
    Mesogastropoda
     Ampullariidae/Pilidae
     Pomacea flagellata12III8II9II
     Hydrobiidae
     Aroapyrgus costaricensis2II12III
     Thiaridae
     Melanoides tuberculata1I2II7II
    Veneroidea
     Sphaeriidae
     Eupera veatleyi19III
    Collembola
     sp. 12II2II7II
    Insecta
    Ephemeroptera
     Baetidae
     Baetis sp.5II
     Callibaetis sp.1I
     Fallceon sp.14III
     Polymitarcidae
     Campsurus sp.1I
     Caenidae
     Caenis sp.5II376IV
     Leptohyphidae
     Leptohyphes sp.3II4II
     Leptophlebiidae
     Farrodes sp.2II
     Traverella sp.1I
    Megaloptera
     Corydalidae
     Corydalus sp.1I
    Hemiptera
     Hydrometridae
     Hydrometra sp.1I
     Belostomatidae
     Lethocerus sp.1I11III
     Hebridae
    Hebrus sp.16III6II24III
     sp.11I
     Veliidae
     Microvelia sp.1I
     sp. 11I
     Mesoveliidae
     Mesovelia sp.11III3II5II
     Naucoridae
     Pelocoris sp.5II2II
     Notonectidae
     Buenoa sp.1I2II
     Pleidae5II7II32III
     Corixidae2II
     Nepidae
     Curicta sp.1I
     Ranatra sp.3II
    Odonata
     Libellulidae
     Anatya sp.1I
     Erythemis sp.5II1I2II
     Erythemis vesiculosa3II
     Orthemis sp.1I7II1I
     Pantala sp.3II4II1I
     Perithemis sp.8II23III1I
     Tramea sp.11III
     Pseudoleon sp.1I
     Nephepeltia sp.2II2II6II
     Miathyria sp.1I1I3II
     sp 1.2II1I2II
     sp.21I1I
     sp.32II
     Aeshnidae
     Anax sp.1I1I14III
     Calopterygidae
     Heteaerina sp.1I
     Coenagrionidae
     Ischnura ramburii6II
     Telebasis sp.6II
     Leptobasis sp.23III
     Acanthagrion sp.2II7II10II
     Argia sp.3II11III
    Coleoptera
     Elmidae
     Microcylloepus sp.1I2II
     Haliplidae
     Haliplus sp.2II
     Staphylinidae3II
     Lampyridae
     sp. 11I
     Lutrochidae1I
     sp. 11I
     Dryopidae
     Pelonomus sp. 1 I
     Dytiscidae
     sp.110II1I7II
     sp.24II2II4II
     sp.33II2II17III
     sp.41I1I1I
     Noteridae
     sp.12II10II12III
     sp.21I2II14III
     Hydrophilidae
     Derallus sp.3II1I70IV
     Berosus sp.15III16III49III
     Tropisternus sp.4II
     Helochares sp.1I7II
     Phaenonotum sp.1I1I4II
     Hydrophilus sp.7II
     Helobata sp.8II1I
     Enochrus sp.5II2II1I
     sp. 13II1I8II
     Scirtidae12III8II220IV
     Curculionidae2II
    Trichoptera
     Hydropsychidae
     Smicridea sp.1I
     Hydroptilidae
     Hydroptila sp.1I9II1I
     Neotrichia sp.4II10II2II
     Oxyethira sp.144IV1I
     Leptoceridae
     Nectopsyche sp.6II
     Oecetis sp.1I
    Lepidoptera
     Crambidae
     Petrophila sp.1I
    Diptera
     Ceratopogonidae
     Probezzia sp.7II2II
     Alluaudomya sp.3II1I
     sp.13II3II5II
     Chironomidae
     Tanypodinae35III147IV26III
     Podonominae1I2II
     Chironominae381IV772IV337IV
     Tabanidae
     Chrysops sp.6II4II3II
     Tabanus sp.1I
     Culicidae
     Aedeomyia squamipennis1I
     Culex culex4II
     Culex erraticus1I
     Mansonia dyari12III
     Mansonia titillans3II
     Chaoboridae
     Chaoborus sp.1I
     Stratiomyidae23III2II20III
     Tipulidae
     sp 1.1I1I
     Tipula sp.1I1I
    Arachnoidea
    Acari/acarina
     Fam. Indet.10II2II1I
     Oribatidae10II
    Crustacea
    Conchostraca35III1752IV1I
    Cladocera
     Daphniidae5II24III6II
    Ostracoda
     Cyprididae
     Zonocypris sp.2II
     Sasrcypridopsis sp.12III3II1I
     Lymnocytheridae
     Cytheridella sp.11III244IV83IV
     Gen. sp. 118III129IV9II
     Gen. sp. 238III27III149IV
     Gen. sp. 32II104IV7II
     Gen. sp. 44II9II20III
     Gen. sp. 51I12III
     Gen. sp. 65II4II1I
    Family richness per plot353940
    Total Family richness (entire study)53
    Taxa richness per plot748281
    Total Taxa richness (entire study)116
    Individual abundance per plot118643171848
    Total Individual abundance (entire study)7□C1 7351
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Taxa richness and abundance of macroinvertebrates in % for each Class/Order collected in all sampling points.

    Class /OrderPlot APlot BPlot C
    Taxa richness
     Oligochaeta1.351.221.22
     Hirudinea1.351.221.22
     Basommatophora8.118.547.32
     Mesogastropoda2.703.663.66
     Veneroidea——1.22
     Ephemeroptera5.417.32—
     Trichoptera4.056.103.66
     Odonata13.5120.7315.85
     Coleoptera20.2918.2924.80
     Collembola—1.221.22
     Hemiptera8.116.1013.41
     Lepidoptera——1.22
     Diptera18.9210.9610.98
     Ostracoda10.819.769.76
     Acari/acarina1.351.222.44
     Cladocera1.351.221.22
     Conchostraca1.351.221.22
    Macroinvertebrate abundance
     Oligochaeta3.570.216.54
     Hirudinea4.333.963.34
     Basommatophora26.034.2218.25
     Mesogastropoda0.990.211.37
     Veneroidea——0.93
     Ephemeroptera0.824.864.86
     Trichoptera0.463.000.20
     Odonata1.971.713.39
     Coleoptera5.310.9021.44
     Collembola0.910.211.18
     Hemiptera3.040.324.02
     Lepidoptera——0.05
     Diptera36.5016.4619.48
     Ostracoda6.389.2013.83
     Acari/acarina0.760.040.54
     Cladocera0.380.420.29
     Conchostraca7.9752.020.29
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ecological Restoration: 35 (2)
Ecological Restoration
Vol. 35, Issue 2
1 Jun 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ecological Restoration.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Management of Typha domingensis (Typhaceae) affects Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in the Palo Verde Wetland, Guanacaste, Costa Rica
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ecological Restoration
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ecological Restoration web site.
Citation Tools
The Management of Typha domingensis (Typhaceae) affects Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in the Palo Verde Wetland, Guanacaste, Costa Rica
Florencia A. Trama, Federico L.S. Rizo Patron Viale, Anjali S. Kumar, Jennifer L. Stynoski, Michael B. McCoy Colton, Monika C. Springer
Ecological Restoration Jun 2017, 35 (2) 175-189; DOI: 10.3368/er.35.2.175

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Management of Typha domingensis (Typhaceae) affects Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in the Palo Verde Wetland, Guanacaste, Costa Rica
Florencia A. Trama, Federico L.S. Rizo Patron Viale, Anjali S. Kumar, Jennifer L. Stynoski, Michael B. McCoy Colton, Monika C. Springer
Ecological Restoration Jun 2017, 35 (2) 175-189; DOI: 10.3368/er.35.2.175
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development of genomic resources for cattails (Typha), a globally important macrophyte genus
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Restoration Techniques for Degraded Steppe Rangelands
  • Restoring Frequent Fire Results in Habitat Improvement for Bison but Minimal Early Reduction of Woody Encroachment
  • Species Interactions Critical to Restoration Success in an Urban Living Shoreline
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • aquatic diversity
  • cattail
  • seasonal wetland
  • tropical
  • wetland restoration
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire