Converting Lawn to Restored Forest on a Midwest College Campus: A Seven Year Assessment of Herbaceous Plant Establishment

References

1. 1. Abella S.R.,
   2. Chiquoine L.B.,
   3. Sinanian P.A.

   Forest change over 155 years along biophysical gradients of forest composition, environment, and anthropogenic disturbance. Forest Ecology and Management 348:196–207.
2. 1. Athy E.R.,
   2. Keiffer C.H.,
   3. Stevens M.H.

   Effects of mulch on seedlings and soil on a closed landfill. Restoration Ecology 14:233–241.
3. 1. Bonan G.B.

   2008. Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 1. Bouma C.,
   2. Huizenga E.,
   3. Warners D.

   2013. Assessing a reconciliation ecology approach to suburban landscaping: biodiversity on a college campus. The Michigan Botanist 52:93–104.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Burghardt K.T.,
   2. Tallamy D.W.,
   3. Schriver W.G.

   2008. Impact of native plants on bird and butterfly biodiversity in suburban landscapes. Conservation Biology 23:219–224.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Cogliastro A.,
   2. Gagnon D.,
   3. Coderre D.D.,
   4. Bhereur P.

   1990. Response of seven hardwood tree species to herbicide, rototilling, and legume cover at two southern Quebec plantation sites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20:1172–1182.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Cogliastro A.,
   2. Gagnon D.,
   3. Bouchard A.

   1997. Is site preparation necessary for bur oak receiving post-planting weed control? Annales des Sciences Forestieres 54:107–116.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Cole E.J.

   1901. Grand Rapids Flora: A Catalogue of the Flowering Plants and Ferns Growing Without Cultivation in the Vicinity of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Grand Rapids, MI: A. Van Dort.
9. 1. Curtis M.J.,
   2. Claassen V.P.

   2009. Regenerating topsoil functionality in four drastically disturbed soil types by compost incorporation. Restoration Ecology 17:24–32.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Davies R.J.

    1985. The importance of weed control and the use of tree shelters for establishing broadleaved trees on grass-dominated sites in England. Forestry 58:167–180.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Dijkstra F.A.,
    2. Geibe C.,
    3. Holmstrom S.,
    4. Lundstrom U.S.,
    5. van Breemen N.

    2001. The effect of organic acids on base cation leaching from the forest floor under six North American tree species. European Journal of Soil Science 52:205–214.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
12. 1. Easterling W.,
    2. Apps M.

    2005. Assessing the consequences of climate change for food and forest resources: a view from the IPPC. Climatic Change 70:165–189.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Finzi A.C.,
    2. Canham C.D.,
    3. van Breemen N.

    1998. Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: Species effects on pH and cations. Ecological Applications 8:447–454.

    OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Foy C.

    1992. Soil chemical factors limiting plant growth. Pages 97–149 in Hatfield J.L., Stewart B.A. (eds), Limitations to Plant Root Growth. New York, NY: Springer.
15. 1. Gill S.E.,
    2. Handley J.F.,
    3. Ennos A.R.,
    4. Pauleit S.

    2007. Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment 33:115–133.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Gomi T.,
    2. Sidle R.C.,
    3. Richardson J.S.

    2002. Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater systems. BioScience 52:905–916.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Hansen A.J.,
    2. Knight R.L.,
    3. Marzluff J.M.,
    4. Powell S.,
    5. Brown K.,
    6. Gude P.H.,
    7. Jones A.

    2005. Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms and research needs. Ecological Applications 15:1893–1905.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Hilaire R.S.,
    2. Arnold M.A.,
    3. Wilkerson D.C.,
    4. Devitt D.A.,
    5. Hurd B.H.,
    6. Lesikar B.J.,
    7. et al.

    2008. Efficient water use in residential urban landscapes. Hortscience 43:2081–2092.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 1. Humbert L.,
    2. Gagnon D.,
    3. Kneeshaw D.,
    4. Messier C.

    2007. A shade tolerance index for common understory species of northeastern North America. Ecological Indicators 7:195–207.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Ihrig M. E.

    2011. Assessing progress of urban ecological restoration using transplants. M.S. thesis. University of Waterloo.
21. 1. Kazmierczak A.,
    2. Carter J.

    2010. Adaptation to climate change using green and blue infrastructure: A database of case studies. University of Manchester, UK. orca.cf.ac.uk/64906/1/Database_Final_no_hyperlinks.pdf
22. 1. Livesley S.J.,
    2. McPherson G.M.,
    3. Calfapietra C.

    2016. The urban forest and ecosystem services: Impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and city scale. Journal of Environmental Quality 45:119–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 1. Lunt P.H.,
    2. Hedger J.N.

    2003. Effects of organic enrichment of mine spoil on growth and nutrient uptake in oak seedlings inoculated with selected ectomycorrhizal fungi. Restoration Ecology 11:125–130.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Mabry C.M.,
    2. Gerken M.E.,
    3. Thompson J.R.

    2008. Seasonal storage of nutrients by perennial herbaceous species in undisturbed and disturbed deciduous hardwood forests. Applied Vegetation Science 11:37–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Malhi Y.,
    2. Roberts J.,
    3. Betts R.,
    4. Killeen T.,
    5. Li W.,
    6. Nobre C.

    2008. Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319:169–172.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 1. Milesi C.,
    2. Running S.W.,
    3. Elvidge C.D.,
    4. Dietz J.B.,
    5. Tuttle B.T.,
    6. Nemani R.R.

    2008. Mapping and modeling the biogeochemical cycling of turf grasses in the United States. Environmental Management 36:426–438.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. NRCS.

    2002. American Cranberrybush. (accessed December 6, 2016). www.plants.usda.gov/factsheet/pdf/fs_viopa2.pdf
28. 1. Robbins P.

    2007. Lawn People. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29. 1. Rosenzweig M.L.

    2003. Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37:194–205.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Sauer L.J.

    1998. The Once and Future Forest. Washington, DC: Island Press.
31. 1. Shimamoto C.Y.,
    2. Botosso P.C.,
    3. Marques M.C.M.

    2014. How much carbon is sequestered during the restoration of tropical forests? Estimates from tree species in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Forestry and Ecological Management 329:1–9.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Sushinsky J.R.,
    2. Rhodes J.R.,
    3. Possingham J.H.P.,
    4. Gill T.K.,
    5. Fuller R.A.

    2012. How should we grow cities to minimize their biodiversity impacts? Global Change Biology 19:401–410.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Spracklin D.V.,
    2. Rhigelato R.

    2016. Carbon storage and sequestration of regrowing montane forests in southern Ecuador. Forest Ecology and Management 364:139–144.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Steensma K.,
    2. Clements D.,
    3. Wood J.,
    4. Van Dragt R.,
    5. Lowe B.

    2013. Stewarding the gift of land: Christian campuses as land management models. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 65:104–115.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Tallamy D.

    2012. Welcoming wildlife into the garden with native plants. Pages 74–79 in Dunne N. (ed), A Native Plants Reader. New York, NY: Brooklyn Botanic Garden.
36. 1. Voss E.G.,
    2. Reznicek A.A.

    2012. Field Manual of Michigan Flora. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
37. 1. Warners D.,
    2. Ryskamp M.,
    3. Van Dragt R.

    2014. Reconciliation ecology: A new paradigm for advancing creation care. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 66:221–235.

    OpenUrl