Trait Complementarity Enhances Native Plant Restoration in an Invaded Urban Landscape

References

1. 1. Abella S.R.,
   2. Craig D.J.,
   3. Smith S.D.,
   4. Newton A.C.

   2012. Identifying native vegetation for reducing exotic species during the restoration of desert ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 20:781–787.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 1. Abrams P.

   1983. The theory of limiting similarity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14:359–376.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Baldwin B.G.,
   2. Goldman D.H.,
   3. Keil D.J.,
   4. Patterson R.,
   5. Rosatti T.J.,
   6. Wilken D.H.

   (eds). 2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second edition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4. 1. Bickart N.

   2013. Managing the weed-shaped hole: Improving nitrogen uptake and preventing re-invasion in urban riparian restoration. Berkeley Scientific Journal 18.
5. 1. Biggerstaff M.S.,
   2. Beck C.W.

   2007. Effects of method of English ivy removal and seed addition on regeneration of vegetation in a southeastern piedmont forest. The American Midland Naturalist 158:206–220.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Brudvig L.A.,
   2. Mabry C.M.

   2008. Trait-based filtering of the regional species pool to guide understory plant reintroductions in midwestern oak savannas, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 16:290–304.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Buckley Y.M.,
   2. Bolker B.M.,
   3. Rees M.

   2007. Disturbance, invasion and re-invasion: Managing the weed-shaped hole in disturbed ecosystems. Ecology Letters 10:809–817.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 1. Butterfield B.J.,
   2. Suding K.N.

   2013. Single-trait functional indices outperform multi-trait indices in linking environmental gradients and ecosystem services in a complex landscape. Journal of Ecology 101:9–17.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Byun C.,
   2. de Blois S.,
   3. Brisson J.

   2013. Plant functional group identity and diversity determine biotic resistance to invasion by an exotic grass. Journal of Ecology 101:128–139.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Charbonneau R.B.

    1987. Strawberry Creek management plan. Office of Environmental Health and Safety, University of California, Berkeley.
11. 1. Chaves M.M.,
    2. Maroco J.P.,
    3. Pereira J.S.

    2003. Understanding plant responses to drought—From genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30:239–264.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Clark D.L.,
    2. Wilson M.,
    3. Roberts R.,
    4. Dunwiddie P.W.,
    5. Stanley A.,
    6. Kaye T.N.

    2012. Plant traits - a tool for restoration? Applied Vegetation Science 15:449–458.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Cleland E.E.,
    2. Larios L.,
    3. Suding K.N.

    2013. Strengthening invasion filters to reassemble native plant communities: soil resources and phenological overlap. Restoration Ecology 21:390–398.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Cody M.L.

    1991. Niche theory and plant growth form. Vegetatio 97:39–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Collinge S.K.,
    2. Ray C.,
    3. Gerhardt F.

    2011. Long-term dynamics of biotic and abiotic resistance to exotic species invasion in restored vernal pool plant communities. Ecological Applications 21:2105–2118.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 1. Cornelissen J.H.C.,
    2. Cerabolini B.,
    3. Castro-Díez P.,
    4. Villar-Salvador P.,
    5. Montserrat-Martí G.,
    6. Puyravaud J.P.,
    7. et al.

    2003a. Functional traits of woody plants: correspondence of species rankings between field adults and laboratory-grown seedlings? Journal of Vegetation Science 14:311–322.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Cornelissen J.H.C.,
    2. Lavorel S.,
    3. Garnier E.,
    4. Diaz S.,
    5. Buchmann N.,
    6. Gurvich D.E.,
    7. et al.

    2003b. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits world-wide. Australian journal of Botany 51:335–380.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 1. Dickens S.J.M.,
    2. Suding K.N.

    2013. Spanning the science-practice divide: Why restoration scientists need to be more involved with practice. Ecological Restoration 31:134–140.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
19. 1. Díaz S.,
    2. Cabido M.

    2001. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:646–655.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Díaz S.,
    2. Cabido M.,
    3. Casanoves F.

    1998. Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:113–122.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Dukes J.S.

    2002. Species composition and diversity affect grassland susceptibility and response to invasion. Ecological Applications 12:602–617.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Ehrenfeld J.G.,
    2. Toth L.A.

    1997. Restoration ecology and the ecosystem perspective. Restoration Ecology 5:307–317.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Emery S.M.

    2007. Limiting similarity between invaders and dominant species in herbaceous plant communities? Journal of Ecology 95:1027–1035.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Fargione J.,
    2. Tilman D.

    2005. Niche differences in phenology and rooting depth promote coexistence with a dominant C4 bunch-grass. Oecologia 143:598–606.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. 1. Foley J.A.,
    2. DeFries R.,
    3. Asner G.P.,
    4. Barford C.,
    5. Bonan G.,
    6. Carpenter S.R.,
    7. Chapin F.S.,
    8. et al.

    2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 1. Funk J.L.,
    2. Cleland E.E.,
    3. Suding K.N.,
    4. Zavaleta E.S.

    2008. Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23:695–703.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 1. Funk J.L.,
    2. Wolf A.A.

    2016. Testing the trait-based community framework: Do functional traits predict competitive outcomes? Ecology 97:2206–2211.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Hallett L.M.,
    2. Diver S.,
    3. Eitzel M.V.,
    4. Olson J.J.,
    5. Ramage B.S.,
    6. Sardinas H.,
    7. et al.

    2013a. Do we practice what we preach? Goal setting for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 21:312–319.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Hallett L.M.,
    2. Standish R.J.,
    3. Hulvey K.B.,
    4. Gardener M.R.,
    5. Suding K.N.,
    6. Starzomski B.M.,
    7. et al.

    2003b. Towards a Conceptual Framework for Novel Ecosystems. Pages 16–28 in Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
30. 1. Hans K.E.,
    2. Maranzana S.

    2008. Strawberry Creek biological resources—Flora and fauna. Report by the Office of Environmental Health and Safety, University of California, Berkeley.
31. 1. Hulvey K.B.,
    2. Aigner P.A.

    2014. Using filter-based community assembly models to improve restoration outcomes. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:997–1005.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Kattge J.,
    2. Díaz S.,
    3. Lavorel S.,
    4. Prentice I.C.,
    5. Leadley P.,
    6. Bönisch G.,
    7. Garnier E.,
    8. et al.

    2011. TRY—A global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology 17:2905–2935.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Kearney M.,
    2. Porter W.

    2009. Mechanistic niche modelling: Combining physiological and spatial data to predict species’ ranges. Ecology Letters 12:334–350.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 1. Keddy P.A.,
    2. Shipley B.

    1989. Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 54:234–241.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Kunstler G.,
    2. Lavergne S.,
    3. Courbaud B.,
    4. Thuiller W.,
    5. Vieilledent G.,
    6. Zimmermann N.E.,
    7. et al.

    2012. Competitive interactions between forest trees are driven by species’ trait hierarchy, not phylogenetic or functional similarity: implications for forest community assembly. Ecology Letters 15:831–840.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
36. 1. Laughlin D.C.

    2014. Applying trait-based models to achieve functional targets for theory-driven ecological restoration. Ecology Letters 17:771–784.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. 1. Li W.,
    2. Luo J.,
    3. Tian X.,
    4. Soon Chow W.,
    5. Sun Z.,
    6. Zhang T.,
    7. et al.

    2015. A new strategy for controlling invasive weeds: selecting valuable native plants to defeat them. Scientific Reports 5:11004.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Lundholm J.T.,
    2. Richardson P.J.

    2010. Mini-review: Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:966–975.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. MacArthur R.,
    2. Levins R.

    1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist 101:377–385.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Markwell J.,
    2. Blevins D.

    1999. The Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter: An exciting new tool for education in the plant sciences. American Biology Teacher 61:672–676.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
41. 1. McCormack M.L.,
    2. Dickie I.A.,
    3. Eissenstat D.M.,
    4. Fahey T.J.,
    5. Fernandez C.W.,
    6. Guo D.,
    7. et al.

    2015. Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytologist 207:505–518.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
42. 1. McGill B.,
    2. Enquist B.,
    3. Weiher E.,
    4. Westoby M.

    2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:178–185.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 1. Mokany K.,
    2. Raison R.J.,
    3. Prokushkin A.S.

    2006. Critical analysis of root:shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biology 12:84–96.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Mouillot D.,
    2. Stubbs W.,
    3. Faure M.,
    4. Dumay O.,
    5. Tomasini J.A.,
    6. Wilson J.B.,
    7. Chi T.D.

    2005. Niche overlap estimates based on quantitative functional traits: a new family of non-parametric indices. Oecologia 145:345–353.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 1. Oksanen J.,
    2. Blanchet F.G.,
    3. Kindt R.,
    4. Legendre P.,
    5. Minchin P.R.,
    6. O’Hara R.B.,
    7. Simpson G.L.,
    8. et al.

    2015. vegan: Community Ecology Package.
46. 1. Parrish J.A.D.,
    2. Bazzaz F.A.

    1976. Underground niche separation in successional plants. Ecology 57:1281–1288.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Pinheiro J.,
    2. Bates D.,
    3. DebRoy S.,
    4. Sarkar D.,
    5. R Core Team

    . 2015. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models.
48. 1. Poorter H.,
    2. Buehler J.,
    3. van Dusschoten D.,
    4. Climent J.,
    5. Postma J.A.

    2012a. Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Functional Plant Biology 39:839–850.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Poorter H.,
    2. Fiorani F.,
    3. Stitt M.,
    4. Schurr U.,
    5. Finck A.,
    6. Gibon Y.,
    7. et al.

    2012b. The art of growing plants for experimental purposes: a practical guide for the plant biologist. Functional Plant Biology 39:821–838.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Price J.N.,
    2. Pärtel M.

    2013. Can limiting similarity increase invasion resistance? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Oikos 122:649–656.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. 1. Purcell A.H.,
    2. Corbin J.D.,
    3. Hans K.E.

    2007. Urban riparian restoration: An outdoor classroom for college and high school students collaborating in conservation. Madroño 54:258–267.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
52. 1. Pysek P.,
    2. Richardson D.M.

    2010. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35:25–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Pywell R.F.,
    2. Bullock J.M.,
    3. Roy D.B.,
    4. Warman L.I.Z.,
    5. Walker K.J.,
    6. Rothery P.

    2003. Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:65–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. 1. Reich P.B.,
    2. Walters M.B.,
    3. Ellsworth D.S.

    1997. From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94:13730–13734.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
55. 1. Roumet C.,
    2. Urcelay C.,
    3. Diaz S.

    2006. Suites of root traits differ between annual and perennial species growing in the field. New Phytologist 170:357–368.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
56. 1. Sandel B.,
    2. Corbin J.D.,
    3. Krupa M.

    2011. Using plant functional traits to guide restoration: A case study in California coastal grassland. Ecosphere 2:1–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
57. 1. Schneider C.A.,
    2. Rasband W.S.,
    3. Eliceiri K.W.

    NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9:671–75.
58. 1. Seastedt T.R.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.,
    3. Suding K.N.

    2008, Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6:547–553.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. 1. Shackelford N.,
    2. Hobbs R.J.,
    3. Heller N.E.,
    4. Hallett L.M.,
    5. Seastedt T.R.

    2013. Finding a middle-ground: The native/non-native debate. Biological Conservation 158:55–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
60. 1. Spasojevic M.J.,
    2. Suding K.N.

    2012. Inferring community assembly mechanisms from functional diversity patterns: the importance of multiple assembly processes. Journal of Ecology 100:652–661.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Suding K.N.

    2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: Successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42:465–487.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
62. 1. Thompson K.,
    2. Petchey O.L.,
    3. Askew A.P.,
    4. Dunnett N.P.,
    5. Beckerman A.P.,
    6. Willis A.J.

    2010. Little evidence for limiting similarity in a long-term study of a roadside plant community. Journal of Ecology 98:480–487.

    OpenUrl
63. 1. Van Mechelen C.,
    2. Van Meerbeek K.,
    3. Dutoit T.,
    4. Hermy M.

    2015. Functional diversity as a framework for novel ecosystem design: The example of extensive green roofs. Landscape and Urban Planning 136:165–173.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Vidra R.L.,
    2. Shear T.H.

    2008. Thinking locally for urban forest restoration: a simple method links exotic species invasion to local landscape structure. Restoration Ecology 16:217–220.

    OpenUrl
65. 1. Violle C.,
    2. Jiang L.

    2009. Towards a trait-based quantification of species niche. Journal of Plant Ecology 2:87–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. 1. Violle C.,
    2. Navas M.-L.,
    3. Vile D.,
    4. Kazakou E.,
    5. Fortunel C.,
    6. Hummel I.,
    7. Garnier E.

    2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
67. 1. Westoby M.

    1998. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil 199:213–227.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science