Predicting Treatment Longevity after Successive Conifer Removals in Sierra Nevada Aspen Restoration

References

1. 1. Ally D.,
   2. Ritland K.,
   3. Otto S.P.

   2008. Can clone size serve as a proxy for clone age? An exploration using microsatellite divergence in Populus tremuloides. Molecular Ecology 17:4897–4911.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 1. Beaty R.M.,
   2. Taylor A.H.

   2008. Fire history and the structure and dynamics of a mixed conifer forest landscape in the northern Sierra Nevada, Lake Tahoe Basin, California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 255:707–719.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Berrill J-P.,
   2. Dagley C.M.

   2012. Geographic patterns and stand variables influencing growth and vigor of Populus tremuloides in the Sierra Nevada (USA). ISRN Forestry doi: dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/271549.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Berrill J-P.,
   2. Dagley C.M.

   2014. Regeneration and recruitment correlate with stand density and composition in long-unburned aspen stands undergoing succession to conifer in the Sierra Nevada, USA. Forest Research. 3:119, doi: 10.4172/2168-9776.1000119.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Dagley C.M.,
   2. Berrill J-P.,
   3. Coppeto S.,
   4. Jacobson K.

   2012. Effects of slash pile burning after restoring conifer-encroached aspen: interim pile building guidelines for aspen injury risk reduction. USDA Forest Service, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Monitoring Report. www.fs.usda.gov/detail/ltbmu/maps-pubs/?cid=FSM9_046480.
6. 1. Endress B.A.,
   2. Wisdom M.J.,
   3. Vavra M.,
   4. Parks C.G.,
   5. Dick B.L.,
   6. Naylor B.J.,
   7. Boyd J.M.

   2012. Effects of ungulate herbivory on aspen, cottonwood, and willow development under forest fuels treatment regimes. Forest Ecology and Management 276:33–40.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Fowler G.W.,
   2. Hussain N.G.

   1987. Individual tree volume equations for aspen in Michigan (accessed March 3, 2016) Forest Management Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources and School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan. www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,1607,7-153-10368_22594-79515--,00.html.
8. 1. Jones B.E.,
   2. Rickman T.H.,
   3. Vazquez A.,
   4. Sado Y.,
   5. Tate K.W.

   2005. Removal of encroaching conifers to regenerate degraded aspen stands in the Sierra Nevada. Restoration Ecology 13:373–379.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Krasnow K.D.,
   2. Halford A.S.,
   3. Stephens S.L.

   2012. Aspen restoration in the Eastern Sierra Nevada: Effectiveness of prescribed fire and conifer removal. Fire Ecology 8(3):104–118.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Krasnow K.D.,
    2. Stephens S.L.

    2015. Evolving paradigms of aspen ecology and management: Impacts of stand condition and fire severity on vegetation dynamics. Ecosphere 6(1):1–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 1. Long J.N.

    1985. A practical approach to density management. The Forestry Chronicle 61:23–27.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Manley P.N.,
    2. Fites-Kaufman J.A.,
    3. Barbour M.G.,
    4. Schlesinger M.D.,
    5. Rizzo D.M.

    2000. Biological Integrity. Pages 497–499 in Manley P.N., Murphy D.D., Knopp C.M. (tech. eds.). Lake Tahoe Watershed Assessment: Volume I. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-175. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
13. 1. Margolis E.Q.,
    2. Farris C.A.

    2014. Quaking aspen regeneration following prescribed fire in Lassen Volcanic National Park, California, USA. Fire Ecology 10(3):14–26.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. McColley S.D.,
    2. Tyers D.B.,
    3. Sowell B.F.

    2012. Aspen and willow restoration using beaver on the Northern Yellowstone Winter Range. Restoration Ecology 20:450–455.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. McCullough S.A.,
    2. O’Green A.T.,
    3. Whiting M.L.,
    4. Sarr D.A.,
    5. Tate K.W.

    2013. Quantifying the consequences of conifer succession in aspen stands: Decline in a biodiversity-supporting community. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184:6947–6986.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. McLean C.D.,
    2. Berger J.M.

    1976. Softwood tree volume equations for major California species. USDA Forest Service Research Note PNW-266. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service.
17. 1. Mock K.E.,
    2. Rowe C.A.,
    3. Hooten M.B.,
    4. DeWoody J.,
    5. Hipkins V.D.

    2008. Clonal dynamics in western North American aspen (Populus tremuloides). Molecular Ecology 17:4827–4844.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 1. NRCS

    . 2007. Soil survey of the Tahoe Basin Area, California and Nevada (accessed March 3, 2016) USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service. soils.usda.gov/survey/printed_surveys
19. 1. Pierce A.D.,
    2. Taylor A.H.

    2010. Competition and regeneration in quaking aspen–white fir (Populus tremuloides–Abies concolor) forests in the Northern Sierra Nevada, USA. Journal of Vegetation Science 21:507–519.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Shepperd W.D.,
    2. Rogers P.C.,
    3. Burton D.,
    4. Bartos D.

    2006. Ecology, biodiversity, management, and restoration of aspen in the Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-178. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service.