Variability in Urban Soils Influences the Health and Growth of Native Tree Seedlings

References

1. 1. Ashworth J.,
   2. Keyes D.,
   3. Kirk R.,
   4. Lessard R.

   2001. Standard procedure in the hydrometer method for particle size analysis. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 32:633–642.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 1. Bailey S.W.,
   2. Horsley S.B.,
   3. Long R.P.,
   4. Hallett R.A.

   2004. Influence of edaphic factors on sugar maple nutrition and health on the Allegheny Plateau. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68: 243–252.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Baxter J.W.,
   2. Pickett S.T.A.,
   3. Dighton J.,
   4. Carreiro M.M.

   2002. Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in oak forest stands exposed to contrasting anthropogenic impacts. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 34:623–633.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Bolund P.,
   2. Hunhammar S.

   1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29:293–301.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Brack C.L

   2002. Pollution mitigation and carbon sequestration by an urban forest. Environmental Pollution 116 Supplement: S195–200.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 1. Burns R.M.,
   2. Honkala B.H.

   1990a. Silvics of North America: Conifers. Page 1383 in: Silvics of North America Agriculture Handbook 654. Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
7. 1. Burns R.M.,
   2. Honkala B.H.

   1990b. Silvics of North America: Hardwoods. Page 877 in Silvics of North America Agriculture Handbook 654. Forest Service, United Stated Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
8. 1. Carmean W.H

   1978. Site index curves for northern hardwoods in northern Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Paper. NC-160, 16 p. North Central Forest Experimental Station, St. Paul, Minnesota.
9. 1. Carter G.,
   2. Knapp A.

   2001. Leaf optical properties in higher plants: Linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. American Journal of Botany 88:677–684.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Cadenasso M.L.,
    2. Pickett S.T.A.,
    3. McDonnell M.J.,
    4. Pouyat R.V.

    2007. Forest vegetation along an urban–rural gradient in the New York City metropolitan area: Patterns and relationships to ecosystem processes. Transactions of the Linnean Society NY 10:79–99.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. City of New York, Department of Parks Topographical Division

    1936. Topographical Map of Van Courtlandt Park.
12. 1. Craul P.J

    1992. Urban Soil in Landscape Design. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
13. 1. Davies Z.G,
    2. Edmondson J.L.,
    3. Heinemeyer A.,
    4. Leake J.R.,
    5. Gaston K.J.

    2011. Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:1125–1134.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Dwyer J.,
    2. Mcpherson E.G.,
    3. Schroeder H.,
    4. Rowntree R.

    1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18:227–234.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Effland W.,
    2. Pouyat R.V.

    1997. The genesis, classification, and mapping of soils in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1:217–228.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
16. 1. Eid T.,
    2. Tuhus E.

    2001. Models for individual tree mortality in Norway. Forest Ecology and Managment 154:69–84.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Falxa-Raymond N.,
    2. Palmer M.I.,
    3. McPhearson T.,
    4. Griffin K.L.

    2014. Foliar nitrogen characteristics of four tree species planted in New York City reforestation sites. Urban Ecosystems 17:807–824.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 1. Geyer W.A.,
    2. Dickerson J.,
    3. Row J.M.,
    4. Acer L.

    2010. Plant Fact Sheet for Silver Maple (Acer saccharinum L.). USDA NRCS Plant Materials Center, Manhattan, KS.
19. 1. Green R

    . 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. New York, NY: Wiley Press.
20. 1. Goldman M.B.,
    2. Groffman P.M.,
    3. Pouyat R.V.,
    4. Mcdonnell M.J.,
    5. Pickett S.T.A.

    1995. CH4 uptake and N availability in forest soils along an urban to rural gradient. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27:281–286.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Groffman P.M.,
    2. Pouyat R.V.,
    3. Cadenasso M.L.,
    4. Zipperer W.C.,
    5. Szlavecz K.,
    6. Yesilonis I.D.,
    7. Band L.E.,
    8. Brush G.S.

    2006. Land use context and natural soil controls on plant community composition and soil nitrogen and carbon dynamics in urban and rural forests. Forestry Ecology and Management 236:177–192.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Hope D.,
    2. Zhu W.,
    3. Gries C.,
    4. Oleson J.,
    5. Kaye J.,
    6. Grimm N.,
    7. Baker L.

    2005. Spatial variation in soil inorganic nitrogen across an arid urban ecosystem. Urban Ecosystems 8:251–273.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Jim C.Y

    1998. Soil characteristics and management in an urban park in Hong Kong. Environmental Management 22:683–695.

    OpenUrlGeoRefPubMed
24. 1. Lindenmayer D.B.,
    2. Franklin J.F.

    1997. Managing Stand Structure as Part of Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management in Australian Mountain Ash Forests. Conservation Biology 11:1053–1068.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Marquis D.A.,
    2. Ernst R.L.,
    3. Stout S.

    1990. Prescribing Silviculture Treatments in Hardwood Stands of the Alleghenies. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-96. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA.
26. 1. McPherson E.G.,
    2. Nowak D.,
    3. Heilser G.,
    4. Grimmond S.,
    5. Souch C.,
    6. Grant R.,
    7. Rowntree R.

    1997. Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: The Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Urban Ecosystems 1:49–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. McQuattie C.J.,
    2. Schier G.A.

    2000. Response of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) seedlings to manganese. Canadian Journal of Forest Restoration 30:456–467.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Mohammed G.H.,
    2. Binder W.D.,
    3. Gillies S.L.

    1995. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A review of its practical forestry applications and instrumentation. Scandavian Journal of Forest Restoration 10:383–410.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation

    2014. Guidelines for Urban Reforestation. Available at www.nycgovparks.org/pagefiles/84/guidelines-to-urban-forest-restoration.pdf (Accessed 12 January 2015).
30. 1. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation

    2015. About NYC Parks. Available at: www.nycgovparks.org/about (Accessed 5 February 2015).
31. 1. Nowak D.,
    2. Hoehn R.E.,
    3. Bodine A.R.,
    4. Crane D.E.,
    5. Dwyer J.F.,
    6. Bonnewell V.,
    7. Watson G.

    2013. Urban Trees and Forests of the Chicago Region. Resource Bulletin. NRS-84. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
32. 1. Oldfield E.E.,
    2. Warren R.,
    3. Felson A.J.,
    4. Bradford M.A.

    2013. FORUM: Challenges and future directions in urban afforestation. Journal of Applied Ecology 50:1169–1177.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Oldfield E.E.,
    2. Felson A.J.,
    3. Wood S.,
    4. Hallett R.,
    5. Strickland M.S.,
    6. Bradford M.

    2014. Positive effects of afforestation efforts on the health of urban soils. Forest Ecology and Managment 313:266–273.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. 1. Oldfield E.E.,
    2. Felson A.J.,
    3. Auyeung D.S.N.,
    4. Crowther T.W.,
    5. Sonti N.F.,
    6. Harada Y.,
    7. Maynard D.S.,
    8. Sokol N.W.,
    9. Ashton M.S.,
    10. Warren R.J.,
    11. Hallett R.A.,
    12. Bradford M.A.

    2015. Growing the urban forest: Tree performance in response to biotic and abiotic land management. Restoration Ecology doi:10.1111/rec.12230

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Pavao-Zuckerman M.A

    2008. The Nature of Urban Soils and Their Role in Ecological Restoration in Cities. Restoration Ecology 16: 642–649.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Pontius J.,
    2. Hallett R.

    2014. Comprehensive methods for earlier detection and monitoring of forest decline. Forest Science 60:1156–1163.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. 1. Pouyat R.V.,
    2. McDonnell M.J.

    1991. Heavy metal accumulation in forest soils along an urban-rural gradient in southeastern New York. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 57:797–807.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Pouyat R.V.,
    2. Szlavecz K.,
    3. Yesilonis I.D.,
    4. Groffman P.M.,
    5. Schwarz K.

    2010. Chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of urban soils. In Aitkenhead-Peterson J., Volder A. (eds) Urban Ecosystem Ecology: Agronomy Monograph 55. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Soceity of America, Inc.
39. 1. Rejmánek M.,
    2. Richardson D. M.

    1996. What Attributes Make Some Plant Species More Invasive? Ecology 77:1655–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Rebecca B

    . 2004. Soil Survey Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report. No 42 Natural Resources Conservation Services.
41. 1. Ruiz-Jaen M.C.,
    2. Mitchell Aide T.

    2005. Restoration Success: How Is It Being Measured? Restoration Ecology 13:569–577.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Reichman SM

    . 2002. The responses of plants to metal toxicity: A review focusing on copper, manganese and zinc. Australian Minerals & Energy Environment Foundation. Available from: www.plantstress.com/Articles/toxicity_i/Metal_toxicity.pdf. Accessed 2015 December 18.
43. 1. Rowntree R.A

    1995. Toward Ecosystem Management: Shifts in the Core and Context of Urban Forest Ecology. Pages 661–675 in Bradley G. (ed) Urban Forest Landscapes Integrating MultiDicipliary Perspectives. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
44. 1. Sanderson E

    2009. Mannahatta: A Natural History of New York City. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
45. 1. Searle S.Y.,
    2. Turnbull M.H.,
    3. Boelman N.T.,
    4. Schuster W.S.,
    5. Yakir D.,
    6. Griffin K.L.

    2012. Urban environment of New York City promotes growth in northern red oak seedlings. Tree Physiology 32:389–400.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
46. 1. SER (Society for Ecological RestorationInternational Science & Policy Working Group

    2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration (available from www.ser.org) accessed in December 2015. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona.
47. 1. Soil Survey Staff, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture

    . Web Soil Survey. websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. (Accessed 27 October 2014).
48. 1. Stephenson N.,
    2. Van Mantgem P.

    2011. Causes and implications of the correlation between forest productivity and tree mortality rates. Ecological Monographs 81:527–555.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. 1. Strasser R.,
    2. Srivastava A.,
    3. Govindjee

    1995. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochemistry and Photobiology 61:32–42.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. White C.S.,
    2. McDonnell M.J.

    1988. Nitrogen cycling processes and soil characteristics in an urban versus rural forest. Biogeochemistry 5:243–262.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
51. 1. Zalesny R.S.,
    2. Wiese A.H.,
    3. Hall R.B.

    2007. Choosing tree genotypes for phytoremediation of landfill leachate using phytorecurrent selection. International Journal of Phytoremediation 9:513–530.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
52. 1. Zhu W.,
    2. Carreiro M.M.

    1999. Chemoautotrophic nitrification in acidic soils in forests along an urban-rural transect. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31:1091–1100.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. 1. Zhu W.,
    2. Carreiro M.M.

    2004 Temporal and Spatial Variations in Nitrogen Cycling in Deciduous Forest Ecosystems Along an Urban-Rural Gradient. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36:266–278.

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Zoettl H.W.,
    2. Huettl R.F.,
    3. Fink S.,
    4. Tomlinson G.H.,
    5. Wisniewski J.

    1989. Nutritional disturbances and histological changes in declining forests. Water, Air & Soil Pollution 48:87–109.

    OpenUrl