Unintentional Selection and Genetic Changes in Native Perennial Grass Populations During Commercial Seed Production

References

1. 1. Burton P.J.,
   2. Burton C.M.

   2002. Promoting genetic diversity in the production of large quantities of native plant seed. Ecological Restoration 20:117–123.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. 1. Darris D.

   2005. Seed Production and Establishment of Western Oregon Native Grasses. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-35.
3. 1. Espeland E.E.,
   2. Emery N.C.,
   3. Mercer K.L.,
   4. Woolbright S.A.,
   5. Kettenring K.M.,
   6. Gepts P.L.,
   7. Etterson J.R.

   (in press). Evolution in restoration populations of plants: insights from agricultural and evolutionary science. Journal of Applied Ecology.
4. 1. Ferdinandez Y.S.N.,
   2. Coulman B.E.,
   3. Fu Y.-B.

   2005. Detecting Genetic Changes over Two Generations of Seed Increase in an Awned Slender Wheatgrass Population Using AFLP Markers. Crop Science 45:1064–1068.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Fu Y.-B.,
   2. Ferdinandez Y.S.N.,
   3. Phan A.T.,
   4. Coulman B.,
   5. Richards K.W.

   2004. AFLP variation in four blue grama seed sources. Crop Science 44:283–288.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
6. 1. Fu Y.-B.,
   2. Peterson G.W.,
   3. Richards K.W.,
   4. Somers D.,
   5. DePauw R.M.,
   6. Clarke J.M.

   2005. Allelic reduction and genetic shift in the Canadian hard red spring wheat germplasm released from 1845 to 204. Theoretical Applied Genetics 110:1505–1516.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 1. Heywood J.

   1991. Spatial analysis of genetic variation in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22:335–355.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Hoskinson P.E.,
   2. Qualset C.O.

   1967. Geographic variation in Balbo rye. Tennessee Farm and Home Science Progress Report 62:8–9.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Hufford K.M.,
   2. Mazer S.J.

   2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Jensen K.B,
    2. Zhang Y.F.,
    3. Dewey D.R.

    1990. Mode of pollination of perennial species in the Triticaceae in relation to genomically defined genera. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 70:215–225.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
11. 1. Jump A.S.,
    2. Merchant R.,
    3. Peñuelas J.

    2008. Environmental change and the option value of genetic diversity. Trends in Plant Science 14:51–58.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
12. 1. Kitzmiller J.H.

    1990. Managing genetic diversity in a tree improvement program. Forest Ecology and Management 35:131–149.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Knapp E.E.,
    2. Dyer A.R.

    1998. When do genetic considerations require special approaches to ecological restoration? Pages 345–363 in Fiedler P.L., Kareiva P. (eds.), Conservation Biology:For the Coming Decade. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
14. 1. Knapp E.E.,
    2. Rice K.J.

    1994. Starting from seed: genetic issues in using native grasses for restoration. Restoration and Management Notes 12:40–45.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Knapp E.E.,
    2. Rice K.J.

    1996. Genetic Structure and Gene Flow in Elymus glaucus: Implications for Native Grassland Restoration. Restoration Ecology 4:1–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Knapp E.E.,
    2. Rice K.J.

    1998. Comparison of Isozymes and Quantitative Traits for Evaluating Patterns of Genetic Variation in Purple Needlegrass (Nassella pulchra). Conservation Biology 12:1031–1041.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Knapp E.E.,
    2. Rice K.J.

    2011. Effects of competition and temporal variation on the evolutionary potential of two native bunchgrass species. Restoration Ecology 19:407–417.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Lesica P.,
    2. Allendorf F.W.

    1999. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: Mix or match? Restoration Ecology 1:42–50.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. McKay J.K.,
    2. Christian C.E.,
    3. Harrison S.,
    4. Rice K.J.

    2005. “How Local Is Local?” A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13: 432–440.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Millar C.I.,
    2. Libby W.J.

    1991. Disneyland or native ecosystem: genetics and the restorationists. Restoration and Management Notes 7:18–24.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Montalvo A.M.,
    2. Williams S.L.,
    3. Rice K.J.,
    4. Buchmann S.L.,
    5. Cory C.,
    6. Handel S.N.,
    7. Nabhan G.P.,
    8. Primack R.,
    9. Robichaux R.H.

    1997. Restoration Biology: A Population Biology Perspective. Restoration Ecology 5:277–290.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Rice K.J.

    1995. What is native? Genetic aspects of ecosystem restoration. Pages 27–29 Proceedings of the 1994 Sustaining Rangeland Ecosystems Symposium. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
23. 1. Rice K.J.,
    2. Emery N.C.

    2003. Managing microevolution: restoration in the face of global climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:469–478.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Rice K.J.,
    2. Knapp E.E.

    2008. Effects of Competition and Life History Stage on the expression of Local Adaptation in Two Native Bunchgrasses. Restoration Ecology 16:12–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Standford E.H.,
    2. Laude H.M.,
    3. de van Booysen P.

    1962. Effects of advance in generation under different harvesting regimes on the genetic composition of Pilgrim ladino clover. Crop Science 2:497–500.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. 1. Standford E.H.,
    2. Laude H.M.,
    3. Enloe J.A.

    1960. Effect of harvest dates and locatrionon the genetic composition of the Syn1 generation of ‘Pilgrim’ ladino clover. Agronomy Journal 52:149–152.

    OpenUrlCrossRef